Search News


Browse Archives

News

The Emerging Hispanic-Serving Institution

February 5, 2010

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

WASHINGTON – The number of institutions officially recognized by the federal government as “Hispanic serving” is set to rise dramatically in the coming years, according to a comprehensive study of Latino enrollment in higher education.

In the 1980s, the designation Hispanic-serving institution (HSI) was created by the federal government to direct funding to nonprofit colleges where at least 25 percent of the full-time-equivalent students are Latino. On Thursday, Excelencia in Education, an advocacy group for Latino students, released a report identifying the growing number of institutions that do not meet the HSI enrollment threshold of 25 percent but that fit its definition of “emerging HSIs” – meaning that they “are within the critical mass range of 15-24 percent and have the potential to become HSIs in the next few years.”

Using data federal data from 2006-7, the report states that there were, at that point, 265 HSIs; another 176 institutions were on the brink of becoming HSIs and met its definition of “emerging.”

“Emerging” HSIs were located in 20 states. The highest concentration of these institutions was in California, which had 52, followed by Texas, which had 42. Still, Deborah Santiago, the report's author and vice president for policy and research at Excelencia, said at a discussion accompanying the report’s release on Capitol Hill that these institutions are “not just in those places where we expect to see Latinos.” For instance, Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Oregon and Utah are among the states that had one such institution.

The largest share -- 44 percent -- of the “emerging” HSIs were public community colleges. Private colleges and universities represented the second largest sector, with 31 percent. Public four-year institutions represented 20 percent, and private two-year institutions represented 5 percent.

“Call me parochial here, but I found it surprising that so many private colleges are emerging HSIs,” said Luis Torres, deputy provost for academic affairs at Metropolitan State College of Denver, an emerging HSI featured in the report. “When one thinks of a rather stereotypical view of Hispanics, it’s that we are in the public colleges. I found it very surprising and telling and interesting. That gives us a lot of opportunities.”

Among the prominent private institutions on the list are Loyola Marymount University, in Los Angeles, with 19.7 percent Latino enrollment, and the University of Miami with 22.1 percent. A significant number of the privates are religiously affiliated institutions, primarily (but not entirely) Roman Catholic.

In the public sector, a number of flagship institutions are also nearing HSI status. The University of California at Los Angeles, for example, has 15 percent Latino enrollment, and the University of Texas at Austin has 17.2 percent.

Some of the “emerging” HSIs identified in the report may already have reached the 25 percent threshold, due to the significant numbers of students who choose not to self-identify as Latino. At Palm Beach Community College’s Lake Worth campus, for instance, the report notes that administrators were certain that the college was well beyond the 25 percent threshold, even though it had an official Latino enrollment of 16.5 percent.

“A high percentage of students chose not to provide information about their ethnicity, and as administrators reviewed student rosters, it was clear that many of these students were potentially Latino (inferred from their last names),” the report reads. “In the college’s internal analysis, staff attributed this phenomenon to a potential stigma of identifying as Hispanic, being undocumented, and/or the institutional requirement that a student whose first language was not English must be tested for language fluency.”

Santiago estimated that at least 15 of the 67 institutions that had Latino enrollments between 20 and 24 percent “could be an HSI today” if their students properly self-identified without fear.

Still, Santiago and others at the discussion argued that institutions should not wait until they reach the 25 percent threshold to start serving the needs of Hispanic students. Torres, for example, noted that Metro State has publicly stated its ambition of becoming an HSI by 2015. It created a task force in 2007, when its percentage of Latino students was 13 percent, to recommend how the college could reach out and appeal to Hispanics in the area.

Torres said he would like to see Congress pass legislation that would give “emerging” HSIs planning grants so that they could intentionally grow into HSIs with ease.

Juan Sepulveda, director of the White House Initiative for Excellence in Hispanic Education, said the Department of Education is “open to the idea” but that it would need some time to consider the merits of awarding such grants. Still, he acknowledged the importance of supporting HSIs, especially if there is hope of reaching President Obama’s goal of the United States having the highest proportion of college graduates in the world by 2020.

