Search News


Browse Archives

News

Changing Course

October 22, 2010

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

As a growing number of nonprofit colleges hire for-profit companies to lay tracks for their new online programs, academics generally have been the third rail. Technology and information systems are one thing, the colleges say; to outsource teaching and curriculum is quite another.

Now, two major e-learning companies have teamed up to disprove that truism. Blackboard and K12, Inc. announced last week that they will begin selling online remedial courses to community colleges beginning next year. The details will be hashed out over the next few months, but the basic outline is this: The companies will design the courses and provide the instructors from K12’s stable, and the colleges will offer the courses through their normal catalogs.

Some nonprofit institutions that partner with companies on online education have been careful to emphasize their commitment to keeping a wall between the business and technology of online course delivery and the actual instruction. “Some things, we would never turn over to the private sector,” Philip Regier, dean of Arizona State University’s online programs, said earlier this month, after his institution announced it was going into business with Pearson to help boost its online offerings.

But Blackboard and K12 are betting that remedial education will be an exception. About 75 percent of first-year students at community colleges need at least one remedial course, according to a report released earlier this year by the The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. And yet the percentage of students who end up moving beyond such courses is typically less than half. Under the circumstances, it might be hard for faculty to reject outsourced courses on territorial grounds.

Larry Gold, director of higher education for the American Federation of Teachers, said that "this particular enterprise may or may not advance student learning — we can’t tell from a press release," But, he added that "we do know that students in developmental education and introductory college courses, particularly at community colleges, need a great deal of personal academic attention and a large array of educational support services, including but certainly not limited to technology. Providing those services to students from all walks of life will require a major investment in on-site instructional and support staff."

As a general rule, faculty have a reputation for being resistant to ceding control of any part of the curriculum to what they might view as commercial interlopers; but remedial courses — with their low pass rates and sub-college material — are notorious for being undesirable gigs. As catch-up courses, they tend to lie far from the academic core of an institution, and in many cases they do not earn students credit toward a degree. “Most professors who get to college level are not there to teach high school English and math,” says Matthew Small, the chief business officer at Blackboard.

High school English and math are K12’s bread and butter. K12 is a publicly traded company that has focused on providing online education — remedial and otherwise — for elementary and secondary school students. “These are the same kids we’re teaching at the high-school level, only six months older,” said Bruce Davis, the company’s vice president of worldwide business development.

K12 has made only a few inroads in higher education; last summer one of its subsidiaries was rebuffed by an accrediting agency when it tried to take over operations at Rochester College, a four-year liberal arts college in Michigan. (K12’s collaboration with Middlebury College to deliver language instruction as part of a summer program has been more successful.) Davis said he will be pleased this time to have, in Blackboard, a co-pilot with a huge network of existing higher-ed clients.

For Blackboard — which has sold online learning platforms and other services for years, but never courses — the deal also represents a new sort of business. Both sides say K12 will do most of the heavy lifting on course design and provide the labor from its stable of 2,700 instructors, while Blackboard will focus mainly on the technology. But the two companies say they will work together on all aspects of the product. Small, the chief business officer, said Blackboard does not currently sell courses past the remedial level. “Outside of this very targeted effort, we have no plans to move into the general areas of curriculum and instruction,” he said.

But despite the widely acknowledged need for better college remediation, there is no guarantee that community colleges will readily outsource their remedial courses.

Burck Smith, CEO of StraighterLine — which sells courses directly to students, rather than institutions — says that it might be difficult to develop better courses for less than what the community colleges already spend on remediation. While state governments give community colleges more money if they enroll remedial students, the colleges are often not required to spend that money on remediation; they actually tend to spend very little on those courses, Smith says. Offering superior courses for less, he says, might be tough. (Blackboard says it has not yet worked out pricing details. As for quality, “We expect to win on the merits,” says Small. “We will have the highest quality offering in this space.”)

Smith nevertheless says he wished luck to the companies, which he does not consider competitors since only a small portion of StraighterLine's courses are aimed at remediation.

“Yes, I think there is interest,” says Michael Collins, program director for Jobs of the Future, which focuses on creating career pathways for underserved populations. But there are some wild cards. First, some community colleges might resist outsourcing remedial education if it stands to affect how much state funding they get, Collins says.

Davis, the K12 vice president, says online courses are a perfect fit for remedial education, since online learning platforms are increasingly able to monitor student engagement and send up red flags when a student is falling behind. As in any classroom, some remedial students are likely to outpace others. But whereas a classroom instructor has to establish a common pace in order to move the entire class through the material in the time allotted, the online version is more like a private tutor, where students learn at their own pace. “An online [system] knows exactly where a student is in curriculum, how long they’ve been there, and where to intervene,” says Davis. “A computer," he adds, "is infinitely patient.”

