Search News


Browse Archives

News

Momentum for Going SAT-Optional

May 26, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

At Drew University this fall, 54 black freshmen are expected to enroll, up from 12 a year ago. At the College of the Holy Cross, applications for the class that will enroll in the fall were up 41 percent from a year ago. At Knox College, deposits for the freshman class that will enroll in the fall are up 35 percent.

These institutions -- in New Jersey, Massachusetts and Illinois, respectively -- have something in common beyond an emphasis on the liberal arts. All have just completed their first cycle of admissions after ending requirements that all applicants had to submit SAT or ACT scores. Most of the applicants to these institutions still submitted scores. And the colleges can cite a variety of factors for their good fortunes. But these are the sorts of statistics that admissions deans (not to mention presidents and trustees) crave, and other colleges are taking note.

Just this week, Gustavus Adolphus College, in Minnesota, announced that it would make standardized tests optional for admissions. And George Mason University, in Virginia, announced that it would make tests optional for applicants with high grade point averages or class ranks in high school. Bennington, Chatham, and Lebanon Valley Colleges have all also recently dropped the requirement.

Indeed there are signs of an upswing in colleges -- especially liberal arts institutions -- that are ending SAT requirements. The National Center for Fair & Open Testing maintains a list of more than 700 colleges that do not require the SAT or ACT, but the list can give an incorrect impression. Most of the colleges on the list aren't very competitive (or in some cases competitive at all) in admissions, so they never required standardized testing. It's only a notable minority on the list that both once required testing and that are hard to get into.

But Robert A. Schaeffer of FairTest (as the center is known) said that he now counts 24 testing-optional institutions on the U.S. News list of the top 100 national liberal arts colleges. That's up 7 in about 18 months, and Schaeffer and others confirmed that several others on that list are seriously considering a shift. As the number of competitive institutions doing away with test requirements grows, and as the College Board continues to face criticism for its handling of scoring errors, the dynamic around the testing debate seems to be changing. 

Nothing prompts colleges to consider a shift like knowing that colleges like them have made the leap and benefited from it. Gustavus Adolphus, for example, focused its analysis on two colleges in the Midwest: Knox, which saw applications rise by 18 percent in the year, and Lawrence University, in Wisconsin, which saw an increase of 12 percent. Not only are the colleges that are shifting gears seeing immediate gains, but several colleges that made the shift a few years ago have conducted in-depth studies of the experience, and they report that the students admitted without standardized test scores are not only succeeding, but doing as well as students who submitted test scores.

No one expects the SAT to disappear. Movement to make testing optional has been much more limited among research universities than among liberal arts colleges. And even the SAT's toughest critics admit that the students who are applying to college today still have to take a test. A student applying to test-optional Mount Holyoke College may well also be applying to Wesleyan University, where scores must be submitted. But for the first time, people are starting to talk about whether liberal arts colleges may reach a critical mass such that students could skip the SAT or ACT completely and still apply to a wide range of highly respected institutions. Schaeffer said that he thinks such a moment is within sight and would likely happen when the number of top liberal arts colleges with testing-optional policies hits 40 or so.

And some educators are excited by that prospect. "I think it would be very good for students to feel that they have the option of not taking the test," said Jane B. Brown, vice president for enrollment and college relations at Mount Holyoke. "The amount of time and energy and money that we are spending on prepping for tests could be used in much more productive ways, ways that would actually prepare you for college."

Needless to say, the College Board looks at these issues very differently. While a few colleges are changing their policies, there is no national trend, according to Caren Scorpanos, a spokeswoman. And those that are ending testing requirements are making the wrong decision, she said. "To lose a national standard is a detriment to the process," she said. Grade inflation makes it impossible to compare students from different high schools, she added. "An A is not an A in every place."

Others, who are not affiliated with the College Board, also say that some colleges' motives in these changes are not entirely altruistic. Because SAT-optional colleges continue to accept scores from those who submit them (and because students who choose not to submit scores tend to score lower than their peers), most such institutions see their averages increase, which tends to help them in rankings. That, in turn, attracts more applicants. But these admissions experts say that these mixed rationales for making the shift only reinforce their belief that more and more colleges will drop the testing requirements.

A few competitive institutions -- most notably Bates College -- have been testing-optional for 20 years or more. And as a result, there is now more extensive data than ever before showing the impact of going that route. Bates has produced a series of studies showing that its applicant pool and student performance are both strong. Mount Holyoke, which dropped the SAT in 2001, is wrapping up one of the most extensive studies done of such a shift -- a research effort financed by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.

