Search News


Browse Archives

News

It's a Mac! It's a PC! It's ... Both?

January 22, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Campus computer labs have always been overwhelmingly PC -- that is, full of Intel-Inside, IBM-compatible personal computers. Ever since iPods gained popularity, though, Macs have likewise become increasingly ubiquitous on college campuses -- if not in the lab, then at least on students' laps.

That growing disconnect hasn't been lost on college information technology officials, many of whom have operated separate Mac labs for students working on art, video editing and other graphics-intensive tasks. But the rival Windows and Mac OS X operating systems came within reach of each other when Apple launched its first laptop featuring an Intel chip in 2006. With an Apple program called Boot Camp -- then in beta, and now a part of the latest version of OS X, Leopard -- users can now run both Windows and Mac operating systems on the same machine, choosing their preferred environment at startup.

The tantalizing possibility of running both Mac and PC software on a single Apple computer has inspired some IT managers to think about ways to save costs and avoid purchasing different types of computers for different software needs. Now, a handful of colleges is moving toward eventually replacing all campus PCs with Macs -- using the dual-boot option -- and others are taking note.

Macs' popularity among college students has steadily risen alongside the company's growing base of fans and the rabid devotion its products often inspire, vastly outpacing its national market share of under 6 percent. At Princeton University, 31 percent of students' computers connected to the campus network in fall 2006 were Macs, compared with 10 percent in 2003-4. Similar gains have been reported across the country. In fall 2006, 20 percent of freshmen at the University of Virginia owned Macs, compared with 3 percent four years earlier. At Dartmouth College, which has historically had strong Apple support, the numbers are even higher, with 55 percent of freshmen last semester reportedly using Macs.

So far, at least, that growing popularity has yet to be matched in most campus computing environments, which run on industry-standard hardware and software that rely on powerful Windows-based servers and compatible network architecture.

In 2006, two colleges separately took the unusual step of switching to Mac lab environments with the dual-boot option: Wilkes University, in Wilkes-Barre, Pa., and Bemidji State University, in Bemidji, Minn. Both began purchasing iMacs to gradually replace their existing PCs over a several-year upgrade cycle, and some other state institutions in Minnesota are following suit. Already, other colleges across the country have begun contacting the IT directors behind the shift as they consider whether going Mac-only makes sense for them as well.

It might or it might not, depending on a number of factors, and as more colleges experiment with dual-boot setups, the advantages and disadvantages will become clearer. In June, St. Francis Xavier University, in Nova Scotia, announced that it was purchasing 350 machines and encouraging its students to buy Apple computers in a campaign to convert all its labs to Mac-only environments. But at Pennsylvania State University, where officials are considering adding some Apple dual-boot facilities, any talk of switching to a single platform is off the table, mostly because of the varied needs of the campus's many departments, colleges and constituencies.

"It’s far too large an institution to head down [the path of] homogeneity, at least at that layer of the stack, if you will," said Kevin M. Morooney, Penn State's vice provost for information technology.

At Bemidji State, with over 5,000 students, and Wilkes, with 2,400 full-time students, imposing technological homogeneity isn't necessarily a problem -- and, if initial reports are to be believed, the plans have largely been embraced. When Brian Allen, Bemidji State's director of technical support, organized a test asking students to specify whether they were using a Mac mini or a PC -- the computers themselves were hidden in boxes -- they couldn't tell the difference. In fact, Windows ran faster on the Macs.

Since then, the university has switched the 115 computers in its "SuperLabs" to 20-inch iMacs or Mac minis that can run either OS X or Windows. The Mac environment comes especially in handy for students using Adobe products for graphic design or video editing as well as other CPU-sapping applications. Wilkes, which started its transition even earlier, already has over 1,000 Apple computers in dual-boat setups.

The benefits immediately became clear when Bemidji State began the transition, according to Allen. Besides saving space otherwise duplicated by Mac and PC systems that now coexist within a single machine, there are significant cost savings -- and as a result, energy savings -- to be found. Allen has projected that the university will save about $2 million in first three years of the transition alone. Even though individual Apple computers are often more expensive than their PC counterparts, the institution will be responsible for purchasing and maintaining fewer machines.

There's also savings on the software side. Allen noted that some programs, like Adobe Creative Suite, are licensed by machine, not by operating system, meaning that two copies -- one on Mac OS, one on Windows -- can be purchased for the price of one, as long as they're running in the same box.

