Search News


Browse Archives

News

Another Kind of Academic Career Path

June 11, 2010

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

WASHINGTON – Some people think they’re qualified to teach online courses because they know how to use e-mail, but there's a lot more instructors need to master to run a Web classroom, a longtime trainer of new instructors said Thursday in a presentation at the American Association of University Professors conference meeting here this week.

“They don’t know how to use Word, they don’t know how to use Excel,” said Bob Barrett, a professor at the American Public University System who has trained online instructors at several institutions. “Statistics on a computer? ‘No, I’ve always done them on paper.' "

As many brick-and-mortar colleges shed untenured teaching staff, and online programs – especially those run by for-profit institutions – continue to hire, teaching in a virtual setting is becoming the new reality for many more academics. Thursday's presentation was one of several on online education at this year's AAUP meeting.

Even if they’re tech-savvy, instructors new to online teaching have a lot to learn, Barrett said, and need extensive training before being put before a virtual classroom. “This is where a lot of schools get into trouble,” he said. “They don’t know how to prepare people to teach online.”

At APUS, a for-profit company that runs American Military University and American Public University and has just entered into an agreement to become Wal-Mart's "education provider," new hires must go through six weeks of unpaid training. “Before an online class is assigned to someone,” he said, “the way that we can find out what kind of teacher they are, what they can do, what they can offer to the university, we make them go through teacher training.”

The training is, in a sense, an extended job interview. It’s where the institution learns whether the new hire can use its learning management system software and how he or she works with other people in the training course – and might interact with students, Barrett said. “What we rely on is the teacher trainer. The teacher trainer is going to do an evaluation at the end, to tell you whether they think this person is a good candidate or this person needs some assistance.”

Administrators generally abide by trainers’ recommendations on trainees, he said, and weaker candidates are often assigned “coaches” or “mentors,” who will “shadow” them for a semester or two. “They will come behind you into your classroom. They’ll look at your grade book, they’ll look at your syllabus, they’ll look at your learning activities. They’re going to take a look at how you’re interacting with your students, how you’re grading papers, to give you ideas.”

The goal in online programs like those with which Barrett has been involved is often to offer a consistent educational experience regardless of who the instructor is. Institutions keep tabs on how often and for how long instructors are logged onto e-mail and learning management systems to ensure that employees are engaged with their students. At APUS, Barrett said he is required to respond to student e-mail messages within 24 hours of when they arrive in his inbox.

Barrett acknowledged that some instructors are irritated by the regimentation, but audience members pushed harder. Protecting academic freedom is, after all, one of the AAUP’s core missions. “How do you observe academic freedom for someone who’s teaching online?” one woman asked.

Barrett said that only a third of the online institutions he’s taught for grant instructors academic freedom. “The rest are, you go by the instruction modules that are given, do not deviate from them. They have people who will come in and look at what you’re doing, will look at what you’re introducing, will comment on things that are a little bit different.” A few attendees shook their head in dismay.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Another Kind of Academic Career Path

  • Similar to University of Phoenix Online
  • Posted by Miguel Luna on June 11, 2010 at 1:15pm EDT
  • This training is similar to the training I endured to teach at the University of Phoenix Online. Now, however, they have anonymous reviewers look over many of the courses I teach and send me their various ratings and comments. These are always in terms of their rigid and uniform course facilitation requirements and how I have deviated from them. Sometimes these feel like a form of being 'written up' if I've deviated too much.

    Sigh. This is the wave of the future since the panopticon of online learning is so readily accessible to University administrators and accreditation pressures incentivize such surveillance.

  • It's not an online classroom
  • Posted by Sagacious Lu , Business at MN State University on June 11, 2010 at 1:15pm EDT
  • -it's a call center. Your call may be monitored for quality and training purposes. Soon to be sent offshore, with all of your work being the property of the employer!

  • Having It All: Online Teacher Training AND Academic Freedom
  • Posted by Karl Schank , Online Prof & Course Chair in IT at UMUC on June 11, 2010 at 1:30pm EDT
  • Online teaching and teacher training on the one hand, and academic freedom on the other, are far from mutually exclusive.

