Search News


Browse Archives

News

Forward Into the Cloud

September 30, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

While a number of colleges and universities devote resources to keep campus e-mail grounded on their own servers, they are finding it difficult to coax students out of the cloud.

Students are increasingly arriving at college already managing multiple e-mail addresses with “cloud”-based e-mail services -- such as Gmail and Hotmail -- which are hosted remotely by third-party companies. These students are often reluctant to use the e-mail client provided to them by their institution.

“We did a survey several years ago, and the overwhelming majority of incoming students said they had between three and four e-mail accounts,” said Beth Ann Bergsmark, director for academic information technology services at Georgetown University.

In order to keep things simple, many students set up their institutional accounts to automatically forward mail to one of their existing, cloud-based mailboxes. Students prefer not to check multiple mailboxes if they don’t have to, said Geoff Nathan, faculty liaison to computing and information technology at Wayne State University. When he asked his students recently why the majority of them auto-forwarded their e-mails to an outside account, they cited features often unavailable on campus accounts, such as texting, video chatting, and virtually unlimited storage space.

Greg Jackson, vice president of policy and analysis at Educause, said that institutions that still maintain on-site e-mail services report that about half of all students have their e-mails forwarded to independent addresses.

This has sparked a discussion campus IT circles and left a number of institutions to examine their e-mail policies: Should colleges allow students to have their campus e-mails auto-forwarded to an outside account?

Thousands of colleges worldwide have attempted to roll with the trend by outsourcing e-mail to cloud providers such as Google through its free Google Apps for Education. And while shedding the burden of running its own e-mail client can serve as a windfall for colleges looking to save cash wherever they can, campus officials often fret about putting private correspondence under the control of third-party providers.

To wit: Earlier this month, a software bug in Google Apps caused a number of e-mail messages to be sent to the wrong mailboxes at several colleges that use the service. Other routine problems -- such as last Thursday’s widespread Gmail outage -- highlight the helplessness of campus IT departments to ensure the reliability of their own e-mail systems. (Of course, colleges that have not outsourced their e-mail also run into such problems, and can't rely on Google's massive troubleshooting resources.)

Campuses that have stuck with internal e-mail systems, often to avoid a loss of control, are undermined by students who forward e-mails to outside accounts. Certain information that gets sent on an internal server, such as grades, might be protected by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, which generally bars colleges from releasing educational information about students without permission, said Thomas Iverson, systems technology supervisor at Iowa’s Mercy College of Health Sciences (in the case of Mercy and other medical colleges, e-mails might also contain patient data protected under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act). Mercy currently does not allow auto-forwarding, although Iverson said it is weighing a policy revision as it tries to grow its distance education programs.

If sensitive information sent from a university source were to be compromised after being auto-forwarded to a student's private account, the university would probably not be liable for violating FERPA, said Tracy Mitrano, an information science scholar and director of IT policy at Cornell University. Nor would Google, said Jeff Keltner, business development manager for Google Apps for Education. If a student chooses to have information forwarded to some other e-mail address, Keltner said, "then the protection of that data is bound exclusively by the user agreements on that individual e-mail account ... there is no relationship between Google and the university."

But with most legally protected information being exchanged via more secure channels, compromised e-mail data is not the most immediate concern for professors and administrators. The first priority is making sure messages get to their recipients. “If it’s an official communication, I want to make sure it gets to the correct address,” said Terence P. Ma, chief information officer at Touro University Nevada.

Auto-forwarding to cloud-based e-mail services can foil universities in this respect. If students are using a service that has not been specially tailored to accept e-mail blasts from specific addresses, official announcements sent by university administrators can get caught in spam filters. Furthermore, if a message fails to arrive at its destination, there is no guarantee that the third-party service will notify the sender of the failure. “There’s the age-old anecdote where students say they have not received an e-mail,” said Iverson. Auto-forwarding, he said, increases the potential “points of failure.”

Even institutions that have outsourced e-mail to cloud-based providers are finding that students still set up university accounts to forward to their own address. While some providers allow campus IT officials to shut off the auto-forwarding function on the university side, systems such as Gmail allow users to pull messages into their independent accounts from the other end, according to Bliss Bailey, executive director of information technology at Auburn University. “The fact is that students are able to reach into their email accounts using [Web protocols] IMAP or POP; they can essentially forward the e-mail on their own,” said Bailey. “The technology has outstripped our ability to police that policy.”

