BlogU

  • With Curriculum, the Medium is the Message

    By Joshua Kim May 4, 2010 9:45 pm EDT

    Three predictions about how changes in the curricular mediums will alter the learning process.

    Prediction 1: Curricular content will be consumed in shorter chunks, across more diffuse times, and in multiple places.

    Prediction 2: The amount of time any given individual (student) spends consuming curricular content will decrease.

    Prediction 3: The total amount of curricular content consumed will increase, as prior "non-students" and "student non-consumers" evolve into curricular consumers.

    All of these predictions of course follow Marshall McLuhan's statement that "the medium is the message," and were inspired by Monday's NYTimes story "Audiences, and Hollywood, Flock to Smartphones."

    The article begins,

    "It might be hard to imagine watching “The Office” on a screen no bigger than a business card. But tens of thousands of people — by the most conservative estimate — are already doing just that."

    Media is moving to the mobile device. Perhaps I'm particularly attuned to this trend, as I currently consume most of my media on my Touch.

    Why? Because I no longer seem to have time in big blocks, so if I want to watch "The Office" or a TED talk I need to grab the opportunity (by grabbing my Touch with is always with me).

    Why? Because I don't want to make a "big commitment" to any one show or movie, and by watching it on my Touch it seems that much easier to stop watching and move to the next thing.

    Why? Because firing up a show or a movie on the "big screen" requires that I dominate a whole space, and that everyone else in the room must watch what I watch or leave. With my Touch, I can watch while my wife and kids do whatever they want to do.

    The total time spent with curriculum will decrease because the competition for attention is growing. By "curriculum", I mostly mean curricular media - but text could also be included (as text can be consumed by a mobile device). My Netflix cue currently contains 389 movies. My Amazon Wish List has 912 items (mostly books). There is simply lots more great stuff to watch and read on offer. The rise of the long tail has moved the scarcity from content to time. Our students face the same abundance of choice, and the same lack of additional hours to process the supply. Our curricular content operates within an attention marketplace. Colleges and universities are sort of like the big 3 TV networks of old. We were used to getting all the market share, as what else would people watch? Nowadays, we all compete.

    I tend to see all this in a positive light (hence prediction #3). Most TV programming has memorably been termed a "vast wasteland", but the mind numbing stupidity of most television is more than balanced out by the pure excellence of shows like The Wire, Deadwood, Sopranos, Big Love etc. etc. The question is not if mobile devices will begin to drive media (and curricular) consumption habits (they will), but how we will leverage these devices to deliver better learning to more people.

Advertisement

Comments on With Curriculum, the Medium is the Message

  • A few other great TV shows
  • Posted by Mark , Director of Research Services / Medical Education at Palmetto Health on May 5, 2010 at 9:45am EDT
  • It's very true that most, especially, non-cable, TV is really poor. But, don't forgot The Shield, CYE, and Treme.

  • Not so fast
  • Posted by dan on May 5, 2010 at 10:45am EDT
  • So true. Soon all textbooks will be replaced by YouTube videos, just as all college lectures were replaced by radio broadcasts in the 1920's and then TV broadcasts in the 1950's.

    Sarcasm aside, I agree with each prediction, but only to a point. New media tend to rearrange the existing ecosystem, not replace it. It's a fallacy to suggest that we consume curricular material in the same way that we consume entertainment. What works for watching Seinfeld reruns doesn't necessarily work for learning Fourier Transforms.

  • Posted by thomas on May 5, 2010 at 12:00pm EDT
  • What if one could program a smartphone to ask a graded multichoice question at random intervals througout a lecture, and require a substantive, on-topic twitter post to a shared course page at other times? Could we use such required engagement tactics to mitigate some of the off-topic texting and browsing in class?

  • What about comprehension
  • Posted by Thad McIlroy , President at The Future of Publishing on May 5, 2010 at 6:00pm EDT
  • I'd be interested in what you perceive the impact will be on the comprehension of these media chunks. Do you absorb as much value from quality content when it's consumed sporadically on less-than-ideal technology in distracting public places?

    I can deal with some email on the bus, a tweet here and there, but wouldn't want to follow an episode of a well-written television program or any other quality media in this fashion. I want to immerse myself in it, or not bother with it at all.