Search News


Browse Archives

News

Students' 'Evolving' Use of Technology

September 17, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Stop the presses: Today's college students are using more technology than ever.

That may not be the most surprising finding from a report released last week by the Educause Center for Applied Research, the analytical arm of the nonprofit group that promotes effective technology use in higher education. But it certainly provides a jumping-off point for an investigation into how students use information technology in college and how it can be harnessed to improve the learning experience.

In at least one central respect, proponents of technology in the classroom are on to something: Most students (60.9 percent) believe it improves their learning.

The changes in technological habits aren't revolutionary per se, as the authors point out; rather, students are making "evolutionary" gains in access to the Internet for everyday uses, inside the classroom and out. Perhaps the most visible of these changes is the continuing increase in the proportion of students with laptops, which has grown to 73.7 percent of respondents (while an almost-total 98.4 percent own a computer of some kind). More surprisingly, over half of laptop owners don't bring them to class at all, with about a quarter carrying them to lectures at least once a week.

The amount of time spent on the Internet also shows no sign of abating, with an average of about 18 hours a week, for any purpose -- and, on the extreme end, some 6.6 percent of respondents (mostly male) saying they spend more than a full-time job's worth of 40 hours online a week. Most students use broadband, more are on wireless connections, and "smart phones" -- all-in-one communications and personal data assistants -- are also on the rise, with 12 percent owning one.

What they're doing when they're online is also changing somewhat, with the rise of Facebook and other social networking sites as the clearest trend this year (to 80.3 percent from 72.3 percent in 2006), along with streaming video and course management software, which 46.1 percent of respondents said they use several times a week or more (compared with 39.6 percent in 2006).

The authors of the study, which surveyed 27,864 students at 103 two- and four-year colleges and universities, note that most undergraduates today are "digital natives" who have grown up immersed in technology in some form. But the "millennials" aren't necessarily ready to cast off the yoke of human interaction and learn solely within virtual 3-D environments wired directly to the brain. The study finds "themes of skepticism and moderation alongside enthusiasm," such that 59 percent preferred a "moderate rather than extensive use of IT in courses."

Instead, students appear to segment different modes of communication for different purposes. E-mail, Web sites, message boards and Blackboard? Viable ways of connecting with professors and peers. Same for chat, instant messaging, Facebook and text messages? Not necessarily, the authors write, because students may "want to protect these tools' personal nature."

"They’re using social networking sites like crazy, but they don’t necessarily think those have a place in the classroom," said Gail Salaway, one of the primary authors and a fellow at ECAR.

In short, as students become more and more connected to each other through various online mediums, they're also becoming more untethered, with laptops and smart phones keeping them physically apart. As a result, the "emerging Web 2.0 paradigm" of "immersive environments" and dynamic information promise (or threaten?) to upend traditional pedagogies and even the way students learn, the authors conclude.

That could mean that some professors might have to play catch-up, according to the report, "The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2007" -- a sentiment also indicated by some of the students in answers to the survey's open-ended questions.

How IT Affects Learning

The epigraph to the report's sixth chapter, from a student's written comments, goes a long way toward summarizing what the authors say is the place of technology in the college setting today: "IT is not a good substitute for good teaching. Good teachers are good with or without IT and students learn a great deal from them. Poor teachers are poor with or without IT and students learn little from them."

Seventy percent of the students polled said information technology helps them do research, a finding that is not surprising in light of the continuing popularity of Google and Wikipedia among undergraduates (sometimes to the consternation of their professors). But that finding also encompasses online library research and article databases.

When it comes to engagement, however, responses are more mixed. About two-fifths of students said they were more engaged with courses that had IT components, while a fifth disagreed and the rest didn't say either way.

So technology's utility in the classroom comes down to how it is used. The question, then, is: How can educators adapt their teaching methods to emerging technologies? And should they?

Skeptics might point out that even students themselves are ambivalent when it comes to using the Internet and other digital tools for class, as the survey highlights. But the study's introduction, written by Chris Dede of the Harvard Graduate School of Education, suggests what professors can expect from digital natives' evolving modes of learning, what he calls "neomillennial learning styles."

