Search News


Browse Archives

News

Awaiting the Tablet

January 27, 2010

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

It has many names — the iTablet, the iSlate, the iTab, the iGuide — but if there is one thing people seem to agree on regarding Apple’s new computing tablet, expected to be unveiled today in San Francisco, it’s that it will change the way people consume media. And many observers believe the impact will be particularly notable on college campuses.

Media prognosticators have been buzzing for months about how higher education might be affected by the arrival of the Apple tablet, which is reported to have a 10-inch color display — about the same size as the screen on Apple’s smallest laptop and larger than the screens of the three-and-half-inch iPhone and iPod touch, the six-inch Amazon Kindle, or the five- to seven-inch Sony Reader.

Ars Technica writer Jeff Smykil recently wrote that the addition of e-textbooks to the iTunes Store could precipitate new ways of supplying students with course materials, possibly based on selling subscriptions and bundling books and other resources by major. Joshua Kim, a senior learning technologist at Dartmouth College and Inside Higher Ed technology blogger, posited that the tablet could combine course materials and collaboration tools, bringing the futuristic vision of a “cloud-based, disaggregated, open educational experience” one step closer to realization. Brand expert Brian Phipps put it more bluntly, writing that the tablet “could replace the conventional classroom.”

Of course, most people won’t know until later today what the tablet can do; and they won’t know what it will do to traditional higher education for a long time after that. “At the moment we’re just sort of reading digital tea leaves,” said Kenneth C. Green, director of the campus computing project.

A Boost for E-Books?

Electronic textbook publishers, for one, are hoping that the release and anticipated popularity of the tablet will be a windfall for e-textbooks — which, though they have been available for several years, so far have failed to catch on with students. E-textbooks accounted for only 2 percent of total textbook sales last fall, according to data from the market research firm Student Monitor.

CourseSmart, a consortium of five major textbook publishers (at least one of which has been talking to Apple), made a video in anticipation of the tablet’s release, in which it superimposes its iPhone application on a tablet-like device and touts the many ways it could make students' lives easier. Frank Lyman, the consortium’s president, has said the tablet offers features far beyond what is offered by the Kindle and the Sony Reader, including color graphics, video, and other media.

In an interview yesterday with Inside Higher Ed, Lyman said he believes the Apple product will give e-textbooks a boost by combining a brand that is widely popular among college students with a platform that is oriented to reading. “At the level of general enthusiasm and interest for e-textbooks, it has sort of captured the imagination of another part of the market,” he said.

Eric Weil, managing director of Student Monitor, agreed that Apple’s brand power could help push e-textbooks into the mainstream. The problem for e-textbooks is not that students don’t know that they exist, it’s that they don’t find them appealing, Weil said. Apple’s involvement could change that, he said, the same way it popularized the MP3 player with the iPod.

Price Points

But the aspect about the Apple tablet that could provide the deepest insight into how much it stands to affect higher education — at least initially — is perhaps the hardest to pin down: the price tag. While some analysts predict that Apple would need to price the tablet at $600 or lower in order to market it successfully, rumors abound that the product could run as high as $1,000 — as much as a regular MacBook.

While CourseSmart claims that its e-textbooks cost half the price of a new, printed textbook, Lyman acknowledged that, depending on the tablet’s price tag, it could take all four years to break even on the initial hardware investment. But he said he hopes the additional value tablet’s many rumored features will persuade students to buy it. After all, given everything the tablet is supposed to do, students might regard cheaper, less cumbersome e-textbooks as a peripheral benefit rather than a main selling point.

Green said the tablet’s penetration on college campuses will turn largely on what current technologies it is capable of replacing. If the features of the Apple tablet are redundant with the functions students use on their iPod touches — or smartphones, or laptops — then they can subtract from the cost of the tablet the money they would have spent on those other technologies, he said. The more gadgets the tablet makes obsolete, the cheaper the investment.

But Weil said he thinks all this accounting is moot. College students don’t generally think in such calculating terms when it comes to technology, he said. “At the end of the day,” he said, “students spend more on their cell phone service than they do on their textbooks.”