Brown, who is leading the study, said that "each year of data confirms the trend: We are able to make very good admissions decisions without the use of standardized tests." By all measures of academic performance, she said, high school grades and courses selected are sufficient to predict who will succeed and who won't. She noted that she is regularly being asked for updates on her study by other colleges considering following Mount Holyoke.

In March, Hamilton College announced that it had reviewed data from a five-year experiment with a testing-optional policy and decided to stick with it. About 40 percent of the students in each entering class at Hamilton (a larger percentage than at some other places) have opted not to submit SAT scores, and they fare slightly better academically at the college than the students who do submit the SAT.

Colleges that recently made the switch cite a variety of rationales and offer a range of experiences.

Robert Weisbuch had only just become president at Drew when the university stopped requiring the SAT. He had previously led the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation, where he noticed a pattern with applicants for various fellowships -- or rather, he noticed the lack of a pattern. Students with very high GRE scores would submit "inert" scholarly proposals while some students with modest scores submitted proposals that were full of intellectual excitement and broke new ground. Weisbuch said that it became obvious that the creative talents he was trying to support were not correlated with standardized test scores.

Then there's the matter of philosophy and mission. "Liberal arts colleges and smaller universities make the claim that we treat people as individuals, but to the extent that their admissions policies ape large research universities, they aren't living up to that," he said. "This is who we are. Why don't we start at the very start of things -- when you apply."

In addition, he said he was bothered by all the pressure students feel over testing, in an era when students test and retest and pay for testing tutors, etc., etc. "Testing has become fetishized," he said.

Drew, like many colleges, is officially describing its shift as a pilot project that will be evaluated after three years. But so far, the results are positive. In addition to the stunning percentage increase in black freshmen, overall applications topped 4,500 -- up in one year from 3,800. Grade point averages were as strong as ever with the larger pool.

Ann Bowe McDermott, director of admissions at Holy Cross, said officials there became more and more convinced that they weren't paying much attention to SAT scores anyway, so questioned why they were worth requiring -- especially given the way students were reacting to the test. "We were watching the growing hysteria over the new test. People were getting themselves up in a lather about the test, and not about the work day in and day out in the classroom that really prepares you," she said.

About 25 percent of applicants didn't submit SAT scores, and McDermott said that even with the 41 percent increase in applications, grades and applicant quality were up. Diversity also improved. This fall's freshmen class is projected to be 18 percent minority, up from 15 percent a year ago.

McDermott said that officials are very pleased with the switch, especially now that they have thought through some unexpected issues. For example, some high schools include SAT scores on student transcripts, and Holy Cross had to decide whether to look at such scores. The college decided not to -- unless there was some affirmative indication from students that they wanted the scores to be seen.

Owen Sammelson, the vice president at Gustavus in charge of enrollment management and admissions, said that there, too, officials thought about the messages that they were sending with a test requirement. "We really need to get back to more of an emphasis on achievement in high school," he said.

Some admissions experts say that dropping SAT requirements may be a less dramatic change than it appears. Michael London, the founder of College Coach, a national company that advises high school students on applying to college, said that "both applicants and colleges have information -- even when the scores aren't submitted."

London offered a hypothetical: For a given college, he knows that students who have a B+ average in honors courses in high school tend to get admitted, if their SAT score is around 1350 (using the old SAT scoring system). If an applicant's SAT score is significantly below 1350, he would suggest not sending the score in, but he'd send in scores in that range or higher. At the college, the admissions officer knows that the applicant's counselor knows all of this, and will assume that those not submitting scores have scores below the published averages. "You don't always need to submit scores for people to know what your scores are," London said.

Richard A. Hesel of Art & Science Group, which advises colleges on admissions and enrollment strategies, said he is currently evaluating the possible impact of dropping an SAT requirement for a client he couldn't name except to say that it was a top liberal arts college. Hesel said that he expected more colleges to make testing optional as they see the benefits of having more applicants and higher average SAT scores.

One institution -- Lafayette College -- went test-optional in the 1990s, only to resume a testing requirement. Barry McCarty, dean of enrollment services at Lafayette, said he too thinks that colleges are motivated by strategy more than anything else. "There are a lot of motivations here, and the one that the media is not very often addressing is the attractiveness of eliminating many of the lowest SAT performers in calculating the mean of a college's class," he said.

