Search News


Browse Archives

News

Blackboard Buys Angel

May 7, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Blackboard on Wednesday announced that it was purchasing Angel Learning for about $95 million, shaking up the course management industry.

While Blackboard is clearly dominant in the market, it has seen a number of colleges and universities shift to open source systems such as Sakai or Moodle, or to other companies. Angel has been particularly successful with community colleges and teaching-oriented institutions, and is known for outstanding customer service. In theory, the acquisition could enable Blackboard to win over Angel clients and to improve its customer service while adding more teaching tools. And that's the way leaders of the two companies described the deal in interviews on Wednesday.

But that vision of the purchase was greeted with skepticism by some industry analysts and colleges that have left Blackboard for Angel. Further, the move comes at a time that some of the other Blackboard rivals may be better positioned than they have been in the past. Desire2Learn remains in a protracted patent fight with Blackboard, but hasn't given up, and has won praise from open source advocates for taking on Blackboard. eCollege, another competitor, has been well behind Blackboard and others, but is benefiting from its 2007 purchase by the publishing giant Pearson. And Epsilen has been pushing for market share, with backing from its primary shareholder, The New York Times.

One technology expert who asked not to be identified, citing the interconnections among various companies and his employer, said that Blackboard will gain business it couldn't have won otherwise through Angel, but that the move could strengthen some of the remaining groups trying to be "the company that is not Blackboard," which is the company some colleges want. While some colleges are embracing open source models, this analyst said, Angel was attracting a growing group of clients who for a range of reasons weren't seeking to go open source and who don't feel comfortable with Blackboard. And it's not clear that buying Angel will result in the changes Blackboard wants.

Some who dislike Blackboard took instantly to Twitter to comment on the announcement. One college instructor, using Desire2Learn's acronym, wrote: "Holy Monopoly, Batman! Blackboard bought Angel. I stay off Twitter for 2 hrs & whole world changes! Help me D2LKinobi, you're our only hope." Another wrote: "Blackboard acquires Angel! Denizens of Alderon screaming last breath-but as Leia says (paraphrase) 'Like sand through the imperial grip.' "

Perhaps of greater worry to Blackboard will be the reaction of Don Gardner, associate vice provost for academic technology at California State University at Long Beach. That university just completed a lengthy review process for its course management system and decided to move from Blackboard to

Interested in Technology Issues?
Visit Inside Higher Ed's "In Focus"
page on technology for highlights
of our News and Views coverage.

Angel. Gardner said late Wednesday afternoon, within an hour of the Blackboard announcement, that he was consulting with the university's purchasing department on whether the news would justify Long Beach abandoning its new contract with Angel.

"This is of grave concern to us," said Gardner. He said that Blackboard has provided "consistently poor customer service" both at Long Beach and at the previous institution where he was CIO, Weber State University. He said that the review process led him to think that Angel was "like day and night" compared to Blackboard on customer service. Blackboard wasn't even the university's second choice, Gardner said (Moodle was).

Told of Blackboard's praise for Angel's customer service record, Gardner said: "Their intentions may be sincere, but I have no faith in their ability as a company to become more like Angel."

Fred B. Lokken, associate dean for teaching technologies at Truckee Meadows Community College, said he was stunned and "more than devastated" by Wednesday's news. Truckee Meadows had been a WebCT client until Blackboard bought that company in 2005. Shortly after that purchase, Truckee Meadows reviewed its options, after finding that customer service -- strong under WebCT -- declined after the purchase. Angel was also less expensive and a faculty panel that reviewed the options favored Angel, making it "an easy choice," Lokken said.

He said that Angel has lived up to all of its promises, and that the system is popular with those who use it -- explaining his dismay over the news. He said that Blackboard had promised to maintain the same level of quality WebCT provided, and that the company didn't follow through. He said that the press release issued Wednesday reminded him of the statements made when the company bought WebCT "and that's why I'm skeptical."

Lokken is chair of the Instructional Technology Council, an affiliate of the American Association of Community Colleges that focuses on technology issues. The council conducts annual surveys of its members and has found up to one third of them considering changes in their course management systems -- a percentage that Lokken predicted would increase if colleges that opted not to have Blackboard find themselves with Blackboard.

