Search News


Browse Archives

News

Rate of Tuition Increases Is Up

October 23, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The rate of tuition increases is going up -- in public and private higher education.

Across sectors, an annual report by the College Board found that this year's percentage increases were slightly larger than those reported a year ago.

Here are some of the key data released by the College Board Monday:

Tuition Changes by Sector, 2007-8

Sector 2007-8 Tuition 1-Year $ Change % Change This Year % Change Last Year
Public 2-year $2,361 $95 +4.2% +4.1%
Public 4-year (in state) $6,185 $381 +6.6% +6.3%
Private 4-year $23,712 $1,404 +6.3% +5.9%

The College Board also reported, but with some caution because data cover only 57 percent of enrollments, that the average tuition at for-profit colleges is $12,089 this academic year, up 6.2 from last year.

For residential students, room and board are also key costs and here, too, they are up. At public institutions, the average room and board this year is $7,404, an increase of 5.3 percent over last year. At private colleges, the average this year is $8,595, an increase of 5.0 percent. (Last year, the percentage increases in room and board were 5.1 percent at public institutions and 5.0 percent at privates.)

A major theme of the College Board report every year is that the relatively few institutions for which total costs now exceed $50,000 a year are highly atypical, even if they include some of the more prestigious colleges and universities in the country. Only 5 percent of students at private four-year institutions (which enroll fewer students than publics) attend colleges where tuition and fees total $36,000 or more. Sixty-five percent of private college students are enrolled at institutions where tuition is less than $27,000.

At public four-year institutions, a plurality of students (43 percent) attend institutions where tuition and fees are $3,000-$5,999. The next largest group (34 percent) enroll at institutions where tuition and fees are $6,000-$8,999.

Another major theme of the College Board, this year as in the past, was that what students actually pay ("net price") tends to be considerably less than what colleges list as their tuition and fee rates. Net price subtracts grants or tax breaks, and the figures here are based on averages for the sectors. While the numbers for net price are going up as well, the base is much smaller.

Net Tuition and Fees, 2007-8

Sector Net Tuition and Fees 1-Year $ Increase 1-Year % Increase
Public 2-year $320 $20 +7%
Public 4-year $2,580 $160 +7%
Private 4-year $14,400 $630 +5%

Sandy Baum, a Skidmore College economist and senior policy analyst at the College Board, said that these data provide important context. She said that there are major "gaps in access" to higher education for members of disadvantaged groups, and she said that "money is a factor" in those gaps. But she said that the relatively low cost of many colleges (especially after aid is awarded) suggested that there are other issues in play as well.

In terms of aid, the College Board offered extensive data there as well. Federal loans are the top source of aid for both undergraduate and graduate students, the data show, with loans playing a much larger role for graduate education.

Student Aid by Type, 2006-7

Type of Aid Undergraduates Graduate Students
Total $97.1 billion $33.4 billion
Federal loans 40% 61%
Institutional grants 21% 17%
Pell Grants 13% n/a
State grants 8% 1%
Private and employer grants 7% 9%
Education tax credits/deductions 5% 2%
Federal grants other than Pell 4% 9%
Federal work-study 1% <1%

One key trend on student loans is the continued growth in private borrowing, which worries many educators because such loan programs have far fewer protections for student borrowers. In 2006-7, the last year for which data are available, private borrowing reached 24 percent of student loan volume. That's up just one percentage point from the previous year, but is double the 12 percent share private loans had in 2000-1, and four times the 6 percent share that the loans had in 1996-7.

Baum said she wasn't sure why the growth slowed. While private loans have received much publicity in the last year due to scandals over campus aid leaders recommending lenders who were also providing them with certain benefits, those scandals broke after the period when most of the borrowing in this year's report would have taken place.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Rate of Tuition Increases Is Up

  • Are You Listening to this Virginia?
  • Posted by kgotthardt on October 23, 2007 at 7:35am EDT
  • Hey Delegates....besides supporting unfair laws like the abusive driver fees, what have you been doing in Richmond? Looks like you haven't done too much for college students and their families. Got something to say about it?

  • Let's just say it...
  • Posted by Hill Junkie on October 23, 2007 at 7:55am EDT
  • It shocks and disappoints me that news outlets, in this case InsideHigherEd as well, consciously elect to report sticker prices and then, after a fair dose of fear mongering, choose to dismissively report the net price that students actually pay. $320 per year at a public two-year school?! $2,580 per year at a public four-year school?! A quick glance at the IPEDS data shows that 4 out of every 5 students attend public higher education institutions and simple division suggests that the respective average cost (which is important) translates into about $26 and $215 per month respectively (the latter being about, oh, $7 PER DAY). Please, please somebody stop this madness about cost being a barrier to higher education. Sure, room and board is expensive and if we want to nitpick, college textbooks are not cheap, but come on, everyone has to eat and keep a room regardless of whether they go to school or not so living costs are largely a wash, not some excess burden. Sure, working while going to school is tough, but it's difficult to reconcile NESSIE results showing students spending less than 10 hours per week outside of the classroom and the hordes of complaints that a 20-hour per week job making submarines is holding them back from finishing on time, or from doing well for that matter.

