Search News


Browse Archives

News

Extra, Extra, Go to WWW...

May 15, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Consider the evolution of University Week, the University of Washington's internal publication for faculty and staff, as a case study:

"Our publication started 26 years ago and we were all print. We got our first Web site in 1998, but it was very simple and what we did was just take everything that we have in print and put it onto the Web site. Then I think it was 2003, there was a budget cut and we were told that we needed to move our publication from weekly to biweekly. We felt that was not often enough to be timely and started doing an online publication in the off weeks. So we would do the print and put that information online and then the next week when we weren't going to do print we would do an online-only publication. So we went on like that and things got more and more complex," recalls Nancy Wick, University Week's editor.

"It was like we were essentially doing two publications with the same staff that had been doing one. In the meantime there was a tremendous move on campus generally towards online, and people were writing to us and saying, 'Why are you sending us this print publication, you're killing trees,' and all that sort of thing. It looked to us like it was time to just stop doing the print."

Which is just what University Week did, last fall, as part of a growing migration of internal university publications to an online only format. The trend has been ongoing for some years now, but has accelerated during the economic downturn, says Rae Goldsmith, vice president of advancement resources at the Council for Advancement and Support of Education. "It's been driven, in part, by financial issues. That's why you're seeing more of a flood of it right now. But it's also being driven just by the nature of the communications world and how it's changing. People are used to getting their news online. It's much more immediate," Goldsmith says.

In terms of cost-savings, "It's not just the money you spend on the print," Goldsmith says. "It's the human resources it takes to do both print and online, as well."

WSU Today, at Washington State University, printed its last print edition in February, and has launched a daily e-mail bulletin in its place. The transition was a result of a university-wide decision to move all internal communications online, explains Robert Frank, director of internal communications and WSU Today's editor.

"There are plusses and minuses," Frank says. "I'm a print person by nature. My training and my background have been in newspapers so I always will have a love for an actual physical newspaper.

"But moving to electronic has definitely had some advantages, in that we are able to deliver news immediately. The advantage of having the [e-mail] push system and having that delivered to every employee I think has improved communications. ...The biggest change has been obviously it offers us the ability that print doesn't of providing videos -- tough to do in a newspaper -- audio clips, photo galleries. All of those are very highly visited on the Web site."

One common challenge in moving to online only is ensuring the publication still gets to those staff members who don't spend their work days staring at computers.

In launching a new online publication with a new tone and a new name, Between the Columns, to replace a weekly print newspaper, the University of Maryland at College Park still maintained a minimal print presence to reach just those audiences. "There's a whole sector of our staff who are not getting our news electronically... folks like guys in the service shops, and dining facilities folks, and residence facilities and maintenance folks. We put drops of that [print] supplement in break rooms and lounges, places where they punch in their time cards," said Monette Austin Bailey, a senior editor/writer in the university publications office and managing editor of Between the Columns.

But she just learned that this month will mark the end of Between the Columns' printed supplement, after which "We'll be all online," says Bailey. She'll be sad to see the broadsheet go. "We've gotten great comments on our Web site and I'm really proud of it, but I wonder how many folks we're not capturing," she says.

"The range of options that you have in an online publication is just dizzying almost. I guess it just makes me a little bit sad sometimes though that I realize that if I really want something in print, want it or not, I can't get it."

Cornell University is trying to address just that concern in moving the weekly Cornell Chronicle to online only. The last edition of the weekly paper will be printed May 29, but Cornell is putting mechanisms in place so those who want a print copy can still get one -- a printable PDF version will be attached to the new weekly e-newsletter, so readers can print it themselves, and the university's print services division will also make copies on demand, for distribution purposes.

"It's like shifting your weight from one foot to the other. You want to do it in a way that you don't fall down," says Tommy Bruce, the vice president for university communications.

Bruce says his main concerns in switching to an online only format were to preserve the deadline and the editorial decision-making that make the Cornell Chronicle a newspaper (a house newspaper, yes, but a newspaper), as opposed to any other university publication. "The particular nature of the product is what you want to preserve," Bruce said.

"The question is whether or not an all-electronic approach is effective in a university setting. That's what we're analyzing now and looking at for next year," says Fred Volkmann, vice chancellor for public affairs at Washington University in St. Louis, which publishes The Record twice weekly online and once weekly in print, featuring much of the same content in both mediums. Volkmann says they'll make a decision about whether to go all-electronic soon and, if they decide to, it'll happen in 2010.

"The main thing is to be strategic with your important audiences," Volkmann says. "In fact, your most important audiences in many ways are your faculty, staff and students."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Extra, Extra, Go to WWW...

  • Recyle an old computer
  • Posted by chs on May 15, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • I agree that there will be people who, by the nature of their jobs, will not have easy access to the online version. Perhaps a solution is to use computers which are being phased out of offices or labs as "reading stations." It is easy enough to limit web access/surfing on those machines using standard Parental control software if you are worried about inappropriate use.