He stressed that it's not just the service provided, but a matter of philosophy. He noted that Angel will be the second company popular with community colleges to have been made a subsidiary of Blackboard. Further, he said he objected to the "predatory" way that Blackboard is fighting with Desire2Learn over patents. "Is the idea to own the market so that we have no choice?" he asked.

Lokken's advice for Blackboard is to keep Angel as separate and independent as possible. "I'm skeptical, but there's a lot Blackboard could learn from Angel," he said.

Others who have made the move from Blackboard to Angel had mellower reactions, while still expressing worry. Washington Online, which provides distance education and support for hybrid courses for the community and technical colleges of Washington State, is in the final stages of a 12-month transition

Interested in Teaching Issues?
Visit Inside Higher Ed's "In Focus"
page on teaching and learning
for highlights of our News and
Views coverage.

from Blackboard to Angel and both systems have been running parallel for almost a year. Cable Green, eLearning director for the system, said that a review found Angel superior on the tools it provided and customer service, and that a faculty panel had designed its own rubrics and -- in the decisive recommendation -- strongly backed Angel.

"Our big question is what will Blackboard do with Angel," he said. Green said that customer service definitely lagged when Blackboard took over WebCT. "I hope that they have learned from that," he said. "That's why many of us are nervous about this."

So far, he said, he was very pleased with the transition to Angel, and that he would have to hope for the best.

For all the criticism Blackboard receives, its services are used routinely on college campuses nationwide by professors to organize their courses and communicate with students and for a range of additional services that have been added on over the years, including plagiarism detection. Blackboard has grown steadily since its 1997 founding.

Michael Chasen, president and CEO of Blackboard, said that the acquisition was part of a continuing effort to "improve and get better as a company." He acknowledged a need to do a better job than was done a few years ago. "Since 2005, we’ve learned a lot about how way to mobilize talent and resources to support the e-learning community. That process hasn’t always been smooth, but our readiness to support clients in an acquisition is much improved."

Ray Henderson, chief products officer at Angel, said that "we're realistic that folks who have recently left Blackboard to come to Angel are going to look at this with some skepticism. We're realistic about that, and plan to address this." He noted that this month is the annual users' group meeting for Angel, providing an opportunity to give much more information to clients. "I hope they will pass from a period of initial skepticism to appreciation of a broader vision of how we'll combine the two companies," he said.

And both Chasen and Henderson stressed that there are many tools Angel has developed that will help Blackboard's customers. Henderson said that Angel has focused on tools that help professors, particularly those working with at-risk students. For example, if a professor knows that students who don't log in some number of times a week tend to do poorly, the system can be programmed to alert the professor about which students aren't logging in, enabling the professor to reach out to those students. Or if an instructor has assignments that are based on completion of previous assignments or scores on tests, the system can be programmed to automatically start students who have reached various levels on the next assignment, while holding back for those who are behind.

The reason Angel has done well with community colleges, Henderson said, isn't that it was seeking that sector per se, but was looking for "institutions that focus on teaching and learning," which is every community college, but not necessarily every four-year institution.

Chasen stressed that the attraction of Angel to Blackboard was respect for just the qualities that Angel's fans praise: teaching tools and customer service. He pledged that Angel customers would continue to receive strong support, that the new version of Angel that is coming out just as this deal is being announced would in fact come out, and that pricing would remain stable. Asked about the long term, he said it was too early to discuss specifics, but that "a possibility" would be for all of the company's customers to benefit from "the best features and functionality of Angel and Blackboard and WebCT."

One industry observer who asked not to be identified said that the news gives openings to Blackboard's remaining competitors, both open source and corporate. "This deal makes a lot of sense for Blackboard given that their WebCT customers have been fleeing to Angel, but I'm not sure that their former customers [who have moved already] will be thrilled. They made a specific decision to leave."

The key question, said this technology and education expert, is how Blackboard can develop "a migration plan" that satisfies its new customers.

Officials of Desire2Learn and Sakai did not respond to requests for comment and eCollege/Pearson declined comment.

