Search News


Browse Archives

News

Next Steps for E-Texts

August 26, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Predicting when e-textbooks will become a viable alternative to the dead-tree variety churned from printing presses to millions of college students a year is a bit like asking whether newspapers will give way to the Internet. Everyone thinks they will, but it's a question of when, and what the new paradigm will look like.

At the beginning of this year, Amazon's newly released Kindle electronic reader, along with its competitors, sparked renewed interested in digital books in general, and their application to instructional materials in particular. More recently, some tech prognosticators are sounding downright bullish on Kindle's future prospects, or at least the probability that in the near future, e-readers will become adopted by a critical mass of consumers.

In other words, more predictions, despite the fact that previous projections of major adoption of electronic books have not historically panned out. But gradually, as the trickle of students and professors who use e-textbooks starts to grow, advances in hardware and an evolving market -- not to mention increasing complaints about textbook costs -- are sure to speed along continuing changes in reading (and studying) habits.

"Most students still buy print versions of textbooks, and carrying them around is as big a pain as it has been for past generations of students," wrote Michael Arrington last month in the popular blog TechCrunch, which tracks Internet start-ups and emerging trends. "Most publishers now offer electronic versions of their textbooks -- McGraw-Hill Education, for example, publishes 95% of their books electronically as well as in print. But there is no compelling device to read them on....

"A new large-screen Kindle would solve those problems. The battery life is much longer than most electronic devices, and carrying a large Kindle is still a lot better than carrying ten heavy textbooks. Our guess is that Amazon will make a major push into the educational markets next year -- it’s the only obvious reason to create a large-screen Kindle" -- which Arrington predicted would be released next year.

Developments in hardware accompany a batch of new initiatives and partnerships from colleges as well as stakeholders not popularly associated with radical changes in the industry: textbook publishers themselves, and independent bookstores. As it turns out, neither is quite as opposed to a digital revolution in publishing as it might initially seem -- especially in the case of publishers, who have invested in e-books for at least a decade.

"The answer is yes, it’s happening already, it’s going to be happening more swiftly in the coming years. There’s been a feeling of inevitability about it," said Joseph J. Esposito, president of the management consulting firm Portable CEO, who has worked in traditional publishing and advised both scholarly presses and Internet companies.

Latest Developments

More and more, colleges are getting into the mix as they start their own initiatives or partner with consortiums or start-ups testing new business models. For colleges, the impetus is to address cash-strapped students' concerns about textbook costs in a lagging economic environment, while publishers get the benefit of increased visibility. Last year, according to the Association of American Publishers, e-textbooks sold by major publishers in the United States added up to $241 million out of about $3.5 billion in sales by major publishers.

As part of its Textbook Affordability Symposium, the University System of Ohio is planning to offer incentives to professors who significantly reduce textbook costs for their students, including grants -- five, to the tune of $50,000 each -- to instructors who help create free materials for the state's most commonly taught courses. In a partnership with CourseSmart, a consortium of major publishers seeking to jump-start an e-textbook market, the system will allow students to use the existing university Web portal, OhioLINK, to buy electronic textbooks directly, said Sean Devine, CourseSmart's CEO.

That agreement follows an ongoing CourseSmart partnership at San Diego State University, where a “substantive number” of courses, at least 200, have their materials available in electronic format, Devine said. The e-books can be purchased directly through the campus store, which he said provides students with "definitive knowledge" about course lists and the ability to use any financial aid benefits. Moreover, CourseSmart recently finalized an agreement with the wholesaler MBS Direct, which will make its member publishers' e-books available on Textbooks.com and in various college bookstores.

Partnering with stores is part of CourseSmart's overall strategy, Devine said. "What we believe is that students are going to purchase their textbooks in a number of different places, and there’s not kind of a monolithic approach to this." (Others in the space, such as CaféScribe, remain online only.)

Esposito said publishers have been eager to jump into the e-textbook market in hopes of shutting out the used-book market -- which some estimate makes up to a third of textbook sales -- once and for all. (Already, several online services offer students the ability to compare prices for used textbooks.) They're "drooling, salivating, rubbing their hands together” at the thought, he said. “They’ve been dying to do this for decades." Many of the available e-textbook platforms, CourseSmart included, operate on a subscription model that presumably expires once the semester is over, much like a library or an online video rental service.

At the same time, publishers stand to gain from the ability to track which digital materials are used by professors and institutions, he said. That would be a potential boon for developers of the next generation of teaching materials. And e-textbooks would easily integrate with existing course management systems, providing students with opportunities for increased collaboration with classmates and instructors. Esposito flagged Pearson's acquisition last year of eCollege, a provider of course management, assessment and e-learning software, as a potential signal of future trends.

