Search Career Advice


Browse Archives

Career Advice

Hiring at 2-Year Colleges

January 15, 2010

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

In my first article I described the work of two-year college faculty members, especially in English, and I argued that a teaching career in community colleges is an attractive alternative to a research or teaching position in four-year institution. Here are some pointers on the two-year hiring process and how to prepare for it.

First, know what we do before you apply. Our English departments look for candidates who understand the mission of community colleges and two-year English. My earlier article is just an introduction; go to the Web sites of several community colleges near you and study their organization and programs. Check out the English Department pages. Find out what courses are taught, how they’re similar to and different from what you’ve taken and/or taught. Find out what basic and developmental courses in reading and writing entail. Learn about the backgrounds, needs, and goals of community college students.

Explore current issues in our profession by visiting the Web site of the Two-Year College English Association — an affiliate of the National Council of Teachers of English. The association is our primary national organization, and it includes seven regional groups that cover the United States and Canada. On the Web site, check out the “Guidelines for the Academic Preparation of English Faculty at Two-Year Colleges” -- a great overview of what the ideal community college English professor brings to our work. The association also publishes a scholarly journal called Teaching English in the Two-Year College; my regional, the English Council of California Two-Year Colleges, publishes its own journal, inside english. Both periodicals offer engaging articles on classroom practice, professional concerns, and rhetorical and composition theory. Finally, the MLA Committee on Community Colleges offers a number of useful resources. There are similar community college groups for many other disciplines.

Second, make sure you have the minimum qualifications for teaching in your field. These standards vary from state to state. For example, to teach English in a two-year college, according to the California Community College Chancellor’s office, you need a master’s degree in English, literature, comparative literature, composition, or a bachelor’s degree in one of the above and a master’s in linguistics, ESL, speech, education with a specialization in reading, creative writing, or journalism, or the equivalent (to be determined by the college, usually after reviewing a application form that comes with the job packet).

Third, get the right training. If you haven’t taken a course in the teaching of composition, do so (this is almost a must). Postsecondary reading training is a wonderful addition (programs like the Certificate in Teaching Postsecondary Reading at San Francisco State University, or California State University-Fullerton’s online Postsecondary Reading and Learning Certificate). Courses in ESL are also a plus. Traditional literary study alone is less impressive.

Fourth, teach part-time to get experience. Serve, if possible, on department and college committees. Teach a variety of courses; teach online as well as face-to-face. Think versatility. Even if you have experience as a teaching assistant at the university where you are earning or earned your doctorate, try to teach a section at a community college, so that your interest in the sector won’t be theoretical only.

When it comes time to apply for a full-time position, you’ll find some two-year job listings in the fall issues of the MLA Job Information List (JIL), but many community colleges don’t announce full-time openings until the spring semester. Look for other announcements in Inside Higher Ed and The Chronicle of Higher Education. Many states also have job registries — master lists of positions.

As you review the listings, study what each position actually requires: never assume all jobs are alike. Read each set of application directions carefully. Tailor each cover letter so that it addresses a particular college (generic letters, or letters that address Big Canyon CC when you’re applying to Little Arroyo CC, get eliminated quickly). Answer all questions, especially supplemental questions, which require short essay answers, in appropriate detail. Make sure you have not said, “see my cover letter” in answer to any of these questions — departments often eliminate candidates who do not answer each question in detail. Proofread all your documents. Mail the complete application packet.

The hiring process varies from college to college, but here’s the general pattern:

The college human resources office screens the packets to make sure each is complete; incomplete packets do not go forward.

The English department screening committee reviews the forwarded applications.It checks to see which candidates meet the minimum qualifications, eliminating those who do not. Next, the screeners rank the remaining candidates and select a small number for interviews. This group is invited to the campus for department interviews.

A second English committee then holds the department interviews (assume that travel to this interview will be at your expense). Unlike those at four-year institutions, department interviews at two-year colleges are usually highly structured:

  • The committee agrees on a set of questions in advance.
  • All candidates hear the same questions, in the same order.
  • There are time limits for answers.
  • In their deliberations, committee members may not use information they’ve gotten elsewhere.

Note the last point: if you’re a part-timer at a college to which you’re applying for a full-time position, or if you know one of the interviewers, work all points that strengthen your candidacy into your answers; in fact, address the interviewers as if you had just met them, even if you had coffee with one of them the day before.

Dress appropriately. While many community college faculty wear casual clothes while they teach, dressing formally for an interview shows respect for the work and the institution. Be on time; in fact, arrive early; sometimes colleges can arrange for campus tours. Don’t worry about being nervous -- your interviewers were all in your position at least once, and two-year college interview committees tend to be supportive and encouraging.

Answer the questions asked; avoid digressions. Remember that strong answers are specific answers. Remember also to smile, make eye contact, and shake hands.

