Search News


Browse Archives

News

Disappearing Jobs

December 17, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The job picture in the humanities is going from bad to worse.

The Modern Language Association's annual forecast on job listings, being released today, predicts that positions in English language and literature will drop 35 percent from last year, while positions in languages other than English are expected to fall 39 percent this year. Given that both categories saw decreases last year, the two-year decline in available positions is 51 percent in English and 55 percent in foreign languages.

The declines in each of the last two years are the largest ever recorded by the MLA, since it started tracking the trends in the association's Job Information List 35 years ago. The list has also never had fewer notices of openings. The MLA's job list does not include all jobs in English and the humanities, but over time, the ups and downs in openings on the MLA list have been an excellent proxy for judging the overall state of the job market.

"This is a historic low," said Rosemary Feal, executive director of the MLA. "We've never seen a recession like this."

Not only are departments being forced to hold off on searches for open positions, Feal said, but she is hearing that many scholars are delaying retirements because of depleted investment savings. "A lot of retirements aren't happening right now."

Among other findings of the MLA analysis:

  • Of the openings that are being listed, tenure-track assistant professor positions made up 53 percent of the jobs in English and 49 percent of the jobs advertised in foreign languages. Those figures are lower than normal. Since 1997, tenure-track assistant professor positions have made up between 55 and 65 percent of the positions announced by departments. (Many departments that hire adjuncts do not list their positions with the MLA, so the percentage of total openings that are tenure track is almost certainly smaller than this year's MLA figures suggest.)
  • The number of new doctorates awarded in 2008 was up slightly in English (to 965 from 927) and foreign languages (to 627 from 608). While those increases are in line with slight ups and downs in Ph.D. production, they indicate that the number of job seekers is likely to be up at a time when jobs are disappearing. This year's new Ph.D.s will be competing not only against each other, but against those who earned doctorates a year or two ago and who are either unemployed or underemployed.
  • In English the fields with the greatest percentage of positions are rhetoric and composition (20.1 percent), British literature (17.9 percent), multiethnic literature (13.7 percent), creative writing (7.0 percent), and American literature (6.1 percent).
  • The languages other than English with the greatest percentage of positions are Spanish (35.5 percent), French (16.0 percent), Chinese (9.5 percent), German (4.0 percent), Arabic (3.0 percent) and Italian (2.0 percent). This year's data reflect a continuation of a trend in which Spanish, while still tops in foreign language hiring, doesn't dominate as it once did. Spanish jobs made up just over half of foreign language jobs in 2000.

Feal said that she was concerned not only about the lack of jobs, but about the decreasing share of jobs that are on the tenure track. For "the integrity of programs to be maintained," she said, departments need to start hiring -- if not now, then when the downturn ends -- on the tenure track. "We've passed that tipping point where you cannot sustain a high quality overall educational experience when you've got 70 percent or more of the teaching done off the tenure track."

The MLA has been working to draw attention to the growing reliance on adjuncts -- and the need to both improve the way they are treated and provide more tenure-track positions. Feal said these efforts will continue, even amid the gloomy economic and jobs outlook.

A number of departments, Feal said, are trying to create postdoctoral positions for some of their new Ph.D.s, to try to provide "a livable wage" and meaningful work for the next year or two. She applauded these moves to "take responsibility for helping their graduate students."

When the job market is depressed, questions are frequently raised about whether graduate departments should contract a bit. Feal said that programs "should always be asking the question: Do we have the right balance between the numbers of graduate students and the possibility of a good academic career?," and that they should be providing honest, current information about job placements to prospective students. Feal said that she thinks some programs don't conduct regular reviews, and that, if they did, some would cut back.

But Feal cautioned against trying to solve the job market problem by shrinking graduate programs. Many programs are turning out great new professors, whose teaching and research should be advanced. "It would be a shame for academic programs to calibrate the number of students they admit exclusively on short-turn fluctuations. That would be short-sighted and rather sad," she said.

The solution to the problem is "to increase the number of viable academic positions."