    Everyone wants to see rankings a la US News abolished. I say, in the name of respectable journalism and letting logic trump intuition, that we stop treating college costs as a "crisis" and focus just a little more on the intellectual barriers that prevent students from succeeding once they get there.

  • Rising college costs
  • Posted by feudi pandola on October 23, 2007 at 8:35am EDT
  • The rising cost of higher education is not a red herring. I disagree with Hill Junkie on that point. There are many, many problems with the US public education system that lead to bigger and costlier problems at the college level. The deterioration of societal values, out of control unions, and the lack of proper parenting all contribute to this crisis, and it is a crisis.

    Sure, college costs are impacted by the type of students who enter them, but that is only one reason for higher cost, and it is hardly the main reason. Anyone who reads this blog knows about the massive, multi-billion dollar endowments at the very best universities...and that these schools lead the way in rising tuition cost as they squirrel away hundreds of millions in income each and every year. Releasing just 10% of that income could go a long way towards controlling tuition cost. Everyone knows that the increase in interest rates to 8.5% for Stafford loans was a tremendous boondoggle to NGO's like Sallie Mae that masquerade as for profit companies but derive most of their real income from the public via subsidies. Thank goodness the Congress fixed THAT leak in the dam. And, as always, there are the abuses of tenure such as the $100,000 bouns paid to Ward Churchill to get rid of him. Tenure abuse goes on at every university and carries a massive cost to students. Lastly, the "net cost" of tuition is a red herring as it implies that the actual cost to society for tuition is less than the published cost. That's not true. Even if a student gets grants and work study funds, somebody still pays for those grants so the published cost of tuition is, in fact, the same as the net cost to the larger society in a macro-economic sense.

  • Any way you slice it...
  • Posted by Blind Man on October 23, 2007 at 9:20am EDT
  • I will say it again, If college costs are such a barrier than why do enrollments keep increasing every year? I agree with the first post.

    The real barrier is what happens after graduation for those people carrying obscene amounts of student loan and credit card debt.

  • Hey Hill...
  • Posted by kgotthardt on October 23, 2007 at 9:20am EDT
  • Where are you getting your numbers? In my good old state of VA and others, your math doesn't make sense.

    I also know when colleges are forced to cut their budgets, they sometimes have to make up for it in service and activity fees. That is a real problem. I recall friends in a HUGE dorm up north who had every other light shut off on them to conserve energy and cut costs. There is obviously something wrong with the way state education is funded and it's not all about schools.

  • Slowing Growth in Private Student Loans
  • Posted by Mark Kantrowitz , Publisher at FinAid on October 23, 2007 at 12:35pm EDT
  • The slowing growth in private student loans is likely a one-time blip due to the introduction of the Grad PLUS loan. The slight increase in annual loan limits for freshman/sophomore and graduate student Stafford loans will also lead to a slight one-time slowing due to a shift in borrowing (aggregate limits didn't increase). The conflict of interest will have a minor impact. The cuts in federal loan subsidies will likely lead to an increase due to shifting of marketing dollars from federal to private loans since private loans are now even more profitable than federal loans. So overall I'd expect to see next year's report show an increase between this year's and the previous year's, and then a return to 25% annual growth rates for several years.

  • Net cost (response to FP)
  • Posted by Faculty Person on October 23, 2007 at 2:25pm EDT
  • Fudi claims:

    Lastly, the “net cost” of tuition is a red herring as it implies that the actual cost to society for tuition is less than the published cost. That’s not true. Even if a student gets grants and work study funds, somebody still pays for those grants so the published cost of tuition is, in fact, the same as the net cost to the larger society in a macro-economic sense.

    Actually 21% of student aid is borne by the university -- institutional grants are a discount on tuition. That's about a third of the total student aid not covered by loans. I expect this figure is higher at some of the highest tuition schools. The published cost of tuition is no more the same as the net cost than the list price of a car is what most people pay.

    Net tuition and fees are more of a valid measure of college costs than list prices just as Hill Junkie points out.

  • How To Lie With Statistics ... And Other Things
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on October 23, 2007 at 3:35pm EDT
  • While the numbers reported herein may be slightly off, they are very close to being accurate.

