Search News


Browse Archives

News

Boost for Liberal Arts Technology?

November 17, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Super high-speed networks are usually the dominion of research universities that need to manage lots of information and transmit it very quickly. Liberal arts colleges, which are less likely to be running supercomputers or logging massive quantities of research data, have not typically deployed them.

That could soon change. The National Institute for Technology in Liberal Education is planning to announce a partnership with Internet2 aimed at bringing liberal arts colleges up to speed on advanced networking.

Eric Jansson, director of NITLE labs, said the institute’s collaboration with Internet2 -- a top provider of “backbone” networks for researchers -- could allow liberal arts colleges to expand their curricular offerings, attract top faculty, and provide remote access to digital collections and other resources.

“The liberal arts have every interest in growing their presence in the sciences, and attracting those faculty who are doing cutting-edge research in all these fields,” Jansson told Inside Higher Ed. “Operationally, they want to expand their capabilities, and they want to engage in the type of scale that makes these types of activities affordable.”

The partnership is in its early stages, but NITLE's executive director, Joey King, said the institute has been in talks with about a half-dozen colleges about putting together pilot programs to test the ways high-bandwidth networks might enhance liberal education.

One is by enabling better video conferencing. Internet2’s advanced networks are “low latency,” meaning that the glitches and delays that can foil the integration of video-based communication via less powerful networks would no longer be an issue. So, instead of five liberal arts colleges hiring five professors to teach five different Arabic language courses on five different campuses, Jansson suggested, one campus could hire one Arabic instructor to teach a course on his own campus and broadcast it to four others.

He pointed to Sunoikisis, the Harvard-based consortium of classics programs, as a model for this sort of exchange. “In some sense, you could say that we’re trying to do is look at the next generation of technology and how it allows us to propel a model like Sunoikisis,” he said.

Liberal arts consortiums could share other resources, such as media collections, Jansson said. It might even be possible to pipe out data being collected by electron microscopes and other sophisticated equipment at research universities connected to the Internet2 network to liberal arts colleges that could never dream of purchasing such machinery themselves.

The idea, he said, would be for liberal arts colleges to leverage each other’s resources to maximize what they could offer students and faculty while minimizing how much they would need to spend to do it -- similar to “cloud computing,” where colleges purchase the ability to use remotely hosted software without having to buy and maintain the associated hardware.

The possibilities the Internet2 network enables, Jansson added, would not only make these liberal arts colleges more attractive to students, but to faculty who might have balked before at their relatively weak research data infrastructures.

Still, King said NITLE’s effort to leverage Internet2 is in its early stages, and will not be without significant challenges -- such as connecting the super-speed network to the institute's sometimes rural affiliates and figuring out applications that are appropriate to the sort of teaching and learning that the liberal arts tradition promotes.

“That’ll take some doing,” he said, “to figure out how all these different capabilities will mesh with the liberal arts and liberal education pedagogy, where the classroom experience is probably the most valued part of the equation.”

While it could take time before any of NITLE's aspirations are widely realized, King said it is not too early to start thinking about how liberal arts colleges might adapt new technologies. "It behooves us to get involved early," he said, “because it will be so ubiquitous in higher ed in 20 years, and we need to essentially start facing the challenges now."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Boost for Liberal Arts Technology?

  • Poor example
  • Posted by Poor example on November 17, 2009 at 11:00am EST
  • It's unfortunate that the leading example of what liberal arts schools would do with Internet2 is "teach Arabic over videoconference". The small liberal arts school model is reliant on face-to-face contact with instructors. Videoconferencing is simply a poor shadow of in-person contact, and this is abundantly clear in distance-taught courses. Better than nothing, perhaps... but I can't recall seeing a liberal arts school sweatshirt that said "Better than nothing" under the crest.

    The other examples, though, are compelling. Teleconferencing is a great way to work in guest lecturers from the wider world. Improving the delivery and quality of networked audio and video to the classroom should lead to more consortial media collection development. And the liberal arts approach has real value to add to science education - allowing collaboration with supercomputing centers and expensive, high-end scientific equipment _does_ match how our students will work in the real world, but still reaps benefits of close and local personal contact between undergrads and professor/researchers.

  • Posted by John on November 17, 2009 at 3:15pm EST
  • @pooexample: Your view of distance learning and video conference classes is not accurate. The fault for poorly led video conf classes lies many times not in the technology, but with the instructor. There are limits in the systems, but usually an instructor who teachs a face-2-face class simply walks into the distance learning room (video conf room, etc.) and tries to replicate what he/she was doing in the face-2-face classroom. This is not the best approach. Much like taking existing course material from a face-2-face class and dropping it into a course management system (Blackboard, Moodle, etc.) is not the best approach to teaching online. Yet, that's what most instructors who teach online are doing.

    Instructors have to be more flexible when using these technologies. They have to get out of their comfort zones, try something different, understand the technology they are using, and not expect an exact replica of the face-2-face classroom. Distance learning, when done correclty, provides great opportunites for students and instructors.

  • Posted by Poor Example on November 18, 2009 at 1:45pm EST
  • @John: unfortunately, I suspect that the "just walk in and see if it works" approach is exactly what will be tried at a lot of NITLE schools, with a lot of dissatisfaction. These are schools which prize small class size and the face-to-face experience, and I doubt that the necessary pedagogical vision to implement distance learning well is widely distributed among them. That's why I think examples like access to high-end scientific equipment, or videoconference collaborations with remote experts (as opposed to class instruction) are better reasons for small colleges to use Internet 2.

    I do agree that "distance learning, when done correctly, provides... opportunities". I don't agree that the critical mass of talented and trained instructors has developed yet to provide 100% distance learning experiences which are generally as good as face-to-face (or face-to-face combined with a heavy local component), and I don't yet see a serious commitment in academia broadly to developing that cohort. So this particular example looks like a way to "do more with less" - but I think there's a necessary caveat "but not quite as well as our other courses."

    Some opportunities are important enough to trade a little quality. (Some are important enough to actually commit resources, like you say, and "do more with more".) But lots of institutions are unhappy with various program areas which started as "let's take the opportunity, but on the cheap."