BlogU

  • Cary Nelson, Provocateur

    By Oronte March 9, 2009 10:39 pm

    Well, that post title was a little redundant, don’t you think? For my readers not in academe, Cary Nelson is the Jubilee Professor of Liberal Arts and Sciences and Professor of English at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, and the 49th (and current) president of the American Association of University Professors. Recent books include Revolutionary Memory: Recovering the Poetry of the American Left (Routledge, 2003) and Office Hours: Activism and Change in the Academy (Routledge, 2004). His Modern American Poetry site, multimedia companion to his Anthology of Modern American Poetry (Oxford UP, 2000) is a go-to resource for teachers and students. He’s also been known to write for Inside Higher Ed, most recently here, here, and here.

    A week or so ago I went to a book release party at the Illinois Program for Research in the Humanities for Cary Nelson and the Struggle for the University, eds. Michael Rothberg and Peter K. Garrett (SUNY, 2009). The book’s cover says, “This collection brings together distinguished and rising cultural studies scholars to explore the ways in which Cary Nelson's work unites scholarship and activism, demonstrating the need for radical engagement in order to democratize the academy and the production of knowledge in and about American culture. Neither a Festschrift nor a tribute, the volume looks at the new directions Nelson's work has inspired in research and activism about the history and politics of the academy, cultural studies, modern American poetry, and graduate pedagogy and mentoring. An engaging afterword by Cary Nelson is also included.”

    It may not be a tribute, but it results in part from a tribute in 2006 that included a dinner at which Nelson was roasted by colleagues, former students, and his wife, the scholar Paula Treichler. I was there for that dinner, which was m.c’d by Michael Bérubé, a blogger of some note. My favorite story that night was told by Andrew Ross, and I’ve transcribed it below from the video of the roast:

    Not long after I’d come to Champaign-Urbana, Cary took me to a faculty party. Paula [Treichler wasn’t able to go]…so it was just us and an adventure in male bonding. It was an afternoon event at the weekend, and so it was rather informal but polite. He introduced me to the hosts, and we went into the nearest room and ran into one of his colleagues, whose identity I will try to protect. The colleague informed us that he’d spent the summer in the South of France—Marseille, to be precise.

    “So were you there to visit the brothels?” inquired Cary.

    There was this look of quiet anxiety that came across the colleague’s face. In the course of time I would learn how to interpret such expressions on the faces of Cary’s interlocutors. But at that time of course I was at a loss to do so.

    “I was there to do my research,” the colleague replied with confidence.

    I have to say that before I came to Urbana, I’d led a rather sheltered life. Nothing had really prepared me for conversations like this, to tell the truth. I had to prepare myself for the academic life here. I had read some of these novels—you know, by David Lodge—and I’d made a point of viewing the film version again of Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf, and from these texts I had learned that academics sometimes take liberties with each other—take personal liberties with each other—but nothing had really prepared me for conversations like this, and I realized that if this was typical of social life here, then I would be entirely out of my depth.

    Cary moved his feet slightly towards the colleague as if to reinforce that he was not going to be brushed off very easily.

    “So were the brothels any different from the last time you visited?”

    And at that point the thought crossed my mind that this colleague’s research might actually involve French sex workers in some way. After all, the U of I [was] promoted as a place where cutting-edge research and cultural studies and the like was encouraged, and so I allowed myself to entertain this prospect. Something about the fellow’s appearance, his demeanor, gave me some doubts about whether he was indeed a sex-work ethnographer, and his response certainly dispelled any thought along those lines.

    “Well, as a matter of fact, I was there to finish my book.” And then he told us his book was on some aspect of the fine arts, something like eighteenth-century English landscaping, or arts that were arguably less refined than those practiced by the French sex workers. By this point, the look on his face has shifted, somewhat, to a sort of alarmed impatience.

    Cary undoubtedly sensed that his quarry was about to flee, so he moved in for his last shot, which was something along the lines of, “I’ve heard that they specialize in extreme discipline, is that correct?”

    At that point of course the colleague bolted from the room with a parting shot along the lines of, “Well, yeah, I suppose you would know more about that than I!” He was an old U of I hand, an old Cary Nelson hand, and had long endured the slings and arrows of Nelsonian fortune, and he knew there was no graceful exit in this kind of situation.

    Cary turned to me, and a sort of sly grin came across his face; the famous arched eyebrows went up. The event was still opaque to me at this point, but I realized at the very least I’d had some kind of initiation into the world of Cary Nelson Studies, a rather surreal world, [which I] would learn to appreciate…in due time.

    I mentioned the brothel story to Nelson at the recent book party, and he said it was his favorite too. “Sometimes you just find yourself doing these things,” he said. “And then you have to go through with them.” The eyebrows went up.