“The president is a very smart person,” Sepulveda said. “Secretary Arne Duncan is a really smart person. Undersecretary Martha Kanter…. They can all count. They know it’s impossible for us to reach this goal without the Hispanic community really bumping up attainment-wise.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The Emerging Hispanic-Serving Institution

  • Posted by Parent on February 5, 2010 at 8:30am EST
  • I had no idea our tax dollars are supporting such a program and have serious reservations about favoring one ethnic or immigrant group in this way. Why not a program that provides support for institutions with a large percentage of first time college students or college students from low-income families? With the exception of African-Americans, who have suffered from systematic, institutional discrimination for most of our history and to my mind constitute a special case, it strikes me as profoundly un-American to favor one ethnic group in this way. It also strikes me as counter-productive to prevailing educational philosophy to encourage colleges to become LESS diverse by encouraging high enrollment by one ethnic group.

  • Why should national orgin matter?
  • Posted by Roger Clegg , President and General Counsel at Center for Equal Opportunity on February 5, 2010 at 8:45am EST
  • Why should the federal government give more money to some schools, and less to others, based on what country the students' ancestors came from? There is no good reason, and certainly none that would pass muster under the "strict scrutiny" the courts use in applying the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause. If the feds want to give more money to schools where the students are from disadvantaged backgrounds, say, or do not speak English as their first language, then they may do so -- but they do not have to use national origin as a proxy for poverty or linguistic ability. In other contexts, we would condemn that as stereotyping.

  • HSI Funding is well deserved
  • Posted by Wallace Johnson , Academic Affairs at South Texas College on February 5, 2010 at 11:00am EST
  • The views expressed above are naive and inaccurate. Latino Americans have a long and unfortunate history of systematic exposure to unfair practices in education funding, housing practices, and job discrimination. The educational achievement gaps for Latino Americans are the bitter legacy of these policies. The work of individuals like Deborah Santiago and Sarita Brown at Excelencia in Education as advocates for a policy agenda for Latino students should be applauded. Their work is even more significant given the changing demographics of the United States.

  • Privilege
  • Posted by Brian C. Steinberg , The Ally Group at The Ally Group on February 5, 2010 at 11:45am EST
  • What a great way to limit white privilege in higher education!

  • HSI has at least two definitions
  • Posted by Dr Charles Rodriguez , Executive Director at Texas A&M University-San Antonio on February 5, 2010 at 12:30pm EST
  • The article creates some unnecessary confusion. The Hispanic-Serving Institution designation has two meanings.

     

    First: The 25% Hispanic student enrollment critrion is used by the Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities (HACU) for association membership and focuses primarily on the 25% Latino enrollment number. HACU administers student scholarship and internship programs (sponsored by both government and private industry) for all races/ethnicities students enrolled at their member HSI colleges and universities.

     

    Second: Based upon federal legislation, there are Title III and Title V grant opportunities for many types of institutions to strengthen academic opportunities at HSIs. The federal legislative definition of an HSI is more demanding and detailed than simply a 25% Hispanic student enrollment. See:

    http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/E9-28996.htm:

     

    “To qualify as an eligible institution under the Title III or Title V Programs, an accredited institution must, among other requirements, have an enrollment of needy students, and its average E&G expenditures per full-time equivalent (FTE) undergraduate student must be low in comparison with the average E&G expenditures per FTE undergraduate student of institutions that offer similar instruction.”

     

    While proprietary institutions of higher education and well-heeled colleges or universities may reach or exceed 25% Hispanic enrollment, that is not sufficient for them to qualify to apply for or receive federal grants under Title III or Title V. All applicant institutions also need to demonstrate that they have a high percentage of students with significant financial need and their overall institutional operating budget must be below their peer institution average for their size enrollment.

     

    So, people ought not get too exercised about the simple growth in numbers of Hispanics and that more colleges and universities are enrolling 25% or more Hispanic students. Tax-supported dollars are awarded through competitive grants and only to eligible need-based institutions. When those dollars are awarded for institutional improvements, they benefit all students enrolled there, regardless of ethnicity or race.

     

    More information can be obtained from HACU at http://www.hacu.net/hacu/Member_FAQs_EN.asp?SnID=98822910.

