Search News


Browse Archives

News

E-Learning's 'Third Phase'

October 27, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Though Blackboard's critics have worried the company might monopolize the market for e-learning tools, competition continues to surface -- notably from companies that once were more focused on the administrative side of campus computing.

SunGard Higher Education is today announcing plans to integrate Epsilen, a learning-based social networking platform, into its learning-management system. The partnership will give SunGard clients access to Epsilen’s collaboration and e-portfolio tools -- as well as 158 years’ worth of digital archives of The New York Times, whose parent company owns the majority share of Epsilen.

When professors are building a course, said Felice Nudelman, executive director of education at the Times, they will be able to use keywords to locate relevant Times content on particular topics and events, and integrate the material into their classes. Students, meanwhile, will be able to manage and share their Epsilen e-portfolios through the SunGard portal. While the combination of services doesn't equal everything Blackboard offers, given that Blackboard's services go beyond classroom experience, it represents a significant addition of content and online communities to the SunGard product for courses.

Today's announcement comes several weeks after the information-management company Datatel said it plans to collaborate with Moodlerooms -- part of the open-source learning-management provider Moodle -- to create teaching and learning tools for colleges. Earlier this year, the Norwegian learning-management company It’s Learning took aim at the U.S. market by opening up an office in Boston and touting its cost-benefit ratio as superior to those of both Moodle and Blackboard.

For both SunGard and Datatel, the products being promoted now, in the build-up to the annual gathering of campus technology leaders at Educause, could represent a challenge to Blackboard, and appear to reflect a desire to expand their role with higher ed clients.

This activity in the e-learning market comes at a time when many colleges may be open to experimentation in how they provide services. Results from a recent Campus Computing Project survey of online program administrators suggest that plenty of

Interested in Technology Issues?
Visit our "In Focus" page, which
features highlights of our coverage
on distance ed, teaching with technology, and other topics. And
sign up for our Twitter feed at
http://twitter.com/ihetech

colleges are amenable to suitors: Nearly half of respondents said they are reviewing their learning-management system strategies, and more than a quarter are planning on switching to a new system within two years.

Meanwhile, data from other Campus Computing Project surveys indicate that Blackboard has seen its market share fall from 80 percent following its acquisition of WebCT in 2005 to 56 percent last year.

Michael Chasen, the president of Blackboard, said in an interview Monday that while Moodlerooms and Epsilen might offer some tools in common with Blackboard, neither offers the same suite of e-learning features, and so neither announcement represents a direct threat. “I don’t think that [the] Datatel and SunGard [moves] are meant to be at the expense of any other LMS that’s out there,” Chasen said. He said that increasing enrollments -- particularly in online education -- and other factors have expanded the market for e-learning software, and noted that Blackboard itself has continued to experience “exponential” yearly growth.

Still, as e-learning becomes more integrated into teaching on college campuses, many who earlier might have opted for the big-name brand by default are now open to alternatives.

Curtis White, vice president of information technology at Ashland University, in Ohio, said that professors there have taken an increased interest in the college’s e-learning resources. Ashland is a Blackboard client because the university signed with Angel, a competitor Blackboard bought out in May. Now, the university is considering other options for when its contract expires.

“Open source is becoming the common lingo of the faculty, and they’re interested in getting involved in some of these products,” White said. “Their colleagues at other campuses have adopted pilot programs with open-source apps, and these folks are talking and saying if we want to try this, will you support us on a pilot? And the answer is always Yes.”

Kenneth C. Green, director of the Campus Computing Project, said partnerships between information-management providers, or ERPs, and companies that offer e-learning software (broadly defined -- i.e., both Blackboard and more limited platforms such as Epsilen) represent the beginning of a “third phase” of strategic alliances in higher education technology.

“The first phase was faculty saying, ‘How do I get this stuff on the Web if I don’t know HTML?’ ” Green said. The second phase involved adding features that let students interact with their professors and each other in that space. The third phase, he explained, will involve figuring out how to extract value from all those transactions.

Prior to learning management systems, he explained, colleges could only measure student engagement via periodic evaluations and other post-facto assessment tools. Now, to varying degrees, students’ interactions with course material, their peers, and their instructors are logged in real time. Alliances between data management and e-learning providers could enable colleges to achieve what the Datatel marketing director Peter Abzug called “a 360-degree view of a student, from the administrative end all the way to academic end.”

