Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

Support All College Options

October 5, 2010

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

It is encouraging that President Obama and Dr. Jill Biden are recognizing the critical role that community colleges play in higher education with today’s White House Summit on Community Colleges. This event highlights how essential community colleges are in helping to reach the president’s goal of producing an additional eight million college graduates in our country by 2020.

However, community colleges cannot meet that goal alone. According to the American Association of Community Colleges, enrollment in the sector increased 16.9 percent in just two years, from fall 2007 to fall 2009, placing a heavy burden on these institutions. To produce more successful college graduates, we need every segment of the diverse higher education community to contribute. The American Council on Education recognizes that fact: “This collective diversity among institutions is one of the great strengths of America’s higher education system and has helped make it the best in the world. Preserving that diversity is essential if we hope to serve the needs of our democratic society.”

These diverse options are unlike those offered by any other nation and include small liberal arts colleges, community colleges, large public universities, online universities, for-profit schools and research institutions. Each sector serves a slightly different niche of students and provides quality programs leading to degrees ranging from an associate to a doctorate. And each will contribute significantly to achieving President Obama’s goal.

In light of this need to pull together, it is disheartening that some in Washington are working to stifle some educational alternatives, such as for-profit institutions. Like all other sectors of higher education, there are some for-profit schools that are not performing up to par academically. And that must be addressed in the form of good policy. That being said, painting the entire sector with too broad a brush may harm good actors that are quality for-profit schools. And no one can reasonably argue that those quality for-profit schools are not essential in helping us meet President Obama’s ambitious goals.

For-profit institutions play a critical role alongside their community college peers. Today’s community colleges and for-profit institutions are filled with students who, for one reason or another, cannot or will not attend a traditional four-year, brick-and-mortar institution. Both sectors provide working adults with educational options that allow them to attend college while working full time to support their families. The National Center for Education Statistics predicts that between now and 2017, the number of college students older than 25 will increase by 19 percent -- nearly twice the predicted growth rate of younger students.

Both sectors also share similar missions of giving underserved student populations -- including minorities, international students, and nontraditional learners -- greater access to quality higher education. And quality programs prepare graduates for successful careers.

The Knives Come Out
On eve of the summit,
study by a consultant
to for-profit colleges
questions performance
of community colleges.
Read the story here.

 

This alignment of missions and goals underscores the fact that, contrary to the perception that the sectors compete with one another, community colleges and for-profit universities often work in close collaboration. While community colleges are meeting an enormous and growing need, they also face the real possibility of not being able to accommodate the overflow of students who will be looking to earn their degrees. Many community college graduates who are working full time go on to receive their bachelor’s degrees at for-profit institutions, online or in the evening.

It is also worth noting that a number of graduate institutions -- including for-profit universities -- help prepare the next generation of community college administrators and faculty who teach those very students. Many of the administrators and instructors at community colleges have earned their credentials at online universities -- not just because of the convenience these institutions afford but also because of the high-quality educational opportunities offered. A 2006 study predicted that 85 percent of community college presidents would retire in 10 years.

To help address that need, we founded a community college leadership doctoral program at Walden in 2003. We worked with some of the nation’s most outstanding community college leaders and Walden faculty, creating one of the most rigorous and substantive Ph.D. programs of this type in the country. More than 100 educators are currently enrolled in this program, working with a dozen national community college leaders as their mentors, including one of this essay’s co-authors. Program graduates are beginning to fill top leadership positions in community colleges all across the nation.

On a day when we are appropriately celebrating the remarkable role that community colleges play in American higher education, it is essential that we also recognize the degree of interdependence and collaboration that exists across all sectors of the higher ed spectrum.

Community colleges and for-profit universities offer educational alternatives to nontraditional students on where and how to earn their degrees. Continuing to provide more educational options -- options that provide innovative and quality programs addressing our social and economic needs -- is the only way America will be able to produce more successful college graduates and reach President Obama’s goal for closing the education gap.

Jonathan A. Kaplan is president of Walden University and Terry O’Banion is director of Walden's Community College Leadership doctoral program.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Support All College Options

  • Posted by Perry on October 5, 2010 at 9:00am EDT
  • Why is this blog running so many editorials advocating privatization and for-profit education?

  • Posted by RedRabbit on October 5, 2010 at 9:30am EDT
  • Perry, I would like to know that as well. This website is one of the few consistent resources for news and critical views on the scam school industry. It would be a shame if it fell in to the 'fairness' trap and toned down their reporting to avoid hurting the feelings of the snake oil salesmen.

    As for supporting all college options...

    Defending these overpriced diploma mills on the basis that we should support "all college options" is on par with defending pyramid schemes and ponzi schemes on the basis that we should support "all investment options."

    Selling students debt and giving them nothing in return is of no benefit to anyone. It is a deplorable practice that hopefully Sen. Harkin and his allies will put a stop to.

    Take all the federal student loan cash going to these chop shop schools and give it to the real schools that deserve it. The developing nations who send their students to America for higher education are not in the habit of sending them to DeVry or "University" of Phoenix. There is good reason for that.

  • Better? Really?!
  • Posted by Philippe Tschaud , Professor at Community College of America on October 5, 2010 at 11:15am EDT
  • I have proudly taught at a medium sized community college in 1983. I began teaching online for this public two year state college in 1990, well before WebCT was ever thought of. During these 20 years, the college has consistently lacked guidance or resources from the administration to make online learning meaningful. The best we've ever received was for them not to outright oppose it. Recently, they've started to realize it's the only competitive advantage we have against numerous colleges and universities sprouting satellite campuses in our remote little village, sucking away students and dollars.