The tablet is expected to hit the shelves in March.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Awaiting the Tablet

  • Do we need textbooks at all?
  • Posted by Prof. Ira Shor , Professor of Composition/Rhetoric at CITY University of NY Graduate Center on January 27, 2010 at 11:15am EST
  • Tech is dazzling and this IHE report is indeed apple-dazzled, unable to ask the big education questions. Why use high-tech for the low-level instruction represented by textbooks? Perhaps we don't need big costly textbooks at all for good teaching and critical learning. Perhaps we can do low-cost desk-top curriculum development and publishing of our own materials where we teach based on our knowledge of what our students need and can do. Textbooks make media/publishing giants profitable but do they make us better teachers who develop smarter students?

    Dr. Ira Shor

  • Think Back a Bit
  • Posted by Retired Prof on January 27, 2010 at 11:15am EST
  • Yes, and the PC gave us a paperless office and much more leisure time, right?

  • e-text futures
  • Posted by bwb , Professor/Economics on January 27, 2010 at 11:45am EST
  • Just to be somewhat less polite, CourseSmart is more of a conspiracy than a consortium. The publishers' approach to CourseSmart offerings has been to try to sell what are essentially pdfs of existing texts at approximately half the price of a new, hardcopy of a text. Yes, there is limited note taking and highlighting capability, but other features make e-texts quite an undesirable alternative for most students. These features usually include the need to manually scroll read a whole page, lame printing options, and the inability after the fact to preserve one's notes and highlighting beyond the licensing period. We've documented cases in which students can buy a new, hardcopy of a text through Amazon and sell it at the end of a semester, if desired, so that the net cost to the students is less than 30% of the suggested retail price. No wonder e-texts have captured only a small part of the market.

    The hope for Apple's tablet is that it will spur the production of texts that have NO PRINT COUNTERPART, and instead have seamless integration of text, animated illustrations, and other audio and video media.

  • publishing for a new age?
  • Posted by Sandy Thatcher , Penn State University Press on January 27, 2010 at 12:30pm EST
  • It is what bwb says in his (her?) last comment that is truly exciting. The possibility that the Apple laptop may enable the publication of the kind of e-books that Robert Darnton envisioned with the ACLS Humanities E-Book and Gutenberg-e projects, which have no strict counterpart in the print environment, is very encouraging to us scholarly publishers who have been wondering how these new kinds of documents could ever be marketed in sufficient quantity to make their publication economically feasible. If the Apple hardware catches on and many millions of the devices are eventually sold, the platform will be in place to do this kind of forward-looking publishing in a way that has not hitherto been possible.---Sandy Thatcher, Penn State University Press

  • Posted by Greg on January 27, 2010 at 12:45pm EST
  • is this another pending law suit by organizations and schools that represent the Blind?

  • Tech Textbooks Wrong Way to Go
  • Posted by Dr. Ira Shor , Prof. of Composition/Rhetoric at City Univ of NY Grad Center on January 27, 2010 at 1:00pm EST
  • Many thanks to Sandy Thatcher for constructive comments. I propose that textbooks distort teaching and learning because encyclopedic knowledge of any field is inappropriate and unnecessary until a college student declares a major in her junior year. Textbooks of any kind for gen ed make a subject rote instead of inspiring, even when they are packaged as eye candy by dazzling machines. And why should students finance the development of dazzling new textbooks that don't yet exist and may never show up? The high cost of the new apple machines transfers start up costs for the textbooks of the future from the publisher to the student who must pay to acquire the technology that creates a profitable potential market without there being enough educational material justifying such an expenditure. The problem with undergraduate learning is not the absence of dazzling machines or dazzling textbooks. Textbooks are a market problem for publishing companies which they may solve at the expense of teachers and students whose needs are not centered in textbooks.

    Dr. Ira Shor

  • Huh?
  • Posted by Dr. John on January 27, 2010 at 8:00pm EST
  • Ira,

    What are you talking about? The iPad costs about as much as three thick intro textbooks.

    Seems to me that, along with the case and keyboard, it could work as THE computing device for 90% of students.

    OK, 90% of students who are hard-core gamers.

  • Ridiculous
  • Posted by Paul , Fall 2010 Doctoral Student on January 27, 2010 at 8:15pm EST
  • All this is is a larger version of the iPhone/iPod Touch interface. That's all! It's such a waste of time and resources. I'm sticking with my iPod Touch, thanks. I don't need a bigger screen, since the Touch is more than sufficient.

    As for it "changing the future of college campuses," I disagree. I will ALWAYS use traditional college textbooks (paper-bound, hardcover or softcover) as my primary learning materials. This technology is just getting wayyyy too out of hand, and mark my words, this will be a contributing factor to the death of humanity as we know it.

    PD18750@aol.com