Felice Nudelman, executive director for education of The New York Times, the parent company of Epsilen, said "Congratulations to Blackboard" on the news. But she saw the announcement as encouraging not just for Blackboard.

"The higher education market is in an exciting phase of development with many colleges and universities looking for the next iteration of e-learning," she said. "Epsilen and the New York Times Knowledge Network are excited about being in this space. I think the Blackboard acquisition of Angel creates an opening for Web 2.0 e-learning platforms like Epsilen and others."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Blackboard Buys Angel

  • Blackboard
  • Posted by Dane on May 7, 2009 at 8:15am EDT
  • As one who has used Blackboard, I have found that, apart from whatever failings it has in service, it is one of the worst course management programs there is. My advise is for all colleges to stop using it and let them to go out of business, but of course this won't happen in our predatory society. If some business controls the market, why should they be concerned about the quality of their product or the service they provide.

  • Junk + Junk = ?
  • Posted by Lucky Hank at William Henry Devereaux, Jr. Institute of Technology on May 7, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • My math skills ain't so good. How do you solve this equation?

    Crappy System + Really Crappy System = ?

  • No self-respecting geek...
  • Posted by Rick on May 7, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • Would misspell Kenobi.

  • Where is Blackboard headed?
  • Posted by Kim , Professor of MIS on May 7, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • In my experience of more than 12 years with the Blackboard course management system, this company has consistently ignored test/quiz security issues and thwarted user attempts to make the browser more secure against copying test questions (except, perhaps, in the most expensive version, which has always been beyond our budget).

    In my experience, Blackboard also raises its price considerably every year. Because many institutions are now facing shrinking budgets, the open-source models are more attractive.

    However, some the open-source models need work to achieve the functional capabilities of the commercial course management systems. My institution could hire a full-time programmer with the money we spend on Blackboard every year, though, and we are seriously considering that strategy. If we independently program the features we want into an open-source system, will Blackboard sue us for patent infringement?

    Hmm ...Rapidly escalating prices, ignoring security issues, regularly purchasing competitors, aggressively pursuing patent protection, and deteriorating customer service. Should we not be concerned about the possibility of abusive monopolistic practices? .

  • Bb buys ANGEL
  • Posted by John Thompson on May 7, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • After switching from Bb to ANGEL like so many other institutions, it will interesting to see how this plays out at my college and others in similar situations. What are the other recommended CMS/LMS available today? I want something sophisticated (as in not a clunky open source program) and akin to ANGEL. What's the recommended ANGEL alternative?

  • Epsilen
  • Posted by Karen on May 7, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • I would look at Epsilen, our institution adopted it in the fall and it is great. A true Web 2.0 environment, great technology, includes ePortfolios, assessment, course management and group collaboration tools, Also includes NYT content. And is reasonably priced. www.epsilen.com

  • alternatives
  • Posted on May 7, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • Moodle and Sakai are the leading open source course management systems.

  • Posted by Dan Malone on May 7, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • Very interesting Grasshopper!!! Prometheus, WebCT, Angel... Bb may take it on the chin for issues with their technology, but make no mistake, this is a very smart, aggressive FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION.

    I must admit though that find Bb's merger spin of taking advantage of Angel's focus on "Customer Support Culture" and "Record of Innovation" amusing. Looks like they dusted off their press releases from their "merger" (read acquisition) of WebCT.

    They mothballed the WebCT technology, and somehow in the process managed to drive their combined company customer satisfaction ratings to the toilet. The biggest challenge... their support team continues to be stretched so completely thin, trying to support a gazillion versions of software with sadly less than impressive results.

    So, to Bb's support team...I wish you luck...you're going to need it. For Bb in general, l hope that the great client cost of switching CMS's continues to be your saving grace, you're going to need it.

  • Posted by Distance Learning on May 7, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • Epsilen is not a CMS for higher learning, but for business type application of workshops and etc.

  • Blackboard makes Microsoft look good
  • Posted by Raoul Ohio on May 7, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • One often hears complaints about Microsoft products. Anyone with the misfortune of having to use Blackboard will appreciate how much work MS does in improving the user experience.