The number of help desk calls also decreased immediately. Michael Salem, the chief information officer at Wilkes University, called the approach "the best of both worlds."

Still, that hasn't meant a completely smooth transition. Colleges aren't exactly known for quickly embracing change, especially when it comes to how students -- and faculty members -- use technology. Salem noted an interesting side effect of the switch: Students are reluctant to restart the computers to boot into a different operating system, because they've been trained to leave lab PCs on when they're finished. Even though both Mac and PC environments are no longer separated into different labs, he said, there's still work to be done to “cross-pollinate the two different groups of users.”

At Bemidji State, Allen said he's considering moving one step further and embracing Apples in the server room, too. The university is also piloting a faculty laptop program using Macbooks. That initiative's success may depend on whether the university -- and its students and faculty -- can bridge the gap between their personal and professional technological expectations.

"There might be benefits to doing a dual-boot lab, but there are still some pretty significant unknowns about what the management of that kind of facility requires, because, as with many things now coming out of Apple, there’s a profound consumer orientation, and managing a lab is an enterprise orientation," said Morooney, of Penn State. "I’m staring at an Apple product as I’m talking to you."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on It's a Mac! It's a PC! It's ... Both?

  • Posted by wish my college would go dual on January 22, 2008 at 8:10am EST
  • I was a Mac person and was forced (by our IT Dept) years ago to switch to a PC. I hope we go the dual route so I can get the best of both worlds. Although at the speed our IT dept moves we'd probably be the last college in the nation to do so.

  • Posted by Richard on January 22, 2008 at 8:50am EST
  • Apple has the "cool factor" nailed. But when it comes to customer service, the company is downright frigid. Until the big guy at Mac decrees a change in the company's (apparent) guiding principles for customer service - "If it's broken then you broke it, all errors are user errors, and Apple will neither admit fault nor take responsibility for anything. Ever" - Apple will struggle to build loyalty among those who are concerned more about value and less about image.

  • Posted by Blitzchecker on January 22, 2008 at 8:50am EST
  • The high Mac percentage at Dartmouth actually represents a long-term decline -- in the late eighties, every student was required to own a Mac, and the proportion was close to 100%, at least among undergrads. The labs were all-Mac, too. This had tangible benefits not only in compatibility and networking but in sheer usability, since Windows was still years behind in user interfaces. The school did not relent until the early 2000s, just as Mac OS X was about to come out and make a Mac requirement justifiable again.

  • Mac-opoly
  • Posted by Dom at Ball State U on January 22, 2008 at 9:50am EST
  • I'm in Italy teaching this semester. The Mac laptop the university provided me with (because it has the video editing software I need) burned up the power cable (which I have found is not unusual). I ordered it last week from the only Apple store in my area. I'm still waiting for it. If it had been from a PC, I would have had the choice of a dozen different shops. Given all the complaints about the product I read online and Apple's lack of response to the problem, I don't know why Mac users tolerate it. Customer service seems more important to me than it is to a monopoly. I'm reminded of Lilly Tomlin's sketch about the phone company pre-divestiture. "We don't care. We don't have to."

  • Posted by go mac go on January 22, 2008 at 9:50am EST
  • At my college, there's a Mac lab (for communication arts majors) and two labs with Dells. There are also Dells in the library and a couple of hallways. The administration and tech support people are PC-minded but they are beginning to recognize that Macs are popular with students. If I had to guess, I'd estimate that sixty to seventy percent of laptops on campus are Apples. It is increasingly common to see nothing but Apples being used in the in-house coffee shop. A student with a HP laptop told me last week she was switching to Apple - to the MacBook Air. It's kids like these who are keeping our entire economy afloat.

  • Apple customer service
  • Posted by PAG , Associate Professor at Virginia Weselyan College on January 22, 2008 at 10:00am EST
  • Richard,
    Any data to support that comment? I have countervailing anecdotes.

  • Apple service/quality
  • Posted by Hank on January 22, 2008 at 10:20am EST
  • There's something about these negative comments that is bothersome to me, they are absolutely opposite to my 15+ years of Mac use. Watching my wife struggle with the Windows platform has involved the experiences you are describing. As a matter of curiosity, did you save money by not getting the extended warranty perhaps?

