Search News


Browse Archives

News

Outsourcing Language Learning

January 22, 2010

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Almost a decade ago, Drake University stirred up controversy by eliminating its foreign language departments and thereby the jobs of faculty in French, German and Italian, even those with tenure.

Traditional lecture and language lab instruction was replaced with the Drake University Language Acquisition Program (DULAP): small discussion groups led by on-campus native speakers, a weekly session with a scholar of the language, a one-semester course on language acquisition and the use of several Web-based learning technologies.

Critics feared the evisceration of language departments, the elimination of countless tenure-track and adjunct jobs, and the prospect of students not actually learning the languages they’d signed up to study.

But not everything that could go wrong, in critics’ eyes, did go wrong. Other institutions haven’t followed suit by dramatically dismantling their language departments and firing faculty en masse, though some departments have shrunk under budget pressures and waning student interest. For them, and for institutions that hope to expand their language offerings but can’t hire new traditional instructors, the Drake model may offer a way for students to learn foreign languages.

“Facility with a language other than English is a general education goal that every institution should have,” said Richard H. Ekman, president of the Council of Independent Colleges. “Not to be cliché, but the world is being globalized. Understanding contemporary cultures of other countries, being able to understand their newspapers and television, is an important part of that language education.”

Though Ekman said he “would argue that a good education would include literature in English and in another language,” he thinks students not planning to pursue academic or literary careers would be served well by conversational knowledge of a language.

Ekman’s is an acknowledgment that practical language learning is what many students want and need. With a three-year grant from W.M. Keck Foundation – which ends this spring – CIC has supported the Network for Effective Language Learning (NELL), offering about two dozen member institutions a chance to learn about DULAP and to use as much or as little of Drake's model as they like for their own language programs.

Rosemary G. Feal, executive director of the Modern Language Association, declined to comment on specific programs, though she did offer a general statement: "Clearly, giving students access to less commonly taught languages is important, and if that access comes by means of a well researched, academically sound program, then students will benefit."

Taking on the Drake Model

The Sage Colleges, with campuses in Albany and Troy, New York, adopted the Drake program’s structure last fall to begin offering Italian. Students were interested in studying the language – many so that they could communicate with Italian-speaking family members.

Sharon Robinson, dean of Russell Sage College, said the institution “just couldn’t afford more full-time language faculty.” Because “adjuncts are really tough to find in our area,” the DULAP model presented a way for Sage to offer new languages.

Sage wasn’t trying to eliminate its Spanish and French programs and faculty, said David Salomon, chair of Sage’s department of English and modern languages, but to add to them without incurring costs and logistical challenges it was unprepared to face. “We didn’t do this to replace anything,” he said. “This is additional.”

During the first semester of the Sage Language Acquisition Program, students met three days each week for conversation with a native speaker “language partner” and a few other students, one day a week with an “outside examiner” – a Ph.D. in Italian -- and one day to discuss language acquisition strategies and course technology with the college's French professor. As it played out, Salomon said, the course was “not an independent study, not an online course, not just a discussion group, but kind of a blend of those things."

Four groups of four or five students each met with Ivana Garita, a Fulbright fellow with two master’s degrees from Italian universities, one in teaching methodologies and one in the teaching of secondary school English. Each week, Garita led three hour-long conversations for each group, creating what she called “a more direct and comfortable learning environment” than a traditional classroom. “Students,” she added, “feel less frustrated by participating in the learning activities and all of them have the chance to say something.”

Over the course of the term, most students went from having “zero” knowledge of the language to now being “able to say some sentences,” Garita said. “They’ve learned to understand and use familiar everyday expressions and very basic phrases.” They can introduce themselves, ask questions and “interact in a simple way.” Though the changes have been “small,” they have been “very satisfying” for Garita and for the students themselves.

At the same time they worked with Garita, the students also had a weekly session via Webcam with an outside examiner who offered instruction on grammar, proctored oral exams and advised students on how to improve their written and spoken skills, which were collected using the Mahara e-portfolio platform. Robinson and Salomon declined to identify the outside examiner, who was not rehired at the end of the fall semester for reasons they would not disclose.

They decided to take on the Drake model after experiencing it firsthand, at CIC’s summer 2008 NELL meeting at Pacific Lutheran University in Tacoma, Wash., where they got a taste of the program with introductory sessions in Russian. “It was totally non-intimidating,” Robinson said. “It was a little bit messy in comparison to traditional language learning but it didn’t matter because we really got to dive in and actually learn.”

