Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

Where Are the Students?

December 17, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Last year, college students were the most fervent supporters of Obama’s bid for the presidency. Now, the U.S. Senate has taken up what Obama says is the defining legislation of his term: health care reform. Oddly, the voice of college students is nowhere to be found in the national debate -- most likely because the activist set does not realize how much is at stake for them personally.

It might seem that college students have little to worry about. Most full-time students in fact have health insurance right now. Two-thirds are covered through their parents’ insurance plans and another 7 percent are covered through a university plan, according to the Government Accountability Office.

But one thing is guaranteed: College students with the good fortune to have insurance right now will lose their current coverage soon after graduation. For those who are insured through their parents’ plans, they will be dropped after they leave school. And for students on a university plan, they will soon learn that the loyalty of their alma mater has limits: It does not extend to a lifetime of affordable health care.

What is a student to do? The current answer, unfortunately, is to get a job. And not just any job: a stable, full-time job with an employer that will offer them health insurance. That, in fact, is the bizarre reality of health care in the United States. We currently live in a system that presumes “employer-sponsored insurance,” in which you must have a steady paycheck before you can get affordable health care.

As college students surely know, however, the prospect of steady full-time work is looking worse than ever. The unemployment rate for young adults is up from 10 percent last year to a whopping 15 percent this year. For recent grads who have the good fortune to land a job, they will be more likely than older workers to work for small companies. But small employers are also the least likely to offer health insurance, and more small companies have dropped health insurance for their workers every year since 2000.

The alternative is to buy insurance individually rather than to bother with an employer. For recent grads in particular, it’s a pity that the cost of these plans is rising faster than wages. As workers just starting their careers, college students will most likely have the lowest earnings of their lifetimes. Short of a steady job or enough money and know-how to navigate the private insurance market, the Class of 2010 will get insurance under the current system only if they are poor or disabled. Only then would they get scooped up by a government safety net program: Medicaid. But it’s not clear that any college students aspire to that fate.

This scenario does not even take into account the existential question that college seniors may be pondering right now: whether they even want to follow the straight-and-narrow path from college to traditional career. Entrepreneurs, activists, travelers, farmers, parents, artists -- be warned: All of those opportunities would require verve, intelligence -- and the willingness to sacrifice good health if need be. It is little wonder that people in their 20s are more likely to be uninsured than any other age group in the U.S. today.

Right now, the U.S. Senate is debating a bill that could help change this situation for college students. But many senators are not yet convinced that Americans really want health care reform. Do college students?

It is a good time for students to think through their answers. For one thing, Obama is calling for a vote on the Senate bill before Christmas. No doubt, health care bills are complicated and boring -- not exactly end-of-term pleasure reading. But students might start with a blog by the director of the White House budget office, Peter Orszag.

Heading into winter break, students also have the chance to think through the health care debate on a more personal level. They can find out when their current coverage is going to end. For those on a parent’s plan, it may come as a shock to find that they will lose coverage on Commencement Day.

Over the holidays, college students can also chat up their grandparents and other older relatives. Polls consistently show that people over the age of 65 are the most resistant to health care overhaul -- in large part because they want to protect their Medicare coverage.

College students do have a major stake in the outcome of the health care debate. So whether on campuses or on their own, students would be wise to think through the issues -- not for Obama’s sake this time, but for their own.

Laura Stark is an assistant professor of sociology and science in society at Wesleyan University; she co-wrote this essay with several Wesleyan juniors and seniors: Suzanna Hirsch, Samantha Hodges, Gianna Palmer and Kim Segall.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Where Are the Students?

  • NPR
  • Posted by Rebecca , Librarian on December 17, 2009 at 11:00am EST
  • Morning Edition aired a story this morning that included a college student who had to "choose between text books and oral surgery".

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=121549462

    While her situation as it stands is horrible, what was worse was her expectation that no job she would be able to get after graduation would include health insurance.

  • Situation is worse for some students
  • Posted by Thad Leffingwell , Associate Professor, Psychology at Oklahoma State University on December 17, 2009 at 11:00am EST
  • The situation described in this article for college students is dire enough, but we are often assuming that college graduates are healthy with pristine health histories. For those that are, they might be able to afford private health insurance if they aren't lucky enough to find a job with the ever-shrinking number of employers with health benefits. However, for students with a spotty health history or, worse yet, a chronic health condition, they are likely to be out-of-luck. Ever had an ear infection? Expect exclusions for anything related to ear, nose, and throat. Ever visited a counselor? Expect mental health exclusions and higher rates. Ever had cancer? diabetes? asthma? Forget about it, you probably won't be able to qualify for a policy at all, or afford it if you do. The richest country in the world is turning it's back on the most vulnerable among us.

  • Excellent article
  • Posted by Christine on December 17, 2009 at 11:00am EST
  • Excellent, unbiased article, that presents the facts as they are. Somewhat unusual for this type of a piece in IHE.

  • Posted by EH on December 17, 2009 at 11:00am EST
  • Good points. And it's great to see this piece written in collaboration with students!