  • Apple Customer Service
  • Posted by Bob Martin , Associate Professor at Pacific Northwest College of Art on January 22, 2008 at 10:30am EST
  • Consumer reports, long recognized for its unbiased product testing, ranks Apple as tops for customer service among all computer companies, and has for the past five years. Could they have been so wrong for so long?

  • Unfair business practices?
  • Posted by Mike on January 22, 2008 at 11:25am EST
  • It occurs to me that the more and more people use Macs for dual-boot configurations with Windows, the more likely Apple will be called on the carpet for forcing you to buy a Mac to run OS X. That, and their unwillingness to OEM license Windows on the Mac, even with Boot Camp. I'd feel a lot differently about running Mac OSX if I didn't have to pay the design premium for the Apple hardware.

    Still, the most cost effective option is to go with a cheaper priced PC vendor, and support Windows or Linux. Whether or not you can get away with it is another question.

  • Apple's Customer Service
  • Posted by RBlalock on January 22, 2008 at 11:25am EST
  • I was a die-hard PC (clone) and Windows fan from the start. When OS X was first released, I gave Mac a try and became a "switcher." I cannot say enough good things about Apple's customer service. I have never had a bad experience in the store or via Apple Care. Sadly, I cannot say the same about my experiences on the PC side.

    I am pleased that Apple has gone the Intel and Bootcamp directions. The ability to have dual-boot on a single machine is phenomenal.

    I am now a die-hard Mac user and am excited that more people are finally realizing how wonderful and powerful the Mac really is!!

  • Unfair Business Practices? No, Good Engineering
  • Posted by Tommy on January 22, 2008 at 1:25pm EST
  • Mike said, "Apple will be called on the carpet for forcing you to buy a Mac and run OS X." If Apple started licensing OS X to be used on other machines besides Apple we would end up with some of the very headaches and poor performance PC users deal with daily. From the very beginning, what has made Apple's OS rock solid is because the software is made for the hardware. Apple's quality control in this area leads the industry. Consumer Reports has documented this too as well as several computer industry publications. Even to his chagrin, Bill Gates has to recognize this too. One is not paying for a "design premium for the Apple hardware", but for the engineering and high quality of the software.

    The cost savings of going "with a cheaper prices PC vendor" will simply pay for the support and maintenance of those PCs and the bug-ridden, virus susceptible software. In fact, Macs run Windows much better than PCs.

  • Virtualization...
  • Posted by Rob on January 22, 2008 at 3:00pm EST
  • I'm surprised no one has mentioned the virtualization options to run Windows on a Mac, namely VMWare Fusion and Parallels. No need to reboot - you can run them simultaneously. Of course you need the RAM to back that up, but RAM is fairly inexpensive nowadays.

    If a college is considering resale after a 3-5 year cycle, Macs do arguably have better resale, which could help recoup some of the initial cost. (Check eBay, for instance.)

    I've had and still have both PCs and Macs. Both have crashed, had internal hardware failures, etc. Over time with newer machines, both have also become more stable.

    In terms of customer service surveys, Mac fanatics are very loyal to their brand, and they may also be more likely to have the tech skills (by the very demographic of who purchases Macs) than those who buy discount PCs. You could probably find similar satisfaction among IBM/Lenovo enterprise-grade computer users, too. Discount machines have lower grade components...

    Enterprise management tools are more available for PCs, with much less monopoly. That is not a small detail, especially as research and other fields become more regulated in terms of record-keeping, discovery, etc.

    The "cool" factor for Macs was mentioned. Just as prospective students get excited about Starbucks on campus, they also get excited about seeing an iMac in the computer lab. Is the Mac superior? Not necessarily. But it is definitely more trendy.

  • The problem with MAC
  • Posted by Jim on January 22, 2008 at 3:00pm EST
  • The problem with Macs is that they are a closed platform that has never been price competitive with Wintel based machines, and they have not had nearly the same degree of availability of freeware, shareware, and bootleg software. This is of course their advantage as well, because it makes the platform less vulnerable to bad software, compatibility problems, viruses, etc. Now that Apple is narrowing the price/ performance gap and converting so many young users to their operating system and software, it is forcing many educational institutions to treat them more seriously. However, students who grow up with Macs face a little bit of a learning curve when they hit the corporate world, which is almost universally Wintel based. That much said, you should probably buy Apple stock on this pullback because they are clearly making major inroads with the next generation of corporate users, and how long will it be before corporations are forced to do the same thing that universities are doing? Then again, if Steve Jobs gets run over by a Microsoft assassin, will the company still be able to maintain its amazing innovation edge? These are the deep questions which must be pondered by IT admins and investors alike.