Harland Rall, chair of Abilene Christian University’s foreign language department, was not a part of NELL, but decided to adopt the Drake model as a way to expand limited language offerings. “We had economic constraints and faculty constraints to teach languages other than the most common ones,” he said. “Complete online instruction wasn’t what we wanted, so DULAP was a good solution.”

Abilene Christian piloted Mandarin during the 2008-9 academic year using the Drake model of a supervising professor and a native speaker conversation partner. The professor, Rall said, was in Beijing, and on-campus graduate students fluent in Mandarin led discussions. Arabic is taught by a professor in Tunisia.

Just as at Sage, the Drake language model is a means for expansion, Rall said. “It doesn’t threaten our hiring policies for the languages we are servicing. It’s a way of extending our department and we’re thrilled to be able to do it.”

That, too, is how Ekman, CIC’s president, sees the model working. “Some places have pretty healthy language programs but want to offer more,” he said, “and others have seen their language programs getting worse and worse and worse, with students not drawn to languages and budgets cut to the bone.”

Drake-based programs, he added, aren’t intended to help colleges pare down their language faculties but, rather, “to reflect the realities” at institutions with limited resources that want to be able to offer students the languages they want to study.

Are They Learning?

Despite the heaps of criticism that were leveled against Drake’s program for its first half-decade or so, CIC opted to work to spread it because, as Ekman told Inside Higher Ed in early 2007, it "is a winning approach, in which students have greater progress and reach a level of functional competency earlier."

For Abilene Christian and for Sage, it was the speed of learning and the conversational skills that convinced them to take on the Drake model.

There has been no comprehensive study of how Drake’s students compare to students who learn languages in a more traditional way. But the anecdotal evidence is there, many times over, said Jan Marston, director of DULAP from its founding until last year.

When students trained at the Des Moines, Iowa, university study abroad, she said, “they’re placed in classes way above where the seat time would indicate they should be.” Students report back that while other students in their programs abroad speak English to each other, “Drake students are speaking Russian to the Russians.”

Marc Cadd, who directs Drake’s World Languages and Cultures program -- DULAP’s successor -- said students are generally placed two semesters ahead of where they would be at Drake when they study elsewhere. For instance, students who had finished Drake’s Spanish 101 and 102 classes would likely be placed into a third-year language class when studying abroad in a Spanish-speaking country “primarily on the strength of their speaking skills.”

The argument, Cadd said, “isn’t that this is a better model than anything else,” just that it works for many students who are interested in using a language for business, travel or family interactions, rather than to become scholars of French or Japanese literature. This spring, about 130 of the university’s 3000 undergraduates are learning languages using the DULAP method. Most majors don’t have a foreign language requirement, nor does the university have a general education language requirement.

Drake offers no language instruction option other than DULAP, but when students find that DULAP doesn’t work for them – or they don’t want to try it – they can choose to take languages at other Des Moines-area colleges and universities. “A few do that each semester, just because it’s a mismatch of teaching and learning styles,” Cadd said.

Only Online

DULAP's success helped Marston win a $788,177 grant last yea from the federal government’s National Security Education Program to start the Virtual Language Studies (VSL) program, a fully course that builds on her DULAP work.

Drake is, so far, offering Mandarin and Russian through entirely virtual means. Just as with DULAP, students meet three times a week with language partners and once a week with a professor with an advanced degree in second language acquisition or the language being taught. Group sessions are conducted using Adobe Acrobat Connect and one-on-one meetings with professors are conducted using Skype. “We’re reorienting our thinking to take advantage of cloud computing,” she said, “to think about how to teach and learn when we’re not bound by place.”

Especially with less commonly taught languages, Marston said, small colleges may struggle to find even the four or five students necessary to run a DULAP-like program or to have a qualified native speaker who can lead discussions. With VLS, she said, it’s possible that “the professor will be at one institution and the four students in the group will be from four different institutions and they all see each other and interact with each other.”

Students at Abilene Christian are learning Arabic, Japanese, Mandarin and Russian through VSL. Sage will begin offering Mandarin this spring and Arabic and Russian in the fall.

Seven students at Southern Vermont College will begin studying Mandarin through VLS this spring, said Charles Crowell, an associate professor of business and director of the college’s Build the Enterprise program. The college first learned about DULAP and VLS through the Council of Independent Colleges’ program last summer.

In addition to coursework through VLS, Crowell said, students will also do supplementary work using college-provided Kindles and iPhones or iPod Touches, part of his broader effort to bring mobile technologies into collegiate learning.