Searching for Strategies

Alysia E. Garrison, a Ph.D. candidate in English at the University of California at Davis and president of the MLA's Graduate Student Caucus, said she hears a lot of worry from fellow grad students about the state of the job market. "There is an unspoken fear that the crunch may last longer than one to two years, though no one has an accurate sense of what will happen," she said.

Many grad students are responding as best they can, she said. Many are applying for a wide range of positions -- adjunct jobs and tenure-track jobs, postdocs, anything that will allow them to work in their fields. She also said that students are trying to "package themselves" to be able to apply for more positions, by thinking about how they can fit into various disciplinary interests.

Regardless of strategy, the odds are long. "At least a couple of my friends have applied to upwards of 100 positions in a single year and have landed two, maybe three interviews," she said.

Garrison said it is important for graduate programs to "be honest with students about the challenges of a Ph.D. in the humanities, and provide training for alternatives to the tenure-track job, such as editing and administration." And she said that programs "have an ethical responsibility to fund and support the graduate students they do admit."

Still, she said she would oppose any shrinking of programs. "The declining presence on campus of humanities programs would signal a decline in their importance to the university community," she said. "Admitting fewer graduate students may also justify decisions to cut writing programs and to move toward online delivery models of student instruction, particularly for lower-division writing and literature courses that graduate students have traditionally taught."

It's Not Just the MLA

The MLA is among several humanities disciplines that will hold annual meetings in the next month -- meetings that normally are key times for job interviews. And while final numbers aren't available for other associations, early indications are that they are also seeing large decreases in available jobs.

The American Historical Association is still tallying the results of its jobs survey, but expects it to show a decline in available positions. Officials of the American Philosophical Association did not return calls, but this analysis of the group's job listings suggests a decline on par with that seen by the MLA.

The American Philological Association is seeing indications of a tight job market in the classics. Adam D. Blistein, executive director, said that the number of colleges interviewing for jobs at the group's meeting later this month is expected to be in "the low 40s." That compares to mid-50s last year, and more than 80 and more than 70 in the two years before that.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Disappearing Jobs

  • Decline in jobs
  • Posted by Tom Couser , Professor of English at Hofstra U on December 17, 2009 at 9:30am EST
  • And don't forget that those jobs in creative writing don't require the Ph.D.

  • Full Disclosure?
  • Posted by Belinda on December 17, 2009 at 11:45am EST
  • Are students looking to enroll in these Masters and PhD programs told up front that their job prospects are very limited? If they are taking on loan debt, it would be helpful to know that going in to the program instead of finding out after your graduate.

  • Post-doc positions are a two-edged sword...
  • Posted by vfichera on December 17, 2009 at 12:15pm EST
  • ...because they contribute to the ratcheting up of the publication expectations imposed by institutions as pre-requisites for the entry-level tenure-track position.

    While there is some sense to this in the so-called hard sciences where experimentalists rarely work and publish alone, in the humanities, scholars rarely work and publish in groups. Further, the newly-minted science Ph.D., through participation as a post-doc on major research with projects headed by senior faculty are able to jumpstart their publication record with the benefit of the wisdom and experience of the senior members of the team. Not so for the single humanities post-doc who, at an early stage of his/her career, is expected to churn out publications which are thus more likely to be of less consequence for the profession than work that has had the opportunity to mature or become "seasoned" through collaboration with senior scholars.

    In short, the creation of humanities post-doc positions to retain the institutions' students in a time of recession is problematic for the profession and often amounts to nothing more for the candidate than teaching adjunct-serfdom by a different name.

  • Learning the hard way
  • Posted by Hannah , Ex-Adjunked on December 17, 2009 at 1:00pm EST
  • I"m hoping various publications will spread the word--no, saturate--grad school job sites with the truth that spending 90K on a humanities Ph.D. really will restricted the number of students condemn you to adjunct serfdom, or in this economy, living in your car on EDD and food stamps. If university grad schools had practiced eithics in the first place and restricted the number of doctoral students desiring to ultimately teach in public higher ed, my former adjunct colleagues would not be bunking with friends and family or cashiering at Walmart after their EDD checks stop.