Meanwhile, start-ups are jumping in to test competing business models. Flat World Knowledge, for example, plans on offering free and open textbook materials to participating institutions, while drawing revenue from add-ons such as study guides and print editions. Other efforts seek to bypass revenue models altogether and promote the adoption of free, ready-to-edit open-source content, a movement that, while miniscule in comparison to print and even electronic textbooks from publishers so far, has attracted significant interest online.

Remaining Obstacles

Whether -- or when -- e-textbooks become as ubiquitous as laptops or smartphones on campuses depends on several factors that continue to hinder widespread adoption. Observers of the nascent market point variously to available hardware, consumer demand and the dearth of content made specifically for digital formats.

"We believe firmly that the most significant gating factor in prior eras of this has been that there hasn’t been a critical mass of inventory available on a single platform. So that student that wanted to try it had to wonder ... 'Is it going to be on a platform that’s compatible? Do I have to have multiple books on [different] platforms?'" Devine said.

"We believe as standards emerge, the market will grow, and as common platforms emerge, the market will grow. We don’t even necessarily believe it has to be our platform."

In Ohio, especially, Devine stressed the key combination of a "critical mass of content," a single platform and a pre-existing portal that students already heavily use. If it's successful, it could be seen as a model for future e-textbook ventures.

Esposito, meanwhile, stressed that until professors start assigning e-textbooks on a widespread basis -- or nudging their students to use them -- the market will continue to respond to demand for print materials. He added that the level of adoption may vary by institution type, noting that some community college systems have more top-down control over curriculums, allowing for coordinated changes in formats.

And even if e-textbooks catch on, he warned that there is no reason to suppose that they would completely take over the higher education market. “People don’t get into foolish false dichotomies. It’s not either-or, it’s supplemental," he said.

Besides having a widely used device and e-textbook platform -- say, something as common as the iPod and iTunes for music -- an important factor in the medium's development may be the growth of content that's "born digital" rather than merely transposed from print, said Bob Stein, founder of the Institute for the Future of the Book.

"We’re getting close in the sense that we might see the right device in the next three to five years, and I think that we’ll start to see some credible examples. How long it takes for things to flip, that really depends on the device more than anything else."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Next Steps for E-Texts

  • Signing Kindle Readers this Side of the Digital Divide
  • Posted by Jerry Pattengale , Ass't Provost at Indiana Wesleyan University on August 26, 2008 at 7:50am EDT
  • Thanks, Andy. This is interesting. Yesterday our bookstore owner said to a nursing student’s father—“You’re the first person to pass the $1,000 mark for a semester in one purchase. Go pick yourself out anything you want. T-Shirt, hat, . . .” The father replied, “I’m okay, it’s worth it . . .” I have two sons in college, one in pre-med, and these costs are indeed staggering but the ROI does seem worth it (though my son wouldn’t have passed on the shirt, and he buys his own books). However, there’s still the manumission of the text that remains, no matter how many books become digital. That is, that physical presence of the written word—largely for practical reasons. While running a foundation we hosted conferences with the British Library at our estate in Hereford, England on manuscripts, and an engaging presentation by Dr. Scott Carroll (Prof. at Cornerstone, MI) spoke directly to this. When the Gutenberg Press literally changed the face of the literary world (1454), a priest (ca. 1510) addressed the ecclesiastical world noting the desire to stay in touch with the physical manuscript, to hold in one’s hand (“manus”) what was sent from it (“mittere”). Carroll also noted that the printed books were replicas of the manuscript copies—it’s what people expected (large folio copies replicating even the hand script at times). The same dynamic seems to be playing out with readers, etc., in the digital world. However, and Andy hits this spot on, the difference today is that these texts are berthed from the digital world, for the digital world (Presnsky’s digital native comes to mind). I also had to chuckle, because last week I committed to a book signing with McGraw-Hill for The Purpose-Guided Student and Why I Teach. I suppose my Sharpie will sign a Kindle reader—and perhaps like FaceBook lists, people will begin talking about their Kindle lists. All said, the ability to save students money makes sense, though I’m a bit leary of incentivizing free books that bypass the rigorous and sensible review process of the major publishers. It’s one thing to have a key scholar involved in a textbook with a few reviewing eyes , and quite another to have dozens of reviewers and an expansive team of experts assisting the pedagogy, layout, technical approach, etc. Who will hold the authors to new editions in an open source venue? It’s the Thomas Khun paradox, where the new paradigm of digital books is a remarkable breakthrough for access, but the shortcuts can prove problematic. However, just as Kodak was able to bring its quality to the digital photo world, I’m confident that McGraw-Hill, Cengage and other major presses will be able to do the same. And, after all, I’m reading Inside online from our local café.

