Search News


Browse Archives

News

When IM Is the Best Way to Stay on Top

August 29, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

It's tough to keep up on your workload, whether you're a faculty member responsible for several classes or a student juggling a full schedule. The logistical dance becomes even more daunting for those learning remotely -- from computers hundreds of miles away, or another campus in the same college system.

Yet those are everyday problems for students and instructors at large, sprawling community college systems, especially those that offer a significant portion of their courses online. The country's largest singly accredited system, Ivy Tech Community College, in Indiana, thinks the solution is already staring many of its students in the face: instant messaging, hardwired into every teenager since the heyday of America Online.

The community college system, which serves more than 115,000 students a year on 23 separate campuses across the state, adopted an instant messaging platform called Pronto, from the collaborative learning software company Wimba. Like a turbocharged AOL Instant Messenger or Google Talk, it lets students chat online with their professors in text, audio or video form, for virtual office hours or impromptu question-and-answer sessions.

Unlike the free IM clients students are already familiar with, though, the software integrates with existing course management systems, such as Blackboard and Moodle, so that their buddy lists are populated with the classmates already signed up for a specific course. Students also see each other's real names, with identities that are validated through the system -- no "sk8rdude21" who may or may not be your group partner -- and they can save their chats for later consultation.

"I use it for my online office hours, I have it on whenever I’m at a computer; I helped at least eight students last night after midnight," said Bonnie Willy, an assistant professor in Ivy Tech's computer information systems and computer information technology department. "It’s there. It dings when they come in so you can hear it. My cat’s trained, so whenever it dings she comes and gets me."

Instant messaging, ubiquitous as it remains in many students' social lives, has yet to catch on in a big way as an official means of communication in the university setting. Grand Rapids Community College, with over 14,000 students in Michigan, and Arizona State University, among others, use Pronto. But Ivy Tech's example -- unusual on such a wide scale -- illustrates the possibilities of using IM at a community college with a large number of distance learners spread across many campuses.

At institutions like Ivy Tech, it's easy for students -- many of whom are nontraditional and most of whom don't live near campus -- to remain part of the faceless procession churning in and out of the institution. Many educators see one-on-one contact as an important part of keeping them engaged, with office hours seen as a central front in the struggle to boost retention -- enough that Pronto is not the only software package to emerge as a potential solution.

"To me, the real key is it just provides a platform for students to remain in close contact with faculty," said Idris Smith, an adjunct instructor who teaches a course on integrated medical office systems at Ivy Tech's Richmond campus. "Hopefully, too, it will help me hang on to those students who kind of get lost along the way. Hopefully, I’ll catch them online sometime and we’ll talk about where they’re at," and make sure they don't "get behind in assignments, too."

Ivy Tech rolled out Pronto about a year ago, said Kara Monroe, executive director of the college's Center for Instructional Technology. Since then, the institution has upgraded to a new version that incorporates video conferencing and file sharing capabilities. Until now, most faculty members have used mainly the text-based features, she said, but she expects that to change as the new features become better known.

Use of the platform is spreading organically. A bit over 8,000 users are registered with Pronto, most but not all of whom are distance learners or students taking a class from a remote campus. (Over 23,000 students are enrolled in the more than 2,000 available online courses, including hybrid courses and video feeds to classes held on campus.) That number also includes instructors from among the 833 so far who have Blackboard accounts, Monroe said.

Its use is expanding steadily, she added, with an average of 215 new accounts a month, either because some faculty members require it or students encourage their instructors to adopt it. Beyond facilitating interactions between students and their instructors, Monroe noted that instant messaging is becoming a useful tool for students to keep in touch with classmates on their own -- and for faculty to stay connected among themselves, too.

Not all institutions that want instant messaging functionality turn to a professional academic solution. Even at Ivy Tech, Monroe noted, instructors and students used to swap AIM or Google screen names (sk8rdude21, anyone?) for out-of-class communication. "We’ve actually been doing that for years," she said. But other colleges looking for similar functionality have turned to Wimba and other providers for more integrated solutions, including Blackboard itself, which includes the text-based Collaborative Tools. Other colleges, focusing on virtual office hours, have opted for software packages like Elluminate Live!.

Some instructors, like Smith, have built Pronto into the very structure of their courses, requiring their students -- in her case, all distance learners -- to download the necessary software in the first week of the semester. It's "just much quicker than sending e-mails back and forth," Smith said. "I’ll have sessions during the semester where they actually have to be online during a specific week."