    The main problem is a cultural that is blind to how integral the humanities are to daily life, daily survival. You will find art, poetry, music, philosophical debate, and all forms of "humanities" in nations that are very poor by our standards, yet America falsely assumes what are called the "hard" sciences are the thing to retain in all of education during a recession. In reality, e-pulications such as this, in addition to hundreds of other publications which "hard science" folks read daily depend upon a humanistic wrangling of thought and the type of expansive critical and creative thinking that is demanded of anyone wanting to make it to the CEO or politically supreme level of anything (a cousin who works for Price-Waterhouse in NYC minored in Cultural Studies and had to pass three creativity tests before becoming a CPA there).

    Until American taxpayers (who fund community colleges and public universities) see the value of the humanities to K-12 and higher education--and to society--it seems to be a good thing that potential grad students are being warned BEFORE they shell out tens of thousands of dollars in loan money for that humanities doctorate not to take on twenty years of debt they cannot pay back.

  • Excuse me while I impale myself
  • Posted by Piss Poor Professor , Future unemployed at www.burntoutadjunct.wordpress.com on December 17, 2009 at 1:00pm EST
  • Where does one start?

    With an "historic low" in the numbers (see point one below), what would the rational, measured, prudent choice of action be? Why stay the course, of course.

    Point by point:

    • In the findings bulleted list, the first notes that the listed numbers of open, tenure-track positions tracks along with the number of actual positions (about 55-65%) in the departments. This point, then, acknowledges that the adjunct (which I think is actually quiet higher) open positions are not tracked by the MLA. Why not? This speaks volumes to the status, rank, worth, etc. of the common adjunct in the humanities.
    • New doctorate numbers have not decreased. More people for less positions. Great.
    • Comp and Rhetoric--not why most people go into English studies--lead the open positions--because other fields lament that their students can't write and they themselves can't be bothered to teach them...a position English departments, hard up to ratchet up cache, have encouraged for years in a desperate attempt at relevancy.
    • Only at 70% of adjunctness is a department deemed at a tipping point...Only when 1 in 4 profs have benefits, job security and prestige is there a problem. I think the real problem is with that number.
    • Post-doc positions in a field where one office doesn't speak to its neighbor because, well, most are running scared (see above bullet points) and, let's be honest, English doesn't, on the whole, attract the most extroverted group.
    • Will one job-seeking strategy work? For one, maybe, but with newly minted, eager future-adjuncts graduating to add to the existing pool, no strategy will suffice.
    • Will departments cut back incoming students (future jobless souls)? No, that would lessen the importance of the field among the colleges (said by a graduate student, though).

    English departments are not heeding the counsel of their own subject. Dulce est decorum est.

  • Posted by You Gotta Ask on December 17, 2009 at 1:15pm EST
  • Looking at the numbers, you have to ask why is comp/rhet leading in the percentage of jobs, especially in a field where they tremendously outnumbered? And looking at the joblists and job descriptions, we're not just talking about teaching writing-as-a-service jobs either. There are quite a few research-focused jobs. And those jobs that are more balanced or teaching-focused, even ones at community colleges, are trending towards preferring PhDs in Comp/Rhet instead of MAs or PhDs in lit with experience teaching writing.

  • Supply and demand
  • Posted by Former academic on December 17, 2009 at 1:45pm EST
  • While I believe that graduate programs in the humanities should consider contracting (no point in churning out ever-higher numbers of PhDs when the job market is so soft that it's slushy), prospective students need to do a more in-depth cost-benefit analysis of PhDs in the humanities.

    If student "X" is willing to spend 5 years, accrue $70K of student loan debt, knowing (s)he will end up teaching as an adjunct at 3 colleges, with a snowball's chance in hell of a tenure-track position, so be it. I do think programs need to encourage potential students to think realistically. At my graduate institution (Harvard), the admissions and financial aid offices had information about the current salary levels of recent graduates. If you know you're MA (with $25K of debt) is going to get you $55K in the mid-Atlantic, but the PhD with $50K of debt will get you $70K, you might make a different choice. 