Some colleges, whether they have outsourced or not, have attempted to encourage students to use their “dot-edu” accounts by requiring them to send official, university-related correspondence from those addresses, and telling them that they, the students, are responsible for any e-mails they miss due to a problem with the forwarding process or their outside provider’s data. However, campus IT officials acknowledged that it is virtually impossible to make students adhere to forwarding policies. “It’s the whole lead-a-horse-to-water saying,” said Iverson.

Cloudy Forecast

By outsourcing to the same cloud-based services that students are using already, officials say, higher education institutions can at least make using the “dot-edu” system more appealing to students. “They come in expecting a [certain] consumer experience, because they’ve been there for so many years,” said Bergsmark, of Georgetown. Georgetown switched to Google Apps for Education’s Gmail interface two months ago, and Bergsmark said early feedback has been positive. “It put them back in that consumer position that they were used to,” she said.

With more and more colleges and universities opting for cloud-based providers, there is a general feeling that on-site e-mail systems -- along with many other services -- are on the way out. “Under the current system, particularly with the Google and Microsoft offerings being free of charge, this is an obvious place where you can cut expenses,” said Ma, of Touro. “I don’t see how universities can sustain [in-house e-mail systems], looking at overall cost and cost/benefit ratio.”

Some officials acknowledge that colleges that choose outsourcing now could find themselves in a bind if the more popular cloud-based brands ever decide to start charging for their services.

But others simply worry about ceding too much to outside companies -- particularly something as information-rich and mission-critical as e-mail. “Some universities have decided that they trust Google or Microsoft,” said Nathan of Wayne State, which still uses an on-site system. “Others have said ‘nope’ -- maybe they trust them, but not with their lives, not with their data.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Forward Into the Cloud

  • Posted by Chris on September 30, 2009 at 9:00am EDT
  • I never rely on the list of official university e-mails provided by the university. The first assignment in every class I teach is to send me an e-mail from an account the student actually checks regularly.

    Oddly, this article seems to imply that this phenomena is confined to students. Faculty forward their e-mail to outside providers too.

    The idea that students or faculty can be expected to rely on a university provided e-mail account as their primary point of online contact is increasingly becoming a myth. Why would a student, who already has an established e-mail address, want to go through the trouble of switching e-mail addresses or managing an additional account? I think we really need to question whether the University should be in the business of providing e-mail addresses for students, either in house or outsourced

  • TIred of IT failures
  • Posted by Anonymous , Professor, social sciences at Big Southeast U. on September 30, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • In recent years my department has seen massive defections from our university email system to gmail. Why? Our university system crashes. Often. And usually at the worst possible times, e.g, the first week of classes. If the faculty and grad students find the university system too frustrating and unreliable, I'm not going to fault the undergraduates from steering clear of it. I've long since given up asking for things like, oh, raises. But is it asking too much for reliable email from the flagship university of my state? Evidently so.

  • Tad More Context
  • Posted by Tracy Mitrano at Cornell on September 30, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • Steve, delighted that you are covering this important topic, and so substantively.

    To be sure there is no misunderstanding, and in line with the other comments on the point that it is about students but not staff or faculty acting on behalf of the institution, I would only like to quote from the email I sent you to clarify the point you from me. Here it is:

    "I don't think the institution is liable in the case where the student sends the information, he or she, it would seem to me, has assumed the risk. It is different when the institution holds the information, for example in the form of financial aid information that includes regulated data."

    Keep up the good reporting! Best, Tracy

  • Issue is structure of University IT, not systems
  • Posted by Jeanne , IT on September 30, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • I see this issue from a different perspective. I see two key issues one of management of basic services centrally or in each unit the other is determining if providing future donors services that they appreciate, while at your institution. This is compounded by the method that research dollars are applied for and funded, directly to the college or unit, which might (or might not) bypass the central organizations strategic direction. Universities appear to have two basic models central or decentralized.

    If the decentralized model includes e-mail and other services that can be leveraged for a larger group, then these institutions are spending more money and usually providing fewer services, as well as adding additional support for the various IT staff. This duplication of effort is the greater issue here. I agree forwarding is also a concern, however if the services were provided I speculate many users would not forward the mail - why bother.

    So the issue is one of changing the directions and thoughts for how universities manage assets - e-mail, future donors, privacy etc. Many of these issues would be addressed if the systems were managed centrally. The group would have the capacity, security, firewalls etc to ensure mail was delivered to whom and when.