Green said being able to refer to these real-time profiles of student engagement could allow colleges to administer “targeted and thoughtful interventions” in cases where engagement was less than it could be -- either at an individual or systematic level.

White, of Ashland, predicted that these changes will be significant. "I think the LMS market is in a lot of flux," he said, adding: “I’ll tell you, this time next year we’ll be going through a very comprehensive evaluation of LMS platforms, and Blackboard will be only one of a number that we’ll look very closely at.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on E-Learning's 'Third Phase'

  • Blowback
  • Posted by Eric on October 27, 2009 at 11:30am EDT
  • It seems to me Blackboard has developed a well-deserved reputation for anticompetitive behavior, a sin anywhere, but perhaps nowhere more so than in academia. It's been allegedly (added to protect myself against a lawsuit) acquisitive, litigious, annoying, and transparently phony.

    The service it provides isn't anything unique or tremendously difficult, and it has no sustainable competitive advantage, so perhaps that's why it may be behaving badly as a corporation.

    I think it deserves this blowback, and hope to see it go down in favor of companies who see academia as a solemn responsibility, and understand that playing in higher education demands a higher set of standards.

    Professors, IT Administrators, University Administrators, and students themselves are not to be messed with. Blackboard is about to find out why.

  • Posted by Raoul Ohio on October 27, 2009 at 4:00pm EDT
  • My concern about Blackboard is that it (IMHO) is crappy. It is a LOT of work to make such a large system work decently, but they have been at it for many versions and made zillions of dollars, and it is time to start getting stuff right.

    For software, what is right? The obvious standard is Microsoft. People love to grip about MS, but the products continue to get better. They have usability labs and study how users deal with products.

    As an example of Bb crappyness, try using the grade book (Warning: Don't actually keep your grades there. Sometimes they vanish.). At first it appears to be five times harder to use than 1980's Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet. Bb experts know some tricks so that it is only twice as hard as 1980's Lotus 1-2-3.

    Everybody in the world knows how to use MS Excel; any competent software designer makes spreadsheet like features behave like Excel so users know how to use them. How hard is that to figure out?

  • Competition should be embraced
  • Posted by Glen , CEO at Scholar360 on October 27, 2009 at 5:45pm EDT
  • The LMS market is definitely evolving. We at Scholar360.com provide a LMS + secure social network to clients. Sounds a bit like what SunGuard is doing with Epsilen. Since the ANGEL acquisiton from Bb, we've seen a tremendous uptick in business. Largely from higher education institutions that are looking for a robust LMS without spending a fortune.

    Competition is great and should be welcomed by all LMS vendors. It is only going to result in better products that ultimately help students, faculty, and institutions. One of the privileges of being in this space is that we provide a service that actually results in helping individuals and institutions reach their eLearning objectives. From our perspective, healthy competition is one driver of this process that needs to be embraced and encouraged.

  • American Apple Pie LMS
  • Posted by Ed Garay at University of Illinois at Chicago on October 28, 2009 at 8:00am EDT
  • It's rather difficult for LMS systems like Blackboard, Moodle, Sakai or any other LMS under scrutiny to be compared to a yet-to-produce-deliverables American Apple Pie LMS newcomer (vaporware or otherwise).

    As a HigheEd customer and educator, I too welcome increased competition, be it from Blackboard, Moodle, Desire2Learn, Pearson eCollege and new Teaching & Learning Technology systems like SunGard-Epsilen, Datatel-MoodleRooms and that newest Pearson Learning Solutions LMS the article did not mention.

    Interesting is also to see that several new LMS systems are popping up everywhere, even though many of our esteemed colleagues and Blackboard pundits have long predicted the demise of Blackboard and LMS systems, in general, as monolithic dinosaur systems that must give way to best-of-breed mix-and-match Teaching & Learning tools and services.

    What happened to the alleged demise of the LMS?

    It's not as if next week was Educause's annual conference or some such, is it? Wait, wait, next week is Educause.