    I'm not in the humanities, but my graduate debt was $30K and my salary is $100K

  • To Piss Poor's Comment above
  • Posted by Paul , Soon-to-be Ph.D. Graduate Student on December 17, 2009 at 2:00pm EST
  • "New doctorate numbers have not decreased. More people for less positions. Great."

    Now tell me . . . what's so great about that? If there are more people vying for less positions, that will create increased competition for those same positions and leave so many people without jobs! It should be more positions to fill, less people if you really want a shot at landing a job.

    I can't believe you would espouse the former viewpoint. Shame on you.

  • the unstainable more apparent
  • Posted by no sympathy on December 17, 2009 at 3:15pm EST
  • Who is surprised by this report? English Departments have known for quite a while that the number of PhD students which they graduate in Literature irresponsibly exceeds the good jobs available in the market. So now in an economic recession an unsustainable practice merely becomes much more apparent. No one should sympathize with the discipline.

    Get a grip, English and MLA. Quit bemoaning the problem and pointing to contributing factors outside of yourself. Don't ignore the problem and focus only on creating post doc positions. Begin by decreasing the number of PhD's you graduate in Literature. And find ways to make your courses and research more relevant to undergraduate students for today's skills-based economy so that you continue to build your major. "But we teach critical thinking" you'll say. Well so does every other discipline in the university. More undergraduates all the time realize that a good appreciation and knowledge of literature does not make one competitive on the job market.

  • Posted by K on December 17, 2009 at 5:00pm EST
  • Paul-I believe that commenter was being sarcastic.

  • News and commentary
  • Posted by GTKarnezis on December 17, 2009 at 9:15pm EST
  • All of this sounds familiar to someone like me who, as an ABD in the late '70's, shared his thoughts about the "job crisis;" see:
    http://web2.adfl.org/adfl/bulletin/v08n1/081006.htm

    I'm sure there are some who are "successful" at getting decent positions, but the shame is that our (their) mentors have done little to remedy matters, though many, especially the academic stars, will talk a good radical game.

    The beat goes on. Some succeed; others fail, not because they are less worthy, but because exploitive working conditions and hiring practices continue to be justified or, worse, be seen as, like the weather, beyond human control. One thing is sure; the lenders of money profit nicely from all those student loans.

  • Cynics
  • Posted by KnowwhatIwant , History on December 17, 2009 at 9:15pm EST
  • It always astonishes me how many scholars with comfy jobs, or those who've retired, scorn those of us who recently chose to do Phds in this market. I was earning six figures in sales, had bought a house and got married (and we have had two kids since starting grad school). I knew jobs were scarce. They've gotten scarcer. I'm $100k in debt now after my Phd. But I wanted to teach a subject I love rather than make cash off of moving crap around the world and lying about what my product did to breadheads with no sense of why we are living this life. Instead of smarmy responses, how about some sympathy for those of us who chose to teach and improve the world? How about sharing a little of your comfy salaries so adjuncts can pay rent? How about some compassion?

  • English has created its own demise
  • Posted by ET on December 17, 2009 at 10:00pm EST
  • English departments have denegrated the teaching of writing, replaced Americal and British literature courses with "theory of everyting" courses like queery theory, gender theory (which is often just discussion of explicit sexual encounters between/among whatever). Students don't read literature: but they are supposed to enjoy all the over-stuffed, arcane theory which means nothing. I feel sorry for new Ph.D.'s who have a degree in theory that will be worthless in a year or two. In addition, many of these new kids can't write well enough to get any kind of job. A Ph.D. in English no longer means anything.

  • K12
  • Posted by Math Prof on December 17, 2009 at 10:45pm EST
  • I'd like to see programs to fast track humanities PhD holders into K12 administrative positions. We need to get people into our schools who were not filtered through our disastrous dumbed down colleges of education.

  • Agree with Math Prof
  • Posted by S on December 18, 2009 at 5:00am EST
  • I do think that there is nothing wrong with earning your PhD and going on to teach at the K-12 level, other than it might be frustrating and feel somewhat limited in scope. If someone really wants to change the system though, what better way than to to reach them young?