  • Posted by Tom Hooyman , Associate Professor at Regis University on August 26, 2008 at 9:35am EDT
  • The Kindle works great and a text book version will be a welcome edition. Don't forget the high school market. Just spent $800 for our 12th grader.

  • E-Texts
  • Posted by Laura Koltutsky on August 26, 2008 at 11:45am EDT
  • As an academic librarian I can assure you that while students are excited by the ability to access course materials and resources online, they are also printing them off to read. Reading online text is not as popular as you might think. Quite often after introducing students to ebooks available to them, they ask if they can print them out. Ebooks require students to read massive amounts of text on screen and until there is a textbook sized Kindle I don't see students rushing to scroll through entire chapters on a handheld device.

  • E-texts
  • Posted by MYHerring on August 26, 2008 at 12:35pm EDT
  • I second the academic librarian's comment as I'm one, too, and do not see many students rushing to this option. In fact, so many students print off texts mindlessly that you wonder where all the tree-huggers have gone. Prints costs have soared and with hardly a quibble about the waste of paper. If the issue were converting textbooks to Kindle readers--not all they're cracked up to be really--it would have been done years ago. Too many statekholders with much to lose have much more to gain to see this not succeed. It will, eventually, though early iterations will likely not be sustainable models.

  • Posted by everycritic on August 26, 2008 at 2:00pm EDT
  • "...carrying a large Kindle is still a lot better than carrying ten heavy textbooks."

    Who in the world carries around ten heavy textbooks on a regular basis? I went to college. I lived off campus. I think I carried a maximum of two books with me at any one time.

    I'm not saying there aren't legitimate uses for e-books but I think the marketers are trying too hard to sell us on the "convenience" idea. Face it folks: paper books are pretty darn convenient already.

    I know this won't be a popular view but I'm also tired of the "dead tree" guilt trips. I buy books and then either give them away or sell them if I don't want them anymore. In short, I recycle. Books have always been sacred to me. I'd never dream of throwing them away so I honestly don't understand why it's now considered so wrong to want paper books.

  • The wrong approach...
  • Posted by LM on August 26, 2008 at 8:40pm EDT
  • I accessed my first e-book recently after being asked to teach an online course that has an ebook. I'll leave the publisher's name, class, and book out of this post, but here are some initial observations:

    - Just as online faculty who try to design an ecourse that replicates their physical classroom designs fail to "get" that the online courseroom is a different medium necessitating a different approach and providing different styles of learning opportunity, ebook publishers (ebooks from publishers, that is) have missed the mark.

    The book I have access to is literally a copy of the print book pages in PDF. There is no page interactivity (e.g., embedded video, flash or other interactions with maps, images, etc).

    -The cost for the book is $49 - a materials fee included in tuition. If students want a black and white version printed, they can pay another $49. The book is $99-$120 from online retailers new and much less if bought used. According to the surveys of students taking this class, most are either printing it themselves (a page at a time at their work, or home, and so forth) or buying the prited version. This suggests they still want the print version. This is a freshman level class, FYI.

    Given these observation, I'd say the ebook is in need of a new paradigm. The idea of an online text should capitalize on what is possible online- the possibilities to include hypermedia/interactive/engaging content.

  • Sorry, that file is corrupted . . .
  • Posted by Dr. F. Gump on August 26, 2008 at 10:25pm EDT
  • As one who has often watched .wav, .wma,
    .mp3, .m4p, etc. etc. music files slip away while trading up from PDA model to PDA model to latest phone . . . if it's worth buying and I hope to keep that information, the dead tree edition sounds more secure.

    How long does it take for a portable electronic device to check online and insure that one has copyright approval to read (as in music files - listen) ebooks?

  • A few thoughts from experience
  • Posted by JP Craig on August 27, 2008 at 7:55am EDT
  • First, I use "ebooks" a lot. The ready availability of pdf versions of journal articles has simplified research for me. I can search them, my OS indexes them, and I can have tons of material with me at all times on my laptop. I can cut and paste, highlight, annotate documents. So, for me, the digital version is superior.

    However, students do tend to print things off, wasting the green opportunity and moving printing expenses to themselves or to the university.

    Some devices, like the Kindle, aren't quite ready for the classroom because they use that eInk or ePaper tech; I can't recall the right name now. And the page refresh times are slow enough that skimming and browsing for a point in the text is not really an option. The various ways you can enter comments on many of these devices are limited by either not being present at all or by being clumsy and slow. Then there's the question of evolving formats and DRM making documents somewhat prone to be obsolete too quickly.