  • Best Option
  • Posted by Chuck on January 22, 2008 at 3:25pm EST
  • I would have to side with Hank, my wife uses a PC I have a Mac, as does our entire office (we use it for our enterprise solutions) not a month goes by that there is not a crash, virus, spyware, some access issue or those ridiculous permissions to do everything. Just last month her whole system crashed, and now she envies my Mac. The PC issue has little to do with customer service or quality, PC's are essentially bad machines, even the techs admit that standard procedure is to reboot every week to prevent a major crash. In 7 years I cannot think of a crash that destroyed my data, a virus, spyware, or any kinds of malware that has affected my Mac. The monopoly PC's have is in the cost benefits Microsoft provides to schools, take that away and Apple is on top. Even with that there are cost models showing the constant maintenance issues with PC's and the "not-so" powerful Windows servers (why does every editor have to add the "powerful" to Windows Servers, they're not)outweigh any perceived issue with a Mac transition. One last point, My X-servers also do not crash, my one Windows server, for accounting, cost me more per year in maintenance than 2 X-servers and 6 mini's. I'll keep my Mac and wish all the Anti Apple rhetoric would die and let the facts show what has always been, Apple just makes a better product.

  • fire or smoke?
  • Posted by skeptic mac user on January 22, 2008 at 3:55pm EST
  • Yes, Macs have the cool, cleverly designed, and pretty looking. I have one. But if Apple hadn't gone out of their way and built in the Trusted Platform Module into the OS we could have run Mac OS X on our already existing PCs instead of having to buy new hardware from one and only one hardware manufacturer.

  • Dual Systems
  • Posted by IBMer on January 22, 2008 at 5:05pm EST
  • I think the dual operating systems is great for the University setting, but encourage Universities to be careful when it comes to considering elimination of Windows systems in favor of MAC. In the business world, MACs are rarely used, and there may be file format issues so users need to be able to use IBM. On the other hand, there may be industries such as graphic design and art which are predominantly MAC, so I would encourage the dual systems, but not getting rid of either!

  • GFU and the Apple Conversion
  • Posted by Greg Smith , CTO at George Fox University on January 22, 2008 at 5:05pm EST
  • George Fox University located in Newberg, OR, has decided to transition their undergraduate laptop program to offer only Apple MacBooks instead of the Apple or PC choice. Our students will be able to run Microsoft Windows if they desire. However, we would not expect a major adoption of the Windows option since only 30% chose a Windows PC this year. Our strongest test group was our Engineering Program. At this time we have only focused this decision on our undergraduate laptop program, however, many of our faculty are also switching to Apple. We will be in a better position to transition staff after we implement our new PeopleSoft ERP system.

  • Inaccuracies in article
  • Posted by drabauer , Assistant Professor of Music Theory at University of California, Irvine on January 22, 2008 at 6:45pm EST
  • "So far, at least, that growing popularity has yet to be matched in most campus computing environments, which run on industry-standard hardware and software that rely on powerful Windows-based servers and compatible network architecture."

    Computer networks almost *never* rely in Windows-based servers, but on products from Cisco, and other networking companies, which implement standard network protocols. Standard hardware does not rely on Windows, and never has.

  • Price premium another myth
  • Posted by Hank on January 22, 2008 at 8:20pm EST
  • "... have to pay the design premium for the Apple hardware." Well, actually you don't -- the prices for Mac vs. Windows are quite similar anymow, *if* you don't play the fully configured Mac price vs. the low-end Windows machine that then requires 100s to add-on to be truly comparable. Plus with the present Macs and Parallels you really have two computers. There is Office for the Mac, but you can run your Windows Office there too. Or not, I don't care.

  • Windows on Mac Boxes
  • Posted by Dan Mitchell at De Anza College on January 22, 2008 at 8:20pm EST
  • Being in Cupertino and literally walking distance from Apple, it should be no surprise that we were early experimenters with Apple's Boot Camp and some of the third party alternatives.