    I personally dropped applying to PhD programs in literature last year, despite most of my professors fully encouraging me to continue my studies at the graduate level, because of the rumors of how few positions would be opening up in the next ten years.

    Instead I am applying to MFA's. I started with English lit because I wanted to write. I figure if I am going to come out of graduate school poor and unemployable, I might as well go for it.

  • Full Disclosure and Alternatives
  • Posted by Tena Helton , Director of Graduate Studies in English at University of Illinois at Springfield on December 18, 2009 at 8:15am EST
  • I make it a point BEFORE application to our master's only program that the job market is dismal and has been for some time and will continue to be. Few do, but I feel it my ethical responsibility to make that point. (One of my advisees who still applied said that I "broke her heart" when I told her that, but she applied anyway.) Problem is that our applications have greatly declined and our program may well fizzle (not just due to my pre-app advising, though). Administrators higher up don't like that a cash cow, which is usually grad education--at least where I am--would atrophy and die.

    I wonder, though, that we Ph.D.s who know our content very well and presumably can teach it very well don't go where we can do the most good--public high schools. We'd reach more students and perhaps do more good. Good research is meant to be applied, not squirreled away in an ivory tower and espoused to 20 graduate students a year who may never get a job.

  • Contracting the Number of English Ph.D.s
  • Posted by JM on December 18, 2009 at 8:30am EST
  • To those arguing that English departments should reduce the number of graduate students they admit/graduate, some, perhaps even many departments, already have.

    In any case, the common response to that argument, though, is that English departments are not overproducing graduates. There are just as many sections of writing and literature courses being offered as ever before. What has changed is who teaches those classes--i.e. many if not most are being taught by adjuncts rather than tenure-line faculty. So, the argument goes, the profession needs just as many graduate students as it always has. Another way to pit that would be to say that it needs better working conditions, not fewer workers.

    The question is whether that argument is still valid. This might be something for the MLA to answer.

  • Gender gap
  • Posted by Feminist PhD , PhD candidate, History at Yale on December 18, 2009 at 9:00am EST
  • Let's be honest--- there is a disproportionate number of women among those earning Humanties PhDs---part of the undervaluing of these degrees is also about undervaluing women at high academic levels. Case in point: all of this year's Whiting Fellows at Yale were white men. It made me sick.

  • Posted by JasonM on December 18, 2009 at 10:30am EST
  • Feminist PhD - maybe that means that the Whiting fellows were actually selected on a color-blind, merit basis, for once.

    Anyway, the federal Dept. of Ed. could make a big impression by requiring placement reports from every program, and creating a big searchable database, so prospective PhDs could see what their actual chances of landing an academic job were, before signing up for the slog. Schools would have to report their data as a condition of getting federal funds.

  • plenty of jobs, few with decent pay and benefits
  • Posted by Townsend Harris at CUNY on December 18, 2009 at 4:30pm EST
  • These discussions bemoaning the lack of college teaching jobs for humanities PhDs too quickly dispense with discussing the profession's common characteristics and too quickly focus on the profession's diminishing characteristics. There are plenty of college teaching jobs. More than ever. More students, more faculty, more courses, more sections, more programs, more colleges. More than ever.

    What's disappearing in recent decades? What's disappeared more quickly this last year? Well, secure, decent-paying teaching/research jobs with good benefits are -- from a managerial point-of-view -- anachronistic and irrelevant to the current "mission".

    But there are plenty of college teaching jobs out there. If you're not yet a PhD, you can enroll in graduate school and pick up one or two or more of them while studying for your MPhil. And if you are a PhD, you can pick up three or four of them every year in a large city like New York. Heck, you can have a couple of dozen of them over the course of your academic career. As much as I love stories about how to make lightning strike, I'm much more interested in our common conditions than anyone's exceptionalism.