As new methods of interacting with information become more ubiquitous, he suggests, citing Second Life-type virtual immersion environments as an example, students will grow up with different expectations and preferences for acquiring knowledge and skills. The implication is less of an emphasis on the "sage on the stage" and a linear acquisition process focusing on a "single best source," focusing instead on "active learning" that comes from synthesizing information from multiple types of media.

Noting that traditional ways of thinking and learning are undergoing a "sea change," Dede encourages a fusion of new and old. But what form that will take, exactly, is not addressed directly in the report.

The problem with predicting the future of learning, suggests Toru Iiyoshi, a senior scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, is that some educators "are against the idea of technology itself transforming their teaching and student learning." Rather than fit it in with their current methods, he said, they should take the opposite approach.

Encouraging them to "start thinking from different perspectives, how they can teach better or improve student learning is, I think, very important," he said.

A College That Embraces IT

What does a learning environment that embraces new technologies look like? It's not clear, but it might resemble a classroom at the Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering in Needham, Mass. The institution, which opened in 2002, found itself having to start from scratch in every way possible, including in its design of an information architecture. The person in charge of that project was Joanne Kossuth, the chief information officer and vice president for development at the college.

Kossuth, who helped implement the Educause study at Olin, said the college is somewhat unusual in that its engineering focus and small classes encourage innovation and collaboration among its students. Where some institutions have had to scramble to adapt to evolving technological needs, Olin did it all at once -- from the ground up. The result is a much more integrated, forward-looking approach to IT.

The college has a 24/7 laptop loan program, which allows students to be in constant communication with each other and helps encourage them to work together on projects, so that "you’ll see students that go out and use things like Google Docs," editing online in real time, she said.

Freshmen come in to the college already well acquainted with social networking and used to course management software, mainly because of its increasing use in high school, Kossuth said. They use a campus-hosted wiki to find rides. They work with administrators to improve software offerings. In other words, the students are at the cutting edge, while some faculty are working to catch up.

"I’m a firm believer that the students that are up and coming are the ones that are driving the adoption, because they’re coming with a set of expectations," Kossuth explained.

Still, in this tech-savvy environment, some face-to-face interaction is still preferred. At the help desk, she said, proposals for chat and text messaging services met with skepticism because students preferred to e-mail or come in themselves. In general, the ECAR report found a number of negative comments about help desks' effectiveness, suggesting their importance to a smooth IT operation.

Other Findings

The report also highlighted a number of gaps and trends through longitudinal comparisons of the past three years' worth of survey data:

  • Leisure devices, such as handheld video and music players (read: iPods), have transcended the gender gap. Where there used to be a difference between males' and females' ownership of the players just two years ago, the gap has disappeared, with 83.1 percent of 18- to 19-year-olds owning one.
  • Engineering and business students use more technology, especially for spreadsheets and graphics editing, and males are more likely to spend more extreme amounts of time online.
  • The report also finds challenges in addressing skills gaps for using spreadsheets and CMS software, highlighting the need for colleges to provide instructional technology to bring students up to speed.

Next year, for the first time, the ECAR survey will additionally focus on a specific aspect of IT. The first topic: social networking.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Students' 'Evolving' Use of Technology

  • Students Evolving Use of Technology
  • Posted by Jmosley on September 17, 2007 at 7:55am EDT
  • The entire article seems to identify at least two areas where information technology and instructional technology (the other IT) are quite practical and useful.

    The first being for student on-line feedback via instructor or tutor. This is especially practical for smaller classes.

    The second and possibly the most powerful is the use of interactive communications (chat, email, BB) to enable collaborative learning.

  • What's next....Plato's Cave in Second Life?
  • Posted by Max Grinnell on September 17, 2007 at 8:20am EDT
  • Good points made here, but is the finding that students still enjoy interacting with other humans in "real-time" that astonishing? (See Goffman's classic "Interaction Ritual" if you remain unconvinced of this....)

