Search News


Browse Archives

News

The Distance Administrator

March 9, 2011

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Three years after moving his family to Iowa, Scott McLeod faced a dilemma familiar to workers in many professions.

The Center for the Advanced Study of Technology Leadership in Education (CASTLE), which McLeod ran out of Iowa State University, was being moved to the University of Kentucky, 700 miles away. Kentucky was offering McLeod a raise of nearly 50 percent in hopes of coaxing him to Lexington. (This paragraph has been updated since publication.)

McLeod was interested but did not want to uproot his family. Directing CASTLE, which works with many regional schools to facilitate better use of technology in classrooms, had prompted an earlier relocation from Minnesota. “We have small kids, and we hadn’t been in Iowa for very long,” he says. “It just wasn’t the right time to go.”

But while a large part of CASTLE’s work involves regional advocacy and education, McLeod believed that his own work as an administrator of the center -- and as an associate professor of education, which was part of the job offer from Kentucky -- could be done remotely.

And so McLeod went from being a common case, that of a professional torn between his career and his family, to an uncommon case: a higher ed administrator who plans to work from home -- three states away. Beginning in the fall, McLeod is slated to run his center and teach his courses full-time from his current home in Ames, Iowa -- save a single monthly sojourn to Lexington to fulfill those duties that still require actual face time, which he believes are few.

While it has become common in higher education for college instructors to teach fully online, telecommuting appears to be rare among university employees who serve leadership roles -- as well as for non-adjunct professors who participate in governing duties, as McLeod will as an associate professor.

Some of McLeod’s future colleagues told the Lexington Herald-Leader they were skeptical that the new hire could manage all his responsibilities using just a telephone and a suite of Web 2.0 tools. “How can you be engaged and do service when you’re not here?” Debra Harley, a professor of special education and rehabilitation counseling, told the newspaper. “Electronic service doesn’t exist.”

McLeod disagrees. The “service” part of the job -- his responsibilities to the faculty and to his center -- break down into three parts, as McLeod sees it: service to the university, which means sitting on committees; service to the discipline, which means publishing articles, attending and coordinating conferences, and participating in national societies and organizations; and service to the community, through his work with CASTLE.

Of those, McLeod thinks telecommuting could pose problems only for the first -- and only if his colleagues on university committees refuse to take what he considers relatively simple steps to let him attend meetings virtually.

“Somebody can just fire up their laptop and hit the Skype button,” he says, adding that synchronous video conferencing is no longer considered odd in the realm of online education. “We do that all the time with students…. We seem to do that less when it comes to internal operations -- the meetings that we have. I think in the corporate world it’s not a big deal to whip up a conference call or video conference, but in academe it has to be some sort of special event.”

As for service to the discipline, McLeod says that writing articles, joining societies and participating in conferences are activities that can easily be done via the Web or the telephone -- ditto, as it turns out, with his day-to-day administrative duties at CASTLE. McLeod says he is confident that shoe-leather outreach among area schools and major strategy meetings with colleagues at Kentucky can be handled during his monthly visits to the campus. Apart from that, the job is mainly a lot of "knowledge work," writing, and coordination.

“Those of us who are very comfortable with these digital tools sort of recognize that it’s nice to walk down the hall and see coworkers, but how much do I lose if I call you via the webcam? For the most part, it’s not much,” McLeod says.

“It's not quite as good as face to face,” he says. “But from a productivity standpoint -- I want to hug my grandkids from time to time, but I don’t have to hug my coworkers.”

Justin Draeger, president of the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators (and himself a former telecommuter), says that higher education has few excuses left for being behind the curve on allowing employees to work from afar when it does not demonstrably hinder productivity.

“Smart colleges and universities and other organizations that want to boost productivity, retain talented employees, and reduce costs should be taking a hard look at a comprehensive teleworking policy that can be implemented strategically and appropriately on a job-by-job or department-by-department basis,” Draeger, then NASFAA’s vice president of public policy and advocacy, wrote in a 2009 op-ed for Inside Higher Ed.

“It is ironic that higher education, which has been so successful in implementing distance learning programs, has lagged so far behind in implementing distance-working programs for its employees,” he wrote.

Draeger says he does not think much has changed since then. He says higher education is perhaps still married to the model of face-to-face exchanges as a cultural ethos that extends from the lecture hall to the administrative ranks.

That may well change as online education keeps rising toward equal footing with the lecture hall, as it nearly has at many public universities. Still, telecommuting, like online teaching, will probably not find acceptance until universities create standard measures that they trust to assess how well the new way is working, Draeger says. Like online teaching and online learning, he says, telecommuting is not for everyone.

“You manage by results,” Draeger says. “You gauge and track productivity and effectiveness. Those things don’t go away. And if those things can be achieved off-site, to allow people to have a better personal- and work-life balance, why would you not strive for that?”

