Search News


Browse Archives

News

HBCU Chiefs Address Grad Rates

December 15, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Under renewed scrutiny about lackluster graduation rates, a group of historically black college presidents is pushing for new assessment tools they say will better capture student outcomes.

While details remain sparse, a report to be published Wednesday by the Thurgood Marshall College Fund suggests that the six-year graduation rate as measured by federal data should be replaced with a new model. Echoing complaints often registered by community college leaders, the report, “Making the Grade: Improving Degree Attainment at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs),” argues that federal data fail to capture the successes of transfer students and part-time students who often attend the institutions. Moreover, the data fail to account for the fact that many HBCU students face additional barriers to success, including lower socioeconomic status and the need for remediation, the report notes.

HBCUs have a history of serving underserved and nontraditional students, which places the institutions at a disadvantage when compared to other colleges under the six-year graduation rate standard, according to Mary Sias, president of Kentucky State University and a co-author of the report.

“You’re not comparing apples to apples,” Sias said on a conference call Monday. “If you gave me the same students, I would be able to do as well or better than the other universities that are majority-serving institutions.”

Nonetheless, the six-year graduation rate has emerged as the federal standard for comparing very different institutions. And when viewed through that lens, HBCUs often don’t appear to be doing well. When the Associated Press analyzed the six-year graduation rates of 83 four-year HBCUs earlier this year, it found that just 37 percent of black students finished within six years. While HBCUs have long touted their special role in educating African Americans, the report noted that the collective graduation rate for black students at HBCUs is actually 4 percentage points lower than the national college graduation rate for black students.

The Thurgood Marshall College Fund report does not introduce a new metric for assessment, but it suggests that any new yardstick should find a way to factor in the percentage of Pell Grant eligible students attending an institution, while also accounting for lower incoming standardized test scores that may indicate barriers to graduation.

“I don’t think a six year graduation rate is really giving us the full picture,” said Marybeth Gasman, an associate professor of higher education at the University of Pennsylvania and a co-author of the report.

Indeed, the current metrics do not illustrate that HBCUs often do a comparatively good job serving students of modest means, even though majority serving institutions have higher graduation rates overall, Gasman said. Take Alcorn State University, a historically black institution in Mississippi where 79 percent of students are Pell Grant eligible and the median SAT score is 910. While it’s true that Alcorn’s graduation rate of 43 percent is 10 percentage points lower than that of the University of Mississippi, it’s also true that just 24 percent of Ole Miss students are Pell eligible and that the median SAT score there is 1,065 -- 155 points higher. By failing to account for the differences in the students these institutions serve, federal data give an incomplete picture, Gasman said.

Some of the data that Gasman and others would like to see more widely used is collected already by the Education Trust and the National Association of System Heads, whose Access to Success Initiative illustrates the successes -- and failures -- college systems have in graduating and enrolling low-income students.

The push from HBCU presidents for different assessment tools comes at a time when some express concern about the future of these institutions. Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour's recent call to merge the state’s three public historically black colleges, for instance, was viewed by many as a threat to the state’s HBCUs.

Asked about perceived threats to the future of HBCUs, Sias stressed their important role in higher education.

“I don’t even consider that we need to put historically black colleges by the side of the road,” she said. “They are needed, and needed more than ever.”

Other co-authors to the report included Dwayne Ashley, president of the Thurgood Marshall College Fund; Ronald Mason, president of Jackson State University; and George Wright, president of Prairie View A&M University.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on HBCU Chiefs Address Grad Rates

  • Posted by RJW on December 15, 2009 at 10:00am EST
  • What exactly is the basis for the statement referring to HBCUs that they are: "... needed more than ever”? Our society has moved on to the far more open and equal opportunities apparent in everyday life than existed 50 years ago. There are those who continue to hide behind the evermore tattered curtain of low expectations that feed mediocrity and slight the achievements of minorities who have aimed higher and worked harder. We need to set higher standards and lower excuses for whatever the failings are in all sectors of education. That said, graduation rates in and of themselves are not a very sound measure for either quality or equality, and the curse of grade inflation will likely find favor as an easier remedy for low retention rates, as it appears to have in many college sport programs.

  • Eliminate HBCUs in the Name of Diversity
  • Posted by G. Tod Slone on December 15, 2009 at 10:00am EST
  • My previous comment regarding another article on HBCUs was censored (uh, moderated), though no four-letter words, ad hominem, or threats were included. Hopefully, this one will not be censored.
    New assessment tools? Anything to present something other than reality! How higher educational! Remedial training? What is needed are remedial training institutions separate from higher education. Remedial training should not exist in institutions of higher education at all. The whole concept has perverted higher education today beyond belief, where we now have professors of “reading.” “Underserved and nontraditional students” seem to be convenient code words for highly unprepared and shouldn’t be in college at all… at least not until prepared. We SHOULD be “comparing apples to apples” or HBCUs are doing a disservice, not a service. Equality is what is needed, not affirmative action.
    I taught four years at two different HBCUs(see www.theamericandissident.org/Bennett.htm and www.theamericandissident.org/GSU.htm) and was amazed at how low the level of student preparation… in general. Of course, there were always exceptions. The social was much more important than the educational and in the case of Grambling State, sports and the band counted most. Regarding Bennett College, I wrote a 743-page nonfiction novel! Regarding both institutions, grade inflation was incredible… for if it weren’t, whole classes would have to flunk… with the exception of a handful of good students of course. Indeed, I felt bad for my good students because they certainly weren’t getting a good education, where the “underserved and nontraditional students” inevitably influenced classes… in a negative direction. The good students should have been elsewhere. Now, this is certainly not a comment about ALL HBCUs, for my experience only pertained to two HBCUs. Finally, what I also was able to witness was the same apathy to vigorous debate and discussion amongst the professorate, which I’d noted in the mostly white institutions where I’d taught. Indeed, I got the distinct impression that what mattered most were not students at all, but the jobs of professors and administrators. It is time to eliminate HBCUs. In a time where DIVERSITY seems to be what counts, HBCUs are anything but diverse. Indeed, I was amazed when at Bennett to hear president Johnnetta Cole speak about how wonderful diversity to her all black student audience.

    G. Tod Slone, PhD and Founding Editor (since 1998)
    The American Dissident, a Journal of Literature, Democracy & Dissidence
    A 501 c3 Nonprofit Providing a Forum for Vigorous Debate, Cornerstone of Democracy
    todslone@yahoo.com
    www.theamericandissident.org
    1837 Main St.
    Concord, MA 01742

  • Population Served is Valid
  • Posted by Jon on December 16, 2009 at 8:30am EST
  • The argument of population served being considered is valid as long as ALL colleges can use the extra consideration depending on the makeup of the population. A look at the private sector, serving an identical socioeconomic student body, reveals that minority students achieve higher graduation rates than the students in so-called majority serving colleges. Yes, the population is harder to serve. Yes, this population has additional barriers. However, they can be served well and the students can succeed in high comparative numbers when they attend an institution that is student centered versus faculty centered.

    Granted, there are other problems in private sector schools. Student success and job attainment IN A FIELD RELATED TO THE EDUCATION is not part of that issue. As the sector that has always been measured by student success and outcomes, private nationally accredited colleges have done more to insure student achievement than any other group.