At the end of your interview, you may be asked to tell the committee anything else you feel is significant about your candidacy. Here’s where you may discuss your interests — academic, professional, personal — and what they will bring to the college. This is not the place, however, to bring up salaries, which ordinarily are not negotiable. The human resources office can give you a salary schedule.

Some interviews include a teaching demo. You’ll know in advance whether you’ll do one, what topic it will cover, and whether it will be with a real class, a selection of students from various classes, or a class composed of faculty members acting as students. The demo might be short (say, 20 minutes), or it might be for a full period. Develop a lesson plan, and prepare an explanation of how it fits into the general structure of your course. Stick to the plan in general. Do, however, pay close attention to students’ questions. Answer them politely, and prepare to modify your agenda if a question calls for it. This is particularly important if the faculty are the "students" — their questions may be intended to test your ability to deal with different teaching situations. Find out in advance if you can use technology, but be prepared to go on without it in case there’s an equipment glitch. Bring handouts (find out how many you’ll need in advance).

The department interview committee selects the finalists, who then move to the next stage: the administrative interview. This meeting is almost always with a senior administrator beyond the department level – sometimes the president – and colleges usually pay for travel at this point. Unlike the department interview, this interview is freewheeling. You can be certain, however, that administrators want to know how you might fit into the larger college community -- what contributions you can make beyond the classroom and the department. Presidents and administrators may also invite your questions. Here’s where you show that you’ve studied this college and explain what you can bring to it.

Next, the administrator or person in charge of the search makes her final choice(s) and checks references. Assuming the references are positive, the offer is made. Upon acceptance, the president sends the name(s) to the college governing board, which has the ultimate authority to make an appointment.

This is undoubtedly a difficult year to be seeking a career in higher education, but two-year college teaching can offer a new Ph.D. or A.B.D. a challenging and satisfying alternative to the research/teaching track. With appropriate preparation and careful attention to the application and hiring process, you can hope that final offer will be to you.

Tom Hurley is professor of English at Diablo Valley College.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Hiring at 2-Year Colleges

  • Do Your Research
  • Posted by Philogenes , Professor at A Community College on January 15, 2010 at 10:30am EST
  • Doing research on the college and department to which you're applying can help get to an interview and allow you to focus your interview responses.
    I think most search committee members feel reassured when the cover letter identifies courses you could teach immediately; catalogs are useful in this stage of your research, but check the college's website. Some include sample syllabi for most courses.
    Look up the members of the department in the catalog. If you find a department that has a very small proportion of PhDs, there may be some prejudice. No one's going to admit to this outside of a department or committee meeting, but some people buy into the idea that PhDs care more about research than teaching. This shouldn't dissuade you from applying, but it should help you decide what you're going to emphasize. Finally, look at dates of appointment for the faculty in the department and their dean. If they've been at the college for a long time, you may want to ask some questions about recent innovations within the department to get a sense of whether there's resistance to change. And it's a good idea to ask about students. If the responses you get are largely negative, you might want to rethink.

  • Watch Out
  • Posted by Keith Johnson on January 15, 2010 at 3:15pm EST
  • The advice to get some part-time (adjunct) teaching experience is wrong, maybe completely wrong. Being an adjunct is often a red flag that signals the candidate is already a member of a second class (marginal) status to the academic world. It may be a good idea to get that experience, but a very bad idea to communicate it. Do it while you are a post-doc, and let the post doc work cover your time on your resume.

    At any rate, talk with your future colleagues at any job application site and check out the atmosphere and unstated campus culture. They will be happy to fill you in. Good luck!

  • Also contribute
  • Posted by Jeff , English at 2-year school on January 15, 2010 at 5:15pm EST
  • I've served on several searches in the past few years, and we typically rank candidates highly only if they appear to have contributions and professional development. While part-timers often make little money, I encourage them to find a regional affiliate of CEA, for instance--something fairly local with a low registration fee--to illustrate your engagement and your commitment. Otherwise, you all have master's degrees plus. But what are you doing outside to prove your value over the others?

    Also, I think Philogenes's observation is spot on. Be an adjunct only when necessary, otherwise, go for the job.

  • Adjuncting is fine; CCs need PhDs teaching students!
  • Posted by Phyllis Stein , Professor/English at Heartland CC on January 16, 2010 at 6:45am EST
  • Keith Johnson doesn't know what he's talking about. CCs don't have any prejudices against solid college teaching experience, no matter how you came by it! Adjunct work that is well respected earns lots of points from hiring committee members.

    An experienced adjunct has student evals to share, lessons, teaching ideas, can talk to the committee with first-hand experience from the trenches, share war stories, BOND! Don't you want to BOND with the hiring committees charged with deciding your fate (or at least give the fleeting experience to them of that bonding having happened while you waltzed onto campus for your interview)?

