Search News


Browse Archives

News

AWOL on Civil Rights?

March 14, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The ongoing dispute over M.B.A.offerings in Baltimore, which came to a head last year, rekindled a conversation about race, fairness and public policy that continued Thursday in a Congressional hearing room.

The dispute involves Morgan State University, a historically black college, and two nearby public institutions that opened a joint business school program despite concerns that it duplicated Morgan State's M.B.A. offering and would adversely affect that program's enrollment, diversity and funding. Some contend that by approving the program, Maryland has undermined its own desegregation plans. Defenders of the new program say it meets specific state needs.

Speaking to the House Committee on Education and Labor, Raymond C. Pierce, dean of the North Carolina Central University School of Law and former deputy assistant secretary for the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights, blasted OCR for lack of oversight in such cases, saying that the federal agency under the Bush administration has failed to intervene in ways that would help put a stop to discriminatory treatment of black colleges.

"It's clear that the lack of enforcement of federal civil rights policy at the Department of Education is an agenda," he told lawmakers.

A statement from a department spokeswoman said the agency is committed to enforcing civil rights law, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin. OCR has plans in place to make "further and faster progress" in completing the Title VI reviews of the states still remaining on OCR’s “open” statewide higher education desegregation case docket, the department says. Those plans are to conduct reviews by the end of 2008, with states deemed not yet fully in compliance with Title VI asked to sign remedial agreements.

Pierce said during the hearing that he wants the House committee to ask the Education Department when it plans to make decisions about state compliance. "Find them guilty or find them innocent -- just do something," he said in an interview.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 1992 decision, ruled that states must do more to desegregate than simply end admissions policies that barred black students from attending mostly white colleges. In the Fordice case (referring to the then-governor of Mississippi), the justices also told states to end duplicate programs at nearby predominantly white and historically black colleges. The theory of the court is that such duplication gives white students an excuse to avoid attending colleges where a majority of students are black. Further, since most state appropriations formulas are enrollment-based, these duplicative programs act to minimize state funds going to black colleges.

In various agreements with OCR, states outlined their plans for how they would comply with federal regulations. Price, who helped review state desegregation plans during the Clinton administration, said some states that agreed to work toward full compliance have not gone far enough since the five-year agreements ended. And they've done so, he argues, without consequence.

An aide to Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.), who heads the House committee, said the chairman was "concerned by some of the testimonies he heard [Thursday] suggesting that the Office for Civil Rights has failed to enforce compact agreements," and that he wants to get answers from the agency.

Added Rep. Howard P. "Buck" McKeon (R-Calif.) the committee's ranking Republican: "I think that's a national problem -- selectively enforcing laws," McKeon said.

In the Morgan State case, the Maryland Senate a year ago passed legislation that would force the Maryland Higher Education Commission to reconsider its decision to approve the M.B.A. program jointly offered by Towson University and the University of Baltimore. That bill stalled, and a new version has been introduced in the senate.

The state's commission had rejected a number of new programs, mostly at predominantly white institutions, at the urging of black college supporters. Still, Earl S. Richardson, Morgan State's president, said Thursday that there's been a "constant eating away at the unique programs," and that not enough is being done to help make his university as competitive as its counterparts that enroll mostly white students. (Richardson said Morgan State's M.B.A. program has lost students since the joint program opened.)

"There's now an urgency about moving us toward that standard of comparability," Richardson said, adding that the joint M.B.A. program is "harmful [to Morgan State], not only in terms of efficiency but in terms of diversity issues."

The hearing featured several presidents of black colleges who were in town for the annual meeting of the National Association for Equal Opportunity in Higher Education.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on AWOL on Civil Rights?

  • Four Things ...
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on March 14, 2008 at 10:40am EDT
  • While I am truly an impartial observer in this case, I do have a few observations:

    How, whether Towson University and the University of Baltimore should have a joint MBA program, ever became a civil rights issue is really weird. What else would you call it? It is nothing more than the sort of mindless academic “entrepreneurship” that, for example, inspired Elon University to believe the world (or even North Carolina) would be a better place if only EU had a school of law.