“It’s about innovation, new ideas, making learning more vital, more alive, more engaging for young adults who are emerging out of the current digital culture,” he said.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Outsourcing Language Learning

  • Insourcing vs. outsourcing...
  • Posted by vfichera on January 22, 2010 at 10:30am EST
  • In the past, I admired Drake's DULAP model (and arranged to help promote it by organizing panels at conferences which featured it) precisely because it did not "outsource" but rather "insourced" its language instruction on an experimental basis. It created a new structure that was not a traditional language department but the academic and financial control was firmly within the hands of Drake University faculty who ran the new program.

    My major criticism of the Drake program is Drake's failure to commit itself fully to the program by tenuring its faculty. (I emailed Drake for more information on this issue a few weeks ago but do not have a reply.) In other words, Drake is now "insourcing" all right: failing to provide permanence to the venture but controlling it completely.

    The attraction of collaborative models between and among non-profit higher education institutions is that they do not "outsource" in the traditional sense: they do not privatize that part of their educational operation. It is, I would proffer, the best way to proceed -- especially in light of the court cases that make distinctions in the applications of copyright law to the private for-profit researcher vs. the non-profit educational research environment, for example.

    There is much to lose when non-profits begin to privatize parts of themselves, and the attraction of Drake's models (which actually build on -- by blending -- the LxC model at Binghamton University and a model of off-site, non-traditional delivery of instruction and testing for less-commonly taught languages which was centered at Cornell, whose name and acronym escape me for the moment) is that they do not go down that privatization path.

    However, until Drake tenures its faculty in these programs, the suspicion that this is simply a cost-cutting way of eliminating tenure will continue to be fueled. Instead of leading the way to the expansion of blended instruction, Drake will inspire faculty to be hesitant to adopt the models, for there is such a thing as throwing a baby out with the bathwater and faculty are correct to resist their administrations when contingency is the watchword of the day.

  • Non-academic study of languages? How about extending that idea?
  • Posted by German prof on January 22, 2010 at 11:00am EST
  • "The argument, Cadd [director of Drake’s World Languages and Cultures program] said, 'isn’t that this is a better model than anything else,' just that it works for many students who are interested in using a language for business, travel or family interactions, rather than to become scholars of French or Japanese literature."

    In other words, this model works when language instruction is purely instrumental and not really academic. What would happen if we extended the model to other fields in the academy? For example, does a future journalist really need any science taught by a Ph.D.? The few basic notions he or she might need to write an occasionally feature article about the local chemical plant could easily be covered by a handout and an occasional chat with a local chemist.

    Though certainly my life involves thousands of chemical, biological, and physical processes every hour, they seem to happen just fine without my knowing the composition of molecules involved or the formula to calculate what's involved in standing up from my desk chair. So do I really need to have taken so much science as an undergraduate?

    No, of course not, if we're racing for the bottom line or the lowest possible level of attainment. The heart of liberal education, it seems to me, has been educating young people to have the potential to be their very best, to seek knowledge endlessly throughout their lives, to have a basic understanding of all fields to enable them to learn more about them when they are encountered in their lives. Learning a little Italian is great, no doubt about it, but I don't think it's usually the job of an institution of post-secondary education to facilitate something so basic--there are language courses outside the academy for that. Learning a little Italian and being introduced to the culture, politics, history, art, and yes, the literature of Italy in the process--now that's a valuable part of liberal education. Italian without Dante is possible, but why not have both in an academic setting? You don't have to become a literary critic to enjoy reading Dante or to gain something quite valuable from his work.

    The Drake model may be fine in very limited doses for very limited schools with a tight concentration on vocational training. But any school claiming any degree of connection to liberal education should reject it as incompatible with its basic philosophy of learning. We owe our students more.

  • On Campus Native Speakers
  • Posted by Edward Monks , Assistant Director/Enrichment and Professional Development at Institute of International Education on January 22, 2010 at 11:15am EST
  • If you are thinking of implementing the Drake language model and would like to host on-campus Fulbright native speakers as described in the article, the Institute of International Education (IIE) is currently accepting applications for the 2010-11 Fulbright Foreign Language Teaching Assistant (FLTA) Program. Specific information on becoming a host institution is available at http://www.flta.fulbrightonline.org/become.html.