    Making a connection with the committee is important because you win inside advocates that way in the committee debates that take place over the different top candidates after the interviews are over and the committee has to submit names to the Dean or VP. Besides, the last five people we hired full-time either had some adjunct experience or worked as an adjunct for us prior to applying. An in-house adjunct is a known commodity. People like to know what they are getting.

    All that said, I personally would like to see more PhD caliber folk populating the halls of community colleges. The CCs have a bias toward MAs because there are a lot of MA folk already there. And the CCs have a bias toward school of ed trained administrators who are often more fans of process than of actual disciplinary know-how. Both biases, MA-only and school of ed., will become more and more quaint and antiquated as more professionally oriented and energetic people, i.e., PhDs, crash the gates of the CCs.

    As more PhDs are shut out of the four-year school labor market, they need to take up residence in the CCs and bring that greater level of commitment to the students and to those institutions. The CCs and CC students will only benefit from the higher standards and greater devotion that typically come with the PhD credentialed people increasing in numbers there.

     

  • Versatility
  • Posted by Anonymous, Please on January 16, 2010 at 3:00pm EST
  • There is a complex issue here suggested in Keith's comment that I don't quite understand. I've been a finalist twice in cc searches and twice not even in the final cut (don't have a Ph.D....a Ph.D. was hired both times... I was told as a candidate that my application could be put into the adjunct file). Why might adjuncting at multiple institutions not be respected? Even with multiple courses designed and/or adapted? Even with publications? I am not trying to antagonize. I sincerely do not understand. One keeps teaching because one is "called to teach." Is more experience worse?

  • Overheard
  • Posted by Dana , English Composition at 3 CC's on January 16, 2010 at 5:45pm EST
  • Many "adjunct" colleagues, with over 10 years of sterling evaluations, about half with Ph.D's, would make it to the first, then the second interview level at a couple of CC's where I taught. All who did get the job were Ph.D's--the doctorate was weighted heavily, in terms of points. When I was rejected a fourth time at one CC, the full-time colleague on the hiring committee told me, in strictest confidence, it was my age-- 47 at the time. Three over-45 colleagues with Ph.D's, also with sterling evaluations and unbeatable recommendations, were told, as an aside, not to bother applying. While there are exceptions, the average full-time hire in the humanities areas is 35. Not all is gloom and doom, however; four age 45-plus adjunct colleagues eventually got full-time jobs--one in Alaska, one in rural PA, one in Lousianna, one in North Carolina. So, being willing to move across the country is a plus.

    About ten years ago, a gathering of adjuncts were told by a full-time instructor on a hiring committee that CC's almost never hire from within because "Why pay you a whole lot more when we have your terrific service at one third the price per class?" and also, "An instructor willing to move across the country to get this job has 'gumption' that we like,." and "He looks really great, except I wonder why he hasn't gotten a full-time job after 17 years of teaching." Things have improved a bit over the years, as some CC's I know hire over half of their full-time faculty from the adjunct pool.

    I think the main obstacle is simple supply and demand. It was much easier for adjuncts to be hired full-time when they were a small minority of the faculty population. Now that we're over two thirds of the CC faculty populaiton, hiring committees can be extraordinarily, whimsically, and sometimes illegally picky. The best advice I can give is to relentlessly and persistently begin campaigning for a full-time job immediately after getting that Ph.D. Each rejection becomes a learning experience, and if you make to the second interview level but are rejected, the hiring committee chair is usually very willing to candidly tell you why you were rejected and what you can do to improve your odds (that is, unless the reason was illegal, such as age or not-a-minority race, ethnicity, or sexual orientation).

    Also get to know the "culture" of the place you're applying at. Very often a dept. chair, like a producer hiring an entertainer, will already have a specific idea of what they want. The bottom line is, with so many qualified and expreienced applicants, your odds of getting hired at a CC hinges on whether they think you'll fit in with the culture of the hiring department and whether or not your presence will benefit the college's "image" in one way or another.

  • Age not a plus even with versatility?
  • Posted by Anonymous, Please on January 16, 2010 at 8:15pm EST
  • Thank you for the above comment. Well, there's nothing one can do about one's age. This makes me think that the plight of adjuncts has no solution. We can't be "moved up," even if we have a lot to offer. It's too late--agewise, money-wise, to earn a doctorate. One has given decades to academia. So that's it?

  • Yes, by all means get adjuncting experience
  • Posted by Fred on January 17, 2010 at 5:30pm EST
  • You're unlikely to get hired at a CC without CC teaching experience. Many CCers believe that CC teaching is somehow different than uni teaching. It's not at all -- good teaching is good teaching, and works at any level. But people act on what they believe whether it's true or not. So get some CC teaching experience as an adjunct. We hire our own adjuncts a lot. I personally prefer PhDs, as do some of my PhD colleagues, but many of our less ambitious colleagues are intimidated by candidates with PhDs.