  • Posted by m on May 7, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • Eating up the competition has been a central part of the Bb business model for a good 10 years (Web Course in a Box, iCollege, Prometheus, WebCT, and so on). And when that doesn't work, they sue (D2L, USPTO). The fact remains that Bb has been extremely unsuccessful at integrating the acquired technologies into their offerings and, over time, have alienated their customer base into seeking alternative solutions.

  • Moodle is not clunky
  • Posted by Faculty Person on May 7, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • We've been using Moodle for some years having transitioned from Blackboard. It's not perfect but I would hardly characterize it as clunky. If people want to send their institutions money to greedy for-profit companies selling overpriced low quality products then they're welcome to do so.

    The biggest caveat with Moodle -- if you want to use the bleeding edge features you will pay a price in integration work. If you stick to the stable version and don't try to integrate new modules that are in development it's quite low maintenance.

  • Timecruiser's CMS/LMS...?
  • Posted by Dan Malone on May 7, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • Has anyone heard of Timecruiser? From what I can find they're an academic CMS/LMS provider not mentioned above. I recall from way back that they offer portal solutions to higher ed, however, upon a bit of a dig, I see that they have won the CODiE award two years running, 2008 and 2009, as "The Best Post Secondary Enterprise System" for their product suite", which includes their Coursecruiser, academic LMS. Two years in a row is pretty impressive, especially in the academic space. I also found them recently added to edutools.net, a sight I've used for years to keep abreast of academic cms product updates and comparisons. If you haven't been to this sight, it's pretty cool!

    Considering the tightening up of the CMS/LMS market with yet another Bb conquer, and the elimination of yet another competitor, it sounds like Coursecruiser is worth exploring...

  • Angel Alternative
  • Posted by Glen Moriarty on May 7, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • This is really stunning news. Angel was a great product. I really do hope BB can absorb their customer service expertise.

    I'm biased (I work here), but one really strong Angel alternative is www.scholar360.com. The feature set is as robust as BB, strong customer service, and way more affordable than BB or even Angel.

  • Posted by Dustin on May 7, 2009 at 2:00pm EDT
  • The real fact of the matter is that ANGEL never existed to be an ongoing concern - they were a pure Venture Capital company, designed to gain market share, become a threat, and be sold for a profit. It isn't about teaching and learning or LMS's, it's about business. ANGEL was at a good place, increasing popularity and market share, but running out of money (as in bankrupt). Blackboard is their saviour. Who's next?

  • Desire2Learn is the Clear Choice
  • Posted by John Baker , Founder, President & CEO at Desire2Learn Incorporated on May 7, 2009 at 3:00pm EDT
  • Desire2Learn wishes to reassure its current and potential clients of its intention to remain independent, with no intention of selling. Desire2Learn just celebrated its 10th anniversary and will continue to provide the best choice for client-focused, innovative online learning and teaching systems over the decades to come.

    Desire2Learn’s number one priority has been, and continues to be, its clients. We are well positioned to continue our growth through close relationships with clients and partners. The company is dedicated to improving education through market leading technology and services, exceptional employees and focus on educator and student needs.

    Desire2Learn will continue with its plans for steady growth. Desire2Learn values competition and believes that monopolies are unhealthy. We are not surprised by this latest Blackboard action; we have seen it before with the takeover of WebCT. We are very interested in engaging ANGEL Learning and other Blackboard clients that are interested in starting a conversation to ensure they are aware of their opportunities. Desire2Learn is the clear choice for institutions wishing to achieve their eLearning vision.

    We offer:

    • no cost conversion

    • industry-leading adoption of open standards and specifications

    • client-customization of the learning environment

    • full course import and export capabilities

    • continued commitment to price stability, lower TCO and higher ROI

    • responsiveness

    We invite institutions to email or call Desire2Learn to learn more: Info@Desire2Learn.com or 1.888.772.0325 or 1.519.772.0325 (within North America), +44 1344 872769 or +44 7711 053835 (for the U.K., Europe and Middle East) and 0412 067 308 or +61 412 067 308 (for Australia).