  • Grim irony
  • Posted by GTKarnezis on December 18, 2009 at 11:30pm EST
  • Townsend, the satire may need some polishing, but it's a pretty good impersonation of someone who doesn't know what he's talking about.

  • Placement Reports
  • Posted by Richard Kimball on December 18, 2009 at 11:30pm EST
  • Jason M has the right idea. When my undergrad advisees apply for admission into grad programs in English, I have them ask directors of graduate studies how many of their program's Ph.D.'s get full-time, tenure-track jobs. The directors not only won't give that info out (or don't even keep track) but also become outraged that potential students would ask.

  • just happy to be here
  • Posted by an oppressed adjunct , English Adjunct at UT Arlington on December 22, 2009 at 4:30pm EST
  • It might have been different. I might have been born on a mountain in Tibet in the 13th century. Think of how my very important mental energy would have been wasted on agriculture!

    I've got PhD apps out right now. (I teach freshman comp. with an MA, earning double the poverty line for one person.) I think I'm blessed to even have a shot at an academic profession. Some lit people, like me, are idealists. I tend to measure down from perfection. If I'm not careful, it can make me a grumpy Gus or an entitled... Ellen... ?

    Anyway, I have a hard time with my peers who claim moral superiority over the people who keep universities solvent.

  • @ GTKarnezis
  • Posted by an oppressed adjunct , English Adjunct at UT Arlington on December 22, 2009 at 5:15pm EST
  • Also...

    In defense of Townsend, I made around a dozen calls this time last year and landed an adjunct job at a CUNY school. Not as hard as you'd think. Actually, it was ridiculously easy in New York, the abyssal center of the current recession. After you read Townsend's title, "plenty of jobs, few with decent pay and benefits," you start to understand his point that the jobs available just aren't that hot.

    Your cleverly worded potshot made me smile, but what exactly is your criticism?

  • Posted by Mike on December 23, 2009 at 5:00am EST
  • "Are students looking to enroll in these Masters and PhD programs told up front that their job prospects are very limited?"
    _________

    I can't speak for everyone, but way back in the early 1990s I certainly WAS told that my prospects were very limited. Many programs, including my own, considered such warnings to be required boilerplate to give to all incoming students.

    But here's the rub: at age 21(almost 22), when I received that warning, I wasn't really sure how to process it. After all, I'd already defied the odds to get accepted into the program: 135 applicants for 4 spots in the program. Perhaps I'm unusual, but I suspect that MOST people who beat those kind of odds assume that they'll do so again at the next level. I certainly thought so.

    But there's another thing I thought: I could LIVE on $12,000 per year plus health insurance (remember, this was the early 1990s). The future would take care of itself. I was set for at least 4 years at a livable (though not sumptuous) wage-- and that's without even considering part-time or summer work. Not bad during a recession.

    Well, it worked out for me, but that's not the point. The point is that at age 21 it's not like warnings exactly did very much good. So, yeah, I think people ARE being warned their prospects are limited. I'm just not sure to what effect.

  • Posted by Mike on December 23, 2009 at 5:00am EST
  • "You will find art, poetry, music, philosophical debate, and all forms of "humanities" in nations that are very poor by our standards, yet America falsely assumes what are called the "hard" sciences are the thing to retain in all of education during a recession."
    ___________

    Ironies abound: most grad programs in sciences couldn't find enough first-tier students if not for international students.

  • @oppressed adjunct
  • Posted by GTKarnezis on December 26, 2009 at 4:30am EST
  • RE: "Jobs in Academe" If you'll take the trouble to read what I wrote over thirty years ago (see my first entry's link) you'll get all my thoughts on this issue. Rereading Townsend's piece, perhaps a better response would have been to inquire just what his point was. That there are crappy jobs for folks out there? Well, Duh! That people should gobble them up as they work hard on their advanced degrees? And your statement about feeling "blessed" and your apologia for all those administrators who are keeping universities afloat (duh: with their high salaries as they hire more and more "blessed" part-timers) is utterly dumfounding. How come there are now adjunct Deans, Presidents or other contingent positions in the managerial world of academe? Let's be clear about who's "blessed," OK?