  • Faculty, too
  • Posted by Carl on September 30, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • I am a faculty member who forwards all email to an external server. I have numerous email accounts, and I want to keep track of them all in one place. The email service used by my university (based on MS Exchange) is not flexible enough to handle that. So I forward my university email elsewhere.

    Side note: the article text implies that email forwarding is the main issue, but this is only one of many issues. For example, one can use the IMAP and/or POP protocols to fetch messages from other accounts even if the messages are not automatically forwarded (e.g. gmail has this ability). So these protocols also have to be disabled, which causes an invoncenience for students who want to use a program such as Outlook to check their mail from home.

    I generally agree with Chris's sentiments, but I think that it is nice for my university to at least provide me a placeholder email address ( name@school.edu ) to use for professional purposes, even if email sent to that account is forwarded elsewhere.

  • another issue solved
  • Posted by Teresa Goodell , assist prof Sch of Nsg at Oregon Health & Sci Univ on September 30, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • My university's domain name occasionally gets blocked by large email providers like att.net because of the viral activity that some employees and students inevitably encourage. Mass emails warning users not to open "suspicious" email notwithstanding. This doesn't happen to Google's gmail.

  • Posted on September 30, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • Two reasons most of the above commenters are not thinking straight:

    1. Privacy. Google is mining your email. You have no idea who they're sharing it with. Every email you send through Google is adding more data to an already gigantic "file" on you, aggregated by banks, credit rating agencies, marketing corporations, and local and federal civic institutions and police and intelligence services.

    2. Convenience. You're going to long for your local university systems again someday, when Google's service failures (which are steadily accelerating now, in both frequency and severity) are as intrusive as any other alternative.

  • overly-cautious instiutions
  • Posted by Michael E. , Professor of English on September 30, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • I would love to be a faculty member who auto-forwards his email to a Gmail account, but my university has disabled that function out of fear of lawsuits. Apparently, they did not get the memo from Cornell's IT dept. stating that allowing individuals auto-forwarding could somehow violate FERPA (which is an absurd claim). It would be nice to work for universities that are more worried about the information needs of their faculty and students and less worried about imaginary lawsuits.

  • my response to 11 a.m. comments
  • Posted by Michael E. , Professor of English on September 30, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • My response to the untitled comments above made at 11 a.m.:

    Those are excellent points, but as a faculty member who is responsible for managing the information in my teaching and research, shouldn't those decisions be mine and not the institutions? Yes, I'm aware that Google mines the metadata of email, but I am willing to exchange that loss of privacy for a service that I consider to be far superior to the university's email client. (I won't go into why I think it's superior, as I don't think that's the point. The point is, I think the decision should be mine.) The same is true about the possibility that Google might diminish or change its service. (Again, an informed decision at my university points out that its services have changed and diminished repeatedly.)

    The bottom line is that faculty are professionals who need to be trusted with their own information management decisions.

  • Decision should be mine - not sure
  • Posted by Jeanne on September 30, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • Response to Michael E - regarding the decision should be his to make....

    Michael, I am not sure that I agree with your statement. Here are some examples where, I think both you and the institution would be held liable
    1 - Grades reaching an inappropriate person or group
    2 - Illegal copies of software
    3 - Illegal copies of music, videos, publications

    In some of these cases, your professional standing might be impacted, however the university could have additional legal liabilities.

    So, given those situations and the nature of changes in the area of information security and privacy it might be easier to have one group keeping you informed rather than you having to keep up with all of those changes and regulations.

    Keeping you informed would take two forms:
    1 - keeping your data safe and secure, and flexibility for access
    2 - informing you regarding key changes that would generally impact the type of research and teaching that you do as well.

    I look forward to your thoughts and comments.

    Jeanne

  • privacy is the big issue
  • Posted by observer on September 30, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • There is widespread belief among politically active student groups here that the university reads their email. Certainly the institution does have the opportunity since their support for email encryption is very very weak and they don't encourage it. Consequently email is readable in storage on their servers.

    Wherever there is a computer system, people are most worried about privacy the more local the system is. It is much easier to imagine that a close by supervisor who has it in for you or an administrator that hates your group's politics is reading your email than to imagine some outsourced employees on the other side of the world are reading it. This may not at all be a valid outlook, but it's a very very common outlook.

    Also some past news stories about university computer science or sociology departments analyzing their institution's email en masse (deidentified allegedly) really didn't help matters. Now the data will be mined on a much larger and probably much more expensive level. Someone somewhere is paying for this storage and bandwidth.