  • Opportunity?
  • Posted by Belinda on December 17, 2009 at 12:15pm EST
  • "And for students on a university plan, they will soon learn that the loyalty of their alma mater has limits: It does not extend to a lifetime of affordable health care."

    You would think that some small schools could benefit by opening their plans to alumni to increase their pool size.

  • Students ARE active
  • Posted by Katie Andriulli on December 17, 2009 at 12:30pm EST
  • Thanks for this article Laura. I wanted to mention that there are organizations working tirelessly to make sure that young people's voices are heard in the health care debate, none more so than Young Invincibles (younginvincibles.org). They've already been instrumental in ensuring that the provision for young people to stay on their parents' insurance until the age of 27 was included in the House version of the bill, and are working hard to make sure the Senate version of the bill doesn't screw over young people.

    They've set up a photo petition on Facebook: http://apps.facebook.com/yiwantchange/main.php and have been collecting photos and stories from thousands of young people across the country who are struggling with the health care system. They also just put out 2 new videos about the importance of health care reform to young people: http://www.youtube.com/user/YIWantChangeVideo#p/c/30AA0E9A23F31006/0/R8RzAeajtbg

    It's important to note too that Young Invincibles is not working in a bubble: they have convened several prominent national groups, including Campus Progress, Rock the Vote, 80 Million Strong, Choice USA, the Student PIRGs and others, in the the YI Want Change Coalition (yiwantchange.org). The coalition has a pretty detailed agenda including many specific policy priorities, which you can read here: http://yiwantchange.org/YIPolicyAgenda.pdf

    I'd encourage any young people out there who want to get involved to visit the Young Invincibles website to learn more.

  • "The current answer, unfortunately, is to get a job."
  • Posted by Rod Bell , Adjunct Professor - Political Science at College of DuPage on December 17, 2009 at 1:30pm EST
  • Now what kind of country is that? You've gotta get a *job* to get health insurance? Worse yet, you've got to get a *good* job to get decent coverage; small companies, start-ups, etc., don't even offer coverage! What's up with that?

    The answer seems so simple: We're the richest country in the world, dammit! Let's cover everybody, and if we make them pay anything (ugh), make sure it's what they can afford. --The money? We'll get it by taxing those who've been illicitly enriching themselves off the current system. And by mandating greater efficiencies, something the federal government is famously expert at. Jeez, how hard can this be?

  • No one seems to understand the entire system
  • Posted by Christine on December 17, 2009 at 3:15pm EST
  • I am disappointed that even on a website that is read by academics, very few seem to understand the complexities of health care. The government is making this political, and most likely will do as poor a job with health care as it does with most other undertakings. It cannot be approached in a purely emotional manner.
    Some questions to think about: Why are employers expected to provide health insurance and not auto or homeowners insurance? (It goes back to depression-era politics).
    Who will treat all these new citizens in the health care system? (It takes 10-15 years to train a physician...and only about 1% of the country hold those credentials. It's a difficult profession.)
    What will be the incentive to study to be a physician and graduate with six-figure plus student loan debt if reimbursement (paychecks) for procedures is going to be lowered or limited to lower costs? (Capitalist, but realistic).
    How will providing healthcare for everyone lower costs? (Insurance is a risk pool, and will cost more the more it is utilized).
    If Medicare reimbursements are lowered to pay for this bill, and less physicians accept it (as with Medicaid) won't healthcare become less accessible to the elderly?
    If we're going to fund reform by "eliminating current inefficiencies," why isn't the government just doing that as a good steward of the people's funds? (Because the government is the worst steward of the people's funds).
    And finally...Who will pay for all this in a country that is now essentially bankrupt?

    This is an unbelievably complicated industry, and these changes are not being developed by people in the industries (or academia) that understand it. There are only emotional buzzwords being thrown about. But the citizenry seem to have little attention span for anything that is complicated. We need thoughtful, meaningful reform, not politics and emotion.

  • Posted by 09bardie , underemployed BA on December 19, 2009 at 3:15pm EST
  • What exactly is the author's evidence that "the voice of college students is nowhere to be found in the national debate" on health care?

  • Christine
  • Posted by DFS on December 28, 2009 at 11:45am EST
  • Why should health insurance be complex?

    Oh, wait -- it's attributable to lawyers somewhere, pro or con your argument.

    And lawmakers are predominantly what -- lawyers?

    I smell a rat, here.

  • Posted by Andrew , assistant Professor at NYCOM on January 16, 2010 at 8:30am EST
  • The issue here is that of the acceptance of personal responsibility rather than the expectation that society will continue to care for the recent college graduate. Any college graduate can find a "steady job." It may not be the job of his or her dreams and it may not pay enough to allow the graduate to have an I-Phone, a flat screen TV, a daily cappucino and free time on the beach. Any college graduate should have the "know-how to navigate the private insurance market"--if they do not, it is the college that has failed, not our society.

    The Medicaid system is there for people who truly cannot afford health insurance. No one goes to the emergency room of not for profit Hospitals in the US and is turned away. People come from all over the world to access U.S. health care. Let's not dumb it down with a takeopver by the U.S> Government that has bankrupted Medicare and cannot run the Post Offoce efficiently after a century of trying.