    I asked if he'd mind if I mentioned the story here. He said not to mention it but to quote it in full.

Advertisement

Comments on Cary Nelson, Provocateur

  • hostile work environment?
  • Posted by Dave Stone , Professor of History at Kansas State University on March 10, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • Ah, the irony. Just this morning my email in-box had a self-satisfied message from the AAUP about how it had worked to preserve and expand the right to sue for sexual harassment. You know--a lawsuit based on the creation of a hostile work environment through offensive remarks.

  • On Tenured Radicals and the Education of O. C.
  • Posted by G. Tod Slone at Unemployed on March 10, 2009 at 11:30pm EDT
  • Would this comment be censored like the comment I’d previously made on a rather lame poem that appeared by another author a while ago? Perhaps not. For thanks to my prodding, the censor (i.e., the moderator) seemed to have become more sensitized to the nefariousness of censorship in Academe vis-à-vis Democracy. Now, what would tenured radical Cary Nelson have had to say about that incident of censorship? We already know, of course, what M. Churm would have said.

    Was Churm’s vignette an example of what “provocative” had come to mean in Academe? If so, the corporate co-optation of the University must surely have become a fait accompli. The castration of terms like “provocative” served that co-optation well, as an integral part of the rationalization process of far too many Academics.

    Regarding Nelson, the question, of course, remained and, of course, was not raised: how did a radical become a tenured, bourgeois, faculty cocktail-party attending president of the staid Association of American University Professors? Kowtowing ones way up the ladder was how it was normally done in Academe, while truth telling was the normal way straight out the freakin’ door. Did Cary Nelson possess some secret formula to do it otherwise? Sure, tell us about it, M. Churm! Or maybe a little quip would be appropriate? After all, academics seemed to excel at quipping their way out of uncomfortable truth jams.

    Nelson’s website, Modern American Poetry, was anything but radical or even remotely “provocative,” or even at all necessary. It was simply a rehash of Academe’s canon. Where was the hardcore questioning and challenging of that bourgeois-friendly canon? How did twisted thinking (discoursing in oxymorons, castration of vocabulary words et al) become so seemingly prevalent (the norm!) in Academe? Now, that would have been a great subject for a doctoral thesis! If I hadn’t already done mine, I’d get to work on it right away.

    Finally, M. Churm, scribbler of this dubious tribute to Nelson, needed to ask how the Education of Oronte Churm had failed him so royally. How had it succeeded in blocking the natural flow of his intellect, placed it into a state of paradigmatic paralysis, where politeness and collegiality, not to mention obsequiousness, were far more pertinent than truth telling, and indeed rendered it utterly incapable of raising the simple—though truth unearthing—questions underscored here? Silence was another academic rhetorical weapon for dealing with uncomfortable truth jams. Perhaps that ought to be the response.

     

    Sincerely,

     

    G. Tod Slone, Founding Editor, 1998

    The American Dissident, a Journal of Literature, Democracy & Dissidence

    A 501 c3 nonprofit organization providing a forum for vigorous debate, cornerstone of democracy,

    And for examining the dark side of the academic/literary established-order milieu

    www.theamericandissident.org

    1837 Main St.

    Concord, MA 01742

  • A quip for G. Tod
  • Posted by Oronte on March 11, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • As Jerry Seinfeld, that great comic of the bourgeoisie, once said: Shouldn't you be out on a ledge somewhere?

  • Standing on the Ledge of Integrity
  • Posted by G. Tod Slone at Unemployed on March 11, 2009 at 2:00pm EDT
  • Oronte,
    How could you possibly have resisted the mighty attraction of the quip? How could you possibly have expressed indignity regarding the censorship of one of my previous comments? Ah, the amazing predictability of apparatchiks in black regalia! The quip or silence… and rarely anything else! How could you possibly have resisted? For lack of cogent counter-argumentation and sincere desire to contemplate and debate opposing viewpoints, always reach for the quip! It's in the blood, I suppose, of clones climbing the ladder of ivory-tower "success" in chuckling euphoria, as democracy in America continues its decline and Academe is swallowed into the corporate mindset of business, business, and more business. While you quote the stand-up comic, I’ll quote the poet José Martí: “No zurcí de éste y de aquél, sinon sajé en mí mismo. Van escritos no en tinta de Academia, sinon en mí propia sangre.” In case, you cannot read Spanish, allow me to translate the last line: My writing is not in the ink of Academe, but rather in my own blood.
    G. Tod

  • Wonders...
  • Posted by Reader #234 , Lurker at The Interweb on March 13, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • I wonder how many Big Chief notebooks it took to write that G. Tod to write that?

  • Posted by Astraea on March 16, 2009 at 8:30am EDT
  • My goodness, it seems Cary Nelson has no friends or defenders here. How could that be?