    First, in each of the lines below, the first number is the value/cost in 1930 dollars, the second is the 1930 value/cost in today’s dollars (using the Consumer Price Index Conversion Multiplier of 12.048), the third is the actual value/cost today, and the fourth is the difference between today and then (measured in today’s dollars and with “then” taken as the baseline).

    http://oregonstate.edu/cla/polisci/faculty/sahr/cv2006.pdf

    Median annual household income ...

    $1,652 ... $19,904 ... $48,000 ... (up 141%)

    Median cost of a new home ...

    $6,515 ... $78,494 ... $246,500 ... (up 214%)

    Average cost of a new car (I used the Chevy Impala) ...

    $610.00 ... $7,349 ... $25,000 ... (up 240%)

    Average cost of a gallon of gasoline

    $0.10/gallon ... $1.20 ... $2.83 ... (up 136%)

    Price of a first class postage stamp

    3 cents ... 36 cents ... 41 cents ... (up 14%)

    Tuition cost for a year at Harvard

    $400 ... $4,189 ... $31,456 ... (up 651%)

    Obviously one – unless s/he is marginally brain-dead – cannot make too much of these “averages;” but they are suggestive. I am struck by the fact that that government agency doesn’t seem to be doing such a bad job of delivering an essential service at a reasonable price. Too bad the Feds are not in the cell phone and cable-net businesses ... not to mention the (universal) health care business.

    Second, I have often heard it said that, despite your prejudices about the cost of higher education, the cost at a year’s tuition at The University of All People back in 19●● was essentially the same as the cost of a new Chevy ... and the same is true today. Interesting thought.

    Third, it is interesting to note that almost 70% of full-time undergraduates today are paying less than $8,000 pre academic year for tuition and fees. We might add to that the fact that every study of the financial payoff for going to college concludes “GO TO COLLEGE OR YOU’RE A STUPID IDIOT!!!” On top of that, of course, the essentially free non-financial payoffs are why most students (who want to be there at all) go to college in the first place.

    Fourth, now I’m transforming myself into my HostileMan alter ego. Did I tell you my daughter-in-law, a third-year student in medical school will have upwards of $100,000 in debt when she wraps everything up? Oops, did I mention that she has a four-year $100,000 scholarship?

    Wait, wait, before you uppity academics start telling me about the fortune she will make over her lifetime (she’s currently interested in family practice in a rural setting), read my posts on the subject in ...

    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/05/24/medicaid

    Fifth, did I happen to mention that as colleges and universities outsource instruction to more and more adjuncts, the number and salaries of full-time support staff, serving generally inept (neither effective nor efficient) upper-level “managers,” escalates beyond belief?

    Forgive me. I’ve got to put HostileMan back in his cage and get back to work.

  • Another Factor
  • Posted by Chris on October 23, 2007 at 3:35pm EDT
  • The elephant in the room that I have yet to see pointed out in discussions here and elsewhere is that one major source of increased costs is increased size of institutions. There are numerous departments and full-time positions that schools have added over the years to better support students, and rightly so. But it's simple really - this support comes at a price. People can either accept this situation, or eliminate these support systems and save money.

  • real cost
  • Posted by That guy Paurie on October 23, 2007 at 4:40pm EDT
  • I hope to send my 3 daughters to State U. I have no illusions re private college, unless my children win extremely large merit scholarships. Here I am not optimistic based on the experience of my neighbors and relatives. They had brilliant children, 4.0 GPAs, class leaders, lots of extra curric, but the kids went to state U due to the prohibitive cost of private and out of state public colleges. Let's be real. If my children live at home and commute to college(as I did) the cost of tuition, fees and books will be $8,000 per year per child. Someone above said the cost of Room & Board at college or staying at home is a wash. That statement is preposterous.
    What was the cost of tuition, books and fees per year at your state's public college circa 1970? In my state it was approx $1,200. Things have changed.

  • Posted by Stella Hoffman , Stella on October 26, 2007 at 12:50pm EDT
  • I worked as a graduate assitant in a financial aid office during the past year and became very aware or troubles associated with private loans. Students, who have two parents working, will probably only get unsubsidized loans from the government to cover part of thier tuition. Their next best solution is the all too popular private loans, with high interest rates and poor customoer services. I know many adults say they worked when they went to college, but if you consider, a work study job pays no more than $1000 a year most of the time. How helpful is that for tuition that is $3,000 or more a semester? My concern is that students who want to go into helping professions (social work and teaching) have to do so many practical hours that working is sometimes not an option. Which leads to them taking out more loans, and if they take out too many private loans, they will not be able to work in social work or education. I have seen it happen before. The government really needs to create more prgrams and provide more loans and grants to working class families.