    While Apple's corporate objectives may differ, it is not our institutional goal to wean people off Windows. Quite the opposite. By putting computers into labs that can run either OS natively institutions can place the OS's and applications needed by al student, faculty, and staff users on all computers. If you like Windows, you will still run Windows. If you prefer Mac, you'll run Mac.

  • mac vs PC
  • Posted by Biosciprof on January 22, 2008 at 10:25pm EST
  • The whole point of the dual boot is that students can run BOTH flavors of software. Should be no problem shifting to a wintel environment if they have to.

    At a previous (academic) employer, the IT dept figured how much manpower it needed to maintain the macs vs the PCs. the net result was that PCs require much more support than Macs. It wasn't that Mac-users were so much more techy, it was simply that the uniform system/hardware made problems less common, and the robustness of the system can fix them sooner.

    I have a powerbook that I have dropped on cement more than once (unintentionally). It is dented, has been across both oceans several times. It was rock solid until theh hard drive went; no surprise, that, and it died slowly enough for me to recover all the data first. It is rock solid again with a new drive. The only problem with macs is they last forever.

    Nice that everyone else is catching up to me.

    (Mac user since Macs started.)

  • MAC vs PC
  • Posted by Susan , Business Owner on January 22, 2008 at 10:25pm EST
  • I have owned my business for 14 years. In my business, we rely on computers everyday for every aspect of our service and production. I am weary from the problems that I have experienced with PC's. I never use clones; I purchase only Dells and HPs and have a professionally installed network and dedicated server. Again, I am weary of the problems associated with PCs and Windows. Rebooting is a way of life in the world of the PC. I have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on PC's. I bought my iMac in October, and I have never been happier. My daily computer life is stress free, and I absolutely love the perks associated with such an awesome piece of hardware. Leopard has brought nothing but enjoyment to my daily life at work and play. Every night, as I put my Mac to sleep, I am grateful for yet another day FREE of rebooting and annoying MS error messages. I will find a way to replace every PC in my business. I will not spend another dime on a PC. If I could find a way, I would never spend another dime on any MS product ever again. My goal is to have all Mac hardware and run both platforms on some of my computers. The world is a much nicer place when I view it through my Mac. I don't consider myself a snob in any other aspect of my life, but I am proud to be a iSnob.

  • Posted by Terry Jones , Project Manager on January 22, 2008 at 10:25pm EST
  • The system performance difference between Mac & PC on comparible systems is most likely only noticible by the average user in a very limited number of situations. However, I can walk into practically any store that sells computer items and find PC compatible software and hardware. Mac's licensing development policies, while perhaps maintaining quality, have also limited the availability of Mac compatible software and hardware.

    Trendy is not a sustainable competitive advantage. Apple may see a short-term spike, but until they can produce a competitively priced machine with all the industry wide support (service, software AND hardware) of the Windows based PC they will fail to maintain a hold on any significant portion of the market share.

    Mac can now run PC software. Great. I'd venture to guess that Microsoft won't bother to develop an OS that can run Mac software.

    The Ipod is all the rage these days. So was the Atari system at one time.

  • Show me...
  • Posted by Terry Jones , Project Manager at M&A Architects, Inc on January 22, 2008 at 10:25pm EST
  • Trendy is not a sustainable competitive advantage. Apple's licensing development policies, while perhaps maintaining quality, have limited the availability of service, compatible software, AND hardware. Apple's history of premium prices will be a difficult hurtle to overcome. Perception may overshadow reality.

    Apple machines can now run PC software. Great. I doubt Microsoft will bother to create an OS that can run Mac software. On the other hand, Microsoft should not discount the damage it does itself by releasing buggy software and OS.
    Colleges and universities have long been at the cutting edge and susceptible to the whims of its student population. Show me news of a major corporation switching from PC to Mac and I'll sit up and take notice.

  • It's really the substance
  • Posted by Hank on January 23, 2008 at 10:05am EST
  • "Trendy is not a sustainable competitive advantage." It's not about trendiness, but if that helps you through the night, enjoy it.