In the months ahead, Blackboard says it plans to conduct focus groups with its clients to figure out exactly what sort of a product they would be looking for. “I think institutions will still be very hesitant to outsource actual teaching of the courses,” says Kara Monroe, executive director of instructional technology at Ivy Tech Community College, in Indiana. “But based on the demand there is for remedial education in the United States, I think it's still an option we need to look at and consider.”

For the latest technology news and opinion from Inside Higher Ed, follow @IHEtech on Twitter.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Changing Course

  • Hmm
  • Posted by Proton on October 22, 2010 at 9:00am EDT
  • “These are the same kids we’re teaching at the high-school level, only six months older,” said Bruce Davis, the company’s vice president of worldwide business development.

    Hmm. I'm not sure this company understands the range of populations served by community colleges.
  • Posted by Mike Burke , asst prof English at St Louis Community College on October 22, 2010 at 9:00am EDT
  • I teach a fair amount of developmental courses, and our daughter has taken a number of developmental math, reading, and writing. She has learned to read and write quite well due to developmental courses, all of which featured strong instructors who worked with her individually. She still struggles with developmental math, which is taught largely by completing a computer-based curriculum at her own pace, assisted by an instructor. So I question whether a commercial computer-based program can really do what needs to be done in a developmental course.

    I also think the real market for these kinds of courses should be high schools, which tend to graduate students in four years, regardless of what they have learned. We in the community college world should be more forthright about our expectations for student preparation, perhaps even having HS students take our placement instruments early their senior year to see where they might place in college coursework.

    That way, the high schools could begin the remediation process before the student has to pay us to learn the things he or she should have learned in order to get ready for a college experience. But until the high schools step up to the plate, CCs will continue to have to offer developmental courses. Too bad the CCs get blamed for the high rate of failure in developmental ed--we can't fix everyone in a couple of semesters after 12 years of education (over which we have no control) has been unable to do so.
  • Six Months Older??
  • Posted by Dan Moody , English/ESL/Reading at Southwestern College on October 22, 2010 at 9:45am EDT
  • I agree with Proton and Mike Burke: First of all, the average age of a community college student in California is around 28 years old, and second, it really is impossible to turn many of these kids around in only one or two semesters. If the adult education system were properly funded and developmental courses were offered there, that would be one thing, but that's not the case in our state. Community colleges are IT. But every semester I see that students who work at their classes, and who are able to juggle their personal and work lives to allow time to study and practice, do succeed.
  • Faulty Business Plan?
  • Posted by Glen S. McGhee , Dir., at FHEAP on October 22, 2010 at 9:45am EDT
  • No mention is made here about quality control and accreditation standards -- schools will understandably shy away from outsourcing that would jeopardize their Title IV eligibility status. For this to work, the business plan needs to address accreditation requirements.

    Oh, but I forgot: accreditors only skim through faculty rosters, if at all during desk reviews, and they don't have time for this during the on-site review. No wonder they call it robo-accreditation.
  • Posted by Rob on October 22, 2010 at 9:45am EDT
  • So, why wouldn't Blackboard have partnered with some of its community college clients to develop this? I assume for now that a for-profit entity will charge more for these courses than community colleges charge their students, and cost is THE issue since the credits don't count toward graduation. Missed opportunity for Blackboard to support those who support them, and benefit more students.
  • online developmental courses
  • Posted by Dr. Alice M. Rainey , program officer/adjunct faculty at Atlantic Cape Community College on October 22, 2010 at 11:30am EDT
  • What makes anyone think that the students will go online to do the work? And if they do, will they complete it? I also teach a college skills course and most of the students do not have the drive, independent thinking and ability to plan due dates needed for online courses.

    And, who is to say that they won't get a "friend" to do the work? I agree that there are components of developmental courses that can be successfully taught in conjunction with the in class course.

    Pilot programs need to be initiated to see how this will work out.
  • Remedial Math Training
  • Posted by LCohen , Retired Chair, Math and Computer Applications at n/a on October 22, 2010 at 11:30am EDT
  • I always harbored a reeluctance to hire high school math teachers as adjuncts. My position was that their "experience" in teaching K12 students was a sign of their failures, not their successses. That said, the company name K12 seems to be a bit of an oxymoron if they want to offer remedial training of the courses already taught in high school.

    We have two assumptions here:
    The teachers were wonderful, but the students were unteachable -- due to attitudes.
    The teachers were the problem.