  • This is Not University Education
  • Posted by Jim Clark , Psychology at University of Winnipeg on January 22, 2010 at 11:15am EST
  • Hi

    When I took French as an undergraduate, the primary orientation of the class was French literature and composition in the original language. That is, it was NOT primarily about basic learning of a language. I fail to see how learning a second language is a legitimate university credit, given many such courses are offered at the high school level, which is where I acquired my basic understanding of French not in university. Moreover, immersion students learn the second language in elementary school. And of course, native speakers learn their language prior to school. How can something acquired by others in preschool, elementary school, and high school merit university credit?

    This is not to deny the value of learning a second language, just wondering why it deserves university credit.

    Take care

    Jim

  • two reactions
  • Posted by Language prof on January 22, 2010 at 2:15pm EST
  • 1. Being a native speaker of a language does not automatically make you a good teacher of it or a decent conversationalist. When will we stop fetishizing native speakers? What better way to discourage students from learning another language since we are essentially telling them they will never be good enough because they can never speak as well as a native.

    2. As the German prof also noted, why not apply Drake's model to other disciplines? I suspect most professors of biology, physical therapy, business, etc would scoff at the suggestion that speaking a few times a week with a biologist, physical therapist or business person is pedagogically sound practice. Why should learning a language be held to a different (lower) standard?

  • Some questions
  • Posted by KS on January 22, 2010 at 3:30pm EST
  • Some aspects of the DULAP approach appear promising, and others just raise questions.

     

    1. An extensive and ever-growing body of research examines how languages can most effectively be taught and learned. To what extent does this research inform language instruction offered in the DULAP model? Depending on how well the leader structures the small group discussions, this form of instruction could be extremely productive—or not so much.

     

    2. As Language prof noted, whether or not someone is a native speaker of a language has little to do with how effectively s/he can teach it. A highly proficient non-native speaker can be an highly effective language instructor.

     

    3. What does “a scholar of the language” mean? Does this mean that a person with the applied linguistics knowledge is relegated to a small fraction of the contact hours with the learners? Or does it mean that someone who researches an obscure aspect of phonology or literature is plopped into a language teaching role that s/he may or may not be equipped for?

  • Are these statistics really telling?
  • Posted by David Graber at Private teacher on January 22, 2010 at 4:15pm EST
  • 130 students out of 3000? It looks like this could simply be a matter of self-selecting students of high motivation (since there is, it seems, no language requirement at Drake). And doesn't it seem more likely that the students are doing better because the class sizes are so much smaller than at a traditional language class?

  • to outsource or not to outsource
  • Posted by tom abeles , editor at On the Horizon on January 22, 2010 at 5:00pm EST
  • We need to be very careful in considering the Drake program in language in light of the larger pictures emerging in post secondary education.

    First, we have to be careful that we do not become reactionary, like the pilots when the electronic cockpits allowed for the elimination of the "flight engineer" or the brakemen when roller bearings came to the rails. Today grades 13-16 are basically extensions of preK-12 where the focus is on meeting continuing education of students. It is or must be student-centric. We see this with increasing number of advanced courses in secondary school accepted in post secondary institutions and many other factors making the transition almost seamless, and, in the current climate, almost required. The argument that there is an academic chasm to be leaped seems almost moot.

    Secondly, the major difference is "who pays" which basically changes the focus to the student (rather than a parent) and the employers that are expecting different skill sets for college graduates. It is primarily in research institutions where the faculty hold some sway as to what happens. And even here, few academics, unlike earlier times, are sufficiently wealthy to set their own research agenda, particularly in the technical arena.

    Third, few institutions can afford to have one of every possible discipline. Thus we are seeing more collaboration between institutions, formally and informally, including course sharing of both students and faculty. The continuing rise of the entire virtual world allows the traditional "just-in-case" knowledge to be found in the global "cloud", including that structured in courses, thus changing the role of faculty. The growing emphasis on all forms of social networking and "just-in-time" knowledge networks point out that what once existed inside the walls of the ivory tower is rapidly leaking out through growing cracks.

    Fourth, specifically regarding language and what constitutes a "college experience", we need to look first at English, the skill that college graduates bring to the workplace, and even the quality of the writing that academics exhibit in their own professional articulation from the lecturn, in pod casts and academic writing. And, while one may wish for students to approach learning a foreign language in scholarly fashion, only a small percentage will trod that path.

    Drake's program is but one of a number of signals that, except for select medallion universities, and even there, only in selected programs, we are seeing in post secondary education-- what Clayton Christensen has described as disruptive innovation.

    I do not believe that faculty have the will power to take back that which they have ceded to the administration in exchange for a sinecure. Until that point, the trends decried here will only add to the ululations about pay raises, parking, travel grants and corner windows.

