Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

Decline of the West

December 2, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Ten years ago, in the final pages of a collection of his selected writings, Cornel West gave readers a look at the work he had in progress, or at least in mind, for the years ahead. One would be “a major treatment of African-American literature and modern Greek literature.” Another was “a meditation on Chekhov and Coltrane that delves into the distinctive conceptions of the tragic in American civilization and of the comic in Russian civilization.” He would be writing an intellectual autobiography “modeled on black musical forms.” Nor had he given up on plans to complete a study of David Hume. There would also be a book on Josiah Royce.

West described his projects as “bold,” “challenging” and “exciting.” These are adjectives, it must be said, better left in someone else’s hands. But the books did sound interesting, and I looked forward to them – especially the one on Royce. In recent years, whenever West released an album of vocal stylings or appeared in a sequel to The Matrix, I would think, “Maybe he’s finally gotten that out of his system and will go back to work on The Spirit of Modern Philosophy.” (Royce was stressing the importance of Hegel's Phenomenology back when Kojève was just a gleam in his daddy's eye.)

I have been following West since the early 1980s, when his papers were appearing in journals such as Social Text, Boundary 2, and Cultural Critique, as well as the occasional issue of The Village Voice. His first three monographs were interesting if not definitive. More appealing in a lot of ways are the two volumes called Beyond Eurocentrism and Multiculturalism, published by Common Courage in 1993, which I have turned to a few times over the years for a shot of energy; the lectures and essays reprinted there are West at his best, shifting between theoretical and vernacular vocabularies in a way that suggests a fusion of Dialectic of Enlightenment and Democratic Vistas by way of Run DMC.

Cornel West’s work was once bold, challenging, exciting. The past tense here is unavoidable. His critical edge and creative powers might yet be reborn (he is 56). But in the wake of his latest book, Brother West: Living and Loving Out Loud, this hope requires a considerable leap of faith. Published by Hay House, the book also bears a second subtitle: “A Memoir.” It is the most disappointing thing I have read in at least a year.

This is not the intellectual autobiography West promised a decade ago. In essence it is a fawning celebrity profile -- one in which reporter and superstar have somehow fused into a single first-person voice. And in fact that turns out to be quite literally true. In the final pages, West pays tribute to David Ritz, his collaborator, who has undertaken similar projects with Marvin Gaye and Grandmaster Flash, among others.

“David Ritz and I have worked together to sculpt a voice that I hear as my own,” explains West, or someone trying to sound like him. “Many of my other books were written in what I consider an ‘academic voice.’ Brother West is rendered in a ‘conversational’ voice.”

In this respect, of course, the Class of 1943 University Professor in the Center for African American Studies at Princeton University is following the lead of David Hume – who, after writing A Treatise of Human Nature, published numerous very popular essays with the help of a writer from Entertainment Weekly.

The problem, to be clear, is not that this is meant to be is a popular book, or even that West himself could not be bothered to write it. Brother West offers much evidence that amour propre and self-knowledge are not the same thing. One tends to be in conflict with the other. A memoir will often show traces of the struggle between them.

Not so here. That battle is plainly over. Self-knowledge has been taken hostage, and amour propre curdled into self-infatuation.

One whole page at the start of the book reads as follows:

I’m a bluesman in the life of the mind, and a jazzman in the world of ideas. -- Cornel West

It will not be the reader’s last encounter with this sentiment. West repeats it at least a few dozen more times -- never with any variation or development. (Clearly this is minimalist jazz: West plays one note, then goes up half a step, then back again.) The rich history of writing by African-American intellectuals -- the essays by Richard Wright, Ralph Ellison, and Amiri Baraka, to make the list no longer than that -- has left no discernible trace on this book. Some of West's own work from the 1980s suggests he has thoughts on that tradition, as well as capacity to contribute to it. But here we are just reminded every so often that he likes to think of himself as a performer. This is not enlightening.

The broad outlines of West's life are interesting enough. His family lived in California, along the edge between the ghetto and the lower middle class. As a teenager in the 1960s he had one foot planted in the church and the other at Black Panther Party headquarters. His academic career started with getting his B.A. from Harvard in three years, then picked up speed. He has had bestsellers. His love life sounds complicated enough to merit an HBO mini-series.

But all of this is just penciled in. There is seldom much detail and never any depth. West makes a few references to academic mentors. He notes his intense interest in various philosophers or authors. Yet there is never a sustained effort to grapple with them as influences on his life and thinking. He mentions his own scholarly books on Marxism and pragmatism (for some odd reason forgetting that he also published one on African-American theology) but does not describe the process of thinking and writing that went into them.

That is not to say that Brother West fails to discuss authorship at all. You catch glimpses of its joys as rendered in the clunky prose of his collaborator: "I like seeing Race Matters translated into Japanese, Italian, and Portuguese. I like seeing The American Evasion of Philosophy translated into Chinese, Spanish, and Italian. I like that there are hundreds of thousands of copies of my book Democracy Matters translated into Spanish. There’s also an edition that’s selling in the French-speaking world. I like the fact that all nineteen of my books are still in print with the exception of the two that won the American Book Award in 1993.”