McCarty said that he didn't like the implication from many of those abandoning SAT requirements that places like Lafayette can't conduct sensitive reviews of applicants. He said that the college places more or less weight on the SAT score based on a variety of factors in a student's background and credentials. "I believe that we are looking at students holistically," he said.

While Lafayette has no plans to end its requirement, McCarty said that the college "was always reassessing," and just hadn't found the reasons to end a requirement "compelling."

How much does the SAT help? He said it helps "on the margin" and so is worth continuing to require. "But I think we all recognize that high school performance is the best predictor," he said.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Momentum for Going SAT-Optional

  • high school work as indicator?
  • Posted by allen , dept. manager at resort industry on May 1, 2008 at 12:20pm EDT
  • i am so tired of hearing academic professionals say this.
    except for the most difficult undergraduate majors, this is seldom the case.
    our best secondary systems still have very restrictive learning environments.
    frankly, our private college prep academys are still protecting the average and below average students with subtantial means and/or alumni connections through inflated grade point averages.

  • Posted by thomassowellfan on May 26, 2006 at 8:40am EDT
  • The fact that some students who did not report scores are doing better than those that did does not tell us anything about what testing tells us about college success. It could be that those who did not test would have scored higher than those that did test but we will never know.

    The article also does not point out if any of the colleges accounted for differences between majors. Students with test low scores could have the same or similar success rates as students who had high scores in a major such as Education which often lacks any serious academic rigor. However, in fields where rigor still exists, such as Philosophy or Economics, there would probably be a difference with high test scoring students outperforming low test scoring students

    While both the SAT and the ACT have their limitations they do a good job of letting students know where they stand academically with other people who took the test. The tests also do not guarantee that a student with high scores will automatically succeed and those with low scores will automatically fail. It does give a student an idea of the areas in which they need to improve, even if they received good grades in that subject in high school.

    Finally, despite what Fair Test might claim, we should still find that students who scored a 700 or better on the math portion of the SAT to do better in college math and the fields that require strong math skills (such as Physics and Engineering) than a student who scored a 600 or less.

  • Right on!
  • Posted by David Robertson , Professor at SUNY on May 26, 2006 at 9:05am EDT
  • It is great – now colleges are realizing ‘the amount of time and energy and money that we are spending on prepping for tests’ which clearly give advantage to the affluent students – it deprieved them of African American students.

    It is appropriate for colleges to make SAT/ACT optional – those tests did not level the playing field – they are discriminatory tests that are intended to exclude African Americans from pursuing higher education – just as the health policies of 60s-70s that were directed against African Americans to control reproduction – they are wrong and morally reprehensible.

    No other ethnicity is suffering discriminatory tactics whether covertly or overtly – like the college board demagogue who claims “An A is not an A in every place.” The implications are clear here – that an A which is awarded to a Caucasian is excellent whereas the A to an African American is questionable.

    In baseball – walk into any public park – and you can notice Caucasians players have a lot of brand new equipments – while African American teams may have no equipment or can’t afford them, the outcome is cherished by those who wear outdated, dilapidated uniforms – here money did not influence the outcome – however in SAT/ACT it does.

    Money is not an indicator how hard one’s willing to work. Bravo for colleges who have come to that realization – there are numerous colleges who still hold on to the days of governor George Wallace.

  • Posted by Patrick Mattimore , SAT Hypocrisy on May 26, 2006 at 10:55am EDT
  • Scott,
    This is a great article b/c it cuts through a lot of the bs rationales for why colleges say they are dropping the SAT requirement. The SAT optional policies have nothing to do with evaluating the total person and everything to do with marketing. It's great to see the hypocrisy of the SAT optional schools pointed out as well since their admissions' counselors are obviously making assumptions about students who don't submit SAT's.
    I contribute to Fair Test but disagree with that agency's blanket condemnation of SAT tests. The test is unquestionably objective, standardized, and reliable. If its correlational validity with first-year grades or post academic success or whatever it is asked to predict is insufficiently high, come up with a better measure, but don't throw out this bathwater until you do.