For the latest technology news and opinion from Inside Higher Ed, follow @IHEtech on Twitter.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The Distance Administrator

  • Long distance librarian
  • Posted by Kit Keller , Director of Library Services at Chancellor University on March 9, 2011 at 7:15am EST
  • Sorry, I don't find this amazing. I've been working remotely as a library director since 2008, and for Chancellor University since August 2011. I supervise staff, hire staff, attend meetings, initiate meetings, answer reference questions, update library holdings, conduct personnel evaluations -- all from Lincoln, Nebraska where I live. The school is located in Cleveland, OH.
    There are very few reasons why we all need to 'be in the same building' to do our jobs. I find that working remotely is efficient and productive. No time (or money, or fuel) is wasted driving, parking, and dressing to go to an office. I can be online and working 15 minutes after I wake up. I definitely think it's how more people will work in the future.
  • 10 years distance department chair
  • Posted by Steven James , Chair, Psychology & Counseling at Goddard College on March 9, 2011 at 8:15am EST
  • I agree with Kit Keller, this isn't news. I've been a department chair for 10 years, living on Cape Cod and working for Goddard College which is in Vermont. I'm on campus a couple of days a month, on average, and attend weekly meetings of the department chairs and most other gatherings virtually. There are some things I prefer to do face-to-face, like faculty evaluations, but with the increasing ease and reliability of video conferencing I may rethink even those sorts of tasks. As for IHE's idea of what's news, I might suggest that more digging into the facts and a broader perspective were in order.
  • Money sent out of state
  • Posted by Ky native , Biology Professor on March 9, 2011 at 8:45am EST
  • While I agree that many jobs can be performed from a distance (and I've known a few administrators that I would like to send far far away), I am appalled that a state-funded university would send its salary dollars out of state. Perhaps this program itself will engender a boost to the local economy, but it still feels like an inappropriate use of state funds.
  • Posted by BiState on March 9, 2011 at 10:45am EST
  • @ Ky native - having an employee who lives three states away may be uncommon, but it's really not very unusual to have someone work in one state and live in another. Just in Missouri, both St. Louis and Kansas City are right on the state borders, and there's no law preventing someone who works at UMKC from living in Kansas, or at UMSL from living in Illinois, if they want.
  • less than thrilled
  • Posted by UK faculty member , professor in a different department at University of Kentucky on March 9, 2011 at 11:45am EST
  • I'm a faculty member at UK, and pardon me if I don't share the bubbly enthusiasm of the administration for this hire. In fact, it disturbs me on two counts: First, a colleague who is present primarily via Skype or email is not a colleague who will add greatly to the intellectual atmosphere of the department. Much of what goes on in academia is the give and take among faculty and students that occurs outside of formal encounters. Research projects germinate when faculty are chatting idly on their way to the campus Starbucks. Valuable mentoring of graduate students takes place in spontaneous conversations that happen by chance, simply because we happened to be in the building at the same time and ran into each other. McLeod is going to miss out on the vast majority of the informal but vital interactions that make a department a vibrant and intellectually stimulating place to be.

    The second reason I'm less than thrilled with this hire is the statement that UK offered to double McLeod's salary to lure him here. You can imagine the delight with which I and many of my other colleagues at UK (who haven't had a raise in three years) greeted that little bit of news. I guess I wish the administration at UK valued the work of the loyal faculty members who are already here even one-tenth as much, and it makes me feel like rather a chump for doing everything I do for the university that doesn't fall under my official division of effort. Maybe the next time an undergraduate drops by my office to chat for an hour about what graduate school is like, I'll just tell him or her to Skype me--better yet, McLeod--at home.
  • Virtual Management is real
  • Posted by Luc Comeau , Executive Director at elearnnetwork.ca on March 9, 2011 at 3:30pm EST
  • I agree that this works, I have been running a network of 18 rural online education Access Centres for close to four years, with a distributed team of over 40 employees and a distributed management team, all from a home office in a village of 1,500 people.

    Welcome to 2011.
  • Interesting comments re: sustainability
  • Posted by Joan on March 10, 2011 at 2:30pm EST
  • I wanted to follow up on Kit's comment re: parking/driving/sustainability. I think these are all really good reasons for people to be able to work remotely (if all of the other mechanisms are in place.) I work for a University that very proudly and loudly touts our sustainability efforts....yet working from home, even in the same city, is not encouraged. I love the idea of getting online to work 15 minutes after I get up. I would be able to put in longer hours if I did not have to spend some of those hours commuting (I know it's my choice to not live near campus, but housing is incredibly expensive near campus), spending time "getting pretty" before work, spending money on professional clothes, etc. Does anyone have any suggestions for how I can encourage my university to be more open to flexible schedules/sustainable practices? Thanks.