If sketchy in other regards, Brother West is never anything but expansive on how Cornel West feels about Cornel West. He is deeply committed to his committed-ness, and passionately passionate about being full of passion. Various works of art, literature, music, and philosophy remind West of himself. He finds Augustinian humility to be deeply meaningful. This is mentioned in one sentence. His taste for three-piece suits is full of subtle implications that require a couple of substantial paragraphs to elucidate.

As mentioned, his romantic life sounds complicated. Brother West is a reminder of Samuel Johnson’s description of remarriage as the triumph of hope over experience. One paragraph of musings following his third divorce obliged me to put the book down and think about things for a long while. Here it is:

“The basic problem with my love relationships with women is that my standards are so high -- and they apply equally to both of us. I seek full-blast mutual intensity, fully fledged mutual acceptance, full-blown mutual flourishing, and fully felt peace and joy with each other. This requires a level of physical attraction, personal adoration, and moral admiration that is hard to find. And it shares a depth of trust and openness for a genuine soul-sharing with a mutual respect for a calling to each other and to others. Does such a woman exist for me? Only God knows and I eagerly await this divine unfolding. Like Heathcliff and Catherine’s relationship in Emily Bronte’s remarkable novel Wuthering Heights or Franz Schubert’s tempestuous piano Sonata No. 21 in B flat (D.960) I will not let life or death stand in the way of this sublime and funky love that I crave!”

No doubt this is meant to be inspirational. It is at any rate exemplary. Rendered more or less speechless, I pointed the passage out to my wife.

She looked it over and said, “Any woman who reads this needs to run in the opposite direction when she sees him coming.”

Returning to the book, I found, just a few pages later, that West was getting divorced for a fourth time. Seldom does reader response yield results that prove so empirically verifiable.

The longest episode narrated in Brother West is its account of the conflict with Larry Summers, then president of Harvard University, starting in October 2001. West reports that Summers began their now-legendary meeting by indicating that they should join forces against the neoconservative Harvard prof Harvey Mansfield.

“Help me f___ him up,” said Summers (according to West, says his quasi-ghostwriter).

West had recently released his first hip hop CD, so perhaps Summers thought this would put him at ease. Not so. West says he made clear to Summers that his feeling for Mansfield was collegial.

With popping a cap in a fellow faculty member’s ass now off the table, the exchange then took the form that has now become famous, culminating in Summers’ demand that West make himself available for fortnightly meetings to evaluate his grades and publication plans.

“If you think that I’m going to trot in here every two weeks to be monitored like a miscreant graduate student,” West says he said, “I’m afraid, my brother, that you’ve messed with the wrong brother.”

As the conflict continued to escalate -- ultimately leading to West’s departure for Princeton -- he was diagnosed with prostate cancer. He has been in treatment and is on the mend. Meanwhile, alas, West has not published a single one of the books he said he was working on 10 years ago. The last one before Brother West was a collection of inspirational passages that is usually shelved in the self-help section.

I would much prefer to think that all of this is a matter of his life being in turmoil throughout this decade, rather than Larry Summers being right about anything. But the painful truth is that West's work has grown ever less substantial over time. He has gone from being a public intellectual into a mere celebrity -- someone well-known for being well-known. Brother West marks the extremity of that process.

Legend has it that the blues guitarist Robert Johnson acquired his haunting style by selling his soul to the devil at a crossroads. West, as a “bluesman of the life of the mind,” has clearly also been to the crossroads. The devil gave him a team of publicists. I don't think this was a good bargain on West's part. It left him unable to recognize that self-respect is often the enemy of self-esteem.

But where there’s life, there’s hope. West might eventually tear up the contract. Perhaps the professorial bluesman should take his own trope seriously and undergo a long period of what jazz musicians call "woodshedding."

The woodshed is where you retire with your instrument. You practice and practice -- and then you practice some more -- and eventually something happens. You reconnect with the instrument. Your fingers shape the sound in a fresh way. In the woodshed you don’t think about the audience, because there isn’t one, apart from the crickets and termites, who don’t much care and aren’t going to be impressed in any case.

It is clearly time for Cornel West to take himself to the woodshed -- and not for a weekend either. He needs to perform for the crickets for a good long while, until he finds something new and meaningful to play. His greatest gift to the public and to himself might be to ignore both for as long as possible.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Decline of the West

  • West Review and The New Yorker
  • Posted by Jerry Pattengale , Ass't Provost at Indiana Wesleyan University on December 2, 2009 at 7:30am EST
  • Scott,