  • This says it all
  • Posted by John , Assoc Dean on January 23, 2010 at 10:30am EST
  • There has been no comprehensive study of how Drake’s students compare to students who learn languages in a more traditional way.

  • The narrow-mindness of some people!
  • Posted by marie on January 23, 2010 at 10:30am EST
  • This is just another example of how to
    1. Save money at the expense of Foreign Language departments which in the view of most American administrators are useless.
    2. Devalue a series of legit academic disciplines.
    3. Make sure that Americans are less competitive on the world market.
    4. Show how anti-intellectual some American administrators can be.

    This also explains why Japanese and Korean cars are so popular everywhere in the world and why GM, Ford and Chrysler do not sell.
    You can buy in your language... but you need to sell it in the buyer language. And if you do not know that language, how to relate to that buyer, you are toast!

  • Facilitating language learning
  • Posted by sam , Director at Le Beaumont Language Centre on January 23, 2010 at 10:30am EST
  • The Drake program is inovative, practical and ingenius! Language is a tool. Drake program is just doing the facilitation work in a campus environment.

    The Drake program creates enormous value for the leaners. It adds diversity to the language landscape in a university.

    Why must learning at the university always be dull, boring and irrelevant? Why can't it be simple, interactive and useful? I am all for it.

  • Posted by German prof on January 23, 2010 at 1:00pm EST
  • Sam, language is more than simply a tool: this is one of the primary arguments for including the study of language--and cultural expressions in that language (such as literature, film, political and historical discourses, music, philosophy, etc.)--as part of liberal education. Language expresses essential cultural differences and may even contribute to their development over time. And with the academic study of language (that is, facilitated by professionals with Ph.D.s and training in second language pedagogy) comes the study of deeper structures, whether linguistic, literary, political, or more generally cultural.

    This study does not merely assist those studying literature and culture, but also aids in the serious study of other disciplines, such as history, philosophy, international relations, art history, music, and even the natural sciences. Many unique scientific opportunities are opened up through even basic familiarity with a second language.

    There's a place for the kind of non-academic study the Drake model promotes. But it is not as part of liberal education.

    Finally, there's simply no validity to the claim that the dominant model of language instruction in the academy is, in your words, "dull, boring and irrelevant" rather than "simple, interactive and useful." I would dispute "simple" in favor of "accessible," but I would certainly claim the remaining qualifiers for my own teaching and teaching philosophy. And I would add "effective as a full-fledged component of liberal education," too. Can the Drake model claim that, or is it really after a quite distinctive goal?

  • A vote for Drake's system
  • Posted by Street-Smart Language Learning on January 24, 2010 at 7:15am EST
  • I'm not educator, but I'm a frequent student of languages who has been very unimpressed with all of the institutional language instruction I've ever had. It ultimately got to the point where I avoided it wherever I could because the results I got on my own were so much better, and indeed the method I used was much closer to Drake's program than traditional language programs.

    More of my thoughts on Drake's program can be found <a href="http://www.streetsmartlanguagelearning.com/2010/01/why-didn-my-university-teach-languages.html">here</a> on my blog.

  • A Response from Drake
  • Posted by Marc Cadd , Director, World Languages and Cultures at Drake University on January 24, 2010 at 7:00pm EST
  • "Outsourcing" is an interesting word in the context of language education. Maybe it's just a matter of semantics, but I don't believe anyone at Drake would use it. We feel our model simply allows us to offer our students an opportunity to learn languages they would otherwise not have an opportunity to learn. And sharing resources for language learning was one of the reasons the Keck Foundation and the CIC helped us develop a consortium through NELL.

    Regarding another point made in this discussion, Drake has, in fact, made a commitment to our program by making four professors on campus tenure-track. The adjuncts we employ seem grateful to have the work in this time of stretched economic resources and we are grateful for their professional knowledge.

    I appreciate the opportunity to discuss what we are doing.

  • Not the last word
  • Posted by Joe Lenz , Dean, College of Arts & Sciences and Professor of English at Drake University on January 25, 2010 at 5:30am EST
  •  

    As the Dean of Arts & Sciences at Drake, I feel compelled to correct some misunderstandings about our language program expressed in the commentary.

     

     

     

    Faculty status: As Marc Cadd just noted, while “vfichera” is correct that language faculty had contingent status, this year they were converted to tenure-track, precisely to demonstrate our commitment to the program and to tenure. (Note to vfichera: I do not know to whom you sent your e-mail, but I apologize that you did not receive a response to your inquiry.)