  • Discrimination
  • Posted by John Nguyen on February 5, 2010 at 12:30pm EST
  • This is institutionalized discrimination and it is disgusting! I thought, as a country, we would eventually evolve into a "post-racial" society, where preferential treatment isn't divvied out to specific ethnic/racial groups. Programs like this knock us (as a society) down a few pegs. I need a shower.

  • HSI's in S. Florida
  • Posted by Dr. Larry A. Calderon , President's Office, Community and Government Affairs at Nova Southeastern University on February 5, 2010 at 1:00pm EST
  • I was surprised to see that Nova Southeastern University was not mentioned on the list of private, four-year HSI's in S. Florida. With an undegraduate student population over the qualifying 25% threshold it has been successful in receiving funding for two consecutive grant years.

    In addition, Nova Southeastern University was also awarded $2.8mil. for the the development of its graduate programs in higher educational leadership. This newest award will provide for the development of a new concentration in its Higher Educational Leadership doctoral program focusing on Strategic Tranformational Leadership.

    Also worthy of mention is the fact that Broward College (previously Broward Community College) qualified as an HSI in 2006 and was awarded $14.2 mil.for the development of its educational support services. This continues to be the single largest TitleV award made to one HSI to date.

  • Two questions for Dr. Rodriguez
  • Posted by Roger Clegg , President and General Counsel at Center for Equal Opportunity on February 5, 2010 at 1:30pm EST
  • 1. You wrote: "So, people ought not get too exercised about the simple growth in numbers of Hispanics and that more colleges and universities are enrolling 25% or more Hispanic students." To whom are you referring? None of the commenters so far seem to be exercised about this.

    2. I understand your point that, to be eligible for the special funding, you have to have the right ethnic numbers AND meet some other criteria. But the discrimination remains. Put the shoe on the other foot: Would you be reassured by a program providing special funding for Non-Hispanic-serving institutions so long as, in addition to not serving too many Hispanics, other criteria had to be met?

  • Hispanic Serving Institutions are Historically Underserved
  • Posted by Alexander Burton , Professor of Political Science at South Texas College on February 5, 2010 at 1:30pm EST
  • It is fairly well documented that there is a persistent legacy of economic marginalization of the Hispanic community that continues to affect education funding for predominantly Hispanic areas. Ergo, these HSIs qualify as serving a needy population, and are eligible for this type of funding. My first year undergraduate students can easily comprehend this, so I find it puzzling that some who have posted above see this as unfairly benefiting one ethnic group above others. As for the "post-racial" comment, I think that a quick look outside the window of the "ivory tower" into the real world might be useful there.

  • Remember kids...
  • Posted by Allen Bostick on February 5, 2010 at 2:30pm EST
  • "Remember kids, it's not considered discrimination if it benefits certain groups." Hhhmmm.

  • My Two Cents
  • Posted by Rachel Renfro , Undergraduate Student at Southern Illinois University on February 5, 2010 at 2:30pm EST
  • So Professor Burton, you're arguing that we must embrace more discrimination to end discrimination. Is that right? You say this special funding helps a "needy population" with a "persistent legacy of economic marginalization." What about all the other marginalized groups in this country? What about first generation white students descended from economically marginalized regions - Appalachia for example? What about African-Americans, Asian-Americans, Native-Americans, and all the other hyphenated Americans? Do they need to gain their special funding opportunities through separate advocacy groups? If so, how do all these ethnic-specific groups vying for special privileges bring us closer together as a society in the real world?

  • Posted by JCP on February 5, 2010 at 4:00pm EST
  • HSIs are only one form of designation used by the federal government to identify institutions that serve a wide range of groups. For example HBCUs (Historical Black Colleges and Universities) TCUs (Tribal Colleges and Universities).

    Majority of these institutions are public institutions that serve anyone and everyone within the public community, not simply one race or ethnic group. Traditionally these institutions remain severely under funded compared the big state or ivy league schools.

    What is not realized is that just because an institution receives funding from the federal government under a particular designation, it does not mean that the institution can discriminate from ALL of its students from benefiting from programs or institutional development funded by these federal dollars. Funds are used to develop resources, programs, etc, for the entire institution that just happen to have a large enrollment of one particular ethnic group.

    Some of the comments posted above are idiotic and quite frankly sad!