    I’m reminded this morning of sitting in my study in 2005, reading a piece from a relatively unknown scholar at the time and realizing that the essay would reverberate throughout the academy and a sundry of media cloisters. And, N. D. Wilson’s “Father Brown Fakes the Shroud” did just that (http://www.christianitytoday.com/bc/2005/marapr/3.22.html ). It also has become one of the memorable pieces in the wonderful thought magazine, Books & Culture. Not that you’re at the same place as Wright was at the time in your profession, but I suppose in some degree, your essay will play out the same. It’ll be much discussed, pro and con, but in appreciation for your clarity of position and rationale. And I suppose it’ll be among the memorable pieces being read by the growing mass of Inside readers. It has a bit of Jeffrey Toobin’s inviting candor found in his “Bench Press” article in The New Yorker (Sept.). In fact, the further into your article I read, the more puzzled I was about its placement (seems pregnant for a 4,000-word essay). At the least, perhaps West is smiling that in an article that highlights his popular press approach, you’re discussing him in the most easily accessible media form. My hope is that West responds to your essay. Because he’s venerated in many circles, you likely anticipated the possible backlash of criticism that may result. All said, my hunch about West is that he respects people for being upfront with their views. And, if so, out of respect will respond. Your essay also reminds me of Ken Bielen’s response to a request to write on Elton John (after writing on Lennon, Neil Young, and now B. Joel -- Praeger). He passed, noting that while he admired Elton’s work in the 70’s, his pen went dry ever since. I’m not convinced we’ve heard the last of the deeper West, and perhaps your piece will play in this decision.

  • Great Review
  • Posted by Jim on December 2, 2009 at 8:30am EST
  • Fabulous essay, Scott. Thoughtful, insightful, brilliantly written. Many thanks.

  • Appiah-ry
  • Posted by Mr Punch on December 2, 2009 at 10:45am EST
  • West seems to be turning into a version of his colleague Kwame Anthony Appiah, who writes book after book advancing his own version of the categorical imperative: Everybody, at all times, should be Kwame Anthony Appiah.

  • The Dilemma of the Black Intellectual
  • Posted by Teresa , Assistant Professor at A university in the South on December 2, 2009 at 10:45am EST
  • Scott:

    I enjoyed your essay as it seemingly explores the "rise and fall" of Cornel West, only to hope that he will "rise again." I must take issue with you, however, on your premise here. West has not lost the intellectual fervor of the olden days, quite the contrary! I think he has redirected his energies to making a critical difference for those beyond the Ivory Tower. As he articulates in "The Dilemma of the Black Intellectual," his mission as a postmodern black intellectual is to "stimulate, hasten and enable alternative perceptions and practices by dislodging prevailing discourses and powers." I think the work we have seen from West in the last 10-15 years is headed in that direction. Through his personal discourse, he demystifies intellectual life and gives credence to the discourses of everyday life for average people.

    To call himself "a bluesman of the life of the mind" is appropos, especially in articulating his struggle to intellectually engage his peers but also the masses. I think he has done just that in the last few years: his intellectual work is more deeply rooted in the specificity of Afro-American life and history." Not to imply that it wasn't before, but now he has a different audience. And what is wrong with that? Nothing! It is time, I think, for more intellectuals to spend less time pontificating about intangibles and look for ways of making a critical difference in the lives of everday people. There may not be much respect for hip-hop culture and blues ideology in the Ivory Tower for philosophers, but for a large number of everyday people in the world, this culture and ideology define a way of life! I thank Cornel West for having the courage to explore the tangilbles, the real problems, in society and not continuing pandering to intellectuals with too much time on their hands.

  • Posted by fred lapides , none at none on December 2, 2009 at 12:00pm EST
  • When I read, see or hear of West, I am reminded of his appearance on TV to announce before the jury decision that clearly O.J. Simpson was innocent...At that point I wondered about the workings of his mind.

  • West
  • Posted by Benj on December 2, 2009 at 1:15pm EST
  • Scott -

    Appreciated your wife's clarity - There was another pickup line of West's that made my jaw drop. West recalls asking on a first date with the woman who became wife #3 if she wanted to become "the first lady of Black America" - A line that put a...personal spin on his recent carping re Obama.

    Someone mentioned the New Yorker above - did anyone catch Remnick's gross Talk of the Town piece on West whom he desribes as visiting "Times Square" with his "publisher." That's to say West and (fellow celeb) Tavis Smiley stopped at the New Yorker's office and Remnick agreed to give them some pub...

  • Posted by New Englander on December 2, 2009 at 7:30pm EST
  • "Through his personal discourse, he demystifies intellectual life and gives credence to the discourses of everyday life for average people." - Teresa, above

    This is patent nonsense. Average people are not sitting around filled with joy about how Professor West gives credence to the discourses of their everyday lives. Nor do they care about whether intellectual life is demystified. Academics (and, yes, I am one) tend to think they are situated in the center of the universe, while nothing could be further from the truth. We appreciate and are responsible for judging intellectual discourse, others don't and are not. I, for one, am most appreciative of this debunking of the over-rated Professor West. I always thought his work was hyped beyond any reasonable standards. Now I find out that he believes his life itself is a work of art, when it turns out he doesn't know how to sustain a loving relationship of commitment and care.

  • The Lost Art of the Oratory
  • Posted by Joe on December 2, 2009 at 11:15pm EST
  • The Today's show interview with West allowed him to offer his own brief explanation of his statement; "I’m a bluesman in the life of the mind, and a jazzman in the world of ideas". It is worth watching.