    I'm 31, and I can definitely detect a significant shift among the students I've taught who are a decade or so younger than me. I think the expectation that the syllabus and other relevant materials should be online is completely understandable and it eliminates hundreds of emails, etc. In terms of technology in the classroom (PowerPoint, clicker devices, and all that), I must reference the phrase shouted by Cuba Gooding, Jr. in "Jerry Maguire"...."Show Me The Money!"....everyone involved in higher education should be asking who benefits from all of these new technologies that are meant to automatically "enhance" the classroom experience.

    Admittedly, there can be a small clutch of students gathered around a passionate instructor in a grove of elms and nothing can happen. On the other hand, I'd bet on that before I'd bet on throwing a bunch of clicker devices to students to see if it gets them energized about learning.....

  • Try this one..
  • Posted by Edward Winslow , a "tired" retired business professor on September 17, 2007 at 10:20am EDT
  • Well, Max, try being a 73 year old retired (from full time) adjunct professor (now working at three online universities) learning how to make video podcasts to support learning facilitation (used to be called teaching) to a group of middle-aged adults (See the attached link to that generation from the NY Times this morning: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/17/opinion/17males.html?th&emc=th
    ) who are trying to catch up after sowing and reaping the harvest of the 60's.

    I'll take this generation of "digital natives" anytime over that generation (technology and all) and will do my best to help them find the values, virtues and morality that they are seeking to
    create a better life...Even to creating a "Second life" under the virtual elm tree. Their schmoozing there is equally as good.

  • tech no substitute for sound teaching
  • Posted by bradley bleck , instructor at Spokane Falls CC on September 17, 2007 at 11:01am EDT
  • As the article indicates, technology is no substitute for well designed and executed instruction. I don't think that's a surprise to anyone who has been paying attention. Our students (meaning those where I teach), while they have email accounts and can surf the web, and may even engage in multi-player games online, along with having their requisite facebook/mysapce account, are not all that adept at using technology in an educational or "productive citizen" sense. That's where faculty can play their part, infusing authentic tasks into the curriculum.

    I have students work in a blog, read and analyze websites and videos they find online (writing essays about these things), all in a broad political context. I think this sort of infusion of technology, while developing an understanding of how "the powers that be" use technology to sway consumer (and by this I mean anyone who consumes/watches/reads what is found online) helps students become savvy with how media is used to influence their thinking and choosing. At least I hope that's the case; if nothing else, it's a start.

  • ECAR Study
  • Posted by Richard Katz , vice president at EDUCAUSE on September 17, 2007 at 11:20am EDT
  • We at ECAR are really grateful for Andy's reporting and everyone's commentary. We follow such commentary closely and try to learn from it. It is a pleasure to serve the community with this study.

  • Thanks!
  • Posted by james L. Morrison , Editor-in-Chief at Innovate on September 17, 2007 at 11:55am EDT
  • Richard, we appreciate the first-rate reports EDUCAUSE publishes, this study being the latest.

    Thanks!

    Jim Morrison
    Editor-in-Chief
    Innovate
    http://innovateonline.info

  • IT
  • Posted by Learn PHP on September 17, 2007 at 12:10pm EDT
  • I think student will benefit more with human interaction then creating virtual classrooms. One on one interaction with peers and teachers in important to stay in touch and confident otherwise you might feel secluded to some degree.

  • Posted by Matt on September 17, 2007 at 12:30pm EDT
  • As a student, I'm incredibly skeptical of any claims of technology improving learning. I've been told repeatedly that laptops in class are the future of learning, and then that every student should have a tablet PC. I've seen massive amount of research being put into an elaborate in-class collaboration system that mirrors the professor's Powerpoint presentation on the class's tablets. I've seen professors use in-class commenting systems in which students submit questions to them online.