    Regardless of reasons for proliferation, I actually do welcome the competition, but mind you that we ought to consider taking things a little LESS personally. We shall not make mission-critical decisions based on impulse, anger, hatred, or exagerated and unfounded fear.

    No, we should stick with an LMS or switch to one or more LMS systems because that is indeed what is best for each of our individual institutions that we work for, best for our always-busy faculty, ...and best for our ultimate customers :: our students.

    These days, it's easy for many of us to be vocal about one thing or another, to blog, Podcast, comment or tweet ad nauseum, but let's not forget for a minute (for a minute) about the silent majority :: ask yourselves honestly if your campus and your precious faculty, in particular, want to change, are ready to change and will indeed benefit from changes, like moving to a new LMS, a decision that might in reality be superfluous and totally unnecessary.

    That ought to be the driving force, not your hatred for a successful company like Blackboard. Last time I checked, we live in America, a free market economy where freedom and being able to make a profit is not illegal.

    Who cares if Blackboard, Google, Apple and Starbucks are profitable? We need that coffee fix, we like our iPhones, we live & search, and we are working very hard, trying to enhance education.

    As for Blackboard being "crappy" or "losing grades"... nonesense! Fear mongoring. If your LMS (any LMS) loses grades and is crappy, it is because you don't know how to run a mission-critical system like an LMS. You don't know how to back your system up or your data replication setup is flawed. Fix it or pay someone that KNOWS to host your system(s).

    While changing LMS systems is not something as simple as changing shoes or moving back from a Mac to a Windows PC, those 3,200 to 3,700 schools that are sticking with Blackboard for (at least) the foreseeable future cannot all be utterly wrong, now, can we?

    Nobody is forcing us to renew with Blackboard year after year, ...and... year after year, Blackboard is required to justify to us why renewing with them is the right choice for our individual institutions for whatever mix of reasons and priorities we may have.

    I wish I could have the opportunity to change cars every year, if I so desired. Heck, I wish I could rearrange "the furniture" from time to time without affecting or otherwise distracting our faculty.

    And if you decide to leave your existing LMS, to move to "better and greener pastures", make sure that that is indeed what is best for your school and take the required two-year minimum to plan and execute the move, successfully and without significantly disrupting Teaching & Learning.

    As technologists and university administrators, I think, it is our duty to make available the best possible technology for our campuses that we can afford. We ought to strive to making effective use of technology as easy and transparent as possible :: Toaster Technology(TM) -- that is what we need. Everybody knows how to operate a toaster. Make sure your LMS is a toaster.

  • They are all the same
  • Posted by Hugo A. Villegas , Fculty at DeVry University on October 29, 2009 at 10:45pm EDT
  • All platforms have the same problems, but this is a short lived condition because technology will evolve either through research and development or by competitive pressures. We need to understand that we are watching the dawn of this technology and to endorse one over the other will only delay the technological improvements that we need for the online environment. Our efforts should be directed to insist that our syllabi could be effortlessly transported from Blackboard to eCollege for example.

  • Right On Ed Garay!
  • Posted by Paul Jacobelli , President at EdTek Services, Inc. on November 2, 2009 at 2:45pm EST
  • I think Ed Garay hits the proverbial nail right on the head. Stop making your feelings about one LMS or another so personal. Education would be better served if that same passion was directed at training instructors to build quality online courses and teach effectively. Be honest, you know that most online courses are lacking and the teaching that takes place could be better. Let's slay that dragon.

  • Open source vs. LMS in the future?
  • Posted by Reetika Joshi , Research analyst at ValueNotes on November 9, 2009 at 5:15am EST
  • As the conclusion of this article suggests, when it comes to selecting learning technology in the near future, open source applications will emerge as likely contenders to the mainstream LMS giants. I have blogged about a similar issue (link- http://www.sourcingnotes.com/e-learningblog/will-the-e-learning-tech-behemoths-reign-supreme-in-the-years-to-come ), and invite your valued thoughts and ideas.

    Thanks.

  • Re: Right On Ed Garay!
  • Posted by Phil on December 2, 2009 at 12:00pm EST
  • In order to get anywhere with faculty training, the faculty have to really buy in to the system. Unless the system is dependable and user friendly, it's impossible to make any headway with the quality of online courses. No one wants to invest the time in a system that's difficult to work with.