Search News


Browse Archives

News

Blackboard's Ambassador

May 10, 2010

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

WASHINGTON -- As president of Blackboard Learn, Ray Henderson’s job is to translate evolving customer demands and market landscapes into coherent business strategies for the learning-management giant. As a blogger and unofficial ambassador of Blackboard’s executive circle, his job has been to build confidence in the company and its services.

Henderson, formerly an executive at Angel, which competed with Blackboard before Blackboard bought it out for $75 million exactly one year ago, met with Inside Higher Ed this week at Blackboard’s slick new offices here to chat about the company’s newest version of its widely used learning-management system, the future of social media in teaching and learning, and the small but growing threat from open-source learning-management platforms, which have chipped away at Blackboard’s market share over the last few years.

“There are numerous things we have done to respond to openness,” Henderson says in the podcast interview. “And I would just say baldly that we’re taking inspiration from the open-source movement.” For example, Henderson last June began blogging occasionally about ideas and challenges being discussed inside the company. When Blackboard dropped its patent lawsuit against Desire2Learn in December, Henderson posted an essay detailing his own feelings about the lawsuit (that Blackboard’s patent assertions were not well-founded) and why the company was backing off (the backlash from many in higher education was becoming a problem).

“There’s a discipline both from social media and from open source about transparency in how you do business,” he says, echoing the predictions of certain media futurists. “There’s a greater expectation of transparency.”

The culture of openness in academe, which has given rise to open courses, open repositories and open-access journals, has probably given open-source learning-management systems such as Moodle and Sakai a boost, Henderson says, though he points out that those systems still own a relatively tiny share of the market. Blackboard’s new transparency initiative — which appears to be an effort to curb the company’s reputation for being irascibly proprietary — is not limited to communications, he says: Blackboard now offers a number of free extensions that customers can play with and customize, a la Moodle. But there are no plans to make the system’s source code open.

Transparency is not the only area where customer demand has grown, Henderson says; demands for support have also increased as versions of Blackboard’s LMS have become more sophisticated. Version 9.1, released last month, reportedly focuses less on new features and more on client support.

It also reduces the burden on institutions that are switching over from an older version, Henderson says — something that customers had been complaining about. He hints that the company may soon move away from annual version releases to more incremental upgrades. “The creative wheels are turning on our part,” he says, “and the world will soon see how we are going to adjust our approach to bringing releases.”

To hear Inside Higher Ed’s entire conversation full conversation with Henderson, listen to our podcast.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Blackboard's Ambassador

  • What next?
  • Posted by Jeanne Phoenix Laurel , Associate Professor and Chair of English at Niagara University on May 10, 2010 at 8:45am EDT
  • What's next--commercials of snappy looking people with a temporary appearance upgrade, glowing "I'm Professor So-and-So, and I invented Blackboard 9"? (In Spanish, or German, or maybe Latin this time?)

  • Opening up Blackboard
  • Posted by Ed Garay at University of Illinois at Chicago on May 10, 2010 at 10:15am EDT
  • Committing to support the IMS Common Cartridge, dropping the infamous Desire2Learn lawsuits, developing the free Learning Environment Connector to facilitate single sign-on and backend integration between Blackboard and Moodle or Sakai, and ongoing support for the IMS Learning Tools Interoperability standards are indeed very good things from Blackboard.

    There is a lot more that Blackboard can and should do, in my opinion, to facilitate further interoperability and variable degrees of institutional open education. Following is my ad hoc list of easy and not-so-easy work that Blackboard ought to do in this area:

    1) Built-in Custom Authentication

    Blackboard needs to provide, out-of-the-box, an intelligent framework for custom authentication. A school, like UIC, for example, should be able to easily and reliably configure Blackboard's authentication to be done in Shibboleth first, fall back to LDAP (AD or some other authentication) and fall back to Blackboard's native or some other authentication. Choosing a Web-based auto like Shibboleth should not break or make next to impossible the drag-and-drop functionality of native WebDAV desktop OS or third-party
    apps with the Content System.

    2) Open Blackboard Licenses to Non-Institutional Users

    This one is pretty easy, but essential :: change the Blackboard license agreement to give institutions the ability to provide access to miscellaneous students, instructors , researchers and people outside of our universities.

    3) Provide Granular Access Control at the Course Site Level

    Blackboard needs to enhance its products to empower schools to granularly define a comprehensive institutional profile that customizes our installations to match our campus policies. This institutional profile would easily define our institutional defaults, optional opt-in/opt-out settings, which defaults can be overwritten (or not) at the institutional, course site and/or individual level, and so forth.

    One such institutional setting, could be, for example to allow instructors, at the course site level, to open up all or some aspects of their course sites to the world. Blackboard would then facilitate access to these open course sites via a dynamic portal of open courseware.

    The granular controls are key, however, in that they need to institutionally define what is allowed or not allowed to be opened or made available for downloading, in terms of copyright and intellectual property.

