BlogU

  • The Facebook Bubble

    By Joshua Kim January 4, 2011 8:45 pm EST

    "Facebook has raised $500 million from Goldman Sachs and a Russian investor in a transaction that values the company at $50 billion, according to people involved in the transaction."

    from 1/3/11 NYT's

    A $50 billion valuation for Facebook equals a single company bubble.

    Facebook matters to higher ed for a few reasons.

    The 2010 ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology reports that 97% of students use Facebook for social reasons, and 29% use Facebook for course associated work.

    How often have you heard students or professors ask for the LMS to behave more like Facebook? Learning is social, and Facebook has raised the bar on what we think a learning management platform should accomplish.

    So if Facebook is so ubiquitous and influential, why shouldn't it be valued at $50 billion?

    3 Reasons:

    Reverse Network Effects: The value of Facebook to users relies on network effects. Facebook is only valuable if your friends are members, and post on the site. Facebook apps depend on a rich and active user base. Network effects, however, work both ways. The utility of Facebook erodes quickly when users bring their networks somewhere else. A perfect example is the Visual Bookshelf Facebook App. It started out as a promising network for book lovers, but as users have migrated to other book sites the utility of the app has dramatically declined. Who wants to be in a virtual book club when people seldom post reviews or reading lists? It doesn't take too many heavy users to leave Facebook for more specialized sites for the value of the network to decrease, as Facebook (like all social media sites) depends on a few heavy contributors to drive the more passive traffic.

    Highly Replicable: Facebook has done well because other sites have done so poorly in providing a social experience. But what happens when these latecomers get their acts together? When Blackboard and the other LMS's adopt robust and organic social tools? When Google figures out how to make gMail and Google Docs more social? When whatever the next entertainment and education platform to emerge on web and mobile platforms comes with baked in social features? We will want to connect around specific content with specific communities. I want to connect on Audible.com with other passionate audiobook readers, and the terrible nature of the sites social tools drives me crazy. But Audible and other sites social and sharing tools will only improve, leaving a general and undifferentiated site like Facebook vulnerable.

    Little Value Add: Facebook aggregates a community, but doesn't do all that much with the people once they are together. At one point I wondered, what would would happen if Facebook got serious about education? What sort of LMS could be developed on top of Facebook's community? What sort of immersive open learning content could be connected with the Facebook community? By now, I've about given up. Despite being born in a dorm room, and nourished by the college student community, I can't find much evidence that Facebook has much understanding or interest in education. I'm not saying that Facebook will eventually seem like a bubble for its failures in education. What I am saying is Facebook's failures in education is indicative of the sites failures to engage and provide a value add for many different communities.

    Educational technology companies are the smartest investment of 2011.

Advertisement

Comments on The Facebook Bubble

  • Education & Facebook's valuation
  • Posted by Mark Notess , Manager, T & L Systems Development / Digital Library Program at Indiana University on January 5, 2011 at 10:30am EST
  • If I were a FB investor who cared mainly about ROI, I'd be telling them to drive hard in the areas of shopping and entertainment. I don't think they have much to lose by not replacing technologies such as Blackboard. There are already free (as in free puppies) substitutes for BB. Nor do I think BB will become as fun or engaging as Farmville has apparently proven: it's a bit like asking your ERP platform to amuse you. The Sakai OAE effort is a move in the right direction, but it would be a distraction for them to try to supplant Facebook.

    On a related note, what's your appraisal of LinkedIn? To my mind, they've been far more neglectful of their opportunities than has FB. I also think their mission is potentially much more aligned with education than is Facebook's.

    Finally, there is FB's vendor lock-in effect of being the world's largest photo sharing site, with the investment users have in tagging. People won't just pick up and run away from that because some late-comer has made a marginally better platform.

    Interesting things to think about--thanks for starting the conversation.
  • Facebook will be Bigger than Google
  • Posted by Michael Staton , CEO at Inigral, Inc on January 6, 2011 at 3:15pm EST
  • In direct response to your point:

    Network Effects are increasing on Facebook, not decreasing. Every day millions of more people sign up for Facebook. Their friendships and relationships get cemented there. Their memories go in. While many people remember the "something else comes along" phenomena of the early social web, the natural tendency of early industries is to stabilize around a standard that becomes one of the dominant companies of our civilization. Just look at the history of Standard Oil.

    While Facebook as a web application is highly replicable, their progress and momentum is unlike anything the world has ever seen. It's completely unreplicable. I know, because I live around lots of smart people that are trying to build successful businesses on the web. Although you read of successes in the media, there are a lot more failures.

    Facebook has become one of the most immensely valuable technologies ever created. While it doesn't solve dramatic problems in health care or education, it helps everyday people all over the world stay connected (in ways never before possible) with their friends, family, and acquaintances, across long distances and times of conveniences. Though it doesn't solve social problems per se, Sociologists and Historians will label it perhaps one of the most important development humanity has ever seen.

    And to trump your point:

    Facebook will be more valuable than Google. Most money spent on Marketing is not spent on search at the "bottom of the marketing funnel" but to generate awareness and communicate the value to people who aren't even intending on becoming a customer. Google owns "search marketing" but Facebook will own all other forms of advertising across all media and devices over the next ten years. They have information about who everyone is, what their interested in, where they're from, who their friends with, what their jobs have been, what schools they went to, where exactly they are located and where exactly they have traveled to. It's an advertisers targeting dream.

    Also, Facebook will own a substantial amount of the Search revenue as well. Most people make purchasing recommendations based on information from their friends and acquaintances. When Facebook introduces that into how people buy, it's going to generate a mound of cash from Search and steal market share "at the bottom of the funnel" from Google.
  • No idea, but
  • Posted by Suzanne on January 6, 2011 at 6:15pm EST
  • I'm not alone as someone who actively disengages with FB without entirely deleting my account. Why? I don't want to be completely out of the loop, that's it.

    I think it's a bubble too. I believe there are no publicly available numbers on profit, which is how the 90s bubble exploded. Lot's of conjecture, hype and inflated egos.

    Comparing FB and Google is a bit apples and oranges isn't it? FB is more vulnerable to critique than Google because there are still plenty of people, (regardless of age) who think it's a waste of time, who don't want to a part of the mainstream, who have any number of reasons why they don't engage.

    Google's utility is apparent, FB's isn't. Google's user experience is elegant; FBs stinks.

    Let's wait and see. :)



  • Having abandoned Facebook
  • Posted by Jim on January 8, 2011 at 8:30am EST
  • In it's early iteration I joined many in hoping that FB could be a useful tool in organizing and advertising campus-based programming efforts. I've since abandoned that notion, and FB altogether.

    I'm now convinced that university staff are overly optimistic when they look to FB as a constructive means of engaging student populations. Their efforts in this seem easily dismissed in favor of less educationally useful functions within FB).

    Imagine walking by a series of exhibits with DVD displays of various activities and programming. Next to a DVD of a Lady Gaga performance (or the latest fad in entertainment) is a collage of photos from a long lost friend. Next to this is a video advertising a Study Abroad program. Which of these is most likely to be ignored?

    I'm convinced that school administrators will have to look to other means for highlighting programs in the minds of their student populations. FB does not appear to be a viable avenue for this.