    It all sounds nice, at least from an administrative point of view, but I don't believe it for a second. We all know what students really do when they bring their laptops to class. Throwing a tablet in there is of questionable value, yet adds another expense to the already massive cost of tuition. There's research that shows Powerpoint presentations are very inefficient ways of presenting information, and I've been dissatisfied with every class I've had in which it was the main tool of the lecturer. And as for the online comment system, why not just take questions in, you know, real life?

    Technology has its uses in academia, but every single use of it in the classroom I've seen so far is either the administration wanting to give the university another selling point ("we have TECHNOLOGY!"), or a way for the professor to technically do his or her job without expending much effort.

  • Posted by Thomas on September 17, 2007 at 12:30pm EDT
  • As best I can tell, the most popular and successful professors are still those whose teaching style is simple, direct, and enlightening. A classroom of plugged-in 20-year-olds will sit mesmerized by a good teacher, without any need for bells and whistles.

    It seems that universities -- which are generally run by people two or three times the age of their students -- are overcompensating in the rush to be as technology-forward as possible. While some IT improvements (wireless campus, online syllabi and readings, lecture podcasts) are useful and should be expected of proactive universities, the emphasis on the "next big thing" seems to be coming as much from administrators and admissions departments as from the students themselves.

  • IT as a learning tool
  • Posted by Robert B. Glenn , Professor Emeritus on September 17, 2007 at 12:55pm EDT
  • Question: Do computer screensever offer students the opportunity of reading a good novel or a Shakespeare play or of watching a ballet or listening to a symphony? If not, do students ever take time away from the screen to discover some meaningful things about their history and their culture? Or have we now relegated discovering and integrating into their culture insignificant?

  • Alternative Education & Technology
  • Posted by Greg Harris on September 17, 2007 at 12:55pm EDT
  • Non-Linear Learning or Online Education is the future yet traditional learning environments and brick and mortar mega Universities or even smaller traditional Colleges are resisting change. Seems the idea of not being able to see touch and feel the students responses or even the traditional social morals that keep the confusion of the politics of success perpetual in a lot of first world nations is more important than expanding learning concepts.

    Guess if I were a Professor and the ‘sage on the stage’ why would I accept becoming the ‘guide on the side’ and live in a perfect world where all people could get pass my ego…and students actually learn something. For me personally getting a education was a struggle and being a minority I always found non-minority Professors bias towards the tradition of being privileged and helping the privileged. Technology has changed all of this and the idea of laptops beings used more often is as old as using a calculator for some I assume. I got my first computer for a adult learning university completion degree in 1989 because the class required the paper to be typed and I thought wow…a word processor would be great for this and the Professor was a real jerk and female jerk at that plus gave me the hardest time…just because.

    I never finished the program but technological learning and alternative learning concepts grew for me and being online was coming into its own then and grew into a massive concept with eager beavers learners like me hungry for more. Instructional Technology…i.e. e-mails, discussion boards, live educational chat classrooms, electronic white board presentations, applications liked Excel and Quattro Pro for math wizards and the very undervalued PowerPoint plus Non-Linear Learning as a whole has become my norm with Bloom’s Taxonomy being researched to its fullest degree….I am now about to receive a Master’s Degree in Instructional Technology from a controversial University that I am sure all the traditional people will say….they are not this or that….but the learning is more real than ever.

  • Technology "benefits" often dubious
  • Posted by Ateacher on September 17, 2007 at 1:55pm EDT
  • I teach electronics and mathematics classes at a two-year college, and.I find many of the technology "advances" advocated for use in the classroom have dubious benefits at best.

    For instance, I can draw a circuit diagram or write down an equation on the blackboard in less than one tenth of the time it takes to generate the same item on a computer. My students who take notes with a pen and paper take seconds to copy down that diagram or equation, while those who use a laptop take so long that the miss the next several minutes of the class.

    Previously generated Powerpoint presentations are inflexible; if a student asks a question leading to an interesting new discussion, the Powerpoint cannot adapt, but if I use a whiteboard and a marker I can lead the discussion down any interesting alleyway that merits it.