     

    One of West’s gifts (and he has many) is his brilliance in the lost art of the oratory. This to me is what is largely ignored or undervalued by his critics.

     

    Also, his approach to his own work is truly benevolent, he seeks to do good . He like many other successful people has an ego. However, he isn’t looking to outdo himself and prove his worth, rather he is attempting to do the most good, as best he can. It is fair to judge his results, but unfair to cast doubt on his motivations.

     

    The popular will be forever at odds with the academic as long as the academic is defined narrowly and the scholar seen as standing apart from, rather than as a part of society.

     

  • Relevance?
  • Posted by Armitage at Midwestern U. on December 2, 2009 at 11:15pm EST
  • I think I speak for most of us under-35s-in-academe when I say...I don't think that any of us really care what Cornell West says, writes or does. People like him once mattered. They don't any more.

  • Posted by eliot , Bottom rung at NYC university on December 3, 2009 at 4:30am EST
  • Great article, Scott. What's always baffled me about West's self-regard is how out of proportion it is to his actual influence. The size of the "masses" he engages is remarkably small, and the level of his "celebrity" is pretty marginal. Big fish in a small pond.

  • Brother West or Brother Ass?
  • Posted by Lord Manhammer , Rustic skeptic at The Diogenes Club on December 3, 2009 at 4:30am EST
  • West wanted to be the President of African American Studies. Instead, he became its Al Sharpton, minus the incisive prose. Brother West reads like the confession of a particularly dorky grad student laboriously cranking out a paper for a seminar in which he no longer believes. After wading through his turgid, quadruple demand for a "full" relationship, I reached the conclusion that Brother West was, indeed, full of it. We can only raise our hands to heaven and thank the good Lord for sparing us ten volumes of fustian prose by the artist formerly known as Cornel.

  • People like him?
  • Posted by Kent on December 3, 2009 at 4:30am EST
  • People like him? Academics? Authors? Public intellectuals? Television pundits? "People like him once mattered. They don't any more." What a pointlessly arrogant thing to say.

  • Bluesman in Flow
  • Posted by Sophie on December 3, 2009 at 6:45am EST
  • @Joe: the popular is at odds with the academic, and orature (still) at odds with the written. West makes a potent case for the necessity of a life of the mind in Astra Taylor's documentary _Examined Life_, fusing Plato and Miles Davis in the back of a cab moving through New York. His popular oratory may not translate well to the page, but watching him speak will, I think, inspire many people to engage with philosophy. Whether they do so within an academic setting is not West's concern -- one thing that seems implicitly to annoy the reviewer is West's equanimity, rather than slavish gratitude, towards the academy.

  • Not an Appiah
  • Posted by CMD on December 3, 2009 at 9:45am EST
  • Mr. Punch, your dig at Appiah is completely unfounded. In my judgment he is an exemplary and impressive scholar. What about his writings support your accusation of narcissism?

  • Posted by David , Literary Trombone at The Blue Note of the Brain on December 3, 2009 at 10:15am EST
  • Lousy book. Tremendous review. Nice to see you move into 5th gear.

  • West as Public Intellectual
  • Posted by Mara Holt , Associate Professor at Ohio University on December 3, 2009 at 12:45pm EST
  • The new book certainly sounds disappointing, and I'm not likely to read it after your compelling review. However, I think Teresa is onto something. For all his faults, West has made his mark in ways are often invisible to your average white academic (like me).

    Yes, I miss West on philosophy. American Evasion was my introduction to West, and at a time when I sorely needed a critique of Dewey that made sense to me (as opposed to the social engineering stuff that didn't jibe with my extensive reading of Dewey). I got my critique, and something even more powerful: West's method of analyzing the strengths of a philosopher and then analyzing his failures of vision within the context of the material and historical conditions in which he operated, particularly in regard to race. This is especially stunning in his treatment of Emerson. His compassionate model of intellectual analysis has influenced me to address intellectual issues in much more depth and complexity than I had thought possible, given the attack and destroy methods in which I had been trained. In Race Matters, particularly the chapter on the nihilism of ghetto life, I saw the same method at work. Just as he earlier was not willing to kick U.S. philosophical pragmatism to the curb because of its racism, in Race Matters he was not willing to give African Americans a free pass.

    Over 20 years later, I have been bowled over a second time by West's methods. Yes, I knew he was dabbling in hip hop and Matrix culture, I knew he was trying to reach a young black audience, but I didn't have a clue about his influence in that arena until I started getting first-year grad students in my classes who were familiar with West and excited about reading his work in my classes. It turned out that West is deep into hip hop culture and his work (and that of other African American intellectuals) is being referenced by hip hop artists in such a way that their audience is being educated and intellectually stimulated by their work.

    One of my students, a white Appalachian male, said that West's influence on hip hop provided him with hope, and was the beginning of his determination to go to college rather than accept the status quo--a life as a coal miner. He's now writing a dissertation geared toward the influence of pedagogy and pop culture in providing options for Appalachian students whose only other option is the mine, and the isolation of a stigmatized group of people whose most pervasive representation in media culture is the Beverly Hillbillies.

