Search News


Browse Archives

News

Blackboard's Bid to Galvanize E-Texts

July 15, 2010

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

ORLANDO — In a series of moves that could give a boost to an e-textbook industry that has been treading water for years, Blackboard announced Wednesday that it is partnering with a major publisher and two major e-textbook vendors to make it easy for professors and students to assign and access e-textbooks and other digital materials directly through its popular learning-management system.

The company, which controlled about 60 percent of the learning-management market as of last year, said it is partnering with McGraw-Hill, a top academic publisher, as well as Follett Higher Education Group and Barnes & Noble, two major distributors that operate a combined 1,500 college bookstores in the United States and Canada.

The McGraw-Hill partnership will allow instructors to search the McGraw-Hill catalog for relevant course materials, then assign them to their students, without ever leaving Blackboard. Students can then purchase and access the assigned materials, also through the Blackboard portal, via the Follett and Barnes & Noble online bookstores.

Blackboard timed the announcement to coincide with its annual user conference here, where delegations from its many clients have gathered to geek out about e-learning and present various projects being done with Blackboard's popular e-learning tool kit.

The company would not comment on whether it is negotiating similar deals with publishers other than McGraw-Hill. But the other big-time e-textbook providers have been making moves of their own. Earlier this week, CourseSmart, a consortium of five major publishers (including McGraw-Hill), unveiled its new “Faculty Instant Access” program, which lets instructors access e-textbooks and other online content directly through any learning-management system (including Blackboard). CourseSmart will be rolling out the program to a handful of "selected universities" in coming weeks.

Michael Chasen, the president of Blackboard, demonstrated his company's new integration with McGraw-Hill, Follett, and Barnes & Noble during a keynote address on Wednesday at the user conference. Chasen narrated as he logged into a dummy course page in astronomy; then, without navigating out of the page, he searched McGraw-Hill's titles for an astronomy e-textbook using a few keywords. Chasen selected one, along with some supplemental e-learning objects, causing them to appear in the list of materials for the course. He then simulated the ease with which a student would log in to the course page, see the title in the list, and purchase it with a few quick clicks. "We’ve heard from our clients and their faculty that they want easier access to all that great online content that’s currently available on the Web through professional publishers,” Chasen said.

The name of the game is convenience, Ray Henderson, president of Blackboard Learn, emphasized later in an interview with Inside Higher Ed. If a publisher’s content is easy to assign electronically through the learning management system, that publisher could have a leg up when professors are deciding which publisher to choose. “There’s recognition… that Blackboard does represent a significant opportunity to reach their end users,” said Henderson. “We’re a great amplifier for their message.”

But can Blackboard, through these arrangements — and other learning-management providers such as Desire2Learn, Moodle, and Sakai, through CourseSmart’s Faculty Instant Access program — help publishers move more e-textbooks? Despite substantial buzz, e-textbooks have so far failed to catch on in academe, capturing 3.5 percent of the total textbook market, according to last year’s Campus Computing Survey. Recent polling by the Student Monitor reveals that student awareness of e-textbooks this spring was down from the previous spring, to 50 percent from 59.

The convenience of learning-management system integration could give the digital textbooks a bump, says Eric Weil, managing director of the Student Monitor. “It certainly can’t hurt, and I think it will have a positive impact,” Weil says, adding that along with the buzz about e-readers galvanized by Apple’s iPad, this fall could be a breakout semester for e-textbooks.

But Kenneth C. Green, director of the Campus Computing Project, cautions against ascribing too much credence to top-down efforts to stoke wider acceptance of e-textbooks. “The issue is not one of delivery, but about making a compelling value proposition,” Green says. In other words: As long as students still think the benefits of using a bound textbook outweigh the convenience of being able to buy an e-textbook through their college’s learning-management system, they will continue purchasing the old-fashioned kind.

For the latest technology news from Inside Higher Ed, follow IHEtech on Twitter.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Blackboard's Bid to Galvanize E-Texts

  • E-books and LMS
  • Posted by Larry Lambert , Systems Administrator at SWC on July 15, 2010 at 11:30am EDT
  • E-books have one failing characteristic, so far, it seems that nobody is buying them back. Hard-bound books can be resold in mainstream media. E-books will become mission critical to colleges in the near future, but as long as they are not faculty initiated or supported it is going to take a much longer time.
    I am especially concerned that the alliances with LMS' may result in publisher's websites being used more often and online education may become "commercialized" and canned. Students have a tough enough time dealing with the technology of thier course managment system. Let's not add more frustration by using different websites for teaching and learning