    4) Comprehensive Import/Export

    Comprehensive import/export facilities are needed to export entire Blackboard course sites, electronic portfolios and anything stored on the Blackboard Content System and its WebDAV folders, into export packages (zip files) that can be used to import them into other systems, not necessarily from Blackboard. Likewise, Blackboard needs to make available, out-of-the-box, intelligent import tools for bringing in course site exports from Moodle, Desire2Learn, Sakai and all other major LMS systems.

    5) Learning Environment Connector Enhancements

    Using Blackboard as a Teaching & Learning system hub, tightly integrated with the school's student information system, authentication and authorization systems, CRM, etc. can save schools some money if the Learning Environment Connector is enhanced to leverage the existing Blackboard backend integration with Moodle and Sakai. For example, using the same Blackboard-Banner integration to feed automatic student rosters to Moodle, or using the school's final grade submission out of Blackboard for course sites in Sakai.

    6) IMS Common Cartridge & Learning Tools Interoperability

    Blackboard needs to intensify its efforts to support the Common Cartridge import/export, and to serve as a catalyst for the development of LTI standards-compliant educational tools.

    Schools running Blackboard would benefit from being able to use tools from other LMS systems, like Sakai Samigo online assessments, or Sakai's integration with OSP e-Portfolio and uPortal. Likewise, Blackboard should make is tools LTI-compliant so they too could used by other LMS systems.

  • Posted by Raoul Ohio on May 10, 2010 at 2:15pm EDT
  • On one hand, I dislike having to depend on another powerful entity. On the other hand, we are stuck with that reality, and can hope Blackboard gets less evil and more useful as time goes by. I will certainly be happy if Blackboard 9 is easier to use. The Gradebook is supposed to be half as useful as Excel. If so, I want a tiny bit of credit. I emailed suggestions to the development staff several times, among other things saying "if you can't figure out how a spreadsheet should work, buy a copy of Excel and pay attention". Today Microsoft, who used to be the evil empire, is a leader in usability, and Apple is the evil empire.

  • Opening up Blackboard, Addendum
  • Posted by Ed Garay at University of Illinois at Chicago on May 10, 2010 at 5:30pm EDT
  • Sorry for the typos on my morning post -- I composed it on my iPad, which inadvertently changed a couple of words on me.
    I neglected to explicitly mention two more important items on my list, namely:
    7) Better Cloud Computing & Web 2.0 Integration
    Blackboard (and all LMS systems, actually) need to start providing extensive and seamless system integration with the Cloud and with miscellaneous Web 2.0 systems and tools.
    The built-in custom authentication, granular access control, LEC enhancements and LTI compliance, I referred to, this morning, will help, but there needs to be further systematic intelligence built-in to make it significantly easier to bring into Blackboard Cloud/Web 2.0 tools, like Google Apps for Education, WordPress MU, pbWorks (pbwiki), MoveableType, Ning, Elgg, Drupal, Twitter, and so forth.
    Northwestern's Bboogle, which integrates Google Apps with Blackboard, for example, is a fantastic project and quite deserving of any possible assistance and resources that Blackboard could offer to make the integration even better.
    Blackboard should develop some of the missing connectors for leading Cloud and Web 2.0 tools best suited for use in Teaching & Learning Technology applications, and develop them in a way that could be leveraged by Sakai, Moodle, Agilix BrainHoney and other LMS systems out there.
    8) Rich Browser/Platform-independent Web Experience is Most Important
    Somewhat related to openness and interoperability, especially, with the advent of native apps that are best suited for providing a better experience on targeted mobile devices, it is absolutely paramount that Blackboard (and every LMS system) remain focused and committed to delivering the best possible Web Accessible browser and platform-independent experience.
    Device-specific mobile apps are great; they certainly make a good option, but they should not undermine the importance of the Web experience. We don't want to start building new digital divides nor walled gardens based on the availability and affordability of native mobile apps. The Web-based experience should remain the Number 1 priority.

  • ease of use and security
  • Posted by Tenured Full Prof , College of Business at public teaching univeristy on June 11, 2010 at 1:15pm EDT
  • I've found the latest versions of Blackboard to have a cumbersome interface ... it takes longer to do the same things and it's easier to make mistakes. (I'm no novice with software ... undergrad in ComSc and PhD in MIS and 33 years of experience in using and creating software.)

    I also find the security for quizzes and exams on Blackboard to be abysmal. Students can do copy-and-paste and screen captures to make copies of questions. Students can also wander around to other applications (and the Internet) to access unauthorized resources while taking quizzes and exams. Secure browsers that lockdown the desktop have been around for a while, but Blackboard apparently refuses to incorporate this type of security. I've pointed this out to company reps repeatedly for about 15 years now but they don't see a problem.

    So, I don't think very highly of Blackboard or their responsiveness to the user community.