    What people should be asking here is how can we ensure our email is encrypted? Do the clients support s/mime or other protocols? Wherever your email is going, make them work to
    decrypt it. Note: if the certificates (containing the encryption keys) are stored within their email
    system then you are not making it very hard for them to decrypt it.

    Another large problem is records. Students and university employees are often part of official research or institutional business subject to record requests. How will those be handled in the face of this outsourcing of email to private companies?

  • Article has a glaring ommission
  • Posted by John on September 30, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • What is missing from this article is one glaring omission; if a student auto forwards his/her email to a third party, cloud based, email system like hotmail, you can't easily identify who the student is when he/she sends from that same account. I get an email from my school's registrar and I have it auto forward to my hotmail account which is happyboy@hotmail.com. When I click reply, the registrar's office has no idea who I am. There in lies some of the concerns some schools and instructors have as opposed to school created email accounts which usually make it easy to spot the student's name in the address. Some instructors and schools still say, for all official school communication make sure you are sending from within your school account.

    Personally, I'd say don't mix school/work email with personal email and move on. You'll all get to work one day and have a work phone # and work email address and you should keep them separate from personal phone # and personal email address. You have plently of tools now where you can pull multiple accounts into one screen (not one account and some want to do) and manage them both.

    And for the faculty commenting here that think they should be in control of everything because they are "professionlas", grow up. You can't control everything at your schools even though you'd all like to. Seriously, you do not run the show; students so. Take them out of the equation and you are out of jobs. You want full control, they you run it all. Teach and work in your school's IT department to see the other side.

  • perptual email
  • Posted by dsulz , library at alberta on September 30, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • All good points but key is that most university accounts are cancelled after graduation. After spending years establishing contacts, folders, organisational structure, etc., access is suddenly cut off. If universities allowed email accounts to continue indefinitely, more might be willing to use them.

  • Posted by talleyrand on September 30, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • Another reason we give every student a .edu address and use only that address to send email communications is mentioned in the article, but not much discussed. It disables the "I didn't get that email" excuse. "It's in our log file that you did get it, dearie. What happened to it after it arrived in your .edu mailbox is your responsibility."

  • the from address problem
  • Posted by unhappy on September 30, 2009 at 2:00pm EDT
  • "What is missing from this article is one glaring omission; if a student auto forwards his/her email to a third party, cloud based, email system like hotmail, you can't easily identify who the student is when he/she sends from that same account. I get an email from my school's registrar and I have it auto forward to my hotmail account which is happyboy@hotmail.com."

    They thought of that. Many of these vendors so terribly anxious to get university email outsourced to them allow the customer to customize the from address or if the institution
    has contracted with the vendor to provide their email it is probably automatically customized
    for the institution.

    Also in many cases of non-web email clients it is entirely possible to set the from address to whatever you want anyway. The from address is no guarantee who sent the email. For that
    you need to use certificates to prove who sent it and even then there are issues.

    It's not just email they want to get control of, it's everything. check out a couple
    examples:
    http://my.liveatedu.com/
    http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/edu/index.html

  • Blocked email
  • Posted by ADD on September 30, 2009 at 2:30pm EDT
  • My university hasn't allowed automatic forwarding of email for a few years. Some students were forwarding their email, then flagging announcements from the school as junk. This led one of the large services (Yahoo, I believe) to block all email from the school since it was thought to be spam. The policy on forwarding was changed fairly quickly after that.

  • Old news?
  • Posted by Jack on October 1, 2009 at 5:30am EDT
  • Sounds a lot like the old days when IT depts didn't want to hand over power to the user (mainframes to desktops, and so on).

    "We can't control student email? Inconceivable!"

  • Posted by name , univ it admin at private edu on October 6, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • Thank you for this unintentionally humorous statement

    "The bottom line is that faculty are professionals who need to be trusted with their own information management decisions."

  • Time to retire email
  • Posted by Patrick Masson , CIO, Computer Information Systems at SUNY Delhi on October 10, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • It's interesting we continue to utilize email for tasks that can be better served with other technologies. Email adoption was essentially a replacement to traditionally mailings: admissions, enrollment, registration, financial aid, grades, etc. Both traditional mail and email are push technologies, I would recommend exploring pull technologies were students, faculty and staff access user-specific information/content online. I am hard pressed to identify any communication currently sent via email on our campus that could not be exposed through a campus portal.