    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2005/11/03/lawschools

    Second, of course the Bush administration has seriously undercut the effectiveness of the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights during his truly bizarre and interminably long tenure in office ...

    http://www.bushslastday.com/

    It is a real stretch, however, to blame this particular decision – not that I think it is about either optimal education distribution or enhanced business environments -- on the current ineptitude of OCR.

    Third, thank god the “Defenders of the new program [who] say it meets specific state needs” are nameless, else we would be forced to ask them (1) what are those needs? (2) what do you expect the substance of a typical MBA program to be? (3) what do you imagine the “expertise” of the faculty of this MBA program will be? (4) how effectively will the “output” of the MBA program align with local and regional needs (whether real or perceived)? and (5) what is the cost-benefit “bottom line” of the proposed program? Perhaps, once we see the needs all laid out neatly in front of us, we will be able help the Maryland decision-makers determine optimal educational responses to their needs (including, I presume, the possibility of creating comprehensive occupational education programs).

    Let’s assume, for example, there is a dire need for an additional 100 MBAs per year in the Baltimore area (accountants I’d wager). I recommend a competition to find the best 120 candidates each year, give them full-ride tuition, fees, and transportation “loans” to study in MBA programs across the border in Northern Virginia or D.C., and tell them if they are continuously employed in the Baltimore area for six years, everything is forgiven. Of course 90% will discover after six years that they’re “locked in” to their jobs and their communities, and they’ll stay forever. Get back to me with a cost-benefit analysis ... and don’t forget to get special deals for your students at those Virginia and D.C. universities ... that’s the sort of thing we business people do.

    Fourth – and finally – why in the world didn’t you interview Michael Steele for this article?

  • Duplication?!
  • Posted by People United on March 14, 2008 at 11:05am EDT
  • Why are we maintaining apartheid as a public policy? Seperate but equal? Forget about duplicating programs, what about duplicating colleges?

    If you want to end desegregation, increase the number of minority students at a particular college, and cut waste and duplication then SHUT DOWN black colleges, womens colleges, Hispanic colleges or any other one trick ponies left over from ancient history.

    If everyone is at "one college" then these concerns are greatly diminished, and would give a more complete picture of what is really happening in colleges. A whole host of inequities and issues would be rendered moot.

    Transfer the entire faculty, staff and students to one college or the other, whichever has the best facilities and location.

    Stop the duplication is right!

  • Posted by Faye Beyeler on March 14, 2008 at 11:30am EDT
  • I disagree with the previous comment of "stop the duplication." If we learned anything from pantyhose marketing it is that "one size does not fit all."

    We need different institutions that cater to different student populations and different student needs.

  • Faye, What??
  • Posted by P.U. on March 14, 2008 at 3:00pm EDT
  • "We need different institutions that cater to different student populations and different student needs."

    Colleges = pantyhose?

    Please explain the illogic of your conclusion. I did not suggest doing away with all 4 or 2 year colleges, or all public or private colleges. I suggested eliminating duplication and at no time did I advocate for "one size fits all"

    In fact, I think many existing colleges would be improved dramatically by mergeing a minority college into it.

  • But you have to admit
  • Posted by Martin on March 14, 2008 at 4:05pm EDT
  • Yes, in a perfect world, the comment from people united makes sense. I do not believe that HBCU's can have it both ways. On the one hand they want to be seen as mainstream, and on the other they want to have special concessions because they serve a distinct population, African-Americans. Affirmative action does not work, not in its present form. It never has and never will because it maintains this double standard of "treat me as an equal, but recognize me as special." If we are to do that then each minority group should have the same treatment, such as Finnish Americans. There is a Finnish American University in Michigan, they do not get special treatment because they were founded to serve a distint segment of the US population, should they? By Affirmative Action standards they should.

