Search News


Browse Archives

News

Ifs, Ands and Butts

January 12, 2010

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Blame it on the rock stars.

A semester after instituting a campus-wide smoking ban, Boise State University is backtracking. Under an unpublicized exemption approved by officials last month, the university will allow smoking in designated areas at its Taco Bell Arena. It’s simply impractical to have to tell the likes of George Strait that he can’t have a cigar on stage, much less usher his roadies to the edges of campus for a smoke break, arena officials say.

“Certainly if we were to send security on stage to prevent an artist from smoking [we're not] going to be in business any longer,” said Ron Janeczko, associate director of the arena.

The smoking ban also wasn’t practical for audience members, Janeczko added. Since the arena doesn’t allow re-admittance, smokers couldn’t leave the venue for a cigarette and return later, he said.

In addition to the arena, Boise State will allow for designated smoking areas at its football stadium and the Morrison Center for the Performing Arts.

The added exemptions at Boise State highlight the difficulties colleges across the country have had maintaining all-out bans and ensuring absolute compliance. While a number of college officials say the bans are mostly honored, they concede that some students continue to flout the rule on the fringes of campus and that enforcement is simply impossible on game days that draw thousands of visitors who are either ignorant of the policies or just don’t feel compelled to follow them. That’s not to say, however, that health officials think the bans lack merit.

“Overwhelmingly we think the policy has been great,” said Jennifer Summers, health educator at Boise State.

A wave of smoking bans took hold on college campuses last year, and now at least 381 institutions have all-out prohibitions or significant restrictions, according to Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights, a national lobbying group that pursues legislative restrictions on tobacco use. It’s of little surprise that colleges haven’t seen absolute compliance in the first years of their bans, and the policies are likely to garner more support over time, according to Liz Williams, project manager of Americans for Nonsmokers Rights

“It definitely becomes part of the culture, and self-enforcement and self-compliance is a major part of any smoke-free law, especially on campus,” she said.

But colleges are wrestling with how to handle that small percentage of students, faculty and staff who may not abide by the policy. At Grand Rapids Community College, a fine system has been put in place for enforcement. Violators are given two warnings, and on the third offense they are made to pay $15. Fines increase to $30 thereafter.

Grand Rapids instituted fines in September, a year after the smoking ban was established. Since that time, campus police have issued just eight warnings about the policy and have not fined anyone for a third offense, according to Sara Dorer, associate director of student conduct.

While Grand Rapids students have largely complied with the ban, area businesses have complained about the flood of students leaving the campus to smoke outside storefronts. Those complaints have triggered further discussion about creating designated smoking areas at the college, something supporters of an all-out ban are concerned about.

“It would [disappoint] me personally,” Dorer said. “Can we truly call ourselves tobacco-free if we have a designated smoking area? In a sense it feels like a step back. We’ve made some significant improvements. I’d hate to see us step back.”

For some institutions, continuing to allow smoking is no longer an option. Such is the case in Iowa, where lawmakers passed legislation in spring of 2008 that forbids smoking in almost all public places. Violators of the policy, who can be reported to campus police or the State Department of Health, face fines of $50.

Kathy Green, director of university health services at the University of Northern Iowa, said campus police have only issued a handful of citations since the ban was implemented. Students largely comply with the ban, although the law is occasionally broken by visitors who show up for football games, she said.

“I’m sure we don’t have 100 percent compliance there, and the police aren’t running around trying to grab everyone who has a cigarette,” Green said. “Whatever is accomplished by peer pressure is probably all that happens on those [game] days.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Ifs, Ands and Butts

  • Posted by keep it to yourself on January 12, 2010 at 11:45am EST
  • I realize people have the right to smoke, but they do not have the right to damage other peoples' lungs or cause other people's discomfort.

    I really don't see why we need to accommodate smoking in arenas. Do we have designated drinking areas in places where alcohol is banned? Designated heroin-shooting areas? Designated sex areas for sex addicts? If people can't attend an event without needing to smoke, perhaps they should rethink their lifestyle choices because it means there's an addiction there. If you can't go an evening or an afternoon without a cigarette, you have a bigger problem than there not being a smoking area. Wear a patch for the afternoon or bring your nicotine gum and let the rest of us breathe. Your choice to start smoking and become addicted doesn't mean others should suffer. Truth be told, I can't even sit next to a smoker without having an allergic reaction because it gets into clothing and hair and does not go away when you put the cigarette out.

    Entire campuses are different because students, staff and faculty have to be there all day, but I still think it's unfair for the rest of us to have to breathe and smell the filth that is tobacco smoke. Smokers brought the ban on themselves by not observing rules that say you need to smoke away from entrances so that those of us who have illnesses, allergies, or just don't want to smell bad don't have to walk through your smoke. If you can't observe those rules, then you need to be confined to an area away from people who you, make no mistake, cause harm to by smoking.