     

     

     

    Language students: It s true that Drake does not have a language requirement of all students. However, the students enrolled in our courses are not self-selected high achievers, as one writer suggested. Students majoring in International Relations and International Business do have a language requirement, Art History is considering instituting one, and some teaching endorsements require language. Of course some students do choose to learn a language. The beauty of Virtual Language Studies, described above, is that such students can be accommodated even when an institution does not have someone “in house” with whom that student can study

     

     

     

    Course content: Recently, DULAP changed its name to World Languages and Cultures to draw attention to the fact that language and culture are inseparable, that one cannot learn one without learning the other. I hope “German prof” will be happy to learn that from the beginning, literature, film, music, politics, history, popular culture, art, and so on are part of the students’ language learning experience. We have also just approved a new certificate in language and cultural competency, which requires study abroad (in the target language) and continued language study upon return.

     

     

     

    Cost-cutting: Our language program is not inexpensive. We have four full time faculty, a full-time program administrator (with faculty rank), an educational technologist, a program administrative assistant, a number of off-campus adjuncts, and the language partners – all for, as noted above, 130 students. You can do the math on the per student cost. And that does not include the technological infrastructure needed for virtual instruction. Clearly, we have made a significant investment in language learning because we think it is essential to preparing engaged global citizens. We also hope that number expands, as indeed was the recommendation of a recent task force that examined the program.

     

  • After ten years, at last tenure-tracks appear...
  • Posted by vfichera on January 25, 2010 at 5:30am EST
  • ...at Drake in its language programs -- and its adjuncts are "grateful"?

    Thank you for the update, but actually, the response isn't very encouraging, is it?

    I'd almost have preferred to remain in the dark....

  • Thanks for the clarifications, Dean Lenz
  • Posted by German prof on January 25, 2010 at 10:15am EST
  • Dean Lenz, thank you for the clarifications of Drake's language programs.

    It is perhaps a bitter irony of the Drake model that it began by letting all of its existing language faculty go, implemented a new system of language teaching and learning, and now, according to your comment, has both reintroduced tenured or tenure-track faculty members and a renewed inclusion of "literature, film, music, politics, history, popular culture, art, and so on" "from the beginning" of language instruction. I do not know all of the circumstances involved in the original introduction of NELL/DULAP that involved the elimination of the previous tenure-track language lines, nor do I know whether you were the Dean at the time, Dr. Lenz. However, the statements of Dr. Cadd regarding the emphasis of the program certainly gave the impression of a, well, quite frankly, anti-liberal arts understanding of language instruction. I wish that you had had the opportunity to comment on the Drake program for the original article. Were you contacted by IHE?

    I do find it unfortunate that an institution claiming to offer its students "integration of the liberal arts and sciences with professional preparation" (http://www.drake.edu/about/) does not apparently feature any possible major in advanced studies in any of the languages taught there. From the comments of Dr. Cadd and Drake students in the original article (though not in your comment, of course), the intensive study of the culture, literature, and language of non-English-speaking world cultures seems to be frowned upon at Drake. That is unfortunate, though certainly not all institutions, especially smaller ones such as Drake, can offer everything.

    Again, Dean Lenz, thank you for your comments. It seems that the "Drake model" has become a bit of a bogeyman in academic language circles. The clarifications you offer, especially those that highlight Drake's return to tenure-track appointments and a contextualization of language in its culture, have been very helpful.

    I ask your unserstanding for the use of a pseudonym in this forum, but such protection for the untenured (and perhaps even the tenured) is a prudent precaution these days.

    Best,
    German prof

  • DRAKE LANGUAGE PROGRAM A JOKE !
  • Posted by Language Professor on January 31, 2010 at 1:30pm EST
  • Drake University received a great deal of attention in The Chronicle of Higher Ed when the president, in a cost-cutting move, abolished the entire modern language department--only to advertise a month or two later for an entry level position (assistant professor) in Spanish. (A quick google search will bring up many of the articles written at that time).

    I contacted Professor Cadd a couple of years ago asking to see the language materials used or any research which had been conducted. I received none.

    The program appeals mostly to administrators and others who know nothing about second language theory and research and who desire to cut costs. Most of those who conduct the language sessions are native speakers who are paid the minimum wage or slightly better.

    Until such time as we have documented evidence of the superiority of this method over other more traditional approaches in scholarly articles, one should consider Drake's approach for what it really is: a joke !