  • Online Publications Replacing Print
  • Posted by George Patsourakos , Retired Administrator at Harvard University on May 15, 2009 at 12:30pm EDT
  • I believe that online publications are rapidly replacing -- or at least supplementing -- print publications at most American universities. There are many reasons for this phenomenon. First, it is much less expensive, since it requires no paper and a lot fewer personnel than print. Second, online information can be updated -- even with up-to-the-minute news -- at any time, rather than just daily or weekly. Third, online information can provide videos of events, but printed publications cannot. These are just a few of the reasons that the trend is for online publications replacing print publications.

  • Online and Print
  • Posted by Orangel Daniels , Dean of Arts and Sciences at Cape Fear Community College on May 15, 2009 at 2:00pm EDT
  • Because of the budget restrictions, the number of drafts or corrections, and the number of personnel involved in the production/printing phase, my divisional newsletter will be placed online in the fall. However, since some faculty/staff prefer hard copies and like easy access, two hard copies of the newsletter will be housed in each academic department.

  • On-line only is trendy
  • Posted by Ken Cuthbertson , Editor, Queen's Alumni Review magazine at Queen's University, Kingston, ON CANADA on May 15, 2009 at 9:00pm EDT
  • The rush to on-line only is undeniable. It may also be unstoppable, given the financial imperatives. But I suspect in the long run it will be counter productive, a false economy that may even do great harm to institutional communications.

    Internet publications are passive in a way print is not. Print is pushed out to the reader. An on-line "publication" requires the reader to come looking for information. And because people are by nature lazy (and impatient) it will be a battle to maintain any kind of consistent readership for on-line publications. Institutions that drop print publications that are mailed to a physical address will also have what is at best a tenuous e-tie to their alumni.

    I've also heard disquieting reports (rumors?) of late that the Internet may one day soon collapse under the sheer weight of the volume of traffic that's out there. Sort of an on-line brown out or even a crash. If this happens, you can bet there will ne chaos. It also seems lilkely to me that some alternative platforms will appear (is that the right term? I'm not very tech saavy), and if that happens I fear we'll see fragmentation of the audience, and all bets will be off when it comes to the effectiveness of on-line publications. Call me pessimist if you like--and maybe I'm misinformed--but I see problems ahead for us all when print is laid to rest.

  • Web Based Admission
  • Posted by James Maraviglia , Asst Vice President at Cal Poly on May 15, 2009 at 9:00pm EDT
  • We moved our entire admission & recruitment effort to the web in 1999. We import all prospective students, parents, and counselors names from all contact sources into EMT and automatically create a dynamic VIP web micro site for each of them based on their individual attributes. We utilize streaming e-mail messages along with other media & technology including knowledge base, broadcast phone messages, text messages, chat and if need be direct mail messages to build relationships with our public. Here is one of the streaming email messages we use as part of this strategy.

    http://www.ess.calpoly.edu/_admiss/vippagemov.html

    All of our prospects have their own individual user name and password, which allows them to sign on and see their own dynamic information 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Their VIP micro site contains streaming video messages from a number of campus sources including our academic department chairs and current and former students. It also includes briefs on a variety of Cal Poly topics that are updated weekly with new releases. Different VIP micro sites have been developed for each audience.

  • a mixed blessing
  • Posted by Frank F. Conlon , Professor Emeritus at University of Washington on May 17, 2009 at 5:30pm EDT
  • In the name of economy (and, I believe falsely, ecology), institutions can migrate from print to web and congratulate themselves on their up-to-date cleverness. My various alumni organizations are also talking up the web as the path of effective communication. And then there are all those people who used to have jobs gathering, editing and preparing copy for the newsletters, magazines, reports and the like... Well, that's all right, a student helper can do that more cheaply and then a well paid web communications specialist can create the final product... At the University of Colorado, the "Silver and Gold" had at least nominally a measure of editorial independence; the 'new and improved' product will be a mouthpiece of the administration. More up to date? Yes, perhaps so, but also more readily managed to assure a consistent point of view, consistent that is with the "brand" of the institution and its keepers.

    On another point, when exactly does one read all this stuff? In print form, college and university publications have been 'secondary' in importance, but the great thing was that I could throw them into the reading pile and get to them at my leisure. I have consumed "many trees" worth of university communications whilst waiting for busses, for planes, while riding on busses and planes, while 'killing' fifteen minutes between chores or appointments; even, whilst moments of personal privacy in small rooms where other tree products are sometimes consumed. (There are some things you can't do with your lap top!). In short, I think that these new web-based productions are interesting, and I greet them with friendly curiosity. But ought we assume that they are effective as modes of communication of news that is not "white hot" in relevance (and which never was). Will potential donors, alumni or not, spend time at their computer seeking the latest rah-rah about the good old U? As an editor of an online scholarly discussion list, the last thing I need is a few more hours at the screen.

    But enough, I await with friendly curiosity, the suggestions of switching from web publications to a set of twitter tweets as a more immediate and 'effective' mode of spreading the good news....