    If West is self-congratulatory, it must be said that in the bulk of his work, he has congratulated others when it took courage to do so. If he describes himself as a performer, he is right, and you have to attend a performance to understand what all the fuss is about. Scott's article seems on target in many ways, and I find it compelling. But as middle-class, white university employees, "we" are seeing only the tip of the iceberg when we view him as a traditional philosopher with a twist or as a disappointment.

    He is reaching the people who need his philosophy the most. He has stepped away from the ivory tower and is providing hope and and alternatives to the nihilism of the people whom he describes in Race Matters. Who knows what effect that will have on the Ivory tower in the long run? I miss the "old" Cornel West, but I completely respect his decision to side-step me in favor of the young oppressed African American and Appalachian students who will help determine the future.

  • I Met West Once
  • Posted by LW , Grad Student at Research University on December 3, 2009 at 12:45pm EST
  • I met West once, as an undergrad. He struck me as a nice enough person, but definitely a "performer." He reminded me of the drama students in high school, the ones with a carefully cultivated public persona. He was not, I should add, in his "academic" voice, either, so I wonder whether his "conversational" voice is any less crafted than his "academic."

    In any case, I've found a lot of West's writing to be thought-provoking, but little else. I rarely cite his work, especially since the 80s, because there's nothing there to cite. He just stopped doing academic worth of any work - "thought provoking" might pass for substance in some departments, I guess, but not in Philosophy. We actually want our scholars to EXPLORE the ideas they've provoked, and do so with both verve and rigor. West sometimes strikes me as so pleased with himself for having said something "profound" that he forgets to do anything else. And if he's "gone beyond academia" to "demystify" it to the masses, he's doing a bad job, because what we do is NOT what he's been doing for the past few decades.

    Frankly, it's too bad. I LIKE a lot of West's ideas. I even like West as a person, despite the sense that he's working from behind a curtain. It was a pleasure to meet him and get a chance to talk with him. He certainly has the intellect and energy to do good work. I just wish he would do more of it.

  • Exciting news
  • Posted by KS , Lowly peon in the groves of academe at A Top! Ten! university in the South on December 3, 2009 at 2:45pm EST
  • After reading the excerpts I am excited to realize that vanity publishing is still robust and has advanced beyond turgid poetry and romance novels.

    Surely this means that the recession is over and we can resume our career climb once universities resume minting such things as "professors of the practice" and "associate vice chancellors" with gay abandon.

  • Poor thing
  • Posted by Beth on December 3, 2009 at 6:00pm EST
  • I was impressed by West years ago, before I had more contact with the real world. West has many gifts, but he sounds like a lost soul.

  • Article / Appiah
  • Posted by Rob W on December 3, 2009 at 6:00pm EST
  • Scott,

    I very much enjoyed this article. I especially appreciated your ability to be critical of West, in an engaging and entertaining way, without being snarky. I'm not sure I've seen that done before.

    As for Anthony Appiah, he's a wonderful philosopher and writer, and an excellent teacher. I heartily, heartily recommend any of his recent books -- The Ethics of Identity, Cosmopolitanism, Experiments in Ethics; they're as good, I think, as contemporary philosophy has to offer, and they're all highly readable.

    Thanks again for your article, Scott. I hope Professor West reads it, and finds something valuable in your criticisms. I also hope that Mara Holt and Teresa are correct about some of the virtues of his new work, and that he sees their supportive comments as well.

    RBW

  • Posted by DM on December 3, 2009 at 7:45pm EST
  • As someone who has been (perhaps I should say 'was') looking for West's (so-far-never-published) book on David Hume since the mid-1990s, I confess that I too have been disappointed with the path West's career has taken. One feels the way Orlando Patterson feels: his is a talent that is being wasted, or least not being fully realized.

    But it well to remember that there has always been some indication that what West is now doing -- the public lectures, the political activism, etc. -- is what he planned on doing. The problem is that it is not all that he planned on doing. Some early stories in the popular press (the NYT Magazine, etc.) indicated that West had intended to write major books (he apparently -- and probably rightly -- did not regard his best-known academic works as major works). This seems to have been his ambition as recently as the immediate aftermath of his move to Princeton (when it was reported that he was working on three academic books), and may still be true today.

    But after all this time it feels safe to say that West has lost his way. I blame his popular success and, though I can't be sure, Travis Smiley, who seems to encourage West to pursue one misguided project after another.

    West needs to retire, if only temporarily, from the public eye so that he can pursue all the projects has long intended to pursue. Otherwise he will have fallen victim to his own success.

  • Posted by Alex , Some guy at Detroit on December 4, 2009 at 5:15am EST
  • We all hope for adoration, admiration, and complete, unquestioned love; most of us never find it, of course, but West need only look in the nearest mirror.