    And I suspect that such devices might not actually lower prices for students. That they might end up costing more. Maybe I'm just paranoid about that. But I can see a lot of busted and stolen devices. And I can see longer lines at the tech support tables. And I wonder too about batteries failing, running out, and going into landfills. And what about the necessity of upgrading infrastructure: outlets, wireless, distribution technologies.

    It's an interesting and possibly useful possibility, but there are a lot of variables to take into account that seem to get insufficient attention in the cheerleading articles I read so often.

  • Access and Disabilities
  • Posted by Gail Conrad , Director Disability Services at San Diego Community College District on August 27, 2008 at 11:20am EDT
  • The article on next steps for e-text is great, but there is more to the story!

    In California, the production of e-text for students with disabilities in the community colleges has been a requirment for a number of years, thanks to the good work of Ralph Black(previously legal counsul for the System of California Community Colleges) and Catherine Campisi (retired from the Department of Rehabilitation).

    What we need from publishers is the ability to provide that e-text in a format that can be read to the student with screen-reader software. It should never be the only format that is available (even though the Kindle is a very portable tool)and I look forward to having publishers work with us. We're not there yet!

    California Community Colleges with the help of it's statewide High Tech Center and the Alternate Text Production Center have provided regular trainings and etext (including Braille) for the colleges in a very timely manner.

    I know that there are many folks in the state that will be happy to work with publishers for good access for all...what we call universal design and possibly lower books costs (changes can be faster).
    ;-} Gail in California

  • When is a textbook not a textbook
  • Posted by Mitch Allen , Publisher at Left Coast Press, Inc. on August 28, 2008 at 4:55am EDT
  • One point not discussed in this article is the long term utility of a textbook. While students often purchase at the beginning of the semester and sell back at the end, that doesn't necessarily apply to upper level course texts or books for courses in the student's major. If they plan on keeping that accounting or biology or engineering book for a 40 year career in that field, the transferability of the technology becomes important. What will happen to that e-text when Kindle readers are so old that they've become kindling?

  • keeping textbooks
  • Posted by Dan Lester on August 28, 2008 at 4:25pm EDT
  • I'm a librarian. I'm about to retire after more than 40 years as a book collector (personally) and as a technology librarian. Yes, I go back to punched cards, but have a 3G iPhone in my pocket that is used for web browsing, etc.

    ebooks will happen, as stated, just a matter of when and how. DRM is an eternal issue, and newer ways of handling it will be developed. 3G may be one of those methods to communicate to the "great server in the sky", or more likely 6G or whatever comes next.

    Will we buy the same things again? Perhaps. But at least in digital format we will be able to convert to a new device, whatever it is like. I won't have to buy Elvis' "Don't be Cruel" on 45, on 33, on cassette, and on CD. At least the CD could be ripped to hard drive and iPod, so I didn't have to buy it again. The same will be true of the textbooks for those who want to keep them.

    As to the value of your 40 year old textbooks from upper division course, the library receives hundreds or more every spring when retiring professors clean out their offices. They're sent over to the library as "gifts". They are often dust-covered and have obviously not been read since student days, and haven't been touched since the last time the prof switched offices or schools. What happens to them? They go into large black plastic bags, and then straight into the dumpster. Why bag them? So no "do gooder" brings these "wonderful books" back to the library. The same thing happens to all types of libraries with everybody's old National Geographics that are "too wonderful to throw away".

    I don't worry about using paper, as it is recyclable, and because the tries used to make it aren't old growth redwoods, but renewable crops like corn or beans. They cut some every year and immediately replant.

    dan@riverofdata.com

  • Paving the cowpaths
  • Posted by Keith Hampson on August 29, 2008 at 5:25am EDT
  • I’m optimistic about the potential of e-textbooks. However, I think they are still falling short of providing end-users with the truly compelling reason to abandon print (after six centuries). In many cases, the publishers are simply moving the same content to the online environment. This is merely “paving the cowpaths”. That is, they are using the new technology to simply offer that which they always have, just faster and cheaper (and in this case, lighter) than previous versions. I think the real winners in this market will be those that find ways to exploit the properties of the new medium, while still finding a way to generate enough revenue to produce high quality content.

  • Annotation?
  • Posted by Jeff C. on September 9, 2008 at 7:15pm EDT
  • The prospect of using e-Texts does look promising, but will the technology allow for practical annotation? I have students who still cannot negotiate MS Word without problems, and now we have to nudge them into electronic/digital in-text noting? Critical reading still needs to be serviced with this new technology, based on what I see.