  • Money Saved for Scholarships/Co-ops
  • Posted by LampCord , onlineNTID Administrator at NTID @ Rochester Institute of Technology on May 7, 2009 at 3:00pm EDT
  • While I don't have the cost of D2L or BB licensing for an institution serving 20,000 students, it seems the savings of converting from either D2L or Bb to an open source system like moodle would be enough to support a small group of techies to support the open CMS, work with integration of new modules, and perhaps hire student techies or offer graduate scholarships for the same purpose. Quality control issues related to customer service at least would be handled in-house.

    As for the battle between D2L and Bb, at what point will Bb make an offer to buy out D2L? Or at what point will D2L run out of funds to continue their defense?

  • Blackboard Adminstrator
  • Posted by Damian Phillip , Blackboard Administrator at Army on May 7, 2009 at 4:45pm EDT
  • As a blackboard administrator, I am responsible for the monitoring and management of over 273 Colleges/Universities, and 30,000 accounts. Moreover, I am responsible for the instruction of classes on blackboard to cadre members who will utilize the blackboard to manage cadet’s accounts. I have had the opportunity to get feedback both from the phone and from the blackboard classes that I teach. One thing I've learn is that when the cadre members are empowered with blackboard information from the class, they do much better, than those who do not. Their confidence is stronger and they feel good knowing that I am there to support their needs. “That is also a very important factor.” The majority of cadre members that call me are those who have not been through the Instructor Training Course, which speaks in volume.

    I have received both my bachelors and masters using e-learning. I understood blackboard from the student standpoint then and now that I am a Blackboard Administrator, I able to understand both perspective. And as far a customer service, I have had nothing but great support coming from blackboard. Yes, of course one call always improves. The best way to do that is by looking at what is happening around you and then adapting to those strong points yourself. I call that adapting to the terrain, which is what blackboard is doing.

  • Posted by Jon on May 7, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • @John Baker: I have no doubt that your company wants to be the competition to Bb that it should be allowed to be, but I have to agree with LampCord - people wonder if you'll survive the legal battle that is as much an indication of a legal system that needs improving as it is of Bb's unethical business practices.

    @Dan Malone: I think all of us who see LMSs from the teaching or administrative side agree that the "change pain" is Bb's * only * saving grace (with no offence to some of the excellent Bb support individuals we've worked with - I realize it's the company that's gone wrong). If it were as easy to switch your LMS as it were to switch which grocery store you shop at or which cell provider you choose, I'm pretty sure Bb's market share would be in the single-digits. Free-market forces are weak in the LMS world not only because of the change pain, but also since it takes a huge investment for a company to develop one.

    My 2 cents: The USPTO is broken. Allow patents on implementation, not concept (at least on a lot of things). It would be like an auto maker trying to patent the idea of the car rather than a specific car design.

    Kind of reminds me of when M$ tried to patent the pageup-pagedown functionality, or having the main system button in the lower left (which targets KDE). As Microsoft's wikipedia page quotes: "Microsoft has a long history of applying for, and being granted patents for, inventions that many argue--and can sometimes demonstrate--were based on earlier work carried out by others, or based on a common, self-evident idea." Blackboard trying to patent the concept of the LMS. But given that Microsoft has significant ownership in Blackboard I'm not surprised that they follow similar practices.

  • D2L is awful
  • Posted on May 7, 2009 at 5:30pm EDT
  • In response to the ad for Desire2Learn posted in an earlier comment... I've been a student at a U that uses D2L for two years now. The user interface for D2L S-U-C-K-S. Truly, horrendously, stupidly bad.

    -It is very difficult to navigate the discussion forums.

    -It is far too easy to screw something up and lose text in long postings.

    -You see a lot of double-postings.

    -The downloads section where you'd get the syllabus or other files integrates very poorly with IE and Word.

    -The email feature is frustratingly poorly integrated, though that may be the U's fault. You can send email from the system, but you can't reply to email from the system.

    -The way the site is designed with frames causes all manner of problems, especially if you're on a low-resolution screen or on a mobile device (even if you're running Safari on an iPhone or Pocket IE or Opera on a Windows Mobile).

    -Even the error message that you get when your login times out is a rediculous offense to proper English.

