BlogU

  • UD's Excellent Adventure

    By UD January 14, 2008 4:32 pm

    Myles Brand is a little like Woody Allen, complete with the rather whiny accent and the self-deprecating manner. UD considered him, at the press conference, and as she did, she thought about universities.

    Brand's blandness is the blandness of the politician, the blandness of the university president. When you watch his surgical neutering of every question raised, his platitudinous evasion of America's bigtime university sports scandal, you think -- UD thought -- of his million-dollar salary.

    When you're sitting on a pile that big, you want to be careful not to make it untidy, and you want to be careful to maintain good relations with its source. Brand's big salary is only one big money reward in a university athletic gold mine, and coaches, television networks, apparel and alcohol vendors, tourism offices, and many other utterly non-academic interests are counting on him to keep mining it, to dig deeper for bigger coaches'
    salaries, more game and less study time, more commercialization and professionalization altogether.

    There's no university in this at all. Many programs are almost entirely autonomous, and university presidents -- most of them another variety of bland -- are powerless. The trends are all toward higher salaries, more game time, academic cheating... toward the disappearance of any academic link to these sports. Universities as academic institutions are hindrances, sources mainly of embarrassment as players haze, take steroids, take bogus courses, commit crimes, flunk out or drop out to go professional, while coaches, arrogant with their own million dollar salaries, break rules with abandon, and -- speaking of abandon -- dump one program after another in search of bigger bucks. And, under whatever circumstances coaches leave, they typically do so rewarded with yet more millions from the immense buyout contracts their agents negotiated....

    Brand, as the public face of this travesty, must form empty responses to almost-empty rooms of journalists (few journalists attend, because of the emptiness) who ask desultory questions.... His modest demeanor must suggest that the NCAA is an academic organization first, concerned with the intellectual and moral development of athletes primarily, and with their ability to win football games secondarily. His demeanor must somehow background the corrupt athletic industrial complex that is the reality of the situation, and foreground something that looks like academic integrity.

    Brand certainly does this adequately, and therefore, UD supposes, earns his salary. He is not bad at saying with a straight face that big-time university football is terrific for universities, and that athletes are students first, plus great role models for their peers....

    You begin to understand Stanley Fish's profound distaste for defenses of university educations that rest on their morally improving nature.
    Organizations like the NCAA cynically play on this idea -- they flatten the university to *nothing more* than a character-development location, and they endlessly invoke -- Brand endlessly invokes -- simplistic ethical language, simplistic moral-uplift language -- to describe universities. It's an effective way to avoid what universities, as Fish rightly stresses, are really about: learning something. You can disagree with the amoral approach Fish takes to universities, but you can understand, given the dominance of the culture of sports and other forms of pious anti-intellectualism at American universities, how he arrived at that approach.

    Now, on her way to the airport, and reviewing the lush and hollow spectacle of the NCAA convention, UD reminds herself of something the president of Florida's New College said about a university education:

    The school is called a "liberal arts" college, he said, "to draw attention to the idea that this education liberates you from provincialism, from your fears, it frees you from your self-centeredness."
    Universities should be unapologetically about freedom from the sort of provincialism that makes many athletes dupes of a sophisticated system that uses and discards them; they should be about educating people away from simplistic views of the world that can be manipulated by cynical and self-centered people.

Advertisement

Comments on UD's Excellent Adventure

  • Agenda Agenda Agenda
  • Posted by NoDogintheHunt , MS on January 14, 2008 at 9:05pm EST
  • Margaret, I'm sorry that you learned absolutely nothing on this trip. Inside Higher Ed should demand you reimburse them for the expense they paid for you to go. So very, very sad. And very myopic :-)

    Please go read my response to Dave Stone on an earlier post.

    THIS is the reality about Sports and academics that you must have completely have missed the mark on.

    You never reported on the Student Athlete Build for Habitat for Humanity that was almost a whole day. Did you miss it like everything welse that was there for you to see?

  • Keeping the cult members in line
  • Posted by RJO on January 15, 2008 at 6:10am EST
  • To make sure the players don't mess up the money-making machine, this software will now let coaches monitor them online (via FIRE):

    http://www.thefire.org/index.php/article/8817.html

  • Posted by francofou on January 15, 2008 at 9:25am EST
  • Perhaps someone could explain what "Student Athlete Build for Habitat for Humanity" has to do with a university education (not certification or training or community service, but education).

  • francofou
  • Posted by NoDogintheHunt , MS> on January 15, 2008 at 11:20am EST
  • Well, let's see, isn't it correct to educate our citizens of the future to use that education to give back to their community?

    For a bunch of so-called intellectuals, some of you seem to have no vision as to what a well-rounded education is really for....

  • Posted by francofou on January 15, 2008 at 7:30pm EST
  • Well, let’s see, isn’t it correct to educate our citizens of the future to use that education to give back to their community?

    Give back? I am tired of clichés. I worked hard to learn, to teach. I "gave back" plenty.

    For a bunch of so-called intellectuals, some of you seem to have no vision as to what a well-rounded education is really for...."

    It is "really for" understanding the values, traditions, and beauty of an incredibly rich heritage. It is not "really for" winning a football game or helping to build a house in order to embellish a CV.

    UD is spot on.

  • francofou
  • Posted by NoDogintheHunt , Ms. on January 16, 2008 at 5:00am EST
  • Au contraire, what's so "cliche" is the small world some people seem to want to live in because it's the only one that must be comfortable for them.

    The rest of us will be happy to continue experiencing all that life has to offer and leave the "narrowminds" to wallow in their own self-serving company.

  • Posted by (Insert hound dog metaphor) on January 16, 2008 at 6:25pm EST
  • "isn’t it correct to educate our citizens of the future to use that education to give back to their community?"

    Yeah, big sports programs do this kinda like frat houses do. Y'know, like beating up women during the week and then holding a fundraiser on the weekend for the battered women's shelter.

  • Posted by francofou on January 17, 2008 at 9:30am EST
  • Snow's two cultures are nothing compared to the split between education and what goes on in the university outside the classroom.