  • Prof. Robertson's World
  • Posted by Craig on May 26, 2006 at 10:55am EDT
  • Just so we can all approach Professor Robertson's comments on his plane, the following are undeniable truths about the world:

    -All Caucasians are affluent.
    -All African-Americans are poor and have been taken advantage of by society.
    -It is impossible for any Caucasian to be poor and succeed through hard work and dedication. Every Caucasian has been handed life on a silver platter merely because of the color of his or her skin.
    -Only money can buy you a high SAT score, unless you're African-American, only hard work and dedication can save you then, because obviously, you have no money to buy a high SAT score.

    Through the grace of Professor Robertson, these truths have come to light and those responsible are now educating our children. I now return you to your regularly scheduled racial stereotypes.

  • Posted by Connie on May 26, 2006 at 1:30pm EDT
  • As worthy a goal as a more diverse student population may be, do some of the colleges who are dropping the SAT requirement also see a competitive advantage in NOT being evaluated as an institution on the basis of comparative SAT scores of the entering class?

  • Good job, Craig.....
  • Posted by Chuck on May 26, 2006 at 1:40pm EDT
  • Craig's comments effectively debunked the errant, hyper-racially tinged world view that Prof. Roberston uses to explain everything........ hence nothing.

    Not a peep from Robertson on the anti-intellectual black sub-culture that so cripples many black students.

    No clue from Robertson that he's ever read (let alone heard of) the trenchant analyses from William Julius Wilson, Stanley Crouch, Albert Murray, Elijah Anderson, or John Ogbu on the depressingly self-inflicted cultural wounds widespread in black communities.

    Just scuttle the SAT scores, admit people into college based on "past oppression," skin color or the absurd notion that students, not professors, will teach one another.

    Who can doubt, in all honestly, the extent of the degradation of learning, the debasement of academic merit and the acceptance of racial double standards with folks like David Robertson at the lectern?

  • SAT
  • Posted by David Mathieu , Vice President at normandale Community College on May 26, 2006 at 2:25pm EDT
  • The real issue for me where colleges have made ACT/SAT optional is that the ritual of signing up, scheduling, and taking the test is a marvelous wake-up call to thousands of students to take their remaining time in high school seriously. It reminds the whole family as well as the student that they are growing up, having to take responsibility, and that they will soon leave the nest. Take the time to prepare......
    I can't think of any more important event in high school than taking the ACT/SAT to make students begin to ponder their future.

  • SAT
  • Posted by Brent Muirhead D.Min., Ph.D. on May 26, 2006 at 5:15pm EDT
  • It is great to see more colleges providing alternatives to the SAT for admission. It is tragic how colleges and universities abuse the use of SAT and GRE scores. I once applied to a university doctoral program with over 150 graduate hours of A level work (three masters degrees) and was turned down due to my GRE scores. I went on to earn two doctorates from schools who did not buy into the GRE dogma. The dark side of higher education is the excessive value placed on the SAT scores.

  • No Testing?
  • Posted by Kevin , Undergraduate on May 26, 2006 at 6:25pm EDT
  • What a mess. The school takes pride in increasing minority enrollments, yet doesn't look at the best indicator of ability they have - the tests.

  • Posted by OWEN on May 26, 2006 at 10:05pm EDT
  • Dropping this requirement may have worked well for a select number of colleges, but if it becomes more common place I wonder what the results will be. It allows colleges more flexibility in the admission selection process but like all good things, there's probably a catch.

  • Throwing the Baby out with the Bathwater
  • Posted by Chydenius , Senior Fellow at Free Curricula Center on May 28, 2006 at 1:00pm EDT
  • In statistics there are Type I (false positive) and Type II (false negative) errors. One must choose which of these is less intolerable than the other, as perfection is unattainable. With drugs, you want to err on the side of caution, in general. With education, you want to err on the side of inclusiveness, in general.

    The advocates of national standards have a point. Without the SAT or ACT, you are left with a hodge-podge of entrance exams, which make inter-collegiate comparisons even more difficult.

    However, when there is only one or a very small number of entrance exam providers, you are faced with a monopoly or oligopoly situation. Monopolists tend to provide lower quality at a higher price than suppliers in competitive markets. If the school that you want to get into requires the SAT, and you believe that the test is flawed, you have no alternative, other than to forego that school. When all of the schools that you would like to attend require the SAT, you are SOL.

    The ACT, GRE, and SAT tests were not found carved in stone lying next to talking shrubbery. They were crafted by the hands of individual humans, each of whom has unique notions about what is important and what can be left out of the test, what makes a good question and correct answer, and what are good incorrect multiple-guess alternatives.