  • Posted by Sarah , Associate Professor on January 12, 2010 at 1:00pm EST
  • If students and faculty would just quit this filthy habit, it would be best for all of us. I cannot even stand to have a smoker come into my office area (which is cut from the main hallway by an anteroom, so no airflow.) The smell lingers for so long, I am forced to open the windows on sub-zero days to air out my office area. I also have asthma and severe allergies. Much like an open-sewer, such a stink should be banned.

  • Let's find someone to Beat-Up!
  • Posted by Ex-Smoker at University Near you on January 12, 2010 at 2:00pm EST
  • I am an ex-smoker, that's right I kicked the habbit. It seems that ex-smokers tend to go towards two extremes; 1) militantly fanactical that every smoker quits (remember Larry Hagmann) and B) Advocate of smokers rights. Did I say smokers rights? How dare I bring up the notion that a smoker has rights.

    Smokers are such a fun bunch to be intolerant of, a target for hate and it's encouraged to attack them ruthlessly. They're weak, inconsiderate, dregs of society! This attitude makes me sick. What a great gift to human nature a PC group towards whom you can direct all hate and be congratulated while you do it. Smokers have no rights.

    Last time I checked smoking was legal. I agree that smokers should be put off 50 feet from building entrances, that people with exsisting health conditions (i.e. asthma and others) should be accomodated. I always was a respectivbe smoker (yes you can be a smoker and respects others rights) I also never littered the ground with my butts, filed stripped and disposed of properly.

    If a smoker wants to light up outside an arena, bar, stadium, library withinm a designated area what's the harm in letting them do that? Put your hate away.

  • In loco parentis
  • Posted by Voltaire on January 12, 2010 at 4:30pm EST
  • Curious! We deleted from our colleges and universities the notion that we should guide and form our students, in loco parentis. And now here we are forcing them to act in ways that we find biologically correct? Smoking is not illegal. Students should be allowed designated smoking areas on campus. For 99+% of the population a little secondary smoke now and then is no big deal. In Paris you get a lot. Nobody seems to die of it. In fact the French have longer life spans than we do at every level of society. The tyranny of health-care professionals is as unacceptable as any other tyranny. Oh, by the way, I don't smoke.

  • public relations problems
  • Posted by former dean of students on January 12, 2010 at 5:30pm EST
  • A private Church affiliated college I worked for banned smoking about 20 years ago only to have our students sit on the lawns of our wealthy neighbors to smoke and cause a safety hazard crossing the street. We found the only viable solution was allowing smoking at one campus location near the dumpster. It conveyed our message that smoking wasn't encouraged, but protected our neighbors from harassment. The X feet from any entrance ban has never worked in my experience. You either have to place an ash tray stand XX feet from the door or your entrance becomes an ash tray.

  • Perfect, Voltaire!
  • Posted by DFS on January 12, 2010 at 7:00pm EST
  • And I am smoker, always considerate even among other smokers, who is fortunate to teach at a sprawling campus in enough open country where I can go and have a cigarette at least fifty feet away from any entrance -- we require 25 -- in no time at all.

    But, I do have a colleague in another department who requires her students who smoke to wash their hands before they enter either her classroom or her laboratory, only because they smoke.

  • Posted on January 12, 2010 at 7:15pm EST
  • Like many other legal activities (sex and drinking come to mind) smoking is regulated, and with good reason. Just because something feels good doesn't mean we as a society have to let you do it anywhere you want. We don't allow sex in public places, even if it's legal, because we don't all want to watch. We allow drinking in designated places, not just anywhere. We don't allow food and drink into archives containing priceless papers. We don't allow driving on sidewalks, though driving is legal. Smoking should be the same way. You can do it in your home, in your yard, in a designated area (but please pick up your butts and put them in the trash! Filters take forever to decompose!) but you don't need to do it everywhere. Where is the sense of entitlement coming from, that smokers have the right to pollute others' air? Smoke in your car, in your home, whatever, but I don't want to breathe it. I don't hate smokers, but I do hate not being able to breathe. As an adult, I have the right to do many things, but I don't do them at the expense of others' comfort and safety. There are respectful smokers, and I wish they would teach other smokers that you don't stand in doorways, you don't just toss butts anywhere, you don't dangle a cigarette out a car window in someone else's face.

  • BEAT THE BANS!!!
  • Posted by Dan Robertson on January 22, 2010 at 6:00pm EST
  • I have purchased a smoking alternative called Crown7. The Electric cigarette devices only emit water vapor but allow you to get your nicotine fix. So this product will not annoy others, it does not smell, nor does it let off any second hand smoke.