But one drawback, she pointed out, is that relying on IM as a chief means of communication disadvantages distance learners who don't have their own computers at home and work instead from labs on campus or the public library. It's important, she acknowledged, to "be kind of careful, too, in that we’re not creating an additional technology gap there.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on When IM Is the Best Way to Stay on Top

  • IM disadvantage
  • Posted by joan morris , instructor at Unviersity of South Florida on August 29, 2008 at 11:30am EDT
  • Asynchronous activities are more suited to many of my students who have multiple complex and heavy work schedules. Many of my students are working professionals. In multiple student surveys and interviews the message is a preference for asynchronous activities to allow more flexibility in schedules.

    I think that the IM activities are good for optional work in the courses in my field. It is important to build trust and a sense of community.

  • Forgive Me ... I’m Not Going There
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on August 29, 2008 at 11:30am EDT
  • I use e-mail very extensively in my interaction with students ... and I have experimented with IM. I’ll tell you why I have scrapped IM (and, by the way, I teach mathematics and statistics).

    My very (perhaps overly) extensive syllabi include addenda that (1) describe my expectations for the nature of my students’ office hours communication with me and (2) describe my expectations for the nature of my students’ e-mail communication with me. One of the bullet points in the latter is ...

    “it is usually the case that when you go to the trouble of asking questions via e-mail, you have (1) thought them through, (2) written them down, and (3) can be fairly explicit in communicating to me what you know and what you don’t know.”

    I think that is a very important characteristic of e-mail communication (especially when I make it a requirement) that is often missed in IM. To my way of thinking, the advantage of IM is also its primary disadvantage; i.e., its immediacy. I found when experimenting with IM that my students were inclined to “weigh in” without “stopping to think” ... a very bad habit indeed.

    P.S. An afterthought to my e-mail instructions includes ...

    “In any event, when you send an e-mail message to me this term, I will expect you to have ‘proofed’ it (1) for spelling, (2) for grammatical accuracy, (3) for use of vocabulary, and (4) for composition. If your message does not pass my ‘test’ in all four respects, it will be returned to you with a message stating, ‘This message is inappropriate for review. Please revise it according to the requirements set forth in your syllabus (see page 12) ... and then resubmit it.’
    Under no circumstances should you send me a message that is completely in lower case, completely in upper case, or contains inappropriate abbreviations (“u” for you, “abt.” for about, “btw” for by the way, etc.).”

    Those expectations are invariably abused with IM. And sloppy communication is highly correlated with sloppy thinking!

  • IM and e-mail guidelines
  • Posted by Pamela Frame on August 29, 2008 at 8:35pm EDT
  • Professor Frizbane Manley's syllabus contains thoughtful and appropriate guidelines for student correspondence.

    But, can you begin a sentence with a conjunction?

  • Response To Pamela Frame
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on August 29, 2008 at 9:55pm EDT
  • Do you mean “can” you do it or “may” you do it?

    Obviously I do it ... especially when I’m in the process of writing a grammatically correct but run-on sentence and think the reader needs a break. What is weird about my beginning a sentence with a conjunction is the fact that every time I do it I have to do a double-take and ask myself, “do you really want to do that?” I have the same problem with my overuse of ellipses. Ouch!

    On the other hand, my writing is far from perfect, and I appreciate your observation. Thanks!

  • Use of IM
  • Posted by George Kuck at csulb on August 31, 2008 at 10:35pm EDT
  • I am frankly afraid to use IM's. With 250 students in two classes, it could be a great time sink. All you need is one minute per student per class session and that is over 4 hours per class hour of helping the students. I use an asynchronous discussion board for the same function with students helping other students and me monitoring and answering questions. This seems to work very well with some classes and poorly with other classes.

  • Conference Systems
  • Posted by sannasa on September 1, 2008 at 7:55am EDT
  • IM aside, I've been using conference and virtual phone systems to help manage my organizing needs. Providers like gotvmail and such are pretty good with reducing hardware requirements and work nicely with coordinating communications.

  • Communication
  • Posted by Dave on September 1, 2008 at 5:15pm EDT
  • Frizbane's reasons for scrapping IM and allowing email parallel mine for scrapping email and requiring person-to-person communication in the case of the sciences. I note in my syllabus that "This is not a distance course and we meet three times weekly." Leaving questions to the chance they will pop into one's head is one thing, but the idea that one can "have it all" requiring other people to be plugged into either a cellphone or computer on the off chance someone is too lazy to track down answers to their own questions in solutions manuals or the exquisite texts replete with indices created by a highly competitive publishing market which we have in chemistry--the latter only feeds the very problem educators face. "You get out of it what you put into it," in content-intensive courses, at least. Relying on an imaginary friend rather than one's wits, abilities, and organization of time and resources defeats the purpose of education. IM and email are an umbilical cord that must be cut (with allowances made to the grand experiment of distance learning).