  • Still discrimination
  • Posted by superdude on February 5, 2010 at 4:45pm EST
  • JCP, the fact remains that federal funds are being allocated based specifically on racial criteria. That the institutions receiving the money spend it broadly doesn't matter. The point remains that this is discriminatory spending and should stop immediately.

  • Not Discrimination
  • Posted by Alexander Burton , Professor of Government at South Texas College on February 5, 2010 at 5:45pm EST
  • Well Rachel it is simply a fact that educational opportunities lag in these communities and educational institutions that serve them are both historically and persistently underfunded. How is it discrimination to correct an imbalance in funding? There are advocacy groups that represent the communities you mention, and there is government funding set aside for those in need who live there as well (the Appalachian Regional Commission, for example).

  • Diversity
  • Posted by Concerned on February 5, 2010 at 8:00pm EST
  • We need to alleviate JCP's grief and Professor Burton's concerns and keep judging people by the color of their skin to provide a more equitable and just system. Come on people! Get with the program!

  • Posted by mos , assoc. prof on February 6, 2010 at 7:45am EST
  • Thank you Dr. Rodriguez for the details about what an HSI is and who benefits from status as an HSI. Some comments following your useful comment show an inability to shift their kneejerk responses when the facts are made clear and those responses don't apply. Even so, I wanted to let you know that your comment was informative and useful.

  • shocked
  • Posted by dubpower at west coast on February 6, 2010 at 4:00pm EST
  • I agree with other posts, we should close these institutions! But let's include HCBU, women colleges, tribal colleges & universities, and schools for the disabled. Blacks, Latinos, women, and the handicapped having been milking the U.S. for way toooo looonnnngggggg ! ! !

    please sense the sarcasm as i do not agree with the claims that society is equal, that equity exist for multiple communities. discrimination has been a salient issue in this country for centuries, regardless if the president is black, and will continue until parity is met for all racial, ethnic, and minorities in this country.

  • Responses
  • Posted by John Nguyen on February 6, 2010 at 10:00pm EST
  • I don't consider individual's concerns over institutions of higher education using racial criteria for preferential treatment "kneejerk responses." Studying the results of such practices in the past shows how detrimental they truly are. We should pursue equal opportunity, not equal results.

  • Are you reading?
  • Posted by RoniM at Education Access on February 8, 2010 at 10:00am EST
  • In order to consider these topics objectively, I believe, we should look at a history of education in the US (http://www.cloudnet.com/~edrbsass/educationhistorytimeline.html) as well as the societal factory that contribute to inequality. A brief examination will review that social standing, wealth attainment, and upward mobility are intrinsically tied to education - our traditional tool for "leveling the playing field" as an attempt provide equal opportunities for all of our citizens.

    It would be excellent if our society was one that is class-less and multicultural, where everyone is treated equally and given equal opportunities. That is not, nor has it ever been the case in the US. To quote Kristina Manusu:

    "The classes in our [society] are based on race, ethnicity, politics and education. Of the phenomenons of social stratification is social inequality, which is is the distribution of resources dividing society into rank, grades, family, religion and education. These divisions should not occur in our society, but it is the sad truth that it does."

    Read the definition of an MSI and it's characteristics, as well as those of the students served by MSI's http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/2008156.pdf. It is a sad fact that even with all of the supposed "opportunities" for underrepresented students, that there are remain glaring societal gaps in educational attainment. I sort of reminds me of a conflict one of my students described in her English Class. It seems that 90% of the class is failing ( D or lower) yet there is reluctance to examine the techniques of the teacher who's class is failing; the blame is continuously put on the students. As a former corporate trainer I can tell you that if I were contracted to teach employees of an organization a new software package, and at the end of my training 90% of the class were unable to use the package as promised I would be quickly unemployed. In both cases the problem can't be only the student, we must look at the system even if it mean that we must adjust the system to meet the actual needs of the student. This does not mean lowering quality; at the end of the day the students I train must be able to use the software. It means adjusting the curriculum, adding more practice time, and assessing skills before training to make sure that my assumptions about how they learn are correct.

    Funding for MSI's, regardless of race, ethnicity or gender, is basically attempting to address some of the systemic barriers to achievement.

    Keep reading.