    What of colleges founded by Germans, or women? You get my argument, I think. Duplicate programs simply because they are housed at a Traditional White University and at an HBCU makes absolutely NO sense at all. The argument made that some African American students won't go to a TWI, but might go to an HBCU is absurd and goes directly against the Affirmative Action argument. IF the program is offered, and IF the student wants that program, in a perfect Affirmative Action world, the student attends the school where the program is housed be it a TWI or HBCU. Anything less, negates ALL of the Affirmative Action arguments, period.

  • Posted by Donald Ray Jenkins on March 15, 2008 at 9:55am EDT
  • Martin's comments show both his fundamental ignorance and prejudice. I wish he and others who think like him would take my course African American Culture; then they would learn what Affirmative Action is and who, white women, have benefited the most from it.

  • Posted by Mr Punch on March 16, 2008 at 1:35pm EDT
  • The proximate issue here, it seems to me, is whether or not the MBA is today an appropriate "unique program." There are so many MBA programs now that they can hardly be regarded as even mildly unusual; they are so various that duplication is hard to prove; and they draw on faculty and other resources already in place for undergrad business programs.

    I don't by any means think that Morgan State's position is indefensible, but I do think it's pretty weak in this case.

  • You Said It, Mr. Punch ...
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on March 16, 2008 at 6:10pm EDT
  • “ ... they draw on faculty and other resources already in place for undergrad business programs.”

    “Undergrad business programs” ... a mind is a terrible thing to waste!

  • Response
  • Posted by Martin on March 17, 2008 at 10:00am EDT
  • To the gentleman who thinks I should take HIS class to learn about affirmative action, what a hoot. You should take my class on equality in education and the affect of keeping the HBCU model as "separate but equal." First, I am not prejudice just because I say affirmative action in its present form does not work. I did not say that affirmative action could not work, your argument that white women have benefited the most proves my point. I not only graduated from an HBCU, but supported and served one for nearly a quarter of a century. I assure you I do not need another lecture of how badly the African-Americans have had it throughout their history. What I do need is for people to wake up and realize that we have coddled HBCU's for decades, out of fear of offending some ethnic group. We have allowed them to continue to segregate themselves, willingly, for the sake of preserving a heritage. If TWI were to advertise their heritage of being founded by whites to educate whites, they would be crucified. And yet, we allow and even encourage HBCU's to do likewise without batting an eye.

    For every case a person can show where Afirmative Action has worked, I can show you ten where it failed. Affirmative Action in its current state is a failure. Now, let's sit down and logically look at where it can succeed, putting aside our differences and looking for a common ground where all people in American, regardless of their race, can have equal access because they have earned it, not because it has been legislated.

  • One final point
  • Posted by Martin on March 17, 2008 at 10:00am EDT
  • And, if you need proof, go to the South Carolina Commission on Higher Education website and read what they define as minorities at the State's higher education colleges and universities. At TWI, the only segment recognized as "other race" are African-Americans and at HBCU's the only "other race" students are whites. I kind of know this because I served on the Access and Equity subcommittee for 20 years. I fought to have the definition expanded to include all minority groups, to no avail. The Access and Equity meetings almost exclusively dealt with issues relating to African-Americans, not white women. Of course Affirmative Action was always a hot topic, but look at Clemson University, where they have an entire division dedicated to the study of African Americans, not minorities.

    I hope one day we can define Affirmative Action in such as way that it keeps doors open for everyone, and that not one person in this country is denied a quality education, be it at an HBCU or a TWI.

  • Martin Needs Courses in English Composition
  • Posted by Donald Ray Jenkins , Dr. on March 19, 2008 at 1:25pm EDT
  • Besides taking my course in African American Culture, Martin also needs to take my courses in Freshman Composition I and Freshman Composition II, since his writing reveals severe deficiencies in the use of the English language. For example, common splices, unsubstantiated statements, glaring generations, hasty conclusions, and faulty logic have no place in argumentative writing.
    By the way, Martin, I have two degrees from Historically Black Colleges and Universities and three from Traditionally White Institutions, and all of the colleges I attended stressed using edited Standard English in public discourse.