    A case in point: UMUC has long had an excellent and award-winning program in teaching its faculty to teach online. While UMUC has standards, it nevertheless allows considerable academic freedom for the instructor to adapt the course to his or her teaching style and approach and to the needs of the students. It does not make its faculty into mere proctors. In addition, as course chairs, we peer-review the syllabi, online classroom setups, e-gradebooks, etc., to check standards and, probably more importantly, to make suggestions for improvements in instruction.

    You really CAN have it all.

  • Real Academic Freedom
  • Posted by Gordon McAlister , Department Chair, monitor, mentor, trainer. at Kaplan University on June 11, 2010 at 4:15pm EDT
  • I agree that Academic Freedom and training are not mutually exclusive. In fact it is possible to take it a step further and assert they are mutually supportive - if one understands that Academic Freedom is about a lot more than an instructor doing what they want how they want to do it. It's about the expression and suppression of ideas. Teacher training helps instructors express ideas more effectively by utilizing best practices. Poor teaching has been responsible for suppressing the expression of more ideas in our colleges and universities than any policy or rules.

  • it is sad that this is the wave of the future
  • Posted by young scholar , proud adjunct prof at state college at state college on June 12, 2010 at 6:30am EDT
  • I teach at a state college and they give adjunct instructors considerable freedom to design their courses and to prepare their syllabus. As a young scholar still working on my PhD and with many years of uncertainty I would much rather teach for a badly funded state school than get paid well in one of those McUniversities that make you a simple cog in the system. Ritzer was right, McUniversities run by MBAs and second rate scholars who didn't have what it takes to make it in academia are spreading like a virus. I know that I didn't invest all of these years of education and effort to be told how to teach by a corporate style "coach".

  • Academic freedom?
  • Posted by Adjunked on June 12, 2010 at 3:15pm EDT
  • Although I have not yet taught at an online McUniversity, I've taught blended and in-person courses at for-profit universities. Usually the content is haphazardly put together and the harried administrators do not have the time to check on what an instructor is doing in class. An adjunct's "currency" is made in avoiding student complaints made to administration. But if an adjunct tries teaching non-mainstream content or uses new methods which results in student complaints, that person is simply not asked to return. I've seen it happen numerous times. The result is bland, circumscribed instruction that fulfills the expectations of students -- just another step in the "student-as-customer" progression.

    Simply put, the real threat to academic freedom is adjunctification, which radically weakens an instructor's control of her/his instructional content, even teaching persona, and strengthens students' and administrators' power to get the "product" they want. As an academic, my loyalty is to my discipline, but as an adjunct instructor, every incentive weakens that loyalty in favor of "customer service."

  • History anyone?
  • Posted by VCVaile , Retired from academia but not from advocacy on June 14, 2010 at 5:15am EDT
  • Yoohoo, any labor historians out there? This is Taylorization.

  • The Best Instructors
  • Posted by Well Taught , Student at For-Profit College on June 14, 2010 at 5:15am EDT
  • I have attended a for-profit and state college while pursuing my degree. The best instructors I had were at the for-profit. The curriculum, method and feedback from the instructor was relevant and applicable to my full time job. I'd rather learn from an expert in the field than someone with "tenure" who has been hiding behind a podium for the last 20 years, what a waste. The for-profits are working for a reason.

  • lower admission requirements and technical skills
  • Posted by young scholar at State College on June 14, 2010 at 8:45pm EDT
  • I don't agree with "Well taught" that instructors in for profits are experts in the field. Usually, instructors at for profits are failures in the field who ended up teaching part time to make some money. There are exceptions but most are mediocre professionals who need extra sources of income. In addition to that the success of the for profits is relative since success is not only measured in terms of net income and enrollment. It is easy to increase enrollment if everyone who breathes gets accepted. It is also easier to attract mediocre students if you tell them that they don't have to learn how to write properly, they don't have to have absolutely any background knowledge on teh subject, all they have to do is to follow the fifteen steps to setting up an AC properly or how to fill out the forms for a divorce, etc. Those institutions should note be allowed to call themselves colleges or universities they shouild be called adult vocational schools. Proof of this is that few regionally accredited graduate programs accept students from for profit universities and even fewer accept their credits for transfer. In conclusion for profit universities are great if you just want to buy a diploma to post on a wall and convince your coworker at Burger King that you have a degree in "para philosphy".