    Meanwhile, have I got a girl for him. One of the reasons Maureen Dowd has trouble with men, according to her book Are Men Necessary?, is that she just cannot find a man who is able to offer proper appreciation for her multiple gifts and talents and measure up to what she demands and is entitled to in a man. Most men just can't appreciate the wonderfulness of Maureen Dowd.

    Anyone who knows West and Dowd could do them a favor by getting them together--and if they become absorbed in themselves and stop writing, they could do the rest of us an even greater favor.

    I'm not an academic and I may be missing something; what exactly does it mean to be a "bluesman of the life of the mind?"

    By the way, New Englander, you misunderstand Teresa. When she talks about "average people" she means people much like herself. She doesn't mean actually ordinary Americans most of whom, if they encountered much of West's writing, would in their unenlighted and average way see it as applesauce.

  • Posted by Paul Gowder on December 4, 2009 at 5:15am EST
  • I agree with CMD and Rob W. The attack on Appiah, who is an extremely brilliant and well-respected philosopher, mars an otherwise excellent article.

  • Write a Substantive Book!
  • Posted by A Hopeful Graduate Student on December 4, 2009 at 9:15am EST
  • I really want his five substantive books-in-progress. What would be so hard about taking a year-long sabbatical (he is clearly so famous that Princeton would give it to him), bulking down in his office, and just churning the g-d dam-ed thing out? C'mon Professor West!

  • white scholars just don't get it...
  • Posted by blackademic , prof at school of contentment on December 4, 2009 at 1:15pm EST
  • cornel west learned long ago that no matter how many academic books that he published he would never be properly respected and embraced by white academics (a philosopy ph.d. this brilliant who has never been shown any interest to teach in a philosophy department?!?!?). the racism in the academy is so deeply entrenched that (how many total black people are in ivy league religious studies departments? philosophy departments?) if he were to keep doing "serious" academic work his contributions would never be taken as seriously as say, scott mclemee's; and, it would make him less accessible to his own community. so, knowing that the "emperor has no clothes" he gave the white academy the middle finger and is doing work to inspire black people. white folks should just leave him alone. the academy is an unfair and culturally biased place. it shows black people less respect even when they do work that is head and shoulders above the navel-gazing, non-creative work of white scholars. c'mon white academics! admit that your standards are so deeply biased and tainted that you would never accept cornel west if he out published harold bloom, marjorie garber and stanley fish. take stock of the true bone-heads in your department. then ask yourself why west does work that speaks to the black masses and not to white scholars. keep doin' your thing cornel!! your memoir is inspiring a lot of people and your speeches are saving lives! none of your white colleagues can speak to the issues you can. we need you. shake off these criticisms like teflon and do you!

  • here's hoping
  • Posted by Steven Augustine on December 4, 2009 at 5:30pm EST
  • Fingers crossed that the "yays" and "nays" in this thread aren't distributed predictably across the inevitable fault-line.

  • Navel gazing?
  • Posted by Klaus at the unemployment line on December 4, 2009 at 5:45pm EST
  • @blackademic

    1. Perhaps racism persists in the Academy. I don't know. I doubt it, since the Academy is full of more than a few relics of the New Left's failed attempts at social engineering in the 1970s.

    2. Your charge that his academic work would be taken lightly rings laughably hollow, since his academic work is widely admired. That his academic work has seemingly discontinued is the entire point of this critique.

    3. Less accessible to his own community? The emperor has no clothes? White folks should leave him alone? Who might I ask is navel-gazing here? It isn't the author of this article. It appears you can't see past the color of his skin to the lamentable lack of output by a brilliant academic.

    That you even feel a need to lash out at "white scholars" whom you envision in some Manichean conflict with "the black masses" speaks more to your own tunnel vision and less to the matter at hand.

    Cheers.

  • West/Summers
  • Posted by Tony Oberdorfer on December 5, 2009 at 10:30am EST
  • The very fact that Cornel West was ever taken seriously says as much as need be said about the degradation of American higher education, a decline to which Larry Summers himself contributed as enthusiastically as his opponents on the Harvard faculty.

  • West defense, cont.
  • Posted by Anon on December 5, 2009 at 3:15pm EST
  • I agree with Eliot Ratzman. I was once a Teaching Fellow for West, and we briefly worked in the same building (Harvard's Barker Center). He was such a phenomenal presence; charismatic, of course, but also tireless in his support of students. Fine, lately he hasn't been producing the type of scholarship that McLemee wants to see (and I'll grant that West makes sometimes makes an easy target of himself). But he's has never stopped imbuing his work with moral and existential concerns, and as an educator he makes a huge impact, wherever he goes.

    And of course I disagree with blackademic. What an absurd and unproductive diatribe. You'd be hard-pressed to name another intellectual who was been as "respected and embraced" by white-dominated academia as Cornel West. He's the Class of 1943 University Professor at Princeton, and formerly he held a similar distinguished post at Harvard.

  • Posted by CJ on December 5, 2009 at 7:45pm EST
  • I love Cornel West. He is part of how I fell in love with Philosophy. So naturally I can also be counted among the many who wish that we would get some more academic writing out of him before he leaves the Earth.