    Apparently post graduate schools should keep the task for themselves and address both student attitude and college professor capability.
  • fundamentally out of touch
  • Posted by bradley bleck , English instructor at Spokane Falls CC on October 22, 2010 at 11:45am EDT
  • I have to say that, based on my experience, the Blackborg CEO hasn't a clue. I've only taught at five community colleges over 20 years in my career, and at none of them was remedial education seen as something we didn't want to do, something that we wanted to cede to someone else. True, many will cede this work to adjuncts, but not always, and always under the supervision of a full-time, tenured faculty member.

    The only people who think that community colleges should get out of the remedial business are the folks who think that teaching at a community college is a second rate gig. Otherwise, that's why people teach at the two-year college level, because they know community college are the great equalizer in higher ed.

    In my particular instance, all of the faculty who teach in the remedial classes also teach the transfer level classes. We don't segregate. We know that in order to have an integrated curriculum, the expectations, the outcomes, the whatever, have to fit, have to be something akin to a program. That's what we do.

    I know we would never go with Blackborg for our remedial instruction. The faculty are not concerned with protecting turf, but protecting and helping students. The last thing we need to do is sell them down the proverbial river of outsourcing, to show them that they don't deserve what the transfer level students deserve in terms of quality and attention. The hubris of Blackborg and K12, seeking to milk these students. It's what's wrong with education.
  • Re: Remedial Math Training
  • Posted by Ken , Physics Professor on October 22, 2010 at 2:00pm EDT
  • Two statements made in the previous comment, Remedial Math Training, assume too far too much.

    Consider:
    "I always harbored a reluctance to hire high school math teachers as adjuncts. My position was that their "experience" in teaching K12 students was a sign of their failures, not their successes."

    A high school teacher is not a failure just because that instructor taught high school. Education begins far earlier than a high school math class. Just one class cannot reverse the damage.

    Consider:
    "We have two assumptions here:
    The teachers were wonderful, but the students were unteachable -- due to attitudes.
    The teachers were the problem."

    This statement forgets a very major contributor to both the attitudes of the students and the tools available for the instructors. This statement forgets society. Few students are inherently bad. Few teachers are inherently bad. These may be the only short-term adjustments to which we have immediate access, but education is not a short-term project. Do not judge the people. Rather, judge the decisions and actions relative to the circumstances.
  • Technology Skills of Developmental Ed Students a Consideration
  • Posted by Cindy , Study Skills/Developmental Education at Palm Beach State College on October 22, 2010 at 3:15pm EDT
  • Before adopting online courses in developmental education, colleges should thoroughly assess the technology skills of their students. Such an assessment must require students to DEMONSTRATE skills. Asking them to rate their abilities is useless because many students overestimate their skills.

    I've been "trying" to teach a f2f study skills course using Blackboard as a supplement for several years. I've learned that many students lack the basic skills to 1) use the technology, or 2) problem solve independently if they have a technology problem -- and they have access to me 24/7 through email and discussion boards -- plus f2f contact two times per week -- plus a HELP-LINE to call. The same students who can type and send a text message on a phone in their lap and never lose eye contact with the classroom professor CANNOT correctly type, save, and attach a file to a course management system.

    Also, access to technology must be an important consideration. Ask if your developmental education students who do not have Internet-connected computers at home (there are many of them!) will travel to campus to complete their courses using college-owned computers.

    I realize times are changing, that's why I'm willing to coach students through their struggles with online learning. I have no idea how they would figure out what to do without direct and speedy intervention.
  • Really?
  • Posted by Dean at Southeast CC on October 22, 2010 at 3:15pm EDT
  • There are so many flaws in some of the article's statements it's hard to know where to begin. But I will focus on one or two. Our developmental department is separate from the math and English departments, but it is in no way superfluous to the institution, or a department that is "shunned". Our faculty have master's degrees and could teach elsewhere, but choose to teach developmental courses because of a desire to help students. This would include those who have not been successful before, or just need a little boost, to be successful in transferring to a university, completing a few classes to upgrade skills, or getting a degree, diploma or certificate in a technical area.

    I would not have current high school teachers teaching these courses. Although the content may be the same, the pedagogy is different. You have to know where the students have come from, but also where they are going, in order to adequately prepare them for success. Our instructors work closely with instructors in the subsequent classes, and in some cases have taught the subsequent classes themselves.

    As for hiring high school teachers as adjuncts - we have wonderful adjuncts who are former h.s. teachers. But they have taken their content knowledge and worked to adapt it to the community college setting with students who are much more than "6 months older".