  • Not all Open Source LMSs are "clunky"
  • Posted by Instructional Techie on May 7, 2009 at 7:15pm EDT
  • Contrary to popular belief, Moodle is not the only open source LMS available. .LRN, developed by MIT, is a rather sophisticated example, as is Sakai, which was previously mentioned. There is a very convenient comparison white paper here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/404896/Open-Source-LMS

    As both a student subjected to Bb and a technologist forced to work with it, I find the system incredibly difficult to navigate and customize - especially in the realm of accessibility. Those seeking a truly accessible LMS should seriously consider ATutor (http://www.atutor.ca), although at the expense of shiny bells and whistles if you're into that.

    In any case, there are choices out there.

  • Cost for comparable systems
  • Posted by Rob , Associate CIO, Academic Technology at Emporia State on May 8, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • Careful out there....

    I just looked at the prices for one of the alternative CMS products mentioned above and it's actually MORE expensive than Bb for a campus our size. If price is your primary criteria, there may be the more weeds than grass on "the other side".

  • Posted by breyerpest on May 8, 2009 at 1:30pm EDT
  • Blackboard is driving everyone to open source!! There's no where to run! You can not escape the claw!

  • no stockholders to report to...
  • Posted by Lance Speelmon , Scholarly Technologist at Indiana University on May 8, 2009 at 2:30pm EDT
  • I am re-warming advice that was offered after the last BB acquisition - if we want to change their behavior, we need to vote with our feet; i.e. stop investing in companies that are driven by the almighty dollar and instead invest in back into ourselves. Sakai and Moodle have done very well by writing educational software of, by, and for education. In fact, I would argue that Sakai is the safest place to be right now with an open/open license (i.e. non-viral) and all of the intellectual property belonging to the Sakai Foundation (i.e. just like the Apache Foundation). We are focused in improving education and not "lining our investor's pockets." Don't get me wrong, we appreciate our commercial partners very much and would not be successful without them, but it is a very healthy, respectful, and symbiotic relationship. The annual conference is coming up in July and is a great opportunity to meet the people that make up the Sakai community, which frankly is our most valuable asset. Best, L

  • OLAT running under Apache License
  • Posted by Angela , E-Learning Coordinator at Hamburg University on May 8, 2009 at 5:00pm EDT
  • Sakai is not the only safe place and I am glad we decided to choose OLAT. OLAT is actually running under the Apache license. It is being used in many places but for the very open license the OLAT-Team does not even know all the running installations. Give it a try. It has less bugs than other open and commercial software. Bugs, roadmap, and other information are found at www.olat.org.

  • alternative to Angel/Bb
  • Posted by Mark Bird , Department Chair, Distance Ed Division at God's Bible School & College on May 9, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • I use GoCourse LMS in my program, but I also teach for a school that uses ANGEL. While it isn't quite as robust as Angel, it is a very good program, especially for the cost. You can get GoCourse for at least half the cost of Angel and the transfer time is incredible.

    One thing GoCourse has that I haven't found in another LMS is the ability to work completely offline. It has a player to download and all work, assignments, and tests can be completed offline, then when an internet connection is available, the work can be sent to the teacher. While I know most people have internet at their fingertips, it can be helpful for international programs, etc.

    GoCourse was created by Agilix, a very reputable company.

    http://www.agilix.com/

  • Nice try but wrong
  • Posted by Kelly on May 11, 2009 at 1:30pm EDT
  • Dustin - From someone who knows, there was ZERO venture capital in Angel and the company was making money hand over fist. They were bought because they became a threat to Bb.

  • who needs a CMS anyway?
  • Posted by open source on May 26, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • With all of the open source tools out there, why do insitutions need anything like a traditional CMS? It doesn't matter whether it's Angel, BB, Desire2Learn, Epsilen (sp?) -- they're old and outmoded ways of looking at the landscape for higher ed. A good example is eportfolios. Why on earth would you want such a function attached to a CMS? Use WordPress (with its fantastic new social media functioning) and you're good to go. This old school idea that one company would serve all your needs is one to get past...and quickly. Open source, cloud computing approaches reflect how students learn and the reality that one company can't be good at everything. For legacy companies still trying to play in the space, it's really about watching the time on those contracts run out and capitalizing on the relationships...how often is it really about serving the faculty and students?