    (I find it *very* hard to believe that those who act like he was never worth the attention lavished upon him have really engaged with a wide array of his works from the 70s, 80s and 90s)

    But I also think I know what allows him to go on feeling like such a premier intellectual even as he fails to return and feed those of us who have enjoyed his actual thorough-going intellectual efforts.

    It is the simple fact that he is one of the greatest public speakers of our time. Listening to Cornel West speak, as millions of people can attest, is always interesting, often exhilarating and sometimes transcendent. I think it is this great gift that he has and continually flexes that allows him to feel like he is meeting much of his potential, even when - for those of us in academia - he is perhaps one of the greatest examples of a sharp mind who is squandering his potential.

    On an interesting personal note, the last time I heard West speak was at Trinity United Church of Christ on the occasion of Rev. Jeremiah Wright's retirement. He spoke beautifully and insightfully about Pastor Wright's contribution and the excitement of what was happening with his parishioner Barack Obama. No one in the sanctuary that day could have guessed how wrong things would go a month or so later...

  • He is reaching his congregation
  • Posted by Karman , Large eastcoast newspaper reporter on December 6, 2009 at 10:15am EST
  • When you think about the congregation of people that Brother West is reaching, one must think about the methods that is needed to reach them. To talk to the Hip Hop culture, you must have a hook (like a rap song). His hook is "I’m a bluesman in the life of the mind, and a jazzman in the world of ideas."
    In Revelation 3:6 "He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches." You don't hear what Brother West he is saying to the congregation, because you are not part of his church and the group he is NOW trying to reach. There are two methods for reaching the Hip Hop Culture: You must either rhyme or repeat the hook.
    And don't write that this sound racist, because it's not. In the 70's, Flip Wilson and Muhammad Ali did it. In the 80's, rap music with Sugar Hill Gang and Grand Master Flash did it. In the 90's, every hit hip hop song had a hook that the artist repeated until you knew it by heart. So hopefully this gives the academia community a look at the Hip Hop Culture and it's learning behavior. Amen, Brother West, keep preaching.

  • Engaging
  • Posted by eskimo joe , Teacher at A Pre-K Classroom in a large urban setting on December 6, 2009 at 5:15pm EST
  • I find Professor West engaging and certainly entertaining. I find it disappointing that he has not kept up on his vow/oath/statement to complete the books he has promised books. I'd imagine scholars in future will need to rent DVDs to assess his contributions to life as a public intellectual; whatever that has come to mean. Hit the books, Professor.

  • reading list
  • Posted by Scott , political scientist at big Midwestern on December 8, 2009 at 7:45pm EST
  • The evidence that the review and comments are good is that (1) I read a review of somebody who is a long way from my work (2) I am not going to read this book (3) I am now completely convinced that I should read Evasion!

  • What agenda does McLemee's article serve?
  • Posted by Sam Robinsta on December 9, 2009 at 2:45pm EST
  • The following blog post praises this article, in service of an obviously right-wing and racist reactionary agenda: http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2009/12/02/cornell-west-a-parody-of-an-academic-celebrity/

    The question then, is not what McLemee thinks he is doing, but what purpose the argumentation and discourse he is using serves in the larger world. And the answer is unsurprisingly unpleasant.

  • How is Brother Scott serving The Revolution??
  • Posted by S.D.A. , Professor of History on December 11, 2009 at 12:15am EST
  • Mr Robinsta is promoting a particularly sleazy brand of motive-mongering--West is Black, therefore criticism of him is suspect, McLemee's criticized West, teherfore McLemee is . . . a racist.
    On the off chance that Mr Robinsta's name is some unsuccessful anagram for "stalinist,"I'll assume it was a joke. But, if not, is that really where we are? Attacking the motives of anyone who dares insult the Holy Clown Cornel West?

  • why the obsession with publishing?
  • Posted by Dennis , Peon at PU on December 11, 2009 at 5:15am EST
  • Socrates and Jesus didn't publish any books. Wasn't there room for all kinds of people in Plato's academy?

    John Rawls didn't publish a single book till he was 50, so why is there such a fetishistic obsession with publishing that is in ur head and in the modern professionalized academy? Can you really say that you can keep up with the number of books that are being published inside of your narrow field even if u speed read like Richard Tuck, maybe it's time the machine slows down even if its for humble mortals to catch their breath.

    Cornel really puts himself out for his students and Princeton is a liberal arts college that should emphasize teaching over being a research university. Maybe you can judge him over his moral failings but you shouldn't judge him on the one-dimensional criteria of his research output. Maybe if more emphasis is placed on teaching and learning, academia will be a saner and happier place.

    Isn't tenure designed to protect public intellectuals and isn't life more than writing? Why can't academics work hard in ways that may or may not show up in their cv.s?