    Contrast this with Capella University, were I've taught part time since 2003. Capella has consistently invested heavily in technology, my professional development and innovative pedagogy to improve their product. I can assure you, I've spent WAY more time with my chairs and deans at Capella in calls, training, and webinars than I EVER have spent at my bricks and mortar college.

    Take it from one who's played both sides of the house--the public colleges in America are largely managed by bureaucrats who wouldn't last a month in the for-profit sector, where innovation and academic results are rewarded, versus public sector where mediocrity and longevity are the only criteria for success.
  • Posted by Assoc Prof on October 5, 2010 at 12:45pm EDT
  • I don't think you can generalize from two examples to all public vs private institutions. I frequently get email from students who are attending online institutions that do not provide hands-on opportunities to conduct research. They are at private institutions that charge them hefty tuition but want to join the research labs of professors at public universities. Anyone can rent a server to present online courses, but not every private institution can provide students with access to cutting edge knowledge because it isn't published yet and won't exist at private institutions. Depends on the goals of the student, but I doubt that many students understand that they are getting a second-rate education despite paying a bunch of money.
  • I disagree...
  • Posted by J. Burmei , Full-Time College Student at Ohio State University on October 5, 2010 at 1:15pm EDT
  • There is one very distinct difference between what brick and mortar schools offer to students in comparison to what the students receive at online institutions: Face-to-Face Interaction. Regardless of what job sector you eventually go into, you need to learn how to present yourself and sell your product. I could list 100 different factors that impact marketing, but none of those lessons learned in the classroom will have an impact if you cannot apply it to real-life situations. Unless you learn your product inside and out and understand how to address your customers needs, it does not matter what level of education you receive.

    This is where brick and mortar schools exceed online "universities". Until you are required to stand up in front of 20, 30, 100 people you do not recognize and give a presentation, all of the concepts taught to you in class are just useless facts. You have to actually apply what you are learning.

    The simple factor of face-to-face interaction and the application of the education that is found at brick and mortar schools can not be match by internet classes. The experience factor that comes with going to a class versus sitting at home on the computer really makes a difference in job placement and job success.

    Just talk to any human resource official at any reputable company. Brick and mortar schools generally graduate more well-rounded, polished students than your online university. And that's a fact that DeVry or the University of Phoenix just cannot dispute.
  • Posted by Steve Foerster , an adjunct IT instructor at a Midwestern community college on October 5, 2010 at 1:45pm EDT
  • I too have experience in both the for-profit and community college sectors, and find that both have value. This hysterical "scam schools" and "diploma mills" nonsense has no place in fair coverage of this ongoing issue, and Inside Higher Ed is right to ignore those sorts of tiresome ideologues.
  • Cost to Attend College: Comparative Analysis
  • Posted by Cleveramerican , Arm Chair at Ivy Wannabee on October 5, 2010 at 2:15pm EDT



  • Mr. Rabbit,

    Overpriced? Think again. I apologize if the facts contradict your rant.

    Here is a report you may find enlightening:

    http://bit.ly/cbYqpN
  • In favor of for-profit education.
  • Posted by Robert J. King , Faculty of Philosophy at University of Phoenix on October 8, 2010 at 6:47am EDT
  • I have held three full scholarships at three top 20 institutions of higher education, #9 ranked small liberal arts college, Davidson College (B.A.), #9 ranked Duke University (M.Div., Th.M.) and #20 ranked University of Notre Dame (Ph.D. studies from 2000 - 03). I currently teach for a highly respected Roman Catholic university's adult continuing education program, for the University of Phoenix and for a community college's military campus. My student performance is highest at the community college largely due to its increased rigor through a military culture of high performance. The second highest student performance is usually the University of Phoenix with many active duty military personnel, career medical personnel, and working parents constituting the "top-tier" of enrollment. Finally, although more highly regarded academically, due to less concrete diagnostic criteria measuring overall student performance my Catholic-affiliated university students usually produce the lowest levels of writing, analytical ability and are most prone to causing disruptions in class. Just this week I received an e-mail from the University of Phoenix president, Dr. Bill Pepicello who is a fellow "Ivy League-level" academic (he holds a master's and a Ph.D. from Brown University). He was in agreement that shared academic standards must be upheld in faculty hiring and recruitment. I was also in agreement with Dr. Pepicello that the University of Phoenix can produce a "viable option" for working adults that needs equal access to student funding. Finally, as someone trained at the highest level academically (i.e. Davidson, Duke, Notre Dame), when I was researching online Ph.D. programs that would allow me to continue teaching and to remain active in church-activist work, Walden University's academic credentials stood out far above the rest. My Ph.D. mentor, Cheryl Keen, Ed.D. (Harvard) has been outstanding and has been a critical reader who has first understood the nature of specifically theological education and also has assisted tremendously in helping to translate my previous educational experience to general educational categories. Thus, contrary to the straw man fallacies of "for profit" higher education, when Faculty members at University of Phoenix have been trained at places such as Brown or Duke and when Faculty members at Walden University have been trained at Harvard, then the onus is actually upon lower-rated universities lacking such credentials to justify their continued disproportionate share of state tax revenue.