  • Response to Dave ...
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on September 2, 2008 at 5:00am EDT
  • I certainly agree that “You [and by “you” I mean both students and teachers] get out of it what you put into it.” But I don’t agree that (at least my) students who communicate with me via e-mail are “too lazy to track down answers to their own questions.” Here’s why (and don’t forget, I teach mathematics and statistics) ...

    1. If my e-mail communication with students is a “substitute” for anything, it’s office hours ... and I don’t mind telling you that, for me, e-mail communication is a Hell of a lot more efficient than office hours. I can’t tell you the number of times a student will have a superb question or an excellent point, and bang! ... just like that I can share it with the entire class.

    2. You would be surprised how infrequently I answer a student’s question via e-mail. Typically, the question arrives, I fire a question back, and the student responds with something like, “Thanks Professor Manley, that’s all I needed.” And if the communication is more extensive than that and if I think it’s of general interest (maybe something I didn’t cover in class or something I could have done a better job with in class), I remove the student’s name and share the communication strand with the entire class.

    3. In my e-mail communications with students at the beginning of the term, my responses are often, “why don’t you check here” (a URL) ... or “have you read pp. 147-9 in the text?” ... and by the end of the term I find they are sooo much more independent in assuming responsibility for their own learning – partly because they know they’re likely to get no more than questions back from me – their learning strategies have become quite impressive.

    In general – and maybe it’s just my instructional style – my students are much better prepared for an e-mail communication with me than they are for a discussion during office hours (which often tend to be filled with all kinds of extraneous stuff). Yes, I do have regular office hours too ... and I probably spend upwards of 60% of that time communicating with students on-line.

    4. Oddly enough, I have never considered my communication with students via e-mail as being a “distance course” ... and I don’t “allow” e-mail; I strongly encourage it.

  • Response to a Response
  • Posted by Dave on September 4, 2008 at 4:50am EDT
  • 1. "If my e-mail communication with students is a “substitute” for anything, it’s office hours ... and I don’t mind telling you that, for me, e-mail communication is a Hell of a lot more efficient than office hours. I can’t tell you the number of times a student will have a superb question or an excellent point, and bang! ... just like that I can share it with the entire class."

    Interesting. Perhaps it is a matter of putting thought into language that is really going on. Do you validate writing as a substitute for speech? I myself validate students speaking with fellows students, and use group work as the central pedagogy in my class.

    Email is just as arguably no substitute if not an exceptionally poor substitute for face-to-face contact. I expect and state from day one that students who register a request from myself are to do so in person.

    2. "You would be surprised how infrequently I answer a student’s question via e-mail. Typically, the question arrives, I fire a question back, and the student responds with something like, “Thanks Professor Manley, that’s all I needed.” And if the communication is more extensive than that and if I think it’s of general interest (maybe something I didn’t cover in class or something I could have done a better job with in class), I remove the student’s name and share the communication strand with the entire class."

    The fact email is infrequently used by you to actually respond to questions perhaps has something to do with "1" above, namely, its poor substitute for reality?

    3. "In my e-mail communications with students at the beginning of the term, my responses are often, “why don’t you check here” (a URL) ... or “have you read pp. 147-9 in the text?” ... and by the end of the term I find they are sooo much more independent in assuming responsibility for their own learning – partly because they know they’re likely to get no more than questions back from me – their learning strategies have become quite impressive."

    Considering the "obvious" responses you give your students by email is it little surprise they seemingly become more independent toward the end of the semester? Such is the limitation of email--as well as reading extended emails such as my own, let alone responding to them. Why not state and maintain from day one the expectation that students be independent and assertive and see you in person? I find that a highly effective strategy to foster student growth and confidence. Expect speech and you will have speech. Expect email and you will get off-the-cuff thinking in odd moments, or perhaps horendously obsessive wannabe writers.

    "In general – and maybe it’s just my instructional style – my students are much better prepared for an e-mail communication with me than they are for a discussion during office hours (which often tend to be filled with all kinds of extraneous stuff)."

    Our mileage varies. I have repeatedly found that email I receive from students--and staff, also, for that matter--is very ambiguous, requiring iterative attempts at deciphering the question asked. Ultimately person-to-person contact is required--after much time has been wasted. Hence, I expect person-to-person contact from day one.

    "Yes, I do have regular office hours too ... and I probably spend upwards of 60% of that time communicating with students on-line."