    Relinquishing the task of standardizing entrance exams to monopolists, whether commercial, governmental, or charitable, leads inexorably to elitism colored by the agendas of the test-writers. Do you want to raise logical/mathematical, left-brained thinking as your standard (the bias in the ACT, GRE, and SAT)? Do you want to encourage success in corporate politics (getting high grades, by whatever means)? Or do you like the Black Intelligence Test of Cultural Homogeneity? www.wilderdom.com/personality/intelligenceCulturalBias.htm

    At a more fundamental level, 'success in college' is highly subjective, as well. Standardized tests presume to predict the students' success at liberal arts, state, and Ivy League universities, whether these students plan to study humanities, business, or natural science. One-size-fits-all tests are not attuned to characteristics of peculiar environments.

    A much more rational approach would be to focus on outputs, instead of obsessing about inputs. Rather than standardize entrance exams, we could standardize exit exams modeled on accreditation. Representatives of departments covered by a particular accrediting body could develop exit exams that applied to all within that regional or professional population.

    The quality of Duke University graduates could be compared very easily to those of the University of Central Florida and American Intercontinental University, because all would be teaching to the same pool of test questions that each had had a hand in developing.

    A further benefit of separating instruction from evaluation -- a practice that is very common in Europe -- is that academic corruption is reduced. There is no point in bribing, ingratiating oneself with, or sleeping with a professor, who is not grading your final exam.

    The SAT is flawed because it is a) an attempt to measure inputs, rather than outputs, b) one-size-fits-all, and c) administered under conditions of monopoly. Dispensing with the SAT is only half of the story. If we are going to assess the academic outcomes of students, graduates, and schools, we need some kind of measurement. Standardized exit exams that are developed by peer schools within an accreditation population would eliminate most of the concerns of the opponents of the ACT, GRE, SAT, and standardized entrance exams, in general.

  • Racial Disparity
  • Posted by Brenda Mayer on May 28, 2006 at 3:25pm EDT
  • I do not understand the logic of Professor Robertson's arguments regarding racial disparity and his specific conclusion that the "A is not an A everyplace" comment has anything whatsoever to do with race.

    In my high school you had to score 95 or higher to merit an A. In most other schools in the Philadelphia school disctrict all that was required was a 90. So you see, Professor Robertson, my A was indeed not the same as a student's from another school. And yes, we did have black students in my school.

    More current and appropriate is the fact that my daughter was receiving B's in a supposedly academically rigorous charter school but could barely read. We have switched her to the regular public school system and now she not only receives A's but is reading two grade levels higher than her peers. My point is that grading still varies from school to school, and has nothing to do with financial or racial factors. The racial mix is the same at both schools my daughter has attended.

    It is preposterous to suggest that events of 40 years ago have any bearing upon my or my daughter's achievements. It is equally preposterous to suggest that my daughter's black friends are not on an equal playing field with her. In fact, I am quite sure that their parents would be insulted by the suggestion.

    I think that as long as society continues to believe in the fallacy of racial disparity, there will continue to be economic differences between the races. However, I also believe that economic differences need not translate into academic differences. But if I believe there is a difference, and act upon that belief, then a self-fulfilling prophecy is the result.

    I know that in my own life, every time I get rid of an excuse my performance increases. When I start playing the blame game, however, my performance and attitude suffer.

    But hey, that's just me.

  • Follow the $Money$
  • Posted by Bruce Harvey on May 29, 2006 at 7:30am EDT
  • This is all about money. Declining enrollments are closing public schools in some locations around the U.S. The pool of eligible college students will continue to decline. The result is the specter of declining freshman class size. But there is as yet little change in the size of the higher education establishment. The small exclusive liberal arts colleges are the first warning of a coming decline or collapse of that establishment. It appears that the number of applications grows when the SAT/ACT filter is removed. More applicants mean more possibilities for discretionary admissions which means keeping up the enrollment which means continuing cash flow from tuition via DOE grants and loans which means keeping administrators and professors on the payroll. The College Board’s screw-up is a convenient accident providing an excuse and smoke screen for enhancing desperately needed cash flow. So, the institution continues to be funded for a while longer. I hope the GRE is NOT abandoned. I think you should expect a decline in GRE scores in a few years highly correlated to undergrad schools and student cohorts that did/did not utilize the SAT filter. It’s a sham, and that’s the shame of it.