  • Not a "Fanatic."
  • Posted by Geoffrey Broadhurst at Bay Shore High School on January 23, 2008 at 6:45pm EST
  • Hey, Rob,
    I just read your comment about Mac “fanatics” having better tech skills and I feel I need to input something here.
    I have been using a Mac for some years now. I also use Windows on PCs at work. I would like to stress that I am a user and not a fanatic of either platform. When either machine does something I am not familiar with (and both platforms can “act up” at times), I end up calling someone else who can help bail me out. I would like to mention that I need to call on a PC tech person much more often than a Mac tech person. It is now to the point that I’ve decided that if I’m spending my own money, I get better value and far less headaches with a Mac. After all, isn’t that what life is all about?

  • Learning to use a Mac
  • Posted by Bridget Bordelon on January 24, 2008 at 7:00pm EST
  • As a 6th grade teacher in Louisiana, I must applaud former Governor Kathleen Blanco, her entire staff, and the Apple Corporation for the laptop initiative that has provided laptops to each 6th grade in the entire state. I am very fortunate to have been selected to take part in this project and my students are delighted. My previous computer experience has been strictly PC and the new MacBooks that use the Leopard version have been challenging to learn. However, the more I use the MacBook, the more I find that it is a more logical system to use. My students have picked up on the MacBook much quicker than I have and in fact are teaching me how to use it.

  • Mac Required
  • Posted by Kristina on January 24, 2008 at 8:45pm EST
  • Now when professors are simply requiring, not just recommending, that students have iTunes and other Mac-based features in order to even remotely survive their courses, students have to invest in something that will enable them to have easy and convenient access to that software. PC isn't the one and only. It's gotta be Mac and at the very least dual.

  • No future for Windows
  • Posted by Bob on January 25, 2008 at 11:15am EST
  • I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned the fact that college students
    in the sciences, especially the physical sciences, must be exposed to
    UNIX/LINUX, and that comes automatically with MAC OS-X. About 70% of my scientific colleagues have converted to Apple in the last five years. They use Microsoft products only when compelled to do so for purposes of communication and presentations, and they are usually underwhelmed by their quality. There's no future for Windows in the
    sciences.

  • Adobe Licensing Confusion
  • Posted by Angela Barker on January 25, 2008 at 8:35pm EST
  • Another user support specialist in our college noted that Adobe license agreements do not allow using more than one copy of the software per licensed computer. ("You may install and use one copy of the Software on up to the Permitted Number of your compatible Computers." ) I just checked with our Adobe reseller and he claims we need one license for each installation even on a single machine. We are confused by Allen's assertion in this article that "...some programs, like Adobe Creative Suite, are licensed by machine, not by operating system, meaning that two copies — one on Mac OS, one on Windows — can be purchased for the price of one, as long as they’re running in the same box."

  • Mac Comments
  • Posted by Stan Sweatt on June 2, 2008 at 5:00pm EDT
  • Disclaimer: Have used Macs in Graphics field, user since '80s. Keep a low profile about Mac-PC.
    Experience: Have watched many friends go PC initially due to perceived $ savings, after several years switched to Mac. Even die-hard "build-it-yourselfer PC people" stick with Mac after switching. Have not found anyone who voluntarily switched from Mac to PC, know many who have switched PC to Mac. Know some who say can't switch to PC because of all the software they have, turns out its all free or stolen, guess I can't blame them!

  • I can only say "HUH"?
  • Posted by shamunda on September 26, 2008 at 5:40pm EDT
  • After reading through many of the comments I'm not at all suprised that the picture of PC vs MAC is still unclear. To the person that said "No Future for Windows in the Sciences", I'm guessing you're referring to the all the sciences - the 200 areas of MS' research that it's not involved in? http://research.microsoft.com

    Hmm and suprisingly all the people there that are real Phd's using PC. Unless i'm mistaken and you're talking about all the sciences not being used with *NIX like systems?

    Any no, abolutely not, is Apples OS X anywhere near a *nix system. It's a hybrid and that's it. Just because part of it's base shared a unix pinning doesn't not make it unix. It's the difference between fully powered seats, and manualy.

    You bought it because it looks pretty, plain and simple, not because you were forced, or because 'it just works', etc, etc.. If you need something that easy to just work, perhaps you shouldn't be in any field needing intelligence. (Actually, given the ratio for systems sold vs defects, there are more PC's that JUST work vs apple ;) But that's another discussion.

    You bought it because you gave into the hype and look. Simple.