    At a time when most of my students exhibit short attention spans and great difficulty staying focussed on what they are supposed to be doing, technologies like laptops and ready internet access in the classroom serve as much to distract as to enhance.

    I do use technology where I think it's appropriate: I've created a website where students can obtain handouts, syllabus information, lab writeups, etc. I've set up my own Web server in the classroom and written my own classroom administration software that lets students take their own attendance, view their classroom grades at the click of a mouse, take online examinations, and so on.

    Beware of technology for technology's sake. Those technologies that add to the teachers workload and the students distraction level while delivering no tangible benefits are best avoided. Those technologies that add fluff and "presentation" while adding no additional learning experience serve only to reinforce the belief that apperance matters more than substance.

    -A teacher.

  • addressing multiple learning styles
  • Posted by Paul Kopco , Instructor at Black Hills State University on September 17, 2007 at 4:45pm EDT
  • Computer-based multimedia course content can address multiple learning styles simultaneously, and is far more engaging and valuable to the students of today (particularly students with disabilities) than the traditional one-dimensional "chalk and talk" presentations of computer-illiterate faculty.

  • So-called "Educational Technology"
  • Posted by Christopher Davidson , 6-12 Technology Instructor at P.K. Yonge Developmental Research School on September 17, 2007 at 5:20pm EDT
  • I teach electronics, software and hardware to students in grades 6-12. My classes alone use a Moodle server, a standalone web server, an FTP server, a LAN-accessible BBS, several digital cameras, MiniDV camcorders, dozens of Macs and PCs, scores of microphones and A/V editing equipment, the list goes on and on.

    This "educational technology" (in reality the correct term is "equipment") is useful in my case because it *is* the curriculum. Under no circumstance would I ever advocate another teacher or school administrator arbitrarily "addding more technology" to their lessons or lectures.

    In years of hunting, I have not found a single solid non-commercial source of research suggesting that so-called "educational technology" is anything more than misplaced technological enthusiasm and a genuine wish by its advocates that simply adding gadgetry and high-tech buffoonery somehow magically improves a student's ability to learn. This is utter nonsense and nothing more than a laughable myth perpetuated by ed-tech pundits and their deep-pocketed market sponsors.

  • Technology in courses
  • Posted by Fred Flener , Retired on September 17, 2007 at 5:20pm EDT
  • Kopko is right when he says need multiple approaches in teaching. When I taught skill oriented courses like Algebra, it was blackboard and chalk, for proof oriented courses, the overhead projector, for discussion courses never a powerpoint, for conference presentations always a powerpoint. In other words, there should not be a single approach for all courses.

    Teaching, say, a statistics class graphing calculators are helpful (necessary in my opinion) tool, so it is important to have a projection device that the instructor and any student can use in a discussion the concepts. In a fuzzy concept course like mathematics methods (there are no simple right answers), having a method of letting students share their thoughts electronically on Web CT, or Blackboard can enhance understanding. (Look at the discussions that arise on this web site.)

    The right use of technology can benefit learning, and to reject it is limiting. On the other hand, much can still be learned in simple human conversation, so to turn to electronic communication as the only vehicle for such is also limiting.

  • A potted summary of Teachning & Learning theory
  • Posted by Cameron Nichol , eLearning & Educational Design Manager at Monash University on September 17, 2007 at 9:00pm EDT
  • I think it's always useful to know what student expectations are, and these should inform our practice, but from an instructional design perspective, it doesn't change the basic tenets.

    1. What do we expect students to know when they walk out the door.
    2. If we had all the resources in the world, how would construct the experience.
    3. How do we replicate that within our current limitations.
    4. How do we know we've achieved our targets.

    Part of that solution is related to utilisation of technology, but equally, part of it is having councillors on campus.

    Part of the solution is thinking creatively about how we align our practice with changes in attitude, but equally, part of the solution is also acknowledging that pathways are laid down in our brain in a particular manner and sometimes aligning our practice with a students preferred "learning style" will not produce the best outcome.