  • E-Books
  • Posted by Donald Jordan , Coordinator of Elearning Initiative at University of the Pacific on July 15, 2010 at 4:00pm EDT
  • Up to this point, the chief failing of e-books is not their integration into LMS systems, but the fact that most e-book readers are slow and cannot quickly skim through an academic text they way a student needs to in a class discussion. Most e-book readers are optimized for novel reading, not research. The iPad makes some strides in this area, but I am concerned that ebooks are becoming balkanized through proprietary apps (which app or device you use to read a book depends on where you buy it: Amazon, B&N, iBooks, etc.). This raises the fear, for me, that companies like Blackboard may sign exclusive deals with publishers making certain books available only on certain platforms. While we do have a standard e-pub format, DRM can and will lock the books into various proprietary standards and will end up being far more expensive in the future. The issue of cost is one that also needs to be dealt with. A pricing model must be brought forward that makes sense and takes into account that there is no resale available, and that publishers save a significant amount off of production costs (as well as marketing costs when you consider sending pdf or epub files to instructors rather than free desk copies that feed into the ridiculous pricing structures of the textbook market).

  • Can you say oligopoly?
  • Posted by John B. on July 16, 2010 at 12:00am EDT
  • In a free market, digital textbooks should cost $10, not $100, e.g. eTAP.org. Then, there would be no need to rely on bookstore buy-back to make textbooks affordable for students.

    The textbook-education alliance is also frought with conflicts of interest from professor royalties to institutional profit-sharing. I know there are educators legitimately trying to change the system to benefit the students, but until we change the economics, the status quo will continue.

    There was also the problem of no suitable portable ebook reading device that could handle graphics and video. The iPad may be the first such viable technology.

  • other problems with e-texts
  • Posted by MIS Prof , MGMT/MKT Dept at public teaching institution on July 16, 2010 at 11:45am EDT
  • I've been advocating for e-texts for a long time now. I generally like the idea of linking publisher material in pieces in the LMS. This approach might let students spread out the cost of the textbook over the semester (just-in-time purchasing). I wonder how it will affect students who need to purchase through the local campus bookstore because of how scholarship money is distributed. Purchasing the material might also be difficult for students who don't have credit cards (surprisingly, there are still some out there in this situation, just like we still have some students who must use dial-up web access or who don't have computers at home at all).

    I do worry some about material students need to keep on their professional bookshelves (there still is some material in this category). Will we establish personal electronic bookshelves at Google and access it with our desktops or mobile devices? Or will we rely on Google books, Google scholar, and Google search to access material when we need it? Will Amazon add an e-shelf that will allow non-Amazon material for the Kindle? Will Apple offer an e-shelf for the iPad? Or will we have multiple e-shelves all over the web? Will there be an open-source alternative? How will various corporate agreements and partnerships restrict this activity? How do we protect copyrights in this environment. I like e-books, but I still have bookcases for a reason.

    There are other drawbacks than no one buying back e-texts. Students can't sell their e-texts to other students after a course or easily share them during a course (at least when DRM is is place). I'm certainly personally frustrated when I want to share an e-book with a friend.

    However, the main reason students at my institution don't buy e-texts is that they can't mark them up as thoroughly (I've surveyed them). Even though our students insist cost is the most important criteria in purchasing a textbook, they reject e-texts because they want to underline, highlight, circle, and write in the margins as they study or as we faculty lecture (in class or in an online video) and drop broad hints about what will be on the next exam. Most e-texts don't support this capability nearly as well as printed versions.

    I'm hoping for smart screens and better mark-up tools to drive student acceptance. Otherwise, students will just stick with printed options or print out material at a higher cost (sometimes on university printers they discover aren't being metered).

    I think smart screens and e-texts will eventually become the norm, well within 20 years. After all, self-opening doors, communicators, and tricorders from Star Trek took less than 50 years to become commonplace. I do realize that Dick Tracy's wrist-watch with video phones took a little longer, but change is accelerating. ;-)

  • No Way
  • Posted by Paul , Grad Student on July 17, 2010 at 1:45pm EDT
  • As a graduate student and future academician, I am and always will be totally against e-books. The traditional, classic textbook is the preferred method of instruction, plain and simple.

    If you're going to allow e-books in the classroom, what devices will you require your students to read them on? That's a pretty big question right there, since most (if not ALL) of the e-book devices could hold or access other information that would lead to academic dishonesty, cheating, plagiarism, etc. I'm sorry, but the classic textbook is the way to go.

    This whole "technology in the classroom" issue really makes my blood boil. I'm one of the firm dissenters against it, since I feel that modern technology is bringing the death of humanity. It decreases normal, everyday interpersonal communication. When I draft my syllabi, I have to include a one-page treatise on my philosophy about technology in the classroom (i.e. no cell phones, iPads, iPods, or any other mobile devices are to be used during testing....they must be confiscated and brought up to the front of the room). What else....all tests will be either written or scantron. I don't believe in giving take-home exams or hosting tests on a computer.

    You get the idea....

    PD18750@aol.com