Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

Pass It On

June 30, 2005

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

One sign of the great flexibility of American English -- if also of its high tolerance for ugliness -- is the casual way users will turn a noun into a verb. It happens all the time. And lately, it tends to be a matter of branding. You "xerox" an article and "tivo" a movie. Just for the record, neither Xerox nor TiVo is  very happy about such unauthorized usage of its name. Such idioms are, in effect, a dilution of the  trademark.

Which creates an odd little double bind for anyone with the culture-jamming instinct to Stick It To The Man. Should you absolutely refuse to give free advertising to either Xerox or TiVo by using their names as verbs, you have actually thereby fallen into line with corporate policy. Then again, if you defy their efforts to police ordinary language, that means repeating a company name as if it were something natural and inevitable. See, that's how they get ya.

On a less antiglobalizational note, I've been trying to come up with an alternative to using "meme" as a verb. For one thing, it is too close to "mime," with all the queasiness that word evokes.

As discussed here on Tuesday, meme started out as a noun implying a theory. It called to mind a more or less biological model of how cultural phenomena (ideas, fads, ideologies, etc.) spread and reproduce themselves over time. Recently the term has settled into common usage -- in a different, if related, sense. It now applies to certain kinds of questionnaires or discussion topics that circulate within (and sometimes between) blogospheric communities.

There does not seem to be an accepted word to name the creation and initial dissemination of a meme. So it could be that "meme" must also serve, for better or worse, as a transitive verb.

In any case, my options are limited.... Verbal elegance be damned: Let's meme.

The ground rules won't be complicated. The list of questions is short, but ought to yield some interesting responses. With luck, the brevity will speed up circulation.

In keeping with meme protocol, I'll "tap"a few bloggers to respond. Presumably they will do likewise. However, the invitation is not restricted to that handful of people: This meme is open to anyone who wants to participate.

So here are the questions:

(1) Imagine it's 2015. You are visiting the library at a major research university. You go over to a computer terminal (or whatever it is they use in 2015) that gives you immediate access to any book or journal article on any topic you want. What do you look up? In other words, what do you hope somebody will have written in the meantime?

(2) What is the strangest thing you've ever heard or seen at a conference? No names, please. Refer to "Professor X" or "Ms. Y" if you must. Double credit if you were directly affected. Triple if you then said or did something equally weird.

(3) Name a writer, scholar, or otherwise worthy person you admire so much that meeting him or her would probably reduce you to awestruck silence.

(4) What are two or three blogs or other Web sites you often read that don't seem to be on many people's radar?
Feel free to discard anything you don't care to answer.

To get things started, I'm going to tap a few individuals -- people I've had only fairly brief contact with in the past. As indicated, however, anyone else who wants to respond is welcome to do so. The initial list:

Okay, that should do for now.

An afterthought on the first question -- the one about getting a chance to look things up in a library of the future: Keep in mind the cautionary example of Enoch Soames, the minor late-Victorian poet whose story Max Beerbohm tells. He sold his soul to the devil for a chance to spend an afternoon in the British Library, 100 years in the future, reading what historians and critics would eventually say about his work.

Soames ends up in hell a little early: The card catalog shows that posterity has ignored him even more thoroughly than his contemporaries did.

Proof, anyway, that ego surfing is really bad for you, even in the future. A word to the wise.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Pass It On

  • Branding and Blogging
  • Posted by Mary McKinney, Ph.D. , Clinical Psychologist & Academic Coach at http://www.SuccessfulAcademic.com on June 30, 2005 at 9:11am EDT
  • Fun article.

    However, even though I can't wait to hear tales of conference gaffes, just as I do with tags in blogdom, I'll give the meme a pass. (Please don't send me an e-chain letter either.)

    How interesting that Xerox and TiVo don't want to be verbed or genericized. I thought that it was a marketers' wetest dream to "own" a brand by having the name represent the whole product category. For example, much of the book "The 22 Immutable Laws of Branding" focuses on how marketers might try to position a new product in order to become a Xerox, Kleenex, Band-aid, Q-tip, Jello, Vaseline, Scotch tape, Frisbee, Rollerblade, Fedex, etc.,. Say authors Ries and Ries, "The ultimate word to own in the mind is the name of the category itself."

    Could the official complaints of Xerox and TiVo be a clever marketing ploy to help us remember that the generic is proprietary?

    I'm also wondering whether, by the next national election, being "Bushed" will no longer mean you're tired.

    And will posting this comment get me googled?

  • Memeogenesis?
  • Posted by Amardeep Singh on June 30, 2005 at 1:35pm EDT
  • Thanks for the Tag, Scott. I'm thinking it over.

    Meanwhile, how about "memeogenesis" as a word for creating a meme? It has a nice biology-ish sound to it. Variations include: memeogenitor, memeogeniture. Over time we could perhaps just shorten it to memeogen.

    It's horribly prosaic and reactionary of me to say it, but I sometimes wonder if "meme" in Blogistan is just a fancy word for "questionnaire." And in meatspace (i.e., reality), since it's questionable whether the biological metaphor applies very well to the spread of ideas, it might be that the old word "idea" continues to be sufficient.

  • Oh dear.
  • Posted by Anthony Paul Smith on July 1, 2005 at 4:36am EDT
  • I've been out of the house all day at my horrible data entry job, so I haven't been able to respond. Suffice it to say you've created a meme that requires quite a bit more thought than the ones I've done in the past. Still, for you, I'll have it up tomorrow. Thanks for passing it on.

  • Memeoficators
  • Posted by Edward Pettit on July 1, 2005 at 4:36am EDT
  • Ditto thanks for the tag, Scott. I'll be posting answers on my blog soon. I look forward to reading the others.

    I like memeoficators for "practitioners of memes." Memeoficator. It sounds kind of obscene.

  • Posted by Miriam Elizabeth Burstein on July 1, 2005 at 11:13am EDT
  • Well, those sound interesting. I'll have my answers up sometime this evening.

  • Oh yeah, please remember this....
  • Posted by Scott McLemee , columnist at Inside Higher Ed on July 1, 2005 at 1:05pm EDT
  • To anyone who responds to this meme, whether because I tagged you in particular, or because you accepted the blanket invitation:

    The protocols of this speech genre include the expectation that you will, in turn, "tap" other people to respond. Let's say at least two. (Like I can enforce that....)

    If you don't do this, the thing will be extinct in short order -- instead of having the long, slow death originally intended.