    I don't understand this, since you previously indicated you provide answers so infrequently by email. How can the hints as to where to find the answer be taking so long? This sounds inefficient. Honestly, few see me during office hours since I explicitly structure my classroom, anticipating as well as indicating to students the open-endedness of what we are learning, and that not everything will be perfectly clear. But more importantly, I stress that they are the best to make meaning out of my course material, which aside from the nuts and bolts--ie., textbook answers in the solutions manual--is highly interpretive. (I realize--or think I do--in math and stats this may not be as much the case).

    4. Oddly enough, I have never considered my communication with students via e-mail as being a “distance course” ... and I don’t “allow” e-mail; I strongly encourage it.

    The point is, I refuse to let what could be a living, breathing, captive audience drift into a quasi-distance class by allowing students to drift into the solitude of late-night email. I want to meet them face-to-face, and I believe that to be of incomparable benefit, both to me as a professor, and to them as developing learners and ultimately citizens. As much as they have their gadgets, higher education calls forth and has to give much more than gadget-satisfaction.

    The worm in the apple of modern practice in education as far as I am concerned in my corner of HE is administrations and faculty taking responsibility for and therefore away from the learner. This can be done by answering miscellaneous emails, but is more frequently done by professors who in the event they have excellent textbooks available in their discipline--default to lecture, which in turn takes the responsibility away from students to come to each class prepared. It also removes the onus from the professor to prepare, grade, and monitor student learning. I can lecture with my eyes shut after 20+ years of teaching my subject. Or I can see my students score above the national average on standardized exams. Oddly, the two seem mutually exclusive.

  • Bowing Out On This One ...
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on September 4, 2008 at 4:30pm EDT
  • Three things Dave:

    First – and there’s no way for you to know this, given my other posts in this particular communication strain – I imagine our educational philosophies and pedagogical styles are very similar. It’s just that I have found using e-mail WITH MY STUDENTS to be a very effective and efficient enhancement of all of the other strategies I employ.

    Although I have the same degree of affection for using e-mail in all of my classes, I teach more than a few classes that (1) are at a satellite campus 40 miles away from our main campus, (2) meet one evening per week, (3) are for graduate students who work full-time and find it difficult to be on campus between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m., or (4) are balancing school, work, and family. Please don’t take that comment to be a cop-out; I still value e-mail communication for traditional students who live on or close to campus.

    Second, about not answering questions via e-mail, I suppose I didn’t make myself clear. I do “answer” questions, but, for the most part, I answer a question by asking the student one or more questions. Here is a “made up” example (none of my students would ask this) ...

    “STUDENT: But I thought the definition of the median is ‘the median is that number that has 50% of the distribution below it.” Isn’t that correct?’

    MANLEY: Okay, you know how to find the median, M, of a collection of numbers.

    Consider this data set ... S = {0, 1, 6, 4, 0, 1, 1, 3, 2}.

    What is M? ... If X is a randomly selected observation from S, what are ...

    Pr[X is greater than M] ... Pr[X is greater than or equal to M] ... Pr[X is less than M] ... Pr[X is less than or equal to M]?

    I guess you can see your ‘definition’ is incorrect. Can you use the information above to formulate an accurate definition of the median? Check back when you’re sure of your answer.”

    So you see, I provided no answers ... only asked more questions. And by the way, asking the student to do that during office hours would probably use up 30 minutes, contribute to the student being dependent on me in a way I try to discourage, and decrease the time I can devote to other students’ questions and concerns.

    Third, I have discovered that, over the years, fewer and fewer of my students use office hours ... even those in danger of failing the course. It speaks to the non-optimal behavior of more than a few students ... behavior I don’t understand and can’t even come close to appreciating (failure seems to be much less traumatic than it was when I was a student). But, of course, I have to schedule and keep office hours anyway ... and there I discover I frequently have more than a little “spare” time. So I get on line to see if there’s anyone there with questions.

    P.S. Would you like to see my syllabus guidelines for students who intend to use my office hours (Addendum 3)?

    P.P.S. Would you like to see why I encourage my students to eschew taking notes in class?

    P.P.P.S. Oh yes, here is my syllabus statement about the three Ps ...

    “Preparedness, Participation, and Professionalism

    To understand the three Ps, begin by re-reading the section about class attendance. Then re-read the section about the Honor Code. Then re-read the section about homework. Then understand that when you come to class you will be expected to (1) have completed the reading assignment to date, (2) have attempted to work all of the homework problems and other assignments to date, (3) be prepared to respond to direct questions asked by the instructor, (4) be respectful of your instructor and fellow students, and (5) never ever consider violating the Honor Code.

    Please understand that if your cell phone ever rings in class, your final grade for the three Ps will be zero. Also, being consistently tardy for class will result in a serious reduction of your three Ps’ point total. You get the drift!”