    You just can't teach developmental classes in isolation. There is so much more going on and you need a teacher students can relate to, talk to, get advice from, etc. Bb - thanks, but no thanks!
  • This makes no sense?
  • Posted by Hugh Miller III , Biology at ETSU on October 23, 2010 at 1:00pm EDT
  • These two companies need to keep their hands off of curriculum! This proposal makes no sense what so ever. If students had difficulty learning math or english in a traditional classroom, why should anyone assume they could learn it online! Online classes only work for highly motivated students who already understand how to study and work independently, I would venture that most students needing developmental classes have not yet developed those skills so they would not be successful in an online environment! Please do not fall for this scam...it is more of the "business" model for education. When are we going to realize that teachers are not assembly line workers and students are not widgets!!!
  • Fundamental flaws in this line of reasoning
  • Posted by Caroline Bordinaro , Librarian at CSU Dominguez Hills on October 23, 2010 at 3:15pm EDT
  • It always amazes me when supposedly intelligent people can make such absurd arguments and assumptions. Echoing the comments of my colleagues above, let's take this baby apart:

    “'These are the same kids we’re teaching at the high-school level, only six months older,' said Bruce Davis, the company’s vice president of worldwide business development."
    Um, no. Try several years older, often with kids of their own.

    "Both sides say K12 will do most of the heavy lifting on course design and provide the labor from its stable of 2,700 instructors...
    But the two companies say they will work together on all aspects of the product."
    Thus treating K-12 Inc. employees as chattel and freezing out any input experienced faculty.

    But here’s the punchline:
    "Davis, the K12 vice president, says online courses are a perfect fit for remedial education, since online learning platforms are increasingly able to monitor student engagement and send up red flags when a student is falling behind...An online [system] knows exactly where a student is in curriculum, how long they’ve been there, and where to intervene,' says Davis. 'A computer," he adds, "is infinitely patient.'"
    No, Mr. Davis. A computer is infinitely stupid, in that it can only respond to parameters set up by programmers. Obviously Mr. Davis has never actually taught a remedial class, or he would know that this statement is pure fiction.

    As my colleagues have stated, the article also fails to address technology access issues (they assume every remedial student has access to and knows how to use a computer) as well as security issues – how do we know that these students are actually doing the work and not getting their friends to do it for them?

    Obviously I'm preaching to the choir here, but we need to make our collective voices louder in order to change the direction of the discourse.
  • "the same kids"
  • Posted by Will Thomas , Assoc. Prof. Dept. of Business and Public Admin at Southwest MN State Univ on October 27, 2010 at 2:00pm EDT
  • “'These are the same kids we’re teaching at the high-school level, only six months older.'

    Several previous comments have indicated that the students in community colleges are more than six months older than their high-school counterparts.

    Separately, though, if some of the students are being taught by K12 in high school, then arrive at a CC needing remedial work, why should we believe K12 will have any more success with them just because they are 6 months older? If K12 "graduates" need remediation, we need to try a different model.
  • fundamentally out of touch? indeed
  • Posted by Alan Trevithick , Adjunct Professor, Sociology and Anthropology at Fordham University and Westchester Community College on October 27, 2010 at 4:15pm EDT
  • I think it's a shame that we have to have a conversation about whether or not it's ok for for-profits to come into public systems like this. After all, these outfits only look at the bottom line, pay ever-lower wages and no benefits to their workers, demean traditional faculty, get questionable results, and claim that they are doing us all a great public service.
    I mean, can't the existing public institutions do all of those things already?
    And, Bradley Bleck: is it really true that you've taught at five community colleges, and that at those places some faculty "will cede...work to adjuncts, but not always, and always under the supervision of a full-time, tenured faculty member"?
    Wow, not at the places I've taught. Maybe because many of the FT people who would supervise me in this way don't have any more experience or any higher credentials than I do—I've been teaching for 20 years and have a doctorate.
    Or they don;t have time? Or they dont care? Or there are too many adjuncts to supervise in this paternalistic and patronizing way-given that at all CC's there are generally at least three times as many adjuncts as FT faculty?
    Who knows, but look, Brother Bradley-please get religion-go to Newfacultymajority.info and get on board.
  • Another thought
  • Posted by Linda on October 28, 2010 at 11:15pm EDT
  • Not surprisingly, many community college students who need remediation are returning adults. K12 is definitely not well-qualified to develop curriculum or pedagogy for these students, who need a very different approach than traditional age students.

    And as for those students who have just graduated from high school. Why would we want to rely on K12 to develop curriculum or pedagogy for them? Didn't the curriculum and pedagogy they were using "6 months earlier" fail these students already? Why would we use the same approach that hasn't worked before? Duh. . .