  • the critics are missing the point
  • Posted by soul , kid at chicago on December 11, 2009 at 5:15am EST
  • in this article, i heard the notes of distress over the unbloomed buds that still adorn the branches of scott's bouquet that he was left by west in the past. this is a bouquet he has waited on patiently for years without much satisfaction and this review seems largely to be an expression of his disappointment that his expectations were not met.

    in this review, i heard little of the harshness that many above seem to have gleaned. those who cheer scott's apparent willingness to take what they perceive as pot shots at west may be simply projecting their own desire to do so upon the author.

    i would echo the desire that scott makes clear that west share more of his insights with us in book format. they are juicy and thrilling to examine and turn over in one's mind like some gourmet dish or fine wine. such a treat! that west may be involved in some other pursuit, in a project that is displeasing to the literati, may be distasteful to his critics. he is withholding our just desserts! how dare he! however, it appears that this project may be bearing some fruit that they are not taking into consideration (if one believes his defenders) by dint of their inability or unwillingness to cede that creating some kind of black american populist philosophy is a worthwhile endeavor.

    so, sorry scott and everyone else, the things you wanted professor west to produce may yet mature (he has many good years left if he lives an average lifespan). until then, your over-intellectualized and ultimately empty sniping is probably less helpful than your thoughtful critiques.

  • Posted by Michael on December 13, 2009 at 4:45pm EST
  • I agree with those who hope for more academic work out of Cornel West in coming years. Yet I think it is important to recognize that West's strength as an educator (and I believe that he would agree with this) lies not so much in the academic books that he writes as in the questions that he is able to raise through oratory and personal engagement. The respect that West commands among young people, their willingness to listen to what he has to say and to really think about it -- these things are the positive products of a different sort of pedagogy than is standard, but which is nonetheless valid. West is teaching, and I appreciate that.

    Also, I think that it is worth seriously engaging with what he says in his speeches, interviews, etc. The mere fact that something is not written down and published does not negate its quality and substance.

  • universities are businesses....
  • Posted by Corin , n/a at hunter college on December 15, 2009 at 5:00am EST
  • I am going to state something I think is pretty obvious.

    Universities such as Princeton and Harvard are serious places, so apparently they hire professors to make serious efforts at what they call "discourse." The administration, including people like Lawrence Summers, expect the academic production to be of a certain "academic" caliber, mainly for the benefit of their own prestige, so that rich people would want to pay for an education there. They expect many people to return the favor in the form of alumni donations. The Ivy League is what people call "elite."

    In bringing in rich people, they also bring in some very smart people. Most of the people at Princeton and Harvard are indeed pretty smart. It's expected that the professors are going to represent the institution as well as cultivate young minds for their new jobs.

    These elite universities evidently think he's smart enough to represent them, and therefore they hired him. So now people complain that he is not doing "serious" intellectual work, i.e. speaking to the mass audience instead of other scholars. Nevertheless, he says what he says because he feels like it.

    If he has failed in his responsibilities as an "intellectual," then possibly he has a different definition of the word "intellectual" than you do. Or maybe intellect isn't what he values the most. Perhaps he merely wants to reach the audience that he is actually talking about in his philosophical inquiries--i.e. people from the working class. But such people don't contribute any money to Harvard or Princeton. They are more likely to be in jail.

  • Really?
  • Posted by TJ , nevermind at nevermind on January 7, 2010 at 4:45pm EST
  • I'm not sure why Dr. West's work is your business. You certainly are not required to read his memoir. I'm also dis-concerned with any set of circumstances which disavow his interest in contemporary African American life.
    If you didn't know... and you probably wouldn't... Dr. West was the first Academic to be honored at BET honors; a show watched by millions of everyday black people. The repeated supposition that Dr. West is not engaging a wider black audience (outside of academia) in important discourse is the type of ignorant Caucasian assumption that makes white analysis of black academic work seem predictable, racist, and trivial. I quite prefer Dr. West work continue speaking to those who need it most, rather than some white trust fund baby/perpetual student who refused to find a practical job and is now "pleased" by big ideas he'll never put to any practical use.
    Good day.

  • It's easy to be cool in higher academia
  • Posted by Soporifix , Professor, English at Houston Community College on January 7, 2010 at 11:15pm EST
  • The "bluesman/jazzman" quote is something someone says about you, not something you say about yourself. West's work is about as authentic and cutting-edge as Don DeLillo, who also writes about simplistic commonplaces as if they're his personal gems of intellectual interrogation.

  • A Culturally Encapsulated Review
  • Posted by Michael Vavrus , Professor, Political Economy & Teacher Education at Evergreen State College on January 29, 2010 at 11:15pm EST
  • Clearly the reviewer is unfamiliar or just plain unreceptive to this kind of Montaigne-type of essay/memoir in which the author -- Cornel West -- takes the reader along for the author's own journey in search for meaning and all the contradictions which that can entail. The reviewer wants West to be something other than who Cornel West is in all the myriad manifestations of his inner/outer self. This memoir actually can help a reader ask him/herself what is the meaning of one's own life, a point that escapes the reviewer in his narrow focus on what he wanted West to write than rather the text that is in front of him -- a reviewer who unfortunately reveals his own cultural encapsulation...