    Technology changes, societal norms change, but through it all, what 50 years of Teaching and Learning research has taught us is:
    Good resources + crap teacher = crap outcome
    Crap resources + good teacher = good outcome (until, the teacher burns out).

  • Posted by Jim Rizzo on September 17, 2007 at 9:05pm EDT
  • As an employee in a liberal arts college and as someone who went to a larger research-oriented university (and not being that old at 28), I question the need to go all out with IT in the classroom. I have been called an "old fart" by co-workers (in a joking manner), but I know what students do when they have class in a computer lab (my office, the Helpdesk, has a window into one of them). They read email, look at Facebook, and chat on AIM. While some might be thinking of a way to use this in the classroom to the benefit of the class, as the article said, the students want this stuff for themselves, not for class. College is about more than just classes and this other technology (social networking, instant messaging, etc) is stuff the students use to keep in touch with friends and don't want an invasion by their professors into their social life.

    The best class has something for everyone and every style of learning. While this is difficult with certain types of classes, the more learning styles it reaches, the more students can get out of it. However, just because students are using technology in such different manners in their lives should not automatically mean that professors and colleges should adjust their curriculum. Much of the use of technology is simply to keep in touch with their friends and enhance their social lives. I have about 60 students that work for me and I don't know any of them who would really use these types of technologies in their classes. Aside from Facebook, email, AIM, and writing papers and doing a little research, most of the students I know don't really care about technology.

  • A careful balance is required
  • Posted by OnceUponATime on September 18, 2007 at 4:45am EDT
  • When the air-operated nail gun was introduced builders and carpenters did not throw away their hand-held hammers. The new tool was used to streamline those tasks that were laborious. In a similar manner, IT in education can be used to automate the mundane and repetitive. Even after finishing a framing job with the nail gun, a builder will go about the frame putting on the finishing touches with the hammer. Teachers definitely should be using IT but in a manner that is consistent with its virtues.

  • Screensaver not required.
  • Posted by Dan Jolt on September 18, 2007 at 5:55am EDT
  • Robert B. Glenn wrote this question in the comment area:

    Do computer screensever offer students the opportunity of reading a good novel or a Shakespeare play or of watching a ballet or listening to a symphony? If not,..

    The Answer is:
    No, but why should the screensaver do this? The computer does this when it's being used and when you are computer literate, you can do all of the above whenever you feel like it. You will find all Shakespeare plays and most other relevant literature, which is out of copyright. For free. You can listen to the music of the world - much of it for free and watch ballet, too, even if the video quality on the legal internet sites is awful. And once you get used to it reading books of a portable computer's screen isn't that bad.

    Learning can never be computer-only. But when it comes to learning from media, printed books and magazines, recorded music on CD, video on tape or TV are losing ground fast. Which is great for a student, as the time saved hunting for information can be better spend processing and understanding it.

  • Students use of Technology
  • Posted by Jan Kenneth Weckman , Artist, assistant lecturer at University of Art and Design Helsinki on September 18, 2007 at 6:35am EDT
  • Students increasing use of various media is completely in accord with their professional future. In a mixed media situation transferring "knowledge" from one medium to another is rarely an object of education, unless in new media studies. Usually each educational setting remains in its own professional formats. In Art and Design areas, the necessary remediations (Bolter & Grusin, 2000) often become rather incomprehensible barriers, not a possibility for creative interpretation processes.
    Coming from a traditional studio teaching tradition, and as a mostly traditional art teacher and entering new media, now also in e-learning environments, the staggering number of media we should master, both as teachers and students, eventually proposes a new set of angles to the teaching content. Our objects of attention, the former monolith objects of interests, artworks, texts, images, break down into their different aspects, more and less virtual, while at the same time keeping together what only in theory seems to be separable, that of mediacy and immediacy. New media entering studio settings somehow splits up, in practice, that which was only theoretically made distinct, say thematic, physical and virtual and formal areas of discussion.
    Here is a link to a forum, recently gathering in Dublin, about this issue. See also my website and its English CV page with a preliminary pdf-paper on the dislocation of learning outcomes in a mixed media setting within visual arts education: http://kotisivu.dnainternet.net/janwec

  • IT + Students = Rise of Independent Scholars?
  • Posted by Peter Jones on September 18, 2007 at 3:05pm EDT
  • Very interesting article. Creating some computer aided learning tools in the 1980s and experience as a student I've wondered about how IT can enable a revolution in learning for 'informal' students. There is a quote here that may be of interest. I find myself as an independent scholar working full-time in the UK's health service:

    Although written at a time when the (first) Internet bubble was still inflating, Join-Lambert et al. (1997) throw light on the possible future directions of study and knowledge:

    "Intelligence is not about knowing axiomatically how to reason... The French 16th Century philosopher Montaigne already had dismissed the concept of a 'well-stuffed head'. The advent of the printing press made the memorization of Ulysses' travels and of folk tales - the support of knowledge at that time - redundant. Montaigne saw no longer use in memorizing a library that was potentially infinite. But does not the Internet ask for a 'well-endowed head'? Won't the best surfer be a 'Jack of all trades'? The fastest surfer is not going to be your typical Ivy-league super-titled philosopher: That guy's head will be simply too loaded to sort it out on the Net. So, there will be fresh opportunities for those who were viewed by society as laggards. It is a clean start with equal opportunities for all. [Online]"

    Regards

    http://www.p-jones.demon.co.uk/
    Hodges' Health Career - Care Domains - Model
    http://hodges-model.blogspot.com/
    h2cm: help 2C more - help 2 listen - help 2 care

    Join-Lambert, L., Klein, P., & Serres, M. (1997). Interview. Superhighways for All: Knowledge’s Redemption. Revue Quart Monde. Paris, 1,163. Retrieved Sept 18 2007, from
    http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-9810/msg00137.html

  • Posted by Lynn McDonald on September 19, 2007 at 6:00am EDT
  • I'm interested in how this use of technology applies to our mature aged students (roughly those over 25). Doing some research on this group in regards to library instruction and their particular needs. Anyone experienced this?

  • Students' Evolving use of technology
  • Posted by patrick hecking , professor of physics at Thiel College on September 26, 2007 at 5:05am EDT
  • I have read the above comments on students’ and instructors’ use of technology in the classroom. I am very uncertain how much students actually do with it and how savvy they are with IT. At our college we have a “laptop for everyone” policy. However, in those of my classes, where they could benefit from their use, I have to prod them to bring them along, and then I am surprised how little they know about the use of EXCEL, the most useful of all Microsoft products. And these are science and engineering students. On the other hand, in another of my classes, where a laptop is unnecessary, they schlep it in and then they do nothing but internet surfing and text messaging to a degree that I will have to disallow the presence of these in this class.

    I have the distinct impression that the value of IT for education (not communication!) is as overrated as the use of TV for this purpose in the 50s. TV was hailed as the panacea of education for the masses, and now it’s just entertainment with a bit of information.

    A big part of the problem is the fact (which few will admit for fear of being branded computer-illiterate) that much of it is plain dysfunctional for all but specialists. IT would have a great potential if it ever worked smoothly without an IT person sitting next to every computer. When I grew up I could learn everything from books. The computer literature today is to 95% useless, at least to me, and the so-called “Help” function isn’t much better. It never works as described. One should bear in mind that every technology needs time to mature, much time. The automobile was invented around 1900. It did not become really easy to use for non-specialists before the advent of the automatic transmission, the electric starter and the automatic choke, about in the 50s. Personal computers emerged around 1985. Everybody who thinks they will be easy to use and truly functional before ~ 2035 deludes himself.

  • "Neo-millinial learning style" is a studid name.
  • Posted by jenel byrd at x-himradio.blogspot.com on November 16, 2010 at 12:15am EST
  • We should just call it "a new learning style". Lets protect the traditional ways of learning by giving less kudos to the internet. I mean okay we get it, info is now reachable from any crevice of the earth. Okay